Research on carbon emissions embodied in China-Russia trade under the background of the Belt and Road

Abstract

Based on the latest China-Russia input-output data sets over the period from 2007 to 2015, this study quantified the flow of embodied carbon emissions in China-Russia trade using the emission embodied in bilateral trade (EEBT) approach. In addition, the structural decomposition analysis (SDA) was employed to identify the potential driving factors that affect embodied carbon in imports and exports. The results showed as follow. 1) China was a net exporter of carbon emissions in bilateral trade between China and Russia during 2007–2015. Despite that the bilateral trade scale had expanded considerably, the net export volume of CO₂ from China to Russia decreased from 13.21 Mt in 2007 to 4.45 Mt in 2015. 2) From the perspective of different sectors, the metal manufacturing and the chemical sectors of China and Russia were the main sources of CO₂ emissions. 3) In terms of driving factors, it was found that the carbon emission coefficient was the main reason for contributing to embodied emission reduction. Moreover, the contribution rate of carbon emission coefficient to reduce the carbon emissions in imports reached to 95.26%, as well as 108.22% in exports. The bilateral trade scale was the main driver for the increase in embodied carbon emissions, and the contribution rate to embodied carbon emissions in imports and exports were 14.80% and 65.17%, respectively. 4) This study argued that China and Russia should further optimize the energy structure and improve the energy efficiency and intermediate technology in the future.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

embodied carbon emissions / I-O model / China-Russia trade / SDA

References

[1] AhmadN, Wyckoff A (2003). Carbon Dioxide Emissions Embodied in International Trade of Goods, OECD STI Working Papers, 2003/15

[2] Chen Z M, Chen G Q (2011). Embodied carbon dioxide emission at supra-national scale: a coalition analysis for G7, BRIC, and the rest of the world.Energy Policy, 39(5): 2899–2909

[3] Daly H E (1968). On economics as a life science.J Polit Econ, 76(3): 392–406

[4] Dietzenbacher E, Los B (1998). Structural decomposition techniques: sense and sensitivity.Econ Syst Res, 10(4): 307–324

[5] Dong Y, Ishikawa M, Liu X, Wang C (2010). An analysis of the driving forces of CO₂ emissions embodied in Japan-China trade.Energy Policy, 38(11): 6784–6792

[6] Du H, Guo J, Mao G, Smith A M, Wang X, Wang Y (2011). CO₂ emissions embodied in China–US trade: input–output analysis based on the emergy/dollar ratio.Energy Policy, 39(10): 5980–5987

[7] Han M, Yao Q, Liu W, Dunford M (2018). Tracking embodied carbon flows in the Belt and Road regions.J Geogr Sci, 28(9): 1263–1274

[8] Hasegawa R, Kagawa S, Tsukui M (2015). Carbon footprint analysis through constructing a multi-region input–output table: a case study of Japan.J Econ Struct, 4(1): 5

[9] IPCC (2006). Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC Publications

[10] Khachoo Q, Sharma R (2016). FDI and innovation: an investigation into intra- and inter-industry effects.Glob Econ Rev, 45(4): 311–330

[11] Lee C F, Lin S J (2001). Structural decomposition of CO₂ emissions from Taiwan’s petrochemical industries.Energy Policy, 29(3): 237–244

[12] Lenzen M (2016). Structural analyses of energy use and carbon emissions—an overview.Econ Syst Res, 28(2): 119–132

[13] Leontief W W (1936). Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the United States.Rev Econ Stat, 18(3): 105–125

[14] LeontiefW W (1941). The Structure of American Economy, 1919–1929: An Empirical Application of Equilibrium Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press

[15] Leontief W W (1970). Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: an input-output approach.Rev Econ Stat, 52(3): 262–271

[16] Li Y, Chen B, Li C, Li Z, Chen G (2020). Energy perspective of Sino-US trade imbalance in global supply chains.Energy Econ, 92: 104959

[17] Li Y, Hewitt C N (2008). The effect of trade between China and the UK on national and global carbon dioxide emissions.Energy Policy, 36(6): 1907–1914

[18] Lien D (2015). China, Mexico and the US: opportunities for trade and growth.N Am J Econ Finance, 34: 345–350

[19] Lin B Q, Sun C W (2010). Evaluating carbon dioxide emissions in international trade of China.Energy Policy, 38(1): 613–621

[20] Liu Q L, Wang Q (2015). Reexamine SO₂ emissions embodied in China’s exports using multiregional input–output analysis.Ecol Econ, 113: 39–50

[21] Liu W G, Wang Y F, Ye J (2010a). CO₂ emissions embodied in international trade of China, 1997–2007.Manage Sci Eng, 1906–1910

[22] Liu X, Ishikawa M, Wang C, Dong Y, Liu W (2010b). Analyses of CO₂ emissions embodied in Japan-China trade.Energy Policy, 38(3): 1510–1518

[23] Liu Y, Chen S, Chen B, Yang W (2017). Analysis of CO₂ emissions embodied in China’s bilateral trade: a non-competitive import input–output approach.J Clean Prod, 163: S410–S419

[24] Liu Z, Meng J, Deng Z, Lu P, Guan D, Zhang Q, He K, Gong P (2020). Embodied carbon emissions in China-US trade.Sci China Earth Sci, 63(10): 1577–1586

[25] Lu Q, Fang K, Heijungs R, Feng K, Li J, Wen Q, Li Y, Huang X (2020). Imbalance and drivers of carbon emissions embodied in trade along the Belt and Road Initiative.Appl Energy, 280: 115934

[26] Machado G, Schaeffer R, Worrell E (2001). Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil: an input-output approach.Ecol Econ, 39(3): 409–424

[27] NBSC (National Bureau Statistics of China) (2009). Input-Output Table of China 2007.Beijing: National Bureau of Statistics of China Press,

[28] NBSC (National Bureau Statistics of China) (2012). Input-Output Table of China 2010.Beijing: National Bureau of Statistics of China Press,

[29] NBSC (National Bureau Statistics of China) (2014). Input-Output Table of China 2012.Beijing: National Bureau of Statistics of China Press,

[30] NBSC (National Bureau Statistics of China) (2017). Input-Output Table of China 2015.Beijing: National Bureau of Statistics of China Press,

[31] NBSC (National Bureau Statistics of China) (2018). China Energy Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistical Press

[32] OECD (2018). Input-Output Tables.Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development,

[33] Peters G P (2008). From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories.Ecol Econ, 65(1): 13–23

[34] Peters G P, Minx J C, Weber C L, Edenhofer O (2011). Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 108(21): 8903–8908

[35] Shui B, Harriss R C (2006). The role of CO₂ embodiment in US-China trade.Energy Policy, 34(18): 4063–4068

[36] Su B, Ang B W (2014). Input–output analysis of CO₂ emissions embodied in trade: a multi-region model for China.Appl Energy, 114: 377–384

[37] Su B, Huang H C, Ang B W, Zhou P (2010). Input-output analysis of CO₂ emissions embodied in trade: the effects of sector aggregation.Energy Econ, 32(1): 166–175

[38] Tan H, Sun A, Lau H (2013). CO₂ embodiment in China-Australia trade: the drivers and implications.Energy Policy, 61(3): 1212–1220

[39] UNCD (2018). UN Comtrade Database. Available at Management Sciences & Sengineering Icmse website

[40] Weber C L, Matthews H S (2007). Embodied environmental emissions in U.S. international trade, 1997–2004.Environ Sci Technol, 41(14): 4875–4881

[41] WESY (2017). Statistical Review of World Energy. Available at BP website

[42] WIOD (2013).World Input-Output Database. Available at University of Groningen website

[43] Wu R, Geng Y, Dong H, Fujita T, Tian X (2016). Changes of CO₂ emissions embodied in China-Japan trade: drivers and implications.J Clean Prod, 112: 4151–4158

[44] Wu X D, Guo J L, Li C, Chen G Q, Ji X (2020). Carbon emissions embodied in the global supply chain: intermediate and final trade imbalances.Sci Total Environ, 707: 134670

[45] Wyckoff A W, Roop J M (1994). The embodiment of carbon in imports of manufactured products: implications for international agreements on greenhouse gas emissions.Energy Policy, 22(3): 187–194

[46] Xing Y (2012). Processing trade, exchange rates and China’s Bilateral Trade Balances.J Asian Econ, 23(5): 540–547

[47] Yabe N (2004). An analysis of CO₂ emissions of Japanese industries during the period between 1985 and 1995.Energy Policy, 32(5): 595–610

[48] Yang Y, Wang H, Löschel A, Zhou P (2022). Patterns and determinants of carbon emission flows along the Belt and Road from 2005 to 2030.Ecol Econ, 192: 107260

[49] Yu Y, Chen F (2017). Research on carbon emissions embodied in trade between China and South Korea.Atmos Pollut Res, 8(1): 56–63

[50] Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Su B, Zhang Y, Wang S, Liu Y, Li H (2017). Embodied carbon in China’s foreign trade: an online SCI-E and SSCI based literature review.Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 68: 492–510

[51] Zhao Y, Wang S, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Ahmad A (2016). Driving factors of carbon emissions embodied in China–US trade: a structural decomposition analysis.J Clean Prod, 131: 678–689

[52] Zhao Y, Zhang Z, Wang S, Wang S (2014). CO₂ emissions embodied in China’s foreign trade: an investigation from the perspective of global vertical specialization.China World Econ, 22(4): 102–120

[53] Zhong Z, Huang R, Tang Q, Cong X, Wang Z (2015). China’s provincial CO₂ emissions embodied in trade with implications for regional climate policy.Front Earth Sci, 9(1): 77–90

[54] Zhu L, Jeon B N (2007). International R&D spillovers: trade, FDI, and information technology as spillover channels.Rev Int Econ, 15(5): 955–976

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by “the Funds for First-class Discipline Construction of Beijing University of Chemical Technology (XK1802-5)”.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 Higher Education Press