Pore structure evolution of mudstone caprock under cyclic load-unload and its influence on breakthrough pressure

Abstract

The pore structure of caprock plays an important role in underground gas storage security, as it significantly influences the sealing capacity of caprock. However, the pore structure evolution of caprock with the cyclic stress perturbations triggered by the cyclic gas injection or extraction remains unclear. In this study, the pore structure changes of mudstone caprock under cyclic loading and unloading were obtained by the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) tests system, then the influence of the changes on the breakthrough pressure of caprock was discussed. The results indicated that the pore structure changes are depending on the stress loading-unloading path and stress level. In the first cyclic, at the loading stage, with the increase of confining stress, the NMR T₂ spectra curve moved to the left, the NMR signal amplitude of the first peak increased, while the amplitude of the second peak decreased gradually. This indicated that the larger pores of mudstone are compressed and transformed into smaller pores, then the number of macropores decreased and the number of micro- and meso-pores increased. For a certain loading-unloading cycle, the porosity curve of mudstone in the loading process is not coincide with that in the unloading process, the porosity curve in the loading process was located below that in the unloading process, which indicated that the pore structure change is stress path dependent. With the increase of cycle numbers, the total porosity shown an increasing trend, indicating that the damage of mudstone occurred under the cyclic stress load-unload effects. With the increase of porosity, the breakthrough pressure of mudstone decreased with the increase of the cyclic numbers, which may increase the gas leakage risk. The results can provide significant implication for the underground gas storage security evaluation.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

underground gas storage / pore structure / nuclear magnetic resonance / cyclic loading-unloading / breakthrough pressure

References

[1] Astiaso Garcia D, Barbanera F, Cumo F, Di Matteo U, Nastasi B (2016). Expert opinion analysis on renewable hydrogen storage systems potential in Europe.Energies, 9(11): 963

[2] Carneiro J F, Matos C R, van Gessel S (2019). Opportunities for large scale energy storage in geological formations in mainland Portugal.Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 99: 201–211

[3] Chao Z, Wang H, Xu W, Ji H, Zhao K (2017). Study on the evolution of permeability and porosity of columnar joint materials under cyclic loading and unloading. Chinese J Rock Mech Eng, 36(1): 124–141 (in Chinese)

[4] Cheng L, Li D, Wang W, Liu J (2021). Heterogeneous transport of free ch₄ and free CO₂ in dual-porosity media controlled by anisotropic in situ stress during shale gas production by CO₂ flooding: implications for CO₂ geological storage and utilization.ACS Omega, 6(40): 26756–26765

[5] Chu Z, Wu Z, Liu Q, Weng L, Wang Z, Zhou Y (2021). Evaluating the microstructure evolution behaviors of saturated sandstone using NMR testing under uniaxial short-term and creep compression.Rock Mech Rock Eng, 54(9): 4905–4927

[6] Cui X, Bustin R M (2005). Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coal seams.AAPG Bull, 89(9): 1181–1202

[7] Fan C, Wen H, Li S, Bai G, Zhou L (2022). Coal seam gas extraction by integrated drillings and punchings from the floor roadway considering hydraulic-mechanical coupling effect.Geofluids, 2022: 1–10

[8] Gao H, Li H A (2016). Pore structure characterization, permeability evaluation and enhanced gas recovery techniques of tight gas sandstones.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 28: 536–547

[9] Hildenbrand A, Schlömer S, Krooss B M, Littke R (2004). Gas breakthrough experiments on pelitic rocks: comparative study with N₂, CO₂ and CH₄.Geofluids, 4(1): 61–80

[10] Hu J, Dong Z, Ma S, Qin X, Xiao X, Zhuan D (2021). Seepage characteristics of damaged rock under stress-seepage coupling.Gold Sci Tech, 29(3): 355–363

[11] Jayasekara D W, Ranjith P G, Wanniarachchi W, Rathnaweera T D (2020). Understanding the chemico-mineralogical changes of caprock sealing in deep saline CO₂ sequestration environments: a review study.J Supercrit Fluid, 161: 104819

[12] Jiang J, Yang W, Cheng Y, Zhao K, Zheng S (2019). Pore structure characterization of coal particles via MIP, N₂ and CO₂ adsorption: effect of coalification on nanopores evolution.Powder Technol, 354: 136–148

[13] Kawaura K, Akaku K, Nakano M, Ito D, Takahashi T, Kiriakehata S (2013). Examination of methods to measure capillary threshold pressures of pelitic rock samples.Energy Procedia, 37: 5411–5418

[14] Lv X, Wang Y, Yu H, Bai Z (2017). Major factors affecting the closure of marine carbonate caprock and their quantitative evaluation: a case study of Ordovician rocks on the northern slope of the Tazhong uplift in the Tarim Basin, western China.Ma Pet Geol, 83: 231–245

[15] Lei R, Wang Y, Zhang L, Liu B, Long K, Luo P, Wang Y K (2019). The evolution of sandstone microstructure and mechanical properties with thermal damage.Energy Sci Eng, 7(6): 3058–3075

[16] Li H, Yang D, Zhong Z, Sheng Y, Liu X (2018b). Experimental investigation on the micro damage evolution of chemical corroded limestone subjected to cyclic loads.Int J Fatigue, 113: 23–32

[17] Li J, Zhou K, Liu W, Deng H (2016). NMR research on deterioration characteristics of microscopic structure of sandstones in freeze–thaw cycles.Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 26(11): 2997–3003

[18] Li X, Kang Y, Haghighi M (2018a). Investigation of pore size distributions of coals with different structures by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP).Measurement, 116: 122–128

[19] Liu J, Xie L Z, He B, Gan Q, Zhao P (2021). Influence of anisotropic and heterogeneous permeability coupled with in-situ stress on CO₂ sequestration with simultaneous enhanced gas recovery in shale: quantitative modeling and case study.Int J Greenh Gas Control, 104: 103208

[20] Ma X, Yu B, Ma D, Zhang S, Cheng Y, Wang K, Yang Y (2010). Project design and matching technologies for underground gas storage based on a depleted sandstone gas reservoir.Nat Gas Ind, 30(8): 67–71

[21] Matos C R, Carneiro J F, Silva P P (2019). Overview of large-scale underground energy storage technologies for integration of renewable energies and criteria for reservoir identification.J Energy Storage, 21: 241–258

[22] Paluszny A, Graham C C, Daniels K A, Tsaparli V, Xenias D, Salimzadeh S, Whitmarsh L, Harrington J F, Zimmerman R W (2020). Caprock integrity and public perception studies of carbon storage in depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs.Int J Greenh Gas Control, 98: 103057

[23] Pang J, Qian G, Wang B, Yang Z, Wei Y, Li Y (2012). Evaluation of sealing ability of underground gas storage converted from the Xinjiang H Gas Field.Nat Gas Ind, 32(2): 83–85

[24] Parra D, Valverde L, Pino F J, Patel M K (2019). A review on the role, cost, and value of hydrogen energy systems for deep decarbonization.Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 101: 279–294

[25] Schmitt M, Poffo C M, De Lima J C, Fernandes C P, Dos Santos V S S (2017). Application of photoacoustic spectroscopy to characterize thermal diffusivity and porosity of caprocks.Eng Geol, 220: 183–195

[26] Shukla R, Ranjith P, Haque A, Choi X (2010). A review of studies on CO₂ sequestration and caprock integrity.Fuel, 89(10): 2651–2664

[27] Sing K S W (1985). Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity.Pure Appl Chem, 57(4): 603–619

[28] Takeda M, Manaka M (2018). Effects of confining stress on the semipermeability of siliceous mudstones: implications for identifying geologic membrane behaviors of argillaceous formations.Geophys Res Lett, 45(11): 5427–5435

[29] Tang Y, Long K, Wang J, Xu H, Wang Y, He Y, Shi L, Zhu H (2021). Change of phase state during multi-cycle injection and production process of condensate gas reservoir based underground gas storage.Pet Explor Dev, 48(2): 395–406

[30] Tarkowski R (2019). Underground hydrogen storage: characteristics and prospects.Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 105: 86–94

[31] Wang G, Han D, Qin X, Liu Z, Liu J (2020). A comprehensive method for studying pore structure and seepage characteristics of coal mass based on 3D CT reconstruction and NMR.Fuel, 281: 118735

[32] Wang L, Zhao N, Sima L, Meng F, Guo Y (2018). Pore structure characterization of the tight reservoir: systematic integration of mercury injection and nuclear magnetic resonance.Energy Fuels, 32(7): 7471–7484

[33] Wang X L, Economides M J (2012). Purposefully built underground natural gas storage.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 9: 130–137

[34] Wang Z, Cui H, Wei G, Jia T, Guo J, He X (2021). Study on the quantitative characterization and seepage evolution characteristics of pores of loaded coal based on NMR.ACS Omega, 6(43): 28983–28991

[35] Wu T, Pan Z, Connell L D, Liu B, Fu X, Xue Z (2020). Gas breakthrough pressure of tight rocks: a review of experimental methods and data.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 81: 103408

[36] Xu J, Xian X, Wang H, Wang w, Yang X (2006). Experimental study on rock deformation characteristics under cycling loading and unloading conditions. Chinese J Rock Mech Eng, 25(1): 3040–3045 (in Chinese)

[37] Xu L, Li Q, Myers M, Chen Q, Li X (2019). Application of nuclear magnetic resonance technology to carbon capture, utilization and storage: a review.J Rock Mech Geotech Eng, 11(4): 892–908

[38] Xu T, Tian H, Zhu H, Cai J (2022). China actively promotes: CO₂ capture, utilization and storage research to achieve carbon peak and carbon neutrality.Adv Geo-Energy Res, 6(1): 1–3

[39] Yao Y, Liu D, Che Y, Tang D, Tang S, Huang W (2010). Petrophysical characterization of coals by low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).Fuel, 89(7): 1371–1380

[40] Zhai C, Qin L, Liu S, Xu J, Tang Z, Wu S (2016). Pore structure in coal: pore evolution after cryogenic freezing with cyclic liquid nitrogen injection and its implication on coalbed methane extraction.Energy Fuels, 30(7): 6009–6020

[41] Zhang C, Wang M (2022). A critical review of breakthrough pressure for tight rocks and relevant factors.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 100: 104456

[42] Zhang F, Jiang Z, Sun W, Li Y, Zhang X, Zhu L, Wen M (2019a). A multiscale comprehensive study on pore structure of tight sandstone reservoir realized by nuclear magnetic resonance, high pressure mercury injection and constant-rate mercury injection penetration test.Mar Pet Geol, 109: 208–222

[43] Zhang L, Wang Y, Miao X, Gan M, Li X (2019c). Geochemistry in geologic-CO₂ utilization and storage: a brief review.Adv Geo-Energy Res, 3(3): 304–313

[44] Zhang W, Ning Z, Gai S, Zhu J, Fan F, Liu Z, Wang H (2022). Fast and effective observations of the pore structure of tight sandstones at the same location by utilizing AFM and CF-SEM.J Petrol Sci Eng, 208: 109554

[45] Zhang Z, Yu X, Deng M (2019b). Damage evolution of sandy mudstone mechanical properties under mining unloading conditions in gob-side entry retaining.Geotech Geol Eng, 37(4): 3535–3545

[46] Zhao P, He B, Zhang B, Liu J (2022). Porosity of gas shale: is the NMR-based measurement reliable?.Petrol Sci, 19(2): 509–517

[47] Zheng S, Yao Y, Elsworth D, Wang B, Liu Y (2020). A novel pore size classification method of coals: investigation based on NMR relaxation.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 81: 103466

[48] Zhou X, Lu X, Quan H, Qian W, Mu X, Chen K, Wang Z, Bai Z (2019). Influence factors and an evaluation method about breakthrough pressure of carbonate rocks: an experimental study on the Ordovician of carbonate rock from the Kalpin area, Tarim Basin, China.Mar Pet Geol, 104: 313–330

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press