Stress sensitivity of coal reservoir and its impact on coalbed methane production in the southern Qinshui Basin, north China

Abstract

Stress sensitivity has significant negative effects on the permeability and production of coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs. To effectively minimize these negative effects, the degree of stress sensitivity during the CBM production process should be carefully studied. In this work, the curvature of the stress-sensitivity curve was adopted to explore the degree of stress sensitivity, dividing the stress-sensitivity curve and the drainage process into five stress stages: sharp decrease, rapid decrease, low-speed decrease, slower decrease and harmless with four critical stress points—transition, sensitivity, relief and harmless. The actual stages were determined by the initial permeability, stress-sensitivity coefficient and difference between the reservoir pressure and desorption pressure. The four critical stress points did not completely exist in the stress-sensitivity curve. With an increase in the initial permeability of coal, the number of existing critical stresses increases, leading to different gas-water drainage strategies for CBM wells. For reservoirs with a certain stress-sensitivity coefficient, the permeability at the sensitive stress point was successively greater than that at the transition, relief and the harmless stresses. When the stress-sensitivity coefficient is different, the stage is different at the beginning of drainage, and with an increase in the stress-sensitivity coefficient, the decrease rate of the permeability increases. Therefore, the stress-sensitivity coefficient determines the ability to maintain stable CBM production. For well-fractured CBM reservoirs, with a high stress-sensitivity coefficient, permeability damage mainly occurs when the reservoir pressure is less than the relief stress; therefore, the depressurization rate should be slow. For CBM reservoirs with fewer natural fractures, the reverse applies, and the depressurization rate can be much faster. The higher the difference between the reservoir and desorption pressures, the higher the effective stress and permeability damage after desorption, resulting in a much longer drainage time and many difficulties for the desorption of coalbed methane. The findings of this study can help better understand and minimize the negative effects of stress sensitivity during the CBM production process.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

coalbed methane / stress sensitivity / curvature / stages division / drainage

References

[1] Busse J, de Dreuzy J, Galindo Torres S, Bringemeier D, Scheuermann A (2017). Image processing based characterisation of coal cleat networks.Int J Coal Geol, 169(1): 1–21

[2] Cai Y, Li Q, Liu D, Zhou Y, Lv D (2018). Insights into matrix compressibility of coals by mercury intrusion porosimetry and N₂ adsorption.Int J Coal Geol, 200(11): 199–212

[3] Cai Y, Liu D, Mathews J P, Pan Z, Elsworth D, Yao Y, Li J, Guo X (2014). Permeability evolution in fractured coal-combining triaxial confinement with X-ray computed tomography, acoustic emission and ultrasonic techniques.Int J Coal Geol, 122: 91–104

[4] Chen D, Pan Z, Liu J, Connell L (2012). Characteristic of anisotropic coal permeability and its impact on optimal design of multi-lateral well for coalbed methane production. J Petrol Sci Eng, 88–89(6): 13–28

[5] Chen D, Pan Z, Liu J, Connell L (2013). An improved relative permeability model for coal reservoirs. Int J Coal Geol, 109–110: 45–57

[6] Chen S, Qin Y, Shen J, Wang G, Hou X (2014). Temperature-stress sensitivity of high-rank coal permeability. J China Coal Soc, 39(9): 1845–1851 (in Chinese)

[7] Cheng X, Luan H, Chen L, Jiang Y, Han W (2021). Numerical investigation on mechanical properties of in homogeneous coal under uniaxial compression and the role of cleat distribution.Bull Eng Geol Environ, 80(9): 7009–7027

[8] Clarkson C, Qanbari F (2016). A semi-analytical method for forecasting wells completed in low permeability, undersaturated CBM reservoirs.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 30(3): 19–27

[9] Fan L, Liu S (2019). Evaluation of permeability damage for stressed coal with cyclic loading: an experimental study.Int J Coal Geol, 216(9): 103338

[10] Feng Q, Jia H, Huang Z, Tian M, Li J, Li X (2018). Calculation model for water influx and controlled reserves for CBM wells with high water yield.Petrol Res, 3(3): 288–292

[11] Feng R, Chen S, Bryant S (2019). Investigation of anisotropic deformation and stress-dependent directional permeability of coalbed methane reservoirs.Rock Mech Rock Eng, 53(8): 625–639

[12] Fu X, Dai J, Feng J (2018). Prediction of tectonic fractures in coal reservoirs using geomechanical method.Geosci J, 22(4): 589–608

[13] Geng Y, Tang D, Xu H, Tao S, Tang S, Ma L, Zhu X (2017). Experimental study on permeability stress sensitivity of reconstituted granular coal with different lithotypes.Fuel, 202(8): 12–22

[14] Guo P, Cheng Y, Jin K, Li W, Tu Q, Liu H (2014). Impact of effective stress and matrix deformation on the coal fracture permeability.Transp Porous Media, 103(1): 99–115

[15] Han G, Ling K, Zhang H (2016). Smart de-watering and production system through real-time water level surveillance for coal-bed methane wells.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 31(4): 769–778

[16] Hou D, Zhang H, Li G (2015). Study of pressure propagation characteristics to determine stress sensitivity of low-permeability gas reservoir.Chem Technol Fuels Oils, 51(2): 181–189

[17] Huang Q, Fu X, Zhang Q, Li Y (2019). Experimental study on overburden pore permeability of medium and high rank coal reservoirs in Qinshui Basin. Coal Sci Techn, 47(6): 164–170 (in Chinese)

[18] Jasinge D, Ranjith P, Choi S (2011). Effects of effective stress changes on permeability of latrobe valley brown coal.Fuel, 90(3): 1292–1300

[19] Jia H, Sun S, Mao C, Wu Z, Lou T, Lou D (2017). Study on single-phase flow water production law of coalbed methane well based on coal and rock stress sensitivity. Coal Sci Techn, 45(12): 189–193 (in Chinese)

[20] Kong X, Wang E, Liu Q, Li Z, Li D, Cao Z, Niu Y (2017). Dynamic permeability and porosity evolution of coal seam rich in CBM based on the flow-solid coupling theory.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 40(4): 61–71

[21] Li B, Wei J, Wang K, Li P, Wang K (2014a). A method of determining the permeability coefficient of coal seam based on the permeability of loaded coal.Int J Min Sci Technol, 24(5): 637–641

[22] Li B, Zhu W, Liu Y, Ma Q, Zhang L, Yue M (2021). Experimental study and production model of multiscale stress sensitivity in tight oil reservoirs. Energy Sources A Recovery Util Environ Effects: 1–12

[23] Li S, Tang D, Pan Z, Xu H, Huang W (2013). Characterization of the stress sensitivity of pores for different rank coals by nuclear magnetic resonance.Fuel, 111(9): 746–754

[24] Li X, Fu X, Ranjith P, Xu J (2019). Stress sensitivity of medium- and high volatile bituminous coal: an experimental study based on nuclear magnetic resonance and permeability-porosity tests.J Petrol Sci Eng, 172(2): 889–910

[25] Li Y, Tang D, Xu H, Meng Y J, Li J (2014b). Experimental research on coal permeability: the roles of effective stress and gas slippage.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 21(11): 481–488

[26] Li Y, Yang J, Pan Z, Tong W (2020). Nanoscale pore structure and mechanical property analysis of coal: an insight combining AFM and SEM images.Fuel, 260(1): 116352

[27] Li Y, Zhang C, Tang D, Gan Q, Niu X, Wang K, Shen R (2017). Coal pore size distributions controlled by the coalification process: an experimental study of coals from the Junggar, Ordos and Qinshui basins in China.Fuel, 206(10): 352–363

[28] Lin Y, Qin Y, Ma D, Zhao J (2020). Experimental research on dynamic variation of permeability and porosity of low-rank inert-rich coal under stresses.ACS Omega, 5(43): 28124–28135

[29] Liu D, Zou Z, Cai Y, Qiu Y, Zhou Y, He S (2021). An updated study on CH₄ isothermal adsorption and isosteric adsorption heat behaviors of variable rank coals.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 89: 103899

[30] Liu H, Sang S, Xue J, Lan T, Xu H, Ren B, Liu S (2018b). Evolution and geochemical characteristics of gas phase fluid and its response to inter-well interference during multi-well drainage of coalbed methane.J Petrol Sci Eng, 162(3): 491–501

[31] Liu Q, Wang J, Liu J, Yang Q, Huang W, Liu Y, Wang L (2022). Determining diffusion coefficients of coal particles by solving the inverse problem based on the data of methane desorption measurements.Fuel, 308(1): 122045

[32] Liu Y, Li M, Yin G, Zhang D, Deng B (2018a). Permeability evolution of anthracite coal considering true triaxial stress conditions and structural anisotropy.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 52(4): 492–506

[33] Liu Z, Liu D, Cai Y, Yao Y, Pan Z, Zhou Y (2020). Application of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in coalbed methane and shale reservoirs: a review.Int J Coal Geol, 218: 103261

[34] McKee C, Bumb A, Koenig R (1988). Stress-dependent permeability and porosity of coal and other geologica formation.SPE Form Eval, 3(1): 81–91

[35] Meng Y, Li Z, Lai F (2015). Experimental study on porosity and permeability of anthracite coal under different stresses.J Petrol Sci Eng, 133(9): 810–817

[36] Meng Y, Tang D, Xu H, Qu Y, Li Y, Zhang W (2014). Division of coalbed methane desorption stages and its significance.Pet Explor Dev, 41(5): 612–617

[37] Meng Z P, Li G Q (2013). Experimental research on the permeability of high-rank coal under a varying stress and its influencing factors.Eng Geol, 162(7): 108–117

[38] Ni X, Tan X, Wang B, Fu X (2021). An evaluation method for types of low-production coalbed methane reservoirs and its application.Energy Rep, 7(11): 5305–5315

[39] Omotilewa O, Panja P, Vega-Ortiz C, McLennan J (2021). Evaluation of enhanced coalbed methane recovery and carbon dioxide sequestration potential in high volatile bituminous coal.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 91(7): 103979

[40] Palmer I, Mansoori J (1998). How permeability depends on stress and pore pressure in coalbeds: a new model.SPE Reservoir Eval Eng, 1(6): 539–544

[41] Reiss L (1980). The Reservoir Engineering Aspects of Fractured Formations. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company Book Division

[42] Seidle J, Jeansonne M, Erickson D (1992). Application of matchstick geometry to stress dependent permeability in coals. In: SPE rocky mountain regional meeting.Casper: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 433–438

[43] Shi J, Wu J, Zhang T, Sun Z, Jia Y, Fang Y, Li X (2019). Novel coalbed methane reservoir permeability and reserve evaluation method based on flowing material balance equation at dewatering stage. In: Proceedings of unconventional resources technology conference.Brisbane: URTeC, 1–16

[44] St. George J D, Barakat M A (2001). The change in effective stress associated with shrinkage from gas desorption in coal.Int J Coal Geol, 45(2): 105–113

[45] Su X, Feng Y, Chen J, Pan J (2001). The characteristics and origins of cleat in coal from western north China.Int J Coal Geol, 47(1): 51–62

[46] Su X, Wang Q, Lin H, Song J, Guo H (2018). A combined stimulation technology for coalbed methane wells: part 1 theory and technology.Fuel, 233(12): 592–603

[47] Sun F, Wang B, Li M, Liang H (2014). Major geological factors controlling the enrichment and high yield of coalbed methane in the southern Qinshui Basin. Acta Petrol Sin, 35(6): 1070–1079 (in Chinese)

[48] Sun Z, Wu K, Shi J, Li Y, Jin T, Li Q, Li X (2019). Novel prediction methods for under-saturated coalbed methane wells: effect of drainage schedules.J Petrol Sci Eng, 181(10): 106215

[49] Tang J, Zhu J, Shao T, Wang J, Jiang Y (2021). A coal permeability model with variable fracture compressibility considering triaxial strain condition.Nat Resour Res, 30(2): 1577–1595

[50] Tao S, Wang Y, Tang D, Xu H, Lv Y, He W, Li Y (2012). Dynamic variation effects of coal permeability during the coalbed methane development process in the Qinshui Basin, China.Int J Coal Geol, 93(1): 16–22

[51] Wang C, Zhang J, Chen J, Zhong R, Cui G, Jiang Y, Liu W, Chen Z (2021). Understanding competing effect between sorption swelling and mechanical compression on coal matrix deformation and its permeability.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 138(2): 104639

[52] Wang D, Lv R, Wei J, Fu Q, Wang Y, Zhang P, Yu C, Yao B (2019). An experimental study of seepage properties of gas-saturated coal under different loading conditions.Energy Sci Eng, 7(3): 799–808

[53] Xiao K, Zhang Z, Zhang R, Gao M, Xie J, Zhang A, Liu Y (2021). Anisotropy of the effective porosity and stress sensitivity of coal permeability considering natural fractures.Energy Rep, 7(11): 3898–3910

[54] Xu B, Li X, Ren W, Chen D, Chen L, Bai Y (2017). Dewatering rate optimization for coal-bed methane well based on the characteristics of pressure propagation.Fuel, 188(1): 11–18

[55] Yan Z, Wang K, Zang J, Wang C, Liu A (2019). Anisotropic coal permeability and its stress sensitivity.Int J Min Sci Technol, 29(3): 507–511

[56] Zhang C, Zhang N, Pan D, Qian D, An Y, Yuan Y, Xiang Z, Wang Y (2018). Experimental study on sensitivity of porosity to pressure and particle size in loose coal media.Enegies, 11(9): 2274–2293

[57] Zhang G, Ranjith P, Liang W, Haque A, Perera M, Li D (2019a). Stress-dependent fracture porosity and permeability of fractured coal: an in-situ X-ray tomography study.Int J Coal Geol, 213(9): 103279

[58] Zhang J, Wei C, Ju W, Yan G, Lu G, Hou X, Zheng K (2019b). Stress sensitivity characterization and heterogeneous variation of the pore fracture system in middle-high rank coals reservoir based on NMR experiments.Fuel, 238: 331–344

[59] Zhang X, Wu C, Wang Z (2019c). Experimental study of the effective stress coefficient for coal permeability with different water saturations.J Petrol Sci Eng, 182(9): 106282

[60] Zhang Y, He Y, Yang Z, Liu X (2010). Experimental research on stress sensitivity of coalbed reservoir. Natural Gas Geoscience, 21(3): 518–521 (in Chinese)

[61] Zhang Z, Zhang R, Wu S, Deng J, Zhang Z, Xie J (2019d). The stress sensitivity and porosity sensitivity of coal permeability at different depths: a case study in the Pingdingshan mining area.Rock Mech Rock Eng, 52(5): 1539–1563

[62] Zhang Z, Zhang R, Xie H, Gao M (2015). The relationships among stress, effective porosity and permeability of coal considering the distribution of natural fractures: theoretical and experimental analyses.Environ Earth Sci, 73(10): 5997–6007

[63] Zhao Y, Wang Z, Xin X (2018). Experiment and model research on the influence of effective stress on the coal permeability. Mining Res Develop, 38(6): 54–60 (in Chinese)

[64] Zhou D, Li K, Wang H, Jin Y, Ru Z, Xu X, Wu C, Jian K (2020). Permeability experiments with overburden pressure of coal measure reservoirs and numerical analysis of its stress sensitivity: a case study of Qinshui Basin, China.Energy Explor Exploit, 38(5): 1690–1705

[65] Zhu H, Tang X, Liu Q, Liu S, Zhang B, Jiang S, McLennan J D (2018). Permeability stress-sensitivity in 4D flow-geomechanical coupling of Shouyang CBM reservoir, Qinshui Basin, China.Fuel, 232(11): 817–832

[66] Zou C, Xue H, Xiong B, Zhang G, Pan S, Jia C, Wang Y, Ma F, Sun Q, Guan C, Lin M (2021). Connotation, innovation and vision of “carbon neutrality”.Nat Gas Indust B, 8(5): 523–537

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press