Biogenic gas generation effects on anthracite molecular structure and pore structure
Aikuan WANG, Pei SHAO, Qinghui WANG
Biogenic gas generation effects on anthracite molecular structure and pore structure
This study carries out a simulated experiment of biogenic gas generation and studies the effects of gas generation on the pore structure and molecular structure of anthracite by mercury intrusion porosimetry, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). The results show that methanogenic bacteria can produce biogenic gas from anthracite. CO2 and CH4 are the main components of the generated biogas. After generation, some micropores (<10 nm) and transitional pores (10–100 nm) in the coal samples transform into large pores. In the high-pressure stage (pressure>100 MPa) of the mercury intrusion test, the specific surface area decreases by 19.79% compared with that of raw coal, and the pore volume increases by 7.25% in total. Microbial action on the molecular structure causes changes in the pore reconstruction. The FT-IR data show that the side chains and hydroxyl groups of the coal molecular structure in coal are easily metabolized by methanogenic bacteria and partially oxidized to form carboxylic acids. In addition, based on the XRD data, the aromatic lamellar structure in the coal is changed by microorganisms; it decreases in lateral size (La) and stacking thickness (Lc). This study enriches the theory of biogenic coalbed gas generation and provides a pathway for enhancing the permeability of high-rank coal reservoirs.
biogenic gas / anthracite / pore structure / molecular structure
[1] |
Beckmann S, Krüger M, Engelen B, Gorbushina A A, Cypionka H (2011). Role of Bacteria, Archaea and Fungi involved in methane release in abandoned coalmines. Geomicrobiol J, 28(4): 347–358
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Chakhmakhchev A (2007). Worldwide coalbed methane overview, In: SPE hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium, SPE. Soc Petrol Eng, 17–23
|
[3] |
Chen S, Tang D, Tao S, Xu H, Li S, Zhao J, Cui Y, Li Z (2018a). Characteristics of in-situ stress distribution and its significance on the coalbed methane (CBM) development in Fanzhuang-Zhengzhuang Block, Southern Qinshui Basin, China. J Petrol Sci Eng, 161: 108–120
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Chen Y L, Qin Y, Wei C T, Huang L L, Shi Q M, Wu C F, Zhang X Y (2018b). Porosity changes in progressively pulverized anthracite subsamples: implications for the study of closed pore distribution in coals. Fuel, 225: 612–622
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Ritter D, Vinson DBarnhart E, Akob D, Fields M, Cunningham F, Orem W, McIntosh J (2015). Enhanced microbial coalbed methane generation: a review of research, commercial activity, and remaining challenges. Int J Coal Geol, 146: 28–41
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Faiz M, Stalker L, Sherwood N, Saghafi A, Wold M, Barclay S, Choudhury J, Barker W, Wang I (2003). Bio-enhancement of coal bed methane resources in the southern Sydney Basin. APPEA J, 43(1): 595–610
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Fu X H, Zhang X D, Wei C T (2021). Review of research on testing, simulation and prediction of coal bed methane content. J China U Min Techn, 50(1): 13–31 (in Chinese)
|
[8] |
Fu H, Yan D, Yang S, Wang X, Zhang Z, Sun M (2020). Characteristics of in situ stress and its influence on coalbed methane development: a case study in the eastern part of the southern Junggar Basin, NW China. Energy Sci Eng, 8(2): 515–529
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Gao L, Brassell S C, Mastalerz M, Schimmelmann A (2013). Microbial degradation of sedimentary organic matter associated with shale gas and coalbed methane in eastern Illinois Basin (Indiana), USA. Int J Coal Geol, 107: 152–164
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Green M S, Flanegan K C, Gilcrease P C (2008). Characterization of a methanogenic consortium enriched from a coalbed methane well in the Powder River Basin, USA. Int J Coal Geol, 76(1–2): 34–45
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Guo Y T, Bustin M R (1998). Micro-FTIR spectroscopy of liptinite macerals in coal. Int J Coal Geol, 36(3–4): 259–275
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Haider R, Ghauri M A, SanFilipo J R, Jones E J, Orem W H, Tatu C A, Akhtar K, Akhtar N (2013). Fungal degradation of coal as a pretreatment for methane production. Fuel, 104: 717–725
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Ibarra J V, Moliner R, Bonet A J (1994). FT-IR investigation on char formation during the early stages of coal pyrolysis. Fuel, 73(6): 918–924
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Jones E J P, Voytek M A, Corum M D, Orem W H (2010). Stimulation of methane generation from nonproductive coal by addition of nutrients or a microbial consortium. Appl Environ Microbiol, 76(21): 7013–7022
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Li Y H, Lu G Q, Rudolph V (1999). Compressibility and fractal dimension of fine coal particles in relation to pore structure characterisation using mercury porosimetry. Part Part Syst Charact, 16(1): 25–31
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Liu A H, Fu X H, Luo B, Luo P, Jiao C (2013). Comprehensive analysis of CBM recovery inLhigh rank coal reservoir of Jincheng area. Int J Min Sci Technol, 23(3): 447–452
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Liu Y, Zhu Y, Liu S, Chen S, Li W, Wang Y (2018). Molecular structure controls on micropore evolution in coal vitrinite during coalification. Int J Coal Geol, 199: 19–30
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Miyazaki S (2005). Coalbed methane growing rapidly as Australia gas supply diversifies. Oil Gas J, 103(28): 32–36
|
[19] |
Opara A, Adams D J, Free M L, McLennan J, Hamilton J (2012). Microbial production of methane and carbon dioxide from lignite, bituminous coal, and coal waste materials. Int J Coal Geol, 96–97: 1–8
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Penner T J, Foght J M, Budwill K (2010). Microbial diversity of western Canadian subsurface coal beds and methanogenic coal enrichment cultures. Int J Coal Geol, 82(1–2): 81–93
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Qin Y, Moore T A, Shen J, Yang Z B, Shen Y L, Wang G (2018). Resources and geology of coalbed methane in China: a review. Int Geol Rev, 60(5–6): 777–812
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Shao P, Wang A, Wang W F (2018). Experimental simulation of biogenic coalbed gas generation from lignite and high-volatile bituminous coals. Fuel, 219: 111–119
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Strąpoć D, Mastalerz M, Dawson K, Macalady J, Callaghan A V, Wawrik B, Turich C, Ashby M (2011). Biogeochemistry of microbial coal-bed methane. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci, 39(1): 617–656
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Wang A K, Shao P (2019). Generation processes and geochemical analysis of simulated biogenic coalbed methane from lignite. Geochem Int, 57(12): 1295–1305
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Wang B, Tai C, Wu L, Chen L, Liu J, Hu B, Song D (2017). Methane production from lignite through the combined effects of exogenous aerobic and anaerobic microflora. Int J Coal Geol, 173: 84–93
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Warwick P D, Breland F C Jr, Hackley P C (2008). Biogenic origin of coalbed gas in the northern Gulf of Mexico Coastal Plain, USA. Int J Coal Geol, 76(1–2): 119–137
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Xia D P, Guo H Y, Ma J Q, Si Q, Su X B (2014). Impact of biogenic methane metabolism on pore structure of coals. Nat Gas Geosci, 25(07): 1097–1102 (in Chinese)
|
[28] |
Yao Y, Liu D, Qiu Y (2013). Variable gas content, saturation, and accumulation characteristics of Weibei coalbed methane pilot-production field in the southeastern Ordos Basin, China. AAPG Bull, 97(8): 1371–1393
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Yoon S P, Jeon J Y, Lim H S (2016). Stimulation of biogenic methane generation from lignite through supplying an external substrate. Int J Coal Geol, 162: 39–44
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Yun J, Xu F Y, Liu L, Zhong N N, Wu X B (2012). New progress and future prospects of CBM exploration and development in China. Int J Min Sci Technol, 22(3): 363–369
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Zheng Q R, Zeng F G, Zhang S T (2011). FT-IR study on structure evolution of middle maturate coals. Journal of China Coal Society, 36(03): 481–486 (in Chinese)
|
/
〈 | 〉 |