Reduction of the wind erosion potential in dried-up lakebeds using artificial biocrusts

Hossein KHEIRFAM, Maryam ROOHI

PDF(17181 KB)
PDF(17181 KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4) : 865-875. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-021-0951-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Reduction of the wind erosion potential in dried-up lakebeds using artificial biocrusts

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The artificial creation of biocrusts can be a rapid and pervasive solution to reduce wind erosion potential (WEP) in dried-up lakes (e.g., Lake Urmia). So, in this study, we created a biocrust by the inoculation of bacteria and cyanobacteria on trays filled by soils collected from the dried-up bed of Lake Urmia, Iran, to reduce WEP in laboratory conditions. We used the wind erodible fraction of soil (EF) and soil crust factor (SCF) equations to calculate the WEP of the treated soils. EF and SCF were decreased (p < 0.05) through applying the co-inoculation of bacteria and cyanobacteria by 5.6% and 10.57%, respectively, as compared to the control; also, the “cyanobacteria alone” inoculation decreased EF by 3.9%. Our results showed that the artificial biocrusts created by soil inoculation, especially with the co-using of bacteria and cyanobacteria, significantly reduced the WEP of a newly dried-up lakebed. Furthermore, we found that inoculation decreased the WEP of the study soil by increasing the soil organic matter content from 3.7 to 5 fold. According to scanning electron microscopy images, the inoculated microorganisms, especially cyanobacteria, improved soil aggregation by their exopolysaccharides and filaments; thus, they can be used with other factors to estimate the soil erodibility in well-developed biocrusts. The inoculation technique could be considered as a rapid strategy in stabilizing lakebeds against wind force. However, it should be confirmed after additional experiments using wind tunnels under natural conditions.

Keywords

biological soil crust / dried-up lakes / dust storms / flowing-sands / soil cyanobacteria

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hossein KHEIRFAM, Maryam ROOHI. Reduction of the wind erosion potential in dried-up lakebeds using artificial biocrusts. Front. Earth Sci., 2022, 16(4): 865‒875 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-021-0951-4

References

[1]
Ahmady-BirganiH, AgahiE, AhmadiS J, ErfanianM. ( 2018). Sediment source fingerprinting of the Lake Urmia sand dunes. Sci Rep, 8( 1): 206
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
AnsariS, FatmaT. ( 2016). Cyanobacterial polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB): screening, optimization and characterization. PLoS One, 11( 6): e0158168
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
AvecillaF, PanebiancoJ E, BuschiazzoD E. ( 2015). Variable effects of saltation and soil properties on wind erosion of different textured soils. Aeolian Res, 18: 145– 153
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
BelnapJ, WalkerB J, MunsonS M, GillR A. ( 2014). Controls on sediment production in two US deserts. Aeolian Res, 14: 15– 24
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
BelnapJ, WilcoxB P, Van ScoyocM W, PhillipsS L. ( 2013). Successional stage of biological soil crusts: an accurate indicator of ecohydrological condition. Ecohydrology, 6( 3): 474– 482
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
BorrelliP, BallabioC, PanagosP, MontanarellaL. ( 2014). Wind erosion susceptibility of European soils. Geoderma, 232-234: 471– 478
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
BorrelliP, PanagosP, BallabioC, LugatoE, WeynantsM, MontanarellaL. ( 2016). Towards a pan—European assessment of land susceptibility to wind erosion. Land Degrad Dev, 27( 4): 1093– 1105
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
BullardJ E, OckelfordA, StrongC L, AubaultH. ( 2018). Impact of multi-day rainfall events on surface roughness and physical crusting of very fine soils. Geoderma, 313: 181– 192
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
ChamizoS, MugnaiG, RossiF, CertiniG, De PhilippisR. ( 2018). Cyanobacteria inoculation improves soil stability and fertility on different textured soils: gaining insights for applicability in soil restoration. Front Environ Sci, 6: 49
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
ChepilW S. ( 1950). Properties of soil which influence wind erosion: I. the governing principle of surface roughness. Soil Sci, 69( 2): 149– 162
[11]
ChepilW S, WoodruffN P. ( 1954). Estimations of wind erodibility of field surfaces. J Soil Water Conserv, 9: 257– 265
[12]
ColazoJ C, BuschiazzoD E. ( 2010). Soil dry aggregate stability and wind erodible fraction in a semiarid environment of Argentina. Geoderma, 159( 1−2): 228– 236
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
CostaO Y A, RaaijmakersJ M, KuramaeE E. ( 2018). Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: ecological function and impact on soil aggregation. Front Microbiol, 9: 1636
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
CutlerN A, BelyeaL R, DugmoreA J. ( 2008). The spatiotemporal dynamics of a primary succession. J Ecol, 96( 2): 231– 246
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Danesh-YazdiM, Ataie-AshtianiB. ( 2019). Lake Urmia crisis and restoration plan: planning without appropriate data and model is gambling. J Hydrol (Amst), 576: 639– 651
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
de OroL A, ColazoJ C, AvecillaF, BuschiazzoD E, AsensioC. ( 2019). Relative soil water content as a factor for wind erodibility in soils with different texture and aggregation. Aeolian Res, 37: 25– 31
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
DuniwayM C, PfennigwerthA A, FickS E, NaumanT W, BelnapJ, BargerN N. ( 2019). Wind erosion and dust from US drylands: a review of causes, consequences, and solutions in a changing world. Ecosphere, 10( 3): e02650
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
FarebrotherW, HesseP P, ChangH C, JonesC. ( 2017). Dry lake beds as sources of dust in Australia during the Late Quaternary: a volumetric approach based on lake bed and deflated dune volumes. Quat Sci Rev, 161: 81– 98
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
FanB, ZhouY, MaQ, YuQ, ZhaoC, SunK. ( 2018). The bet-hedging strategies for seedling emergence of Calligonum mongolicum to adapt to the extreme desert environments in northwestern China. Front Plant Sci, 9: 1167
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
FryrearD W, BilbroJ D, SalehA, SchombergH, StoutJ E, ZobeckT M. ( 2000). RWEQ: improved wind erosion technology. J Soil Water Conserv, 55( 2): 183– 189
[21]
FryrearD W, KrammesC A, WilliamsonD L, ZobeckT M. ( 1994). Computing the wind erodible fraction of soils. J Soil Water Conserv, 49( 2): 183– 188
[22]
GaoL, BowkerM A, XuM, SunH, TuoD, ZhaoY. ( 2017). Biological soil crusts decrease erodibility by modifying inherent soil properties on the Loess Plateau, China. Soil Biol Biochem, 105: 49– 58
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
GarbevaP, TycO, Remus-EmsermannM N P, van der WalA, VosM, SilbyM, de BoerW. ( 2011). No apparent costs for facultative antibiotic production by the soil bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf0-1. PLoS One, 6( 11): e27266
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
GilletteD A, AdamsJ, EndoA, SmithD, KihlR. ( 1980). Threshold velocities for input of soil particles into the air by desert soils. J Geophys Res Oceans, 85( C10): 5621– 5630
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
JanssenP H, YatesP S, GrintonB E, TaylorP M, SaitM. ( 2002). Improved culturability of soil bacteria and isolation in pure culture of novel members of the divisions Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia. Appl Environ Microbiol, 68( 5): 2391– 2396
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
JiangC, ZhangH, ZhangZ, WangD. ( 2019). Model-based assessment soil loss by wind and water erosion in China’s Loess Plateau: dynamic change, conservation effectiveness, and strategies for sustainable restoration. Global Planet Change, 172: 396– 413
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
KheirfamH. ( 2020). Increasing soil potential for carbon sequestration using microbes from biological soil crusts. J Arid Environ, 172: 104022
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
KheirfamH RoohiM ( 2020). Accelerating the formation of biological soil crusts in the newly dried-up lakebeds using the inoculation-based technique. Sci. Total Environ, 706: 136036
[29]
KheirfamH, SadeghiS H R, HomaeeM, Zarei DarkiB. ( 2017a). Quality improvement of an erosion-prone soil through microbial enrichment. Soil Tillage Res, 165: 230– 238
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
KheirfamH, SadeghiS H R, Zarei DarkiB, HomaeeM. ( 2017b). Controlling rainfall-induced soil loss from small experimental plots through inoculation of bacteria and cyanobacteria. Catena, 152: 40– 46
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Le BissonnaisY. ( 2016). Aggregate stability and assessment of soil crustability and erodibility: I. theory and methodology. Eur J Soil Sci, 67( 1): 11– 21
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
LoeppertR H SuarezD L ( 1996) Carbonate and gypsum. In: Bigham JM, editor. Methods of soil analysis, part 3—chemical methods. Madiscon: American Society of Agronomy, 437− 474
[33]
LópezM V, deDios Herrero J M, HeviaG G, GraciaR, BuschiazzoD E. ( 2007). Determination of the wind-erodible fraction of soils using different methodologies. Geoderma, 139( 3−4): 407– 411
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
MahlmannD M, JahnkeJ, LoosenP. ( 2008). Rapid determination of the dry weight of single, living cyanobacterial cells using the Mach-Zehnder double-beam interference microscope. Eur J Phycol, 43( 4): 355– 364
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
MagerD M, ThomasA D. ( 2011). Extracellular polysaccharides from cyanobacterial soil crusts: a review of their role in dryland soil processes. J Arid Environ, 75( 2): 91– 97
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
MalekiM, EbrahimiS, AsadzadehF, Emami TabriziM. ( 2016). Performance of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation on wind erosion control of sandy soil. Int J Environ Sci Technol, 13( 3): 937– 944
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
MugnaiG, RossiF, FeldeVincent J M N L, ColesieC, BüdelB, PethS, KaplanA, DePhilippis R. ( 2018). The potential of the cyanobacterium Leptolyngbya ohadii as inoculum for stabilizing bare sandy substrates. Soil Biol Biochem, 127: 318– 328
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Muñoz-RojasM, RománJ R, Roncero-RamosB, EricksonT E, MerrittD J, Aguila-CarricondoP, CantónY. ( 2018). Cyanobacteria inoculation enhances carbon sequestration in soil substrates used in dryland restoration. Sci Total Environ, 636: 1149– 1154
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
NaikS N, GoudV V, RoutP K, DalaiA K. ( 2010). Production of first and second generation biofuels: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 14( 2): 578– 597
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
PásztorL, NégyesiG, LaborcziA, KovácsT, LászlóE, BihariZ. ( 2016). Integrated spatial assessment of wind erosion risk in Hungary. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 16( 11): 2421– 2432
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Roncero-RamosB, RománJ R, Gómez-SerranoC, CantónY, AciénF G. ( 2019). Production of a biocrust-cyanobacteria strain (Nostoc commune) for large-scale restoration of dryland soils. J Appl Phycol, 31( 4): 2217– 2230
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
RossiF, De PhilippisR. ( 2015). Role of cyanobacterial exopolysaccharides in phototrophic biofilms and in complex microbial mats. Life (Basel), 5( 2): 1218– 1238
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
RossiF, OlguínE J, DielsL, DePhilippis R. ( 2015). Microbial fixation of CO2 in water bodies and in drylands to combat climate change, soil loss and desertification. N Biotechnol, 32( 1): 109– 120
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
RozensteinO, ZaadyE, KatraI, KarnieliA, AdamowskiJ, YizhaqH. ( 2014). The effect of sand grain size on the development of cyanobacterial biocrusts. Aeolian Res, 15: 217– 226
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
SadeghiS H R, KheirfamH, HomaeeM, Zarei DarkiB, VafakhahM. ( 2017). Improving runoff behavior resulting from direct inoculation of soil micro-organisms. Soil Tillage Res, 171: 35– 41
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
SequeiraC H, AlleyM M. ( 2011). Soil organic matter fractions as indices of soil quality changes. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 75( 5): 1766– 1773
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
ShahabinejadN, MahmoodabadiM, JalalianA, ChavoshiE. ( 2019). The fractionation of soil aggregates associated with primary particles influencing wind erosion rates in arid to semiarid environments. Geoderma, 356: 113936
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
StuartR K, MayaliX, LeeJ Z, Craig EverroadR, HwangM, BeboutB M, WeberP K, Pett-RidgeJ, ThelenM P. ( 2016). Cyanobacterial reuse of extracellular organic carbon in microbial mats. ISME J, 10( 5): 1240– 1251
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
VacekZ, ŘeháčekD, CukorJ, VacekS, KhelT, SharmaR P, KučeraJ, KrálJ, PapajV. ( 2018). Windbreak efficiency in agricultural landscape of the central Europe: Multiple approaches to wind erosion control. Environ Manage, 62( 5): 942– 954
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
WalkleyA, BlackI A. ( 1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci, 37( 1): 29– 38
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
WangW B, LiuY D, LiD H, HuC X, RaoB Q. ( 2009). Feasibility of cyanobacterial inoculation for biological soil crusts formation in desert area. Soil Biol Biochem, 41( 5): 926– 929
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
WhitneyJ W, BreitG N, BuckinghamS E, ReynoldsR L, BogleR C, LuoL, GoldsteinH L, VogelJ M. ( 2015). Aeolian responses to climate variability during the past century on Mesquite Lake Playa, Mojave Desert. Geomorphology, 230: 13– 25
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
WhittonB A PottsM ( 2012). Introduction to the cyanobacteria. In: Whitton B A, ed. Ecology of Cyanobacteria II. Berlin: Springer, 1− 13
[54]
PagliaiM StoopsG ( 2010). Physical and biological surface crusts and seals. In: Stoops G, Marcelino V, Mees F, eds. Interpretation of Micromorphological Features of Soils and Regoliths. New York: Elsevier, 419− 440
[55]
YanY, WangX, GuoZ, ChenJ, XinX, XuD, YanR, ChenB, XuL. ( 2018). Influence of wind erosion on dry aggregate size distribution and nutrients in three steppe soils in northern China. Catena, 170: 159– 168
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
ZeinoddiniM, TofighiM A, VafaeeF. ( 2009). Evaluation of dike-type causeway impacts on the flow and salinity regimes in Urmia Lake, Iran. J Great Lakes Res, 35( 1): 13– 22
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
ZouX, LiJ, ChengH, WangJ, ZhangC, KangL, LiuW, ZhangF. ( 2018). Spatial variation of topsoil features in soil wind erosion areas of northern China. Catena, 167: 429– 439
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Urmia Lake Research Institute, Urmia University, Iran (No. 98/A/001), whose valuable assistance is greatly appreciated.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(17181 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/