Sensitivity of Typhoon Lingling (2019) simulations to horizontal mixing length and planetary boundary layer parameterizations

Siqi CHEN , Feng XU , Yu ZHANG , Guiling YE , Jianjun XU , Chunlei LIU

Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2) : 304 -322.

PDF (10971KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2) : 304 -322. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-021-0890-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Sensitivity of Typhoon Lingling (2019) simulations to horizontal mixing length and planetary boundary layer parameterizations

Author information +
History +
PDF (10971KB)

Abstract

Forecasting the intensity of typhoons is a difficult problem in numerical weather prediction. It is subject to many factors, among which the selection of physical parameterization schemes for the model is a hot topic of research. In this study, the effects of horizontal mixing length (represented by h_diff) and planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes were investigated. Six idealized and four operational sensitivity experiments were designed based on simulation of the typhoon Lingling, which occurred over the western Pacific in 2019, using the Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting model. The results of the idealized experiments showed that, as h_diff was increased, the slope of the typhoon eye area also increased, and its intensity became stronger. On the other hand, the results of the sensitivity experiments indicated that the intensity of the simulated typhoon was sensitive to the choice of PBL scheme, with the forecast bias of the QNSE (Quasi-Normal Scale Elimination) scheme being smaller than that of the GFDL (Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory) scheme. Angular momentum budget analyses indicated that, when increasing the h_diff, the convergence of angular momentum was larger in the boundary layer, which led to a faster spin-up of the vortex, further increasing the intensity of the typhoon. From the calculated horizontal and vertical vortex spread it was found that, when the h_diff was increased, the corresponding horizontal and vertical diffusion eddies also showed an increasing trend, which was also the reason for the strengthening of the typhoon. Meanwhile, the forecast bias decreased significantly with increasing horizontal mixing length when using the same PBL scheme.

Keywords

Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting model / planetary boundary layer / western Pacific / typhoon / horizontal diffusion

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Siqi CHEN, Feng XU, Yu ZHANG, Guiling YE, Jianjun XU, Chunlei LIU. Sensitivity of Typhoon Lingling (2019) simulations to horizontal mixing length and planetary boundary layer parameterizations. Front. Earth Sci., 2022, 16(2): 304-322 DOI:10.1007/s11707-021-0890-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Bell M M, Montgomery M T, Emanuel K A (2012). Air–sea enthalpy and momentum exchange at major hurricane wind speeds observed during CBLAST. J Atmospheric Sci, 69: 3197–3222

[2]

Biswas M K, Coauthors (2018). 2018: Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (HWRF) Model: 2018. Scientific Documentation

[3]

Braun S A, Tao W K (2000). Sensitivity of high-resolution simulations of Hurricane Bob (1991) to planetary boundary layer parameterizations. Mon Weather Rev, 128(12): 3941–3961

[4]

Bryan G H (2012). Effects of surface exchange coefficients and turbulence length scales on the intensity and structure of numerically simulated hurricanes. Mon Weather Rev, 140(4): 1125–1143

[5]

National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce (2015). NCEP GFS 0.25 Degree Global Forecast Grids Historical Archive

[6]

Emanuel K A (1995). Sensitivity of tropical cyclones to surface exchange coefficients and a revised steady-state model incorporating eye dynamics. J Atmos Sci, 52(22): 3969–3976

[7]

Emanuel K A (1997). Some aspects of hurricane inner-core dynamics and energetics. J Atmos Sci, 54(8): 1014–1026

[8]

Emanuel K A (1986). An air–sea interaction theory for tropical cyclones. Part I: steady-state maintenance. J Atmos Sci, 43(6): 585–605

[9]

Gelaro R, McCarty W, Suárez M J, Todling R, Molod A, Takacs L, Randles C, Darmenov A, Bosilovich M G, Reichle R, Wargan K, Coy L, Cullather R, Draper C, Akella S, Buchard V, Conaty A, da Silva A, Gu W, Kim G K, Koster R, Lucchesi R, Merkova D, Nielsen J E, Partyka G, Pawson S, Putman W, Rienecker M, Schubert S D, Sienkiewicz M, Zhao B (2017). The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2). J Clim, 30(14): 5419–5454

[10]

Gray W M, Ruprecht E, Phelps R (1975). Relative humidity in tropical weather systems. Mon Weather Rev, 103(8): 685–690

[11]

Green B W, Zhang F (2014). Sensitivity of tropical cyclone simulations to parametric uncertainties in air–sea fluxes and implications for parameter estimation. Mon Weather Rev, 142(6): 2290–2308

[12]

Hariprasad K B R R, Srinivas C V, Singh A B, Vijaya Bhaskara Rao S, Baskaran R, Venkatraman B (2014). Numerical simulation and intercomparison of boundary layer structure with different PBL schemes in WRF using experimental observations at a tropical site. Atmos Res, 145–146: 27–44

[13]

Janjić Z I (1990). The step-mountain coordinate: physical package. Mon Weather Rev, 118(7): 1429–1443

[14]

Kilroy G, Smith R K, Montgomery M T (2016). Why do model tropical cyclones grow progressively in size and decay in intensity after reaching maturity? J Atmos Sci, 73(2): 487–503

[15]

Knapp K R, Kruk M C, Levinson D H, Diamond H J, Neumann C J (2010). The international best track archive for climate stewardship (IBTrACS). Bull Am Meteorol Soc, 91(3): 363–376

[16]

Ma Z, Fei J, Huang X, Cheng X (2018). Sensitivity of the simulated tropical cyclone intensification to the boundary-layer height based on a K-profile boundary-layer parameterization scheme. J Adv Model Earth Syst, 10(11): 2912–2932

[17]

Ma Z, Fei J, Lin Y, Huang X (2020).Modulation of clouds and rainfall by tropical cyclone’s cold wakes. Geophys Res Lett, 47: e2020GL-088873

[18]

Malkus J S, Riehl H (1960). On the dynamics and energy transformations in steady-state hurricanes. Tellus, 12(1): 1–20

[19]

Nolan D S, Stern D P, Zhang J A (2009). Evaluation of planetary boundary layer parameterizations in tropical cyclones by comparison of in situ observations and high-resolution simulations of hurricane Isabel (2003). Part II: inner-core boundary layer and eyewall structure. Mon Weather Rev, 137(11): 3675–3698

[20]

Ooyama K (1969). Numerical simulation of the life cycle of tropical cyclones. J Atmos Sci, 26(1): 3–40

[21]

Persing J, Montgomery M T (2003). Hurricane superintensity. J Atmos Sci, 60(19): 2349–2371

[22]

Rajeswari J R, Srinivas C V, Rao T N, Venkatraman B (2020). Impact of land surface physics on the simulation of boundary layer characteristics at a tropical coastal station. Atmospheric Res, 238: 104888

[23]

Rosenthal S L (1971). The response of a tropical cyclone model to variations in boundary layer parameters, initial conditions, lateral boundary conditions, and domain size. Mon Weather Rev, 99(10): 767–777

[24]

Rotunno R, Bryan G H (2012). Effects of parameterized diffusion on simulated hurricanes. J Atmos Sci, 69(7): 2284–2299

[25]

Rotunno R, Chen Y, Wang W, Davis C, Dudhia J, Holland G J (2009). Large-eddy simulation of an idealized tropical cyclone. Bull Am Meteorol Soc, 90(12): 1783–1788

[26]

Smith R K, Montgomery M T, Van Sang N(2009). Tropical cyclone spin-up revisited. Q J R Meteorol Soc, 135(642): 1321–1335

[27]

Stevens B, Moeng C H, Sullivan P P (1999). Large-eddy simulations of radiatively driven convection: sensitivities to the representation of small scales. J Atmos Sci, 56(23): 3963–3984

[28]

Tang J, Zhang J A, Aberson S D, Marks F D, Lei X (2018a). Multilevel tower observations of vertical eddy diffusivity and mixing length in the tropical cyclone boundary layer during landfalls. J Atmos Sci, 75(9): 3159–3168

[29]

Tang J, Zhang J A, Kieu C, Marks F D (2018b). Sensitivity of hurricane intensity and structure to two types of planetary boundary layer parameterization schemes in idealized HWRF simulations. Trop Cyclone Res Rev, 7: 201–211

[30]

Wang Y (1995). An inverse balance equation in sigma coordinates for model initialization. Mon Weather Rev, 123(2): 482–488

[31]

Xue M, Schleif J, Kong F, Thomas K W, Wang Y, Zhu K (2013). Track and intensity forecasting of hurricanes: impact of convection-permitting resolution and global ensemble Kalman filter analysis on 2010 Atlantic season forecasts. Weather Forecast, 28(6): 1366–1384

[32]

Zhang J A, Montgomery M T (2012). Observational estimates of the horizontal eddy diffusivity and mixing length in the low-level region of intense hurricanes. J Atmos Sci, 69(4): 1306–1316

[33]

Zhang J A, Uhlhorn E W (2012). Hurricane sea surface inflow angle and an observation-based parametric model. Mon Weather Rev, 140(11): 3587–3605

[34]

Zhang J A, Marks F D (2015). Effects of horizontal diffusion on tropical cyclone intensity change and structure in idealized three-dimensional numerical simulations. Mon Weather Rev, 143(10): 3981–3995

[35]

Zhang J A, Marks F D, Sippel J A, Rogers R F, Zhang X, Gopalakrishnan S G, Zhang Z, Tallapragada V (2018). Evaluating the impact of improvement in the horizontal diffusion parameterization on hurricane prediction in the operational hurricane weather research and forecast (HWRF) Model. Weather Forecast, 33(1): 317–329

[36]

Zhang J A, Kalina E A, Biswas M K, Rogers R F, Zhu P, Marks F D (2020). A review and evaluation of planetary boundary layer parameterizations in hurricane weather research and forecasting model using idealized simulations and observations. Atmosphere, 11(10): 1091

[37]

Zhang Y, Xie Y, Wang H, Chen D, Toth Z (2016). Ensemble transform sensitivity method for adaptive observations. Adv Atmos Sci, 33(1): 10–20

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (10971KB)

822

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/