Reasonable start time of carbon dioxide injection in enhanced coalbed methane recovery involving thermal-hydraulic-mechanical couplings

Chaojun FAN, Lei YANG, Bin XIAO, Lijun ZHOU, Haiou WEN, Hao SUN

PDF(6772 KB)
PDF(6772 KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3) : 832-843. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-022-1029-7
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Reasonable start time of carbon dioxide injection in enhanced coalbed methane recovery involving thermal-hydraulic-mechanical couplings

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Injection of gas (CO2) into coal seams is an effective method to benefit from both CO2 geological storage and coalbed methane recovery. Based on the dual pore structure of coal mass, and the Weibull distribution of fracture permeability, a thermal-hydraulic-mechanical (THM) coupling mathematical model is proposed involving the non-isothermal adsorption of binary gases, dynamic gas diffusion between matrix and fractures, multiphase seepage, coal deformation, heat conduction and heat convection. This mathematical model is applied to study the process of CO2-enhanced coalbed methane recovery (CO2-ECBM). Results show that the CH4 content of CO2-ECBM in coal seam decreases significantly when compared with that of regular drainage, and decreases rapidly in the early stage but slowly in the later stage. Coal seam permeability evolution is triggered by changes in gas adsorption/desorption, temperature and effective stress. For regular drainage, the early permeability shows a decreasing trend dominated by the increase of effective stress, while the later permeability shows an increasing trend dominated by the CH4 desorption caused shrinkage of coal matrix. For CO2-ECBM, the permeability in coal seam generally shows a downward trend due to both matrix swelling induced by gas adsorption and thermal expansion, particularly near injection well. There appears an increased and delayed peak production rate of CH4. The CH4 production rate of CO2-ECBM is always higher than that of regular drainage. The CH4 cumulative production and CO2 cumulative storage linearly increase with time, and the CH4 cumulative production of CO2-ECBM increased by 39.2% in the duration of 5000 d compared with regular drainage. Reasonable CO2 injection starting time can overcome the issue of early CO2 breakthrough and ineffective increase of CH4 production. In the studied case, the optimal injection starting time is 2500 d. Compared with the simultaneous CH4 extraction and CO2 injection, the CH4 cumulative production of optimal time has increased by 30.1%. The research provides a reference for determining the reasonable CO2 injection time under similar conditions.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

CO2 sequestration / coalbed methane / reasonable injection start time / thermo-hydro-mechanical coupling model / numerical simulation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chaojun FAN, Lei YANG, Bin XIAO, Lijun ZHOU, Haiou WEN, Hao SUN. Reasonable start time of carbon dioxide injection in enhanced coalbed methane recovery involving thermal-hydraulic-mechanical couplings. Front. Earth Sci., 2023, 17(3): 832‒843 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-022-1029-7

References

[1]
Cheng L, Li D, Wang W, Liu J (2021). Heterogeneous transport of free CH4 and free CO2 in dual-porosity media controlled by anisotropic in situ stress during shale gas production by CO2 flooding: implications for CO2 geological storage and utilization.ACS Omega, 6(40): 26756–26765
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[2]
Fan C J, Elsworth D, Li S, Chen Z W, Luo M K, Song Y, Zhang H H (2019b). Modelling and optimization of enhanced coalbed methane recovery using CO2/N2 mixtures.Fuel, 253: 1114–1129
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Fan C J, Elsworth D, Li S, Zhou L J, Yang Z H, Song Y (2019a). Thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical couplings controlling CH4 production and CO2 sequestration in enhanced coalbed methane recovery.Energy, 173: 1054–1077
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Fan C J, Li S, Luo M K, Du W Z, Yang Z H (2017). Coal and gas outburst dynamic system.Int J Min Sci Technol, 27(1): 49–55
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Fan C J, Wen H O, Li S, Bai G, Zhou L J (2022). Coal seam gas extraction by integrated drillings and punchings from the floor roadway considering hydraulic-mechanical coupling effect.Geofluids, 2022: 5198227
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Fan C J, Yang L, Wang G, Huang Q M, Fu X, Wen H O (2021a). Investigation on coal skeleton deformation law in CO2 injection enhanced CH4 drainage from underground coal seam.Front Earth Sci, 9: 891
[7]
Fan Y P, Deng C B, Zhang X, Li F Q, Wang X Y, Qiao L (2018). Numerical study of CO2-enhanced coalbed methane recovery.Int J Greenh Gas Control, 76: 12–23
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Fan Z L, Fan G W, Zhang D S, Zhang L, Zhang S, Liang S S, Yu W (2021b). Optimal injection timing and gas mixture proportion for enhancing coalbed methane recovery.Energy, 222: 119880
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Fang H H, Sang S X, Liu S Q (2019a). Numerical simulation of enhancing coalbed methane recovery by injecting CO2 with heat injection.Petrol Sci, 16(1): 32–43
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Fang H H, Sang S X, Liu S Q (2019b). Establishment of dynamic permeability model of coal reservoir and its numerical simulation during the CO2-ECBM process.J Petrol Sci Eng, 179: 885–898
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Fang H H, Sang S X, Liu S Q (2019c). The coupling mechanism of the thermal-hydraulic-mechanical fields in CH4-bearing coal and its application in the CO2-enhanced coalbed methane recovery.J Petrol Sci Eng, 181: 106177
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Hou Y D, Huang S P, Han J, Liu X B, Han L F,Fu C F (2020). Numerical simulation of the effect of injected CO2 temperature and pressure on CO2-enhanced coalbed methane.Appl Sci (Basel), 10(4): 1385
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Huo B J, Jing X D, Fan C J, Han Y L (2019). Numerical investigation of flue gas injection enhanced underground coal seam gas drainage.Energy Sci Eng, 7(6): 3204–3219
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Liu A, Liu S M, Liu P, Wang K (2021a). Water sorption on coal: effects of oxygen-containing function groups and pore structure.Int J Coal Sci Technol, 8(5): 983–1002
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Liu J S, Chen Z W, Elsworth D, Miao X X, Mao X B (2011). Evolution of coal permeability from stress-controlled to displacement-controlled swelling conditions.Fuel, 90(10): 2987–2997
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Liu J, Xie L, Elsworth D, Gan Q (2019). CO2/CH4 competitive adsorption in shale: implications for enhancement in gas production and reduction in carbon emissions.Environ Sci Technol, 53(15): 9328–9336
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
Liu J, Yao Y B, Liu D M, Elsworth D (2017). Experimental evaluation of CO2 enhanced recovery of adsorbed-gas from shale.Int J Coal Geol, 179: 211–218
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Liu M Y, Wen H, Fan S X, Wang Z P, Fei J B, Wei G M, Cheng X J, Wang H (2022). Experimental Study of CO2-ECBM by injection Liquid CO2.Minerals (Basel), 12(3): 297
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Liu T, Lin B Q, Fu X H, Liu A (2021b). Mechanical criterion for coal and gas outburst: a perspective from multiphysics coupling.Int J Coal Sci Technol, 8(6): 1423–1435
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Luo M K, Yang L, Wen H O, Zhao D S, Wang K (2022). Numerical optimization of drilling parameters for gas predrainage and excavating-drainage collaboration on roadway head.Geofluids, 2022: 3241211
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
MuY L, FanY P, WangJ R, Fan N (2019). Numerical study on the injection of heated CO2 to enhance CH4 recovery in water-bearing coal reservoirs. Energy Sources A Recovery Util Environ Effects
[22]
Niu Q H, Wang W, Liang J J, Yuan W, Wen L, Chang J F, Ji Z M, Zhou H, Wang Z Z, Jia X J (2020). Investigation of the CO2 flooding be havior and its collaborative controlling factors.Energy Fuels, 34(9): 11194–11209
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Ren T, Wang G, Cheng Y P, Qi Q X (2017). Model development and simulation study of the feasibility of enhancing gas drainage efficiency through nitrogen injection.Fuel, 194: 406–422
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Sun Y F, Zhao Y X, Yuan L (2018). CO2-ECBM in coal nanostructure: modelling and simulation.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 54: 202–215
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Vishal V, Singh T N, Ranjith P G (2015). Influence of sorption time in CO2-ECBM process in Indian coals using coupled numerical simulation.Fuel, 139: 51–58
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Wang G, Wang K, Wang S G, Elsworth D, Jiang Y J (2018). An improved permeability evolution model and its application in fractured sorbing media.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 56: 222–232
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Wang Z L, Sang S X, Zhou X Z, Liu X D (2022). Numerical study on CO2 sequestration in low-permeability coal reservoirs to enhance CH4 recovery: gas driving water and staged inhibition on CH4 output.J Petrol Sci Eng, 214: 110478
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
WuY, LiuJ S, ChenZ W, Elsworth D, PoneD (2011). A dual poroelastic model for CO2-enhanced coalbed methane recovery. Int J Coal Geol, 86(2–3): 177–189
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Xia T, Zhou F, Gao F, Kang J, Liu J, Wang J (2015). Simulation of coal self-heating processes in underground methane-rich coal seams.Int J Coal Geol, 141-142: 1–12
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Xiao B, Liu S G, Li Z W, Ran B, Ye Y H, Yang D, Li J X (2021). Geochemical characteristics of marine shale in the Wufeng Formation–Longmaxi Formation in the northern Sichuan Basin, South China and its implications for depositional controls on organic matter.J Petrol Sci Eng, 203: 108618
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Zhang L, Li J H, Xue J H, Zhang C, Fang X Q (2021). Experimental studies on the changing characteristics of the gas flow capacity on bituminous coal in CO2-ECBM and N2-ECBM.Fuel, 291: 120115
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Zhang X G, Ranjith , P G (2019). Experimental investigation of effects of CO2 injection on enhanced methane recovery in coal seam reservoirs.J CO2 Util, 33: 394–404
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Zhao P, He B, Zhang B, Liu J (2022). Porosity of gas shale: is the NMR-based measurement reliable?.Petrol Sci, 19(2): 509–517
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Zheng S J, Yao Y B, Elsworth D, Liu D M, Cai Y D (2020). Dynamic fluid interactions during CO2-ECBM and CO2 sequestration in coal seams. Part 2: CO2-H2O wettability.Fuel, 279: 118560
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Zheng S J, Yao Y B, Sang S X, Liu D M, Wang M, Liu S Q (2022). Dynamic characterization of multiphase methane during CO2-ECBM: an NMR relaxation method.Fuel, 324: 124526
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Zhou F D, Hussain F, Cinar Y (2013). Injecting pure N2 and CO2 to coal for enhanced coalbed methane: experimental observations and numerical simulation.Int J Coal Geol, 116-117: 53–62
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Zhou L J, Zhou X H, Fan C J, Bai G (2022). Coal permeability evolution triggered by variable injection parameters during gas mixture enhanced methane recovery.Energy, 252: 124065
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Zhu Z J, Yao Z H, Nemcik J, Han J (2022). Investigation of overburden movement and ground stress behaviour in multiseam mining. Lithosphere, 2022(special 11): 3312379

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(6772 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/