Damage characterization of shale under uniaxial compression by acoustic emission monitoring

Abstract

Understanding the damage behavior and cracking mechanism of brittle shale is crucial for hydraulic fracturing design. In this research, uniaxial compression tests are conducted on shale samples with different bedding plane orientations, and acoustic emission monitoring is implemented synchronously. The results indicate that the apparent elastic modulus increases with increasing bedding orientation. For the bedding orientations of 45° and 90°, the lateral deformation is anisotropic due to the bedding structure, revealing the anisotropic Poisson effect. A shear failure surface and tensile failure surfaces form parallel to the bedding plane for bedding orientations of 45° and 90°, respectively. For the bedding orientation of 0°, shear failure mainly occurs through the bedding planes. Additionally, the damage mechanism of shale is investigated by crack classification based on AE parameters. It is found that crack initiation is induced by the generation of shear cracks for the bedding orientation of 45°, whereas by the generation of tensile cracks for other bedding orientations. According to damage attributable to different type cracks, shear cracks dominate the damage behavior for bedding orientations of 0° and 45°, whereas tensile cracks dominate the damage behavior for bedding orientation of 90°. Finally, the information entropy is calculated by AE energy. A low value of information entropy, approximately 0.36, predicts failure with a low degree of instability for the bedding orientation of 0°, whereas a high value of information entropy, more than 1.5, predicts failure with a high degree of instability for other bedding orientations. This finding indicates that the failure behavior is gradual progressive damage for bedding orientation of 0°, whereas sudden damage dominates failure behavior for other bedding orientations.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

shale / damage characterization / uniaxial compression / acoustic emission

References

[1] Amadei B (1996). Importance of anisotropy when estimating and measuring in situ stresses in rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, 33(3): 293–325

[2] Du K, Li X, Tao M, Wang S (2020). Experimental study on acoustic emission (AE) characteristics and crack classification during rock fracture in several basic lab tests. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 133: 104411

[3] Hakala M, Kuula H, Hudson J A (2007). Estimating the transversely isotropic elastic intact rock properties for in situ stress measurement data reduction: a case study of the Olkiluoto mica gneiss, Finland. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 44(1): 14–46

[4] Heng S, Guo Y, Yang C, Daemen J J K, Li Z (2015). Experimental and theoretical study of the anisotropic properties of shale. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 74: 58–68

[5] Hou P, Gao F, Yang Y G, Zhang X X, Zhang Z Z (2016). Effect of the layer orientation on mechanics and energy evolution characteristics of shales under uniaxial loading. Int J Min Sci Technol, 26(5): 857–862

[6] Hu X, Su G, Chen G, Mei S, Feng X, Mei G, Huang X (2019). Experiment on rockburst process of borehole and its acoustic emission characteristics. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 52(3): 783–802

[7] Jaeger J C (1960). shear failure of anisotropic rock. Geol Mag, 97(1): 65–72

[8] Jarvie D M, Hill R J, Ruble T E, Pollastro R M (2007). Unconventional shale-gas systems: the Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as on model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment. AAPG Bull, 91(4): 475–499

[9] JCMS-Ⅲ B5706 (2003). Monitoring method for active cracks in concrete by acoustic emission. Japan: Federation of Construction Materials Industries

[10] Jia Z Q, Xie H P, Zhang R, Li C B, Wang M, Gao M, Zhang Z, Zhang Z (2020). Acoustic emission characteristics and damage evolution of coal at different depths under triaxial compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 53(5): 2063–2076

[11] Johnston J E, Christensen N I (1995). Seismic anisotropy of shales. J Geophys Res Solid Earth, 100(B4): 5991–6003

[12] Kim H, Cho J W, Song I, Min K B (2012). Anisotropy of elastic moduli, P-wave velocities, and thermal conductivities of Asan Gneiss, Boryeong Shale, and Yeoncheon Schist in Korea. Eng Geol, 147–148: 68–77

[13] Li X Y, Lei X L, Li Q, Li X C (2017). Experimental investigation of Sinian shale rock under triaxial stress monitored by ultrasonic transmission and acoustic emission. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 43: 110–123

[14] Nataf G F, Castillo-Villa P O, Baró J, Illa X, Vives E, Planes A, Salje E K H (2014). Avalanches in compressed porous SiO₂-based materials. Physical Review E, 90(2): 022405

[15] Niandou H, Shao J F, Henry J P, Fourmaintraux D (1997). Laboratory investigation of the mechanical behaviour of Tournemire shale. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 34(1): 3–16

[16] O’Brien N, Slatt R M (2012). Argillaceous Rock Atlas. New York: Springer Science & Business Media

[17] Ohno K, Ohtsu M (2010). Crack classification in concrete based on acoustic emission. Constr Build Mater, 24(12): 2339–2346

[18] Ohtsu M, Okamoto T, Yuyama S (1998). Moment tensor analysis of Acoustic Emission for cracking mechanisms in concrete. ACI Struct J, 95: 87–95

[19] Rybacki E, Meier T, Dresen G (2016). What controls the mechanical properties of shale rocks? – Part II: brittleness. J Petrol Sci Eng, 144: 39–58

[20] Rybacki E, Reinicke A, Meier T, Makasi M, Dresen G (2015). What controls the mechanical properties of shale rocks? — Part I: strength and Young’s modulus. J Petrol Sci Eng, 135: 702–722

[21] Sethna J P, Dahmen K A, Myers C R (2001). Crackling noise. Nature, 410(6825): 242–250

[22] Shannon C E (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J, 27(3): 379–423

[23] Sheng M, Tian S, Li G, Ge H, Liao H, Li Z (2017). Shale rock fragmentation behaviors and their mechanics by high pressure waterjet impinging. Sci Sin Phy Mech & Astro, 47(11): 114610

[24] Simpson N D J, Stroisz A, Bauer A, Vervoort A, Holt R M (2014). Failure mechanics of anisotropic shale during Brazilian tests. American Rock Mech Assoc, 14–7399

[25] Tian Y, Yu R G, Zhang Y, Zhao X B (2020). Application of acoustic emission characteristics in damage identification and quantitative evaluation of limestone. Adv Eng Sci, 52(3): 115–122 (in Chinese)

[26] Wang J, Xie L Z, Xie H P, Ren L, He B, Li C B, Yang Z P, Gao C (2016). Effect of layer orientation on acoustic emission characteristics of anisotropic shale in Brazilian tests. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 36: 1120–1129

[27] Worotnicki G (1993). CSIRO triaxial stress measurement cell. In: Hudson J A, ed. Rock Testing and Site Characterization: Principles, Practice and Projects. Oxford: 329–394

[28] Wu S, Ge H K, Wang X Q, Meng F B (2017). Shale failure processes and spatial distribution of fractures obtained by AE monitoring. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 41: 82–92

[29] Yang S Q, Yin P F, Huang Y H (2019). Experiment and discrete element modelling on strength, deformation and failure behaviour of shale under Brazilian Compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 52(11): 4339–4359

[30] Yuan X P, Liu H Y, Wang Z Q (2012). An interacting crack-mechanics based model for elastoplastic damage model of brittle materials under compression. Chinese Solid Mech, 33(6):592–602

[31] Zhu Z Q, Zeng Y W (2005). Study on uniaxial compressive strength and shear failure surface of layered rock mass. Geotechnical Engineering World, 8(4): 27–29

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press