Characterizing the urban spatial structure using taxi trip big data and implications for urban planning

Haibo LI , Xiaocong XU , Xia LI , Shifa MA , Honghui ZHANG

Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1) : 70 -80.

PDF (4250KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1) : 70 -80. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-020-0844-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Characterizing the urban spatial structure using taxi trip big data and implications for urban planning

Author information +
History +
PDF (4250KB)

Abstract

Urban spatial structure is an important feature for assessing the effects of urban planning. Quantifying an urban spatial structure cannot only help in identifying the problems with current planning but also provide a basic reference for future adjustments. Evaluation of spatial structure is a difficult task for planners and researchers and this has been usually carried out by comparing different land use structures. However, these methods cannot efficiently reflect the influence of human activities. With the wide application of big data, analyzing data on human travel behavior has increasingly been carried out to reveal the relationship between urban spatial structure and urban planning. In this study, we constructed a human-activity space network using the taxi trip big data. Clustering at different scales revealed the hierarchy and redundancy of the spatial structure for assessing the appropriateness and shortcomings of urban planning. This method was applied to a case study based on one-month taxi trip data of Dongguan City. Existing urban spatial structures at different scales were retrieved and utilized to assess the effectiveness of the master plan designed for 2000 to 2015 and 2008 to 2020, which can help identify the limitations and improvements in the spatial structure designed in these two versions of the master plan. We also evaluated the potential effect of the master plan designed for 2016 to 2035 by providing a reference for reconstructing and optimizing future urban spatial structure. The analysis demonstrated that the taxi trip data are important big data on social spatial perception, and taxi data should be used for evaluating spatial structures in future urban planning.

Keywords

urban structure / taxi GPS data / complex networks / community management

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Haibo LI, Xiaocong XU, Xia LI, Shifa MA, Honghui ZHANG. Characterizing the urban spatial structure using taxi trip big data and implications for urban planning. Front. Earth Sci., 2021, 15(1): 70-80 DOI:10.1007/s11707-020-0844-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Alexander E R, Faludi A (1989). Planning and plan implementation: notes on evaluation criteria. Environ Plann B Plann Des, 16(2): 127–140

[2]

Alterman R, Hill M (1978). Implementation of urban land use plans. J Am Inst Plann, 44(3): 274–285

[3]

Arenas A, Fernandez A, Gomez S (2008). Analysis of the structure of complex networks at different resolution levels. New J Phys, 10(5): 053039

[4]

Berry B J (1968). Interdependency of spatial structure and spatial behavior: A general field theory formulation. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 21(1): 205–227

[5]

Brody S D, Highfield W E, Thornton S (2006). Planning at the urban fringe: an examination of the factors influencing nonconforming development patterns in southern Florida. Environ Plann B Plann Des, 33(1): 75–96

[6]

Castells M, Cardoso G (2005). The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy. Washington, DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University

[7]

Csardi G, Nepusz T (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. Inter Journal, Complex Systems, 1695(5): 1–9

[8]

De Montis A, Barthélemy M, Chessa A, Vespignani A (2007). The structure of interurban traffic: a weighted network analysis. Environ Plann B Plann Des, 34(5): 905–924

[9]

Fortunato S (2010). Community detection in graphs. Phys Rep, 486(3–5): 75–174

[10]

Girvan M, Newman M E (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99(12): 7821–7826

[11]

Gao S, Wang Y, Gao Y, Yu L (2013). Understanding urban traffic-flow characteristics: a rethinking of betweenness centrality. Environ Plann B Plann Des, 40(1): 135–153

[12]

Gong Y X, Lin Y Y, Duan Z Y (2017). Exploring the spatiotemporal structure of dynamic urban space using metro smart card records. Comput Environ Urban Syst, 64: 169–183

[13]

Gordon P, Richardson H W (1996). Beyond polycentricity: the dispersed metropolis, Los Angeles, 1970-1990. J Am Plann Assoc, 62(3): 289–295

[14]

Guimerà R, Mossa S, Turtschi A, Amaral L A (2005). The worldwide air transportation network: anomalous centrality, community structure, and cities’ global roles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 102(22): 7794–7799

[15]

Guimerà R, Nunes Amaral L A (2005). Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks. Nature, 433(7028): 895–900

[16]

Han H, Lai S, Dang A, Tan Z, Wu C (2009). Effectiveness of urban construction boundaries in Beijing: an assessment. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A, 10(9): 1285–1295

[17]

Hasan S, Schneider C M, Ukkusuri S V, González M C (2013). Spatiotemporal patterns of urban human mobility. J Stat Phys, 151(1–2): 304–318

[18]

Heiden U, Heldens W, Roessner S, Segl K, Esch T, Mueller A (2012). Urban structure type characterization using hyperspectral remote sensing and height information. Landsc Urban Plan, 105(4): 361–375

[19]

Innes J E, Booher D E (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: a framework for evaluating collaborative planning. J Am Plann Assoc, 65(4): 412–423

[20]

Kang C, Sobolevsky S, Liu Y, Ratti C (2013). Exploring human movements in Singapore: a comparative analysis based on mobile phone and taxicab usages. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGKDD international workshop on urban computing, ACM

[21]

Lancichinetti A, Fortunato S (2009). Community detection algorithms: a comparative analysis. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys, 80(5): 056117

[22]

Laurian L, Day M, Berke P, Ericksen N, Backhurst M, Crawford J, Dixon J (2004). Evaluating plan implementation: a conformance-based methodology. J Am Plann Assoc, 70(4): 471–480

[23]

Li S, Li X, Liu X P, Wu Z F, Ai B, Wang F (2013). Simulation of spatial population dynamics based on labor economics and multi-agent system: a case study on a rapidly developing manufacturing metropolis. Int J Geogr Inf Sci, 27(12): 2410–2435

[24]

Li S, Lyu D, Liu X, Tan Z, Gao F, Huang G, Wu Z (2020a). The varying patterns of rail transit ridership and their relationships with fine-scale built environment factors: big data analytics from Guangzhou. Cities, 99: 102580

[25]

Li S, Lyu D, Huang G, Zhang X, Gao F, Chen Y, Liu X (2020b). Spatially varying impacts of built environment factors on rail transit ridership at station level: a case study in Guangzhou, China. J Transp Geogr, 82: 102631

[26]

Li X, Yeh A G O (2000). Modelling sustainable urban development by the integration of constrained cellular automata and GIS. Int J Geogr Inf Syst, 14(2): 131–152

[27]

Lim C, Kim K J, Maglio P P (2018). Smart cities with big data: reference models, challenges, and considerations. Cities, 82: 86–99

[28]

Liu J, Wang X, Zhuang D (2003). Application of convex hull in identifying the types of urban land expansion. Acta Geographica Sinica (Chinese edition), 58(6): 885–892 (in Chinese)

[29]

Liu Y, Kang C, Gao S, Xiao Y, Tian Y (2012). Understanding intra-urban trip patterns from taxi trajectory data. J Geogr Syst, 14(4): 463–483

[30]

Liu X, Gong L, Gong Y, Liu Y (2015). Revealing travel patterns and city structure with taxi trip data. J Transp Geogr, 43: 78–90

[31]

Long Y, Gu Y, Han H (2012). Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of urban planning implementation effectiveness: evidence from five urban master plans of Beijing. Landsc Urban Plan, 108(2–4): 103–111

[32]

Newman M E (2004). Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys, 69(6): 066133

[33]

Niu X, Zhu J, Cheng S (2017). A technical framework for urban master plan implementation evaluation using mobile phone signaling data. Urbanism and Architecture, 27

[34]

Norton R K (2008). Using content analysis to evaluate local master plans and zoning codes. Land Use Policy, 25(3): 432–454

[35]

Parr J (2004). The polycentric urban region: a closer inspection. Reg Stud, 38(3): 231–240

[36]

Rahmani M, Jenelius E, Koutsopoulos H N (2015). Non-parametric estimation of route travel time distributions from low-frequency floating car data. Transp Res, Part C Emerg Technol, 58: 343–362

[37]

Ratti C, Sobolevsky S, Calabrese F, Andris C, Reades J, Martino M, Claxton R, Strogatz S H (2010). Redrawing the map of Great Britain from a network of human interactions. PLoS One, 5(12): e14248

[38]

Rinzivillo S (2012). Discovering the geographical borders of human mobility. KI- Künstliche Intelligenz 26(3): 253–260

[39]

Rosvall M, Bergstrom C T (2007). An information-theoretic framework for resolving community structure in complex networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 104(18): 7327–7331

[40]

Shi L, Chi G, Liu X, Liu Y (2015). Human mobility patterns in different communities: a mobile phone data-based social network approach. Ann GIS, 21(1): 15–26

[41]

Talen E (1996). After the plans: methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans. J Plann Educ Res, 16(2): 79–91

[42]

Tian L, Shen T (2011). Evaluation of plan implementation in the transitional China: a case of Guangzhou city master plan. Cities, 28(1): 11–27

[43]

Veloso M, Phithakkitnukoon S, Bento C (2011). Sensing urban mobility with taxi flow. International Workshop on Location-based Social Networks

[44]

Voorde T V D, Jacquet W,Canters F (2011). Mapping form and function in urban areas: an approach based on urban metrics and continuous impervious surface data. Landscape and Urban Planning, 102(3): 1–155

[45]

Wang T, Yue W, Ye X, Liu Y, Lu D (2020). Re-evaluating polycentric urban structure: a functional linkage perspective. Cities, 101: 102672

[46]

Wang Z, Deng Y, Song X, Bing W U (2001). The complexity analysis of the spatial structure in Shanghai. Prog Geogr, 20(4): 331–340

[47]

Wildavsky A (1973). If planning is everything, maybe it’s nothing. Policy Sci, 4(2): 127–153

[48]

Wei L, Luo Y, Wang M, Cai Y Y, Su S L, Li B Z, Ji H Y (2020). Multiscale identification of urban functional polycentricity for planning implications: an integrated approach using geo-big transport data and complex network modeling. Habitat Int, 97: 102–134

[49]

Xi G, Zhen F (2017). Exploring the ideas and methods of urban planning evaluation based on big data. Urban Planning Forum

[50]

Xu X, Yuruk N, Feng Z, Schweiger T A J (2007). SCAN: a structural clustering algorithm for networks. In: An International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining

[51]

Yu W (2014). Implementation evaluation of Beijing urban master plan based on subway transit smart card data. In: International Conference on Geoinformatics

[52]

Yuan Y, Raubal M, Liu Y (2012). Correlating mobile phone usage and travel behavior—a case study of Harbin, China. Comput Environ Urban Syst, 36(2): 118–130

[53]

Zhong C, Arisona S M, Huang X, Batty M, Schmitt G (2014). Detecting the dynamics of urban structure through spatial network analysis. Int J Geogr Inf Sci, 28(11): 2178–2199

[54]

Zhou X, Yeh A G O, Yue Y (2018). Spatial variation of self-containment and jobs-housing balance in shenzhen using cellphone big data. J Transp Geogr, 68: 102–108

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (4250KB)

960

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/