Low-field NMR application in the characterization of CO2 geological storage and utilization related to shale gas reservoirs: a brief review

Zhaohui LU, Ke LI, Xingbing LIU, Peng ZHAO, Jun LIU

PDF(4493 KB)
PDF(4493 KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3) : 739-751. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-022-1007-0
REVIEW ARTICLE
REVIEW ARTICLE

Low-field NMR application in the characterization of CO2 geological storage and utilization related to shale gas reservoirs: a brief review

Author information +
History +

Abstract

CO2 geological storage and utilization (CGSU) is considered a far-reaching technique to meet the demand of increasing energy supply and decreasing CO2 emissions. For CGSUs related to shale gas reservoirs, experimental investigations have attracted variable methodologies, among which low-field NMR (LF-NMR) is a promising method and is playing an increasingly key role in reservoir characterization. Herein, the application of this nondestructive, sensitive, and quick LF-NMR technique in characterizing CGSU behavior in shale gas reservoirs is reviewed. First, the basic principle of LF-NMR for 1H-fluid detection is introduced, which is the theoretical foundation of the reviewed achievements in this paper. Then, the reviewed works are related to the LF-NMR-based measurements of CH4 adsorption capacity and the CO2-CH4 interaction in shale, as well as the performance on CO2 sequestration and simultaneous enhanced gas recovery from shale. Basically, the reviewed achievements have exhibited a large potential for LF-NMR application in CGSUs related to shale gas reservoirs, although some limitations and deficiencies still need to be improved. Accordingly, some suggestions are proposed for a more responsible development of the LF-NMR technique. Hopefully, this review is helpful in promoting the expanding application of the LF-NMR technique in CGSU implementation in shale gas reservoirs.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

CO2/CH4 competitive adsorption / shale gas reservoir / CO2 geological storage / gas recovery enhancement / low-field NMR

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhaohui LU, Ke LI, Xingbing LIU, Peng ZHAO, Jun LIU. Low-field NMR application in the characterization of CO2 geological storage and utilization related to shale gas reservoirs: a brief review. Front. Earth Sci., 2023, 17(3): 739‒751 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-022-1007-0

References

[1]
Abdussalam O, Trochu J, Fello N, Chaabane A (2021). Recent advances and opportunities in planning green petroleum supply chains: a model-oriented review.Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol, 28(6): 524–539
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Adeyilola A, Nordeng S, Onwumelu C, Nwachukwu F, Gentzis T (2020). Geochemical, petrographic and petrophysical characterization of the Lower Bakken Shale, Divide County, North Dakota.Int J Coal Geol, 224: 103477
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Borgia G C, Brown R J S, Fantazzini P (1998). Uniform-penalty inversion of multiexponential decay data.J Magn Reson, 132(1): 65–77
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
Brown R J S, Chandler R, Jackson J A, Kleinberg R L, Miller M N, Paltiel Z, Prammer M G (2001). History of NMR well logging.Concepts Magn Reson, 13(6): 335–413
[5]
Brown R J S, Fatt I (1956). Measurements of Fractional Wettability of Oil Fields’ Rocks by the Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation Method. Fall Meeting of the Petroleum Branch of AIME, October 14, Los Angeles, California
[6]
Butler J P, Reeds J A, Dawson S V (1981). Estimating solutions of first kind integral equations with nonnegative constraints and optimal smoothing.SIAM J Numer Anal, 18(3): 381–397
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Carr H Y, Purcell E M (1954). Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments.Phys Rev, 94(3): 630–638
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Cheng H L M, Stikov N, Ghugre N R, Wright G A (2012). Practical medical applications of quantitative MR relaxometry.J Magn Reson Imaging, 36(4): 805–824
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[9]
Cheng L, Li D, Wang W, Liu J (2021). Heterogeneous transport of free CH4 and free CO2 in dual-porosity media controlled by anisotropic in situ stress during shale gas production by CO2 flooding: implications for CO2 geological storage and utilization.ACS Omega, 6(40): 26756–26765
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[10]
Coates G R, Xiao L, Prammer M G (1999). NMR Logging Principles and Applications. Houston (Texas): Gulf Publishing Company
[11]
Cornillon P, Salim L C (2000). Characterization of water mobility and distribution in low- and intermediate-moisture food systems.Magn Reson Imaging, 18(3): 335–341
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[12]
Duguid A, Glier J, Heinrichs M, Hawkins J, Peterson R, Mishra S (2021). Practical leakage risk assessment for CO2 assisted enhanced oil recovery and geologic storage in Ohio’s depleted oil fields.Int J Greenh Gas Control, 109: 103338
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Dunn K J, Bergman J D, Latorraca A G (2002). Nuclear Magnetic Resonance: Petrophysical and Logging Applications. In: Handbook of Geophysical Exploration. New York: Pergamon.
[14]
Fan C J, Yang L, Wang G, Huang Q M, Fu X, Wen H O (2021). Investigation on coal skeleton deformation in CO2 injection enhanced CH4 drainage from underground coal seam.Front Earth Sci (Lausanne), 9: 766011
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Fatah A, Bennour Z, Ben Mahmud H, Gholami R, Hossain M M (2020). A review on the influence of CO2/shale interaction on shale properties: implications of CCS in shales.Energies, 13(12): 3200
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Fathi E, Akkutlu I Y (2014). Multi-component gas transport and adsorption effects during CO2 injection and enhanced shale gas recovery.Int J Coal Geol, 123: 52–61
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Gensterblum Y, Busch A, Krooss B M (2014). Molecular concept and experimental evidence of competitive adsorption of H2O, CO2 and CH4 on organic material.Fuel, 115: 581–588
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Godec M, Koperna G, Petrusak R, Oudinot A (2013). Potential for enhanced gas recovery and CO2 storage in the Marcellus Shale in the Eastern United States.Int J Coal Geol, 118: 95–104
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Godec M, Koperna G, Petrusak R, Oudinot A (2014). Enhanced gas recovery and CO2 storage in gas shales: a summary review of its status and potential.Energy Procedia, 63: 5849–5857
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Golub G H, Heath M, Wahba G (1979). Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter.Technometrics, 21(2): 215–223
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Guo J C, Zhou H Y, Zeng J, Wang K J, Lai J, Liu Y X (2020). Advances in low-feld nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technologies applied for characterization of pore space inside rocks: a critical review.Petrol Sci, 17(5): 1281–1297
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Hatzakis E (2019). Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy in food science: a comprehensive review.Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf, 18(1): 189–220
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[23]
Hirasaki G J, Lo S W, Zhang Y (2003). NMR properties of petroleum reservoir fluids.Magn Reson Imaging, 21(3–4): 269–277
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[24]
Hu T, Xu T F, Tian H L, Zhou B, Yang Y Z (2021). A study of CO2 injection well selection in the naturally fractured undulating formation in the Jurong Oilfield, China.Int J Greenh Gas Control, 109: 103377
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Huang L, Ning Z F, Wang Q, Ye H T, Chen Z L, Sun Z, Sun F R, Qin H B (2018). Enhanced gas recovery by CO2 sequestration in marine shale: a molecular view based on realistic kerogen model.Arab J Geosci, 11(15): 404
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Huang X, Li T T, Gao H, Zhao J S, Wang C (2019). Comparison of SO2 with CO2 for recovering shale resources using low-field nuclear magnetic resonance.Fuel, 245: 563–569
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Huang X, Xue J J, Li X (2020). Adsorption behavior of CH4 and C2H6 on shale under the influence of CO2 and flue gas.Energy Fuels, 34(5): 5689–5695
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Iddphonce R, Wang J J, Zhao L (2020). Review of CO2 injection techniques for enhanced shale gas recovery: prospect and challenges.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 77: 103240
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Keles C, Tang X, Schlosser C, Louk A K, Ripepi N S (2020). Sensitivity and history match analysis of a carbon dioxide “huff-and-puff” injection test in a horizontal shale gas well in Tennessee.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 77: 103226
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Kirli M S, Fahrioglu M (2019). Sustainable development of Turkey: deployment of geothermal resources for carbon capture, utilization, and storage.Energy Sources Part A-Recovery Utilization Environmental Effects, 41(14): 1739–1751
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Lawson C L, Hanson R J (1974). Solving Least Squares Problems. Prentice-Hall
[32]
Li J, Wu Q Z, Lu J, Jin W J (2018). To quantitatively determine the adsorption and free methane volume content in shale gas core based on NMR technique. Well Logging Techn, 42(3): 315–320 (in Chinese)
[33]
Li L G, Li C, Kang T H (2019). Adsorption/desorption behavior of CH4 on shale during the CO2 Huff-and-Puff process.Energy Fuels, 33(6): 5147–5152
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Lin T, Liu X, Zhang J, Bai Y, Liu J, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Cheng X, Lv J, Yang H (2021). Characterization of multi-component and multi-phase fluids in the Upper Cretaceous oil shale from the Songliao Basin (NE China) using T1T2 NMR correlation maps. Petrol Sci Technol, 39 (23–24): 1060–1070
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Liu D Q, Li Y L, Agarwal R K (2016). Numerical simulation of long-term storage of CO2 in Yanchang shale reservoir of the Ordos Basin in China.Chem Geol, 440: 288–305
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Liu D Q, Li Y L, Yang S, Agarwal R K (2021a). CO2 sequestration with enhanced shale gas recovery.Energy Sources Part A-Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects, 43(24): 3227–3237
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Liu F Y, Ellett K, Xiao Y T, Rupp J A (2013). Assessing the feasibility of CO2 storage in the New Albany Shale (Devonian-Mississippian) with potential enhanced gas recovery using reservoir simulation.Int J Greenh Gas Control, 17: 111–126
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Liu J, Xie L, Elsworth D, Gan Q (2019a). CO2/CH4 competitive adsorption in shale: implications for enhancement in gas production and reduction in carbon emissions.Environ Sci Technol, 53(15): 9328–9336
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[39]
Liu J, Xie L, Yao Y, Gan Q, Zhao P, Du L (2019b). Preliminary study of influence factors and estimation model of the enhanced gas recovery stimulated by carbon dioxide utilization in shale.ACS Sustain Chem & Eng, 7(24): 20114–20125
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Liu J, Xie L Z, He B, Gan Q, Zhao P (2021b). Influence of anisotropic and heterogeneous permeability coupled with in-situ stress on CO2 sequestration with simultaneous enhanced gas recovery in shale: quantitative modeling and case study.Int J Greenh Gas Control, 104: 103208
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Liu J, Yao Y, Liu D, Elsworth D (2017). Experimental evaluation of CO2 enhanced recovery of adsorbed-gas from shale.Int J Coal Geol, 179: 211–218
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Liu X, Zhang J, Bai Y, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Cheng X, Lv J, Yang H, Liu J (2020a). Pore structure petrophysical characterization of the Upper Cretaceous oil shale from the Songliao Basin (NE China) using low-field NMR.J Spectrosc, 2020: 1–11
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Liu Y L, Wang C (2018). Determination of the absolute adsorption isotherms of CH4 on shale with low-field nuclear magnetic resonance.Energy Fuels, 32(2): 1406–1415
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Liu Z S, Liu D M, Cai Y D, Yao Y B, Pan Z J, Zhou Y F (2020b). Application of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in coalbed methane and shale reservoirs: a review.Int J Coal Geol, 218: 103261
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Luo X R, Ren X J, Wang S Z (2019). Supercritical CO2-water-shale interactions and their effects on element mobilization and shale pore structure during stimulation.Int J Coal Geol, 202: 109–127
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Levitt M H (2015). Nuclear spin relaxation.Resonance, 20(11): 986–994
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Martin A (1995). Nuclear-magnetic-resonance imaging — technology for the 21st-century.Oilfield Rev, 7(3): 19–33
[48]
McPhee C, Reed J, Zubizarreta I (2015). Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR).Develop Petroleum Sci, 64: 655–669
[49]
Meiboom S, Gill D (1958). Modified spin-echo method for measuring nuclear relaxation times.Rev Sci Instrum, 29(8): 688–691
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Middleton R S, Carey J W, Currier R P, Hyman J D, Kang Q J, Karra S, Jimenez-Martinez J, Porter M L, Viswanathan H S (2015). Shale gas and non-aqueous fracturing fluids: opportunities and challenges for supercritical CO2.Appl Energy, 147: 500–509
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Pereira P, Ribeiro C, Carneiro J (2021). Identification and characterization of geological formations with CO2 storage potential in Portugal.Petrol Geosci, 27(3): petgeo2020–123
[52]
Qiu S, Lei T, Wu J T, Bi S S (2021). Energy demand and supply planning of China through 2060.Energy, 234: 121193
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Rani S, Prusty B K, Pal S K (2020). Characterization of shales from Damodar valley coalfields for CH4 recovery and CO2 sequestration.Environ Techn & Innov, 18: 100739
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Seevers D O (1966). A Nuclear Magnetic Method for Determining The Permeability Of Sandstones. SPWLA 7th Annual Logging Symposium. Society of Professional Well Log Analysts Transactions, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 1–14
[55]
Shi J L, Shen G F, Zhao H Y, Sun N N, Song X H, Guo Y T, Wei W, Sun Y H (2018). Porosity at the interface of organic matter and mineral components contribute significantly to gas adsorption on shales.J CO2 Utilization, 28: 73–82
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Straley C, Vinegar H, Morriss C (1994). Core analysis by low field NMR.1994 International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Proceedings: 43–56
[57]
Streich R, Becken M, Ritter O (2010). Imaging of CO2 storage sites, geothermal reservoirs, and gas shales using controlled-source magnetotellurics: Modeling studies.Geochemistry, 70: 63–75
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Sun H, Yao J, Gao S H, Fan D Y, Wang C C, Sun Z X (2013). Numerical study of CO2 enhanced natural gas recovery and sequestration in shale gas reservoirs.Int J Greenh Gas Control, 19: 406–419
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Sun H Y, Zhao H, Qi N, Li Y (2017). Molecular insights into the enhanced shale gas recovery by carbon dioxide in Kerogen Slit Nanopores.J Phys Chem C, 121(18): 10233–10241
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Sun X X, Yao Y B, Liu D M, Zhou Y F (2018). Investigations of CO2-water wettability of coal: NMR relaxation method.Int J Coal Geol, 188: 38–50
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Tang J P, Tian H N, Ma Y, Sun S J, Li W J (2017). Experimental study on desorption characteristics of gas in coal shale based on NMR technology. J Liaoning Technical U (Natural Science Edition), 36(3): 282–287 (in Chinese)
[62]
Testamanti M N, Rezaee R (2019). Considerations for the acquisition and inversion of NMR T2 data in shales.J Petrol Sci Eng, 174: 177–188
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Tian F, Li T T, Huang X, Dang H L (2020). Adsorption behavior of CH4, C2H6, and CO2 on moisture-equilibrated shale.Energy Fuels, 34(8): 9492–9497
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
van Beek T A (2021). Low-field benchtop NMR spectroscopy: status and prospects in natural product analysis.Phytochem Anal, 32(1): 24–37
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[65]
Wang J, Zhang Y, Xie J (2020). Influencing factors and application prospects of CO2 flooding in heterogeneous glutenite reservoirs.Sci Rep, 10(1): 1839
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[66]
Wang Q B (2019). Effects of clay mineral characteristics on shale adsorbed gas:based on the experimental analysis of shale samples in Longmaxi Formation of Dingshan Area, Southeast Sichuan. J Chongqing U Sci Techn (Natural Sciences Edition), 21(3): 20–24 (in Chinese)
[67]
Wang X Q, Zhai Z Q, Jin X, Wu S T, Li J M, Sun L, Liu X D (2016). Molecular simulation of CO2/CH4 competitive adsorption in organic matter pores in shale under certain geological conditions.Pet Explor Dev, 43(5): 841–848
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Wang X Y, Xie J, Chen X J (2021). Applications of non-invasive and novel methods of low-field nuclear magnetic resonance and magnetic resonance imaging in aquatic products.Front Nutr, 8: 651804
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[69]
Washburn K E (2014). Relaxation mechanisms and shales.Concepts Magn Reson Part A Bridg Educ Res, 43A(3): 57–78
CrossRef Google scholar
[70]
Xie H P, Li X C, Fang Z M, Wang Y F, Li Q, Shi L, Bai B, Wei N, Hou Z M (2014). Carbon geological utilization and storage in China: current status and perspectives.Acta Geotech, 9(1): 7–27
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Xie Y C, Hou Z M, Liu H J, Cao C, Qi J G (2021). The sustainability assessment of CO2 capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) and the conversion of cropland to forestland program (CCFP) in the Water-Energy-Food (WEF) framework towards China’s carbon neutrality by 2060.Environ Earth Sci, 80(14): 468
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
Xu H, Tang D Z, Zhao J L, Li S (2015). A precise measurement method for shale porosity with low-field nuclear magnetic resonance: a case study of the Carboniferous-Permian strata in the Linxing area, eastern Ordos Basin, China.Fuel, 143: 47–54
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
Yang Y, Liu S M (2020). Review of shale gas sorption and its models.Energy Fuels, 34(12): 15502–15524
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
Yao Y B, Liu D M (2012). Comparison of low-field NMR and mercury intrusion porosimetry in characterizing pore size distributions of coals.Fuel, 95(1): 152–158
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Yao Y B, Liu D M, Liu J G, Xie S B (2015). Assessing the water migration and permeability of large intact bituminous and anthracite coals using NMR relaxation spectrometry.Transp Porous Media, 107(2): 527–542
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Yao Y B, Liu D M, Xie S B (2014). Quantitative characterization of methane adsorption on coal using a low-field NMR relaxation method.Int J Coal Geol, 131: 32–40
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
Yao Y B, Liu J, Liu D M, Chen J Y, Pan Z J (2019). A new application of NMR in characterization of multiphase methane and adsorption capacity of shale.Int J Coal Geol, 201: 76–85
CrossRef Google scholar
[78]
Yin T T, Liu D M, Cai Y D, Zhou Y F, Yao Y B (2017). Size distribution and fractal characteristics of coal pores through nuclear magnetic resonance cryoporometry.Energy Fuels, 31(8): 7746–7757
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
Zhang T, Ellis G S, Ruppel S C, Milliken K, Yang R (2012). Effect of organic-matter type and thermal maturity on methane adsoption in shale-gas systems.Org Geochem, 47(6): 120–131
CrossRef Google scholar
[80]
Zhao G, Wang C (2019). Influence of CO2 on the adsorption of CH4 on shale using low-field nuclear magnetic resonance technique.Fuel, 238: 51–58
CrossRef Google scholar
[81]
Zhao P, He B, Zhang B, Liu J (2022). Porosity of gas shale: is the NMR-based measurement reliable?.Petrol Sci, 19(2): 509–517
CrossRef Google scholar
[82]
Zhao P, Xie L, He B, Liu J (2020). Strategy optimization on industrial CO2 sequestration in the depleted Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation Shale in the northeastern Sichuan Basin, SW China: from the perspective of environment and energy.ACS Sustain Chem & Eng, 8(30): 11435–11445
CrossRef Google scholar
[83]
Zhao P, Xie L Z, He B, Liu J (2021). Anisotropic permeability influencing the performance of free CH4 and free CO2 during the process of CO2 sequestration and enhanced gas recovery (CS-EGR) from Shale.ACS Sustain Chem & Eng, 9(2): 914–926
CrossRef Google scholar
[84]
Zhou G Z, Hu Z M, Gu Z B, Chang J, Duan X G, Liu X G, Zhan H M (2021). Low-field NMR investigation of the dynamic adsorption–desorption process of shale gas.Energy Fuels, 35(6): 4762–4774
CrossRef Google scholar
[85]
Zhou J P, Yang K, Tian S F, Zhou L, Xian X F, Jiang Y D, Liu M H, Cai J C (2020). CO2-water-shale interaction induced shale microstructural alteration.Fuel, 263: 116642
CrossRef Google scholar
[86]
Zhou W N, Wang H B, Yang Y Y, Liu X L (2019). Adsorption Mechanism of CO2/CH4 in Kaolinite Clay: insight from molecular simulation.Energy Fuels, 33(7): 6542–6551
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (Nos. 2021YFH0048 and 2021YFH0118), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 20826041E4199), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52074059), the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China (No. CSTB2022NSCQ-BHX0721), the Chongqing Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scientists (No. cstc2021jcyj-jqX0007) and the Key Laboratory of Shale Gas Exploration, Ministry of Natural Resources (No. KLSGE-202103).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(4493 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/