A quantitative study of the scale and distribution of tight gas reservoirs in the Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin, northwest China

Abstract

Gas and water distribution is discontinuous in tight gas reservoirs, and a quantitative understanding of the factors controlling the scale and distribution of effective reservoirs is important for natural gas exploration. We used geological and geophysical explanation results, dynamic and static well test data, interference well test and static pressure test to calculate the distribution and characteristics of tight gas reservoirs in the H₈ Member of the Shihezi Formation, Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin, northwest China. Our evaluation system examines the scale, physical properties, gas-bearing properties, and other reservoir features, and results in classification of effective reservoirs into types I, II, and III that differ greatly in size, porosity, permeability, and saturation. The average thickness, length, and width of type I effective reservoirs are 2.89, 808, and 598 m, respectively, and the porosity is>10.0%, permeability is>10 × 10^–3µm², and average gas saturation is>60%. Compared with conventional gas reservoirs, tight gas effective reservoirs are small-scale and have low gas saturation. Our results show that the scale of the sedimentary system controls the size of the dominant microfacies in which tight gas effective reservoirs form. The presence of different types of interbeds hinders the connectivity of effective sand body reservoirs. The gas source conditions and pore characteristics of the reservoirs control sand body gas filling and reservoir formation. The physical properties and structural nature of the reservoirs control gas–water separation and the gas contents of effective reservoirs. The results are beneficial for the understanding of gas reservoir distribution in the whole Ordos Basin and other similar basins worldwide.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

tight gas / sandbody scale / effective sand reservoir / Ordos Basin

References

[1] Abdulrauf R A, Lamidi B, Syed R H, Abdullah A, Rahul S B (2019). Insight into the pore characteristics of a Saudi Arabian tight gas sand reservoir. Energies, 12(22): 1–27

[2] Abuamarah B A, Nabawy B S, Shehata A M, Kassem O M K, Ghrefat H (2019). Integrated geological and petrophysical characterization of oligocene deep marine unconventional poor to tight sandstone gas reservoir. Mar Pet Geol, 109: 868–885

[3] Amiri M, Yunan M H, Zahedi G, Jaafar M Z, Oyinloye E O (2012). Introducing new method to improve log derived saturation estimation in tight shaly sandstones—a case study from Mesaverde tight gas reservoir. J Petrol Sci Eng, 92–93: 132–142

[4] Behmanesh H, Hamdi H, Clarkson C R (2015). Production data analysis of tight gas condensate reservoirs. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 22: 22–34

[5] Bersezio R, Giudici M, Mele M (2007). Combining sedimentological and geophysical data for high-resolution 3-D mapping of fluvial architectural elements in the Quaternary Po plain (Italy). Sediment Geol, 202(1–2): 230–248

[6] Best J, Woodward J, Ashworth P, Smith G S, Simpson C (2006). Bar-top hollow: a new element in the architecture of sandy braided rivers. Sediment Geol, 190(1-4): 241–255

[7] Bjørlykke K (2014). Relationships between depositional environments, burial history and rock properties—some principal aspects of diagenetic process in sedimentary basins. Sediment Geol, 301: 1–14

[8] Bridge J S (1993). The interaction between channel geometry, water flow, sediment transport and deposition in braided rivers. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 75(1):1–71

[9] Bridge J S, Tye R S (2000). Interpreting the dimensions of ancient fluvial channel bars, channels, and channel belts from wireline-logs and cores. AAPG Bull, 84: 1205–1228

[10] Chen P, Tan X, Yang H, Tang M, Jiang Y, Jin X, Yu Y (2015). Characteristics and genesis of the Feixianguan Formation oolitic shoal reservoir, Puguang gas field, Sichuan Basin, China. Front Earth Sci, 9(1): 26–36

[11] Daniel A, Viktor R (2015). Investigation on fluid transport properties in the North-German Rotliegend tight gas sandstones and applications. Environ Earth Sci, 15: 4322–4331

[12] Davy C A, Skoczylas F, Barnichon J D, Lebon P (2007). Permeability of macro-cracked argillite under confinement: gas and water testing. Phys Chem Earth, 32(8–14): 667–680

[13] Economides M J, Wood D A (2009). The state of natural gas. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 1(1-2): 1–13

[14] Fan X, Gong M, Zhang Q, Wang J, Bai L, Chen Y (2014). Prediction of the horizontal stress of the tight sandstone formation in eastern Sulige of China. J Petrol Sci Eng, 113: 72–80

[15] Fu X, Agostini F, Skoczylas F, Jeannin L (2015). Experimental study of the stress dependence of the absolute and relative permeabilities of some tight gas sandstones. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 77: 36–43

[16] Ghanbarian B, Liang F, Liu H (2020). Modeling gas relative permeability in shales and tight porous rocks. Fuel, 272: 1–11

[17] Guo C, Xu J, Wei M, Jiang R (2015). Experimental study and numerical simulation of hydraulic fracturing tight sandstone reservoirs. Fuel, 159: 334–344

[18] Guo Z, Jia A, Ji G (2017). Reserve classification and well pattern infilling method of tight sandstone gasfield: a case study of Sulige. Acta Petrol Sin, 38: 1299–1309

[19] He D, Jia A, Ji G, Wei Y, Tang H (2013). Well type and pattern optimization technology for large scale tight sand gas, Sulige gas field. Pet Explor Dev, 40(1): 84–94

[20] Hooke J (2003). Coarse sediment connectivity in river channel systems: a conceptual framework and methodology. Geomorphology, 56(1–2): 79–94

[21] Hu W, Wei Y, Bao J (2018). Development of the theory and technology for low permeability reservoirs in China. Pet Explor Dev, 45(4): 685–695

[22] Ji G, Jia A, Meng D, Guo Z, Wang G, Cheng L, Zhao X (2019). Technical strategies for effective development and gas recovery enhancement of a large tight gas field: a case study of Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin, NW China. Pet Explor Dev, 46(3): 629–639

[23] Jia A, Wang G, Meng D, Guo Z, Ji G, Cheng L (2018). Well pattern infilling strategy to enhance oil recovery of giant low-permeability tight gasfield: a case study of Sulige gasfield, Ordos Basin. Acta Petrol Sin, 39: 802–813

[24] Jiang S, Chen P, Yan M, Liu B, Liu H, Wang H (2020). Model of effective width and fracture conductivity for hydraulic fractures in tight reservoirs. Arab J Sci Eng, 20(4): 614–628

[25] John W R, Peter J M (1997). Sandstone-body and shale-body dimensions in a braided fluvial system: Salt Wash Sandstone Member (Morrison Formation), Garfield County, Utah. AAPG Bull, 81: 1267–1291

[26] Ju W, Shen J, Qin Y, Meng S, Li C, Li G, Yang G (2018). In-situ stress distribution and coalbed methane reservoir permeability in the Linxing area, eastern Ordos Basin, China. Front Earth Sci, 12(3): 545–554

[27] Labourdette R (2011). Stratigraphy and static connectivity of braided fluvial deposits of the lower Escanilla Formation, south central Pyrenees, Spain. AAPG Bull, 95(4): 585–617

[28] Landry C J, Prodanović M, Eichhubl P (2016). Direct simulation of supercritical gas flow in complex nanoporous media and prediction of apparent permeability. Int J Coal Geol, 159: 120–134 doi:10.1016/j.coal.2016.03.015

[29] Li H, Li Y, Feng Y, Zhong J, Luo H (2020a). An interpretation method for a gas production profile based on the temperature and pressure behavior of low-permeability gas reservoirs. Arab J Sci Eng, 20(4): 545–565

[30] Li Y, Yang J, Pan Z, Meng S, Wang K, Niu X (2019a). Unconventional natural gas accumulations in stacked deposits: a discussion of Upper Paleozoic coal-bearing strata in the east margin of the Ordos Basin, China. Acta Geol Sin, 93(1): 111–129

[31] Li Y, Gao X, Meng S, Wu P, Niu X, Qiao P, Elsworth D (2019b). Diagenetic sequences of continuously deposited tight sandstones in various environments: a case study from Upper Paleozoic sandstones in the Linxing area, eastern Ordos basin, China. AAPG Bull, 103(11): 2757–2783

[32] Li Y, Xu W, Wu P, Meng S (2020b). Dissolution versus cementation and its role in determining tight sandstone quality: a case study from the Upper Paleozoic in northeastern Ordos Basin, China. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 78: 103324

[33] Liu M, Liu Z, Wang B, Sun X, Guo J (2015a). A new method for recovering paleoporosity of sandstone: case study of middle Es₃ member of Paleogene formation in Niuzhuang Sag, Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin in China. Front Earth Sci, 9(3): 521–530

[34] Liu X, Kang Y, Luo P, You L, Tang Y, Kong L (2015b). Wettability modification by fluoride and its application in aqueous phase trapping damage removal in tight sandstone reservoirs. J Petrol Sci Eng, 133: 201–207

[35] Liu Z, Cui M, Fan A (2014). Calculation method discussion of tight sandstone gas reserves: a case of volumetric method in SX block. Nat Gas Geosci, 25: 1983–1993

[36] Lunt I A, Smith G H S, Best J L, Ashworth P J, Lane S N, Simpson C J (2013). Deposits of the sandy braided South Saskatchewan River: Implications for the use of modern analogs in reconstructing channel dimensions in reservoir characterization. AAPG Bull, 97(4): 553–576

[37] Luo C, Jia A, Guo J, He D, Wei Y, Luo S (2016a). Analysis on effective reservoirs and length optimization of horizontal wells in the Sulige Gasfield. Nat Gas Ind, 3(3): 245–252

[38] Luo C, Jia A, He D (2016b). Comparison study on the distribution of gas and water in Xu-4 and Xu-6 Formations tight gas sandstone reservoir of Guang’an Gasfield, Sichuan Basin. Nat. Gas Geosci., 27: 359–370

[39] Martin R G (2006). Width and thickness of fluvial channel bodies and valley fills in the geological record: a literature compilation and classification. J Sediment Res, 76(5): 731–770

[40] Miall A D (2006). Reconstructing the architecture and sequence stratigraphy of the preserved fluvial record as a tool for reservoir development: A reality check. AAPG Bull, 90(7): 989–1002

[41] Miller M, Shanley K (2010). Petrophysics in tight gas reservoirs-key challenges still remain. Lead. Edge, 29(12): 1464–1469

[42] Morad S, Al-Ramadan K, Ketzer J M, De Ros L (2010). The impact of diagenesis on the heterogeneity of sandstone reservoirs: a review of the role of depositional facies and sequence stratigraphy. AAPG Bull, 94(8): 1267–1309

[43] Morteza A, Gholamreza Z, Mat H Y (2015). Reducing predictive uncertainty in log-derived water saturation models in a giant tight shaly sandstones-A case study from Mesaverde tight gas reservoir. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 23: 380–386

[44] Nazari M H, Tavakoli V, Rahimpour-Bonab H, Sharifi-Yazdi M (2019). Investigation of factors influencing geological heterogeneity in tight gas carbonates, Permian reservoir of the Persian Gulf. J Petrol Sci Eng, 183: 1–18

[45] Nazemi M, Tavakoli V, Sharifi-Yazdi M, Rahimpour-Bonab H, Hosseini M (2019). The impact of micro-to macro-scale geological attributes on Archie’s exponents, an example from Permian–Triassic carbonate reservoirs of the central Persian Gulf. Mar Pet Geol, 102: 775–785

[46] Nelson P H (2009). Pore-throat sizes in sandstones, tight sandstones and shales. AAPG Bull, 93(3): 329–340

[47] Ostensen R W (1983). Microcrack permeability in tight gas sandstone. SPE J, 23(6): 919–927

[48] Rashid F, Glover P W J, Lorinczi P, Collier R, Lawrence J A (2015). Porosity and permeability of tight carbonate reservoir rocks in the north of Iraq. J Petrol Sci Eng, 133: 147–161

[49] Santamarina J C, Park J, Terzariol M, Cardona A, Castro G M, Cha W, Garcia A, Hakiki F, Lyu C, Salva M, Shen Y, Sun Z, Chong S H (2019). Soil Properties: Physics Inspired, Data Driven. In Lu N, Mitchell J, eds. Geotechnical Fundamentals for Addressing New World Challenges. Cham: Springer: 67–91

[50] Shanley K W, Cluff R M, Robinson J W (2004). Factors controlling prolific gas production from low-permeability sandstone reservoirs: implications for resource assessment, prospect development, and risk analysis. AAPG Bull, 88(8): 1083–1121

[51] Skelly L R, Bristow S C, Ethridge G F (2003). Architecture of channel-belt deposits in an aggrading shallow sandbed braided river: the lower Niobrara River, northeast Nebraska. Sediment Geol, 158(3–4): 249–270

[52] Smith S H G, Ashworth J P, Best L J, Woodward J, Simpson J C (2006). The sedimentology and alluvial architecture of the sandy braided South Saskatchewan River, Canada. Sedimentology, 53(2): 413–434

[53] Tye R S (2004). Geomorphology: an approach to determining subsurface reservoir dimensions. AAPG Bull, 88(8): 1123–1147

[54] Wang G, Jia A, Yan H (2017). Characteristics and recoverability evaluation on the potential reservoir in Sulige tight sandstone gas field. Oil Gas Geol., 38: 896–904

[55] Wang H, Jiang S, Huang C (2018). Differences in sedimentary filling and its controlling factors in rift lacustrine basins, East China: a case study from Qikou and Nanpu sags. Front Earth Sci, 5(1): 82–96

[56] Wang J, Jiang S, Jun X (2020). Lithofacies stochastic modelling of a braided river reservoir: a case study of the Linpan Oilfield, Bohaiwan Basin, China. Arab J Sci Eng, 20(4): 577–590

[57] Xu X, Hu Y, Shao L (2017). Experimental simulation of gas accumulation mechanism in sandstone reservoir: a case study of Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin. J China U Min Technol, 46: 1323–1331

[58] Yuan L, Sima L, Wu S (2014). Models for saturation of the tight gas sandstone reservoir. Petrol Sci Technol, 32(23): 2777–2785

[59] Zafar A, Su Y, Li L, Fu J, Mehmood A, Ouyang W, Zhang M (2020). Tight gas production model considering TPG as a function of pore pressure, permeability and water saturation. Petrol Sci, 17(5): 1356–1369

[60] Zhao F, Tang H M, Meng Y F, Li G, Xing X (2009). Damage evaluation for water-based underbalanced drilling in low-permeability and tight sandstone gas reservoirs. Pet Explor Dev, 36(1): 113–119

[61] Zhao W, Bian C, Xu Z (2013). Similarities and differences between natural gas accumulations in Sulige gas field in Ordos basin and Xujiahe gas field in Central Sichuan Basin. Pet Explor Dev, 40(4): 429–437

[62] Ziarani A S, Aguilera R (2012). Pore-throat radius and tortuosity estimation from formation resistivity data for tight-gas sandstone reservoirs. J Appl Geophys, 83: 65–73

[63] Zou C, Yang Z, Zhang G (2019). Establishment and practice of unconventional oil and gas geology. Acta Geol Sin, 93: 12–23

[64] Zou C, Zhu R, Liu K, Su L, Bai B, Zhang X, Yuan X, Wang J (2012). Tight gas sandstone reservoirs in China: characteristics and recognition criteria. J Petrol Sci Eng, 88–89: 82–91

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the PetroChina Innovation Foundation (No. 2019D-5007-0210), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51904050、41902153), the Chongqing Natural Science Foundation Project (Nos. cstc2019jcyj-msxmX0725、0457), Open Fund of Engineering Research Center of Development and Management for Low to Ultra-Low Permeability Oil & Gas Reservoirs in West China, Ministry of Education (KFJJ-XB-2020-4) and the Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (No. KJQN201901531).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press