Quantifying the spatiotemporal characteristics of ecosystem services and livelihoods in China’s poverty-stricken counties

Abstract

Understanding the coupling relationship between ecosystem services and poverty livelihoods is a prerequisite for poverty eradication and ecological protection in China. In this paper, we intended to quantify the coupling relationship between ecosystem services and poverty livelihoods in 717 poverty-stricken counties in China. First, we identified distinct levels of ecosystem services and poverty respectively in the poverty-stricken areas based on the ecosystem services subsystem index and poverty livelihoods subsystem index. Then, we calculated the coupling degree and coupling coordination degree between the ecosystem services and the poverty livelihoods in China’s poverty-stricken counties from 2000 to 2015. Finally, we analyzed the temporal and spatial evolution of the coupling between ecosystem services and poverty livelihoods. The results indicate that the ecosystem services showed a trend of first decreasing and then increasing, while the poverty level showed an increased trend. In addition, the coupling relationship between ecosystem services and poverty livelihoods in poverty-stricken counties was also improved from 2000 to 2015. However, the coupling degree value or coupling coordination degree values in some counties or contiguous impoverished areas showed a decreased trend, the coupling relationship between ecosystem services and poverty livelihoods in those counties or areas was higher conflict. Future more, the coupling relationship in China’s poverty-stricken counties was mainly intermediate conflict and low conflict, which need to improve in the future. Thus, it is suggested that effective measures are required to lift ecosystem services out of the poverty trap and into sustainable livelihoods.

Keywords

ecosystem services / poverty livelihoods / coupling degree / coupling coordination degree / coupling relationship / spatiotemporal characteristic

References

[1] Ai B, Ma C, Zhao J, Zhang R (2020). The impact of rapid urban expansion on coastal mangroves: a case study in Guangdong Province, China. Front Earth Sci, 14(1): 37–49

[2] Akwetaireho S, Getzner M (2010). Livelihood dependence on ecosystem services of local residents: a case study from Mabamba Bay wetlands (Lake Victoria, Uganda). Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag, 6(1–2): 75–87

[3] Auler A C, Galetto S L, Hennipman F S, Guntzel E D, Giarola N F, Fonseca A F (2017). Soil structural quality degradation by the increase in grazing intensity in integrated crop-livestock system. Bragantia, 76(4): 550–556

[4] Berchoux T, Watmough G R, Hutton C, Atkinson P M (2019). Agricultural shocks and drivers of livelihood precariousness across indian rural communities. Landsc Urban Plan, 189: 307–319

[5] Chambers R, Conway G R (1991). Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st Century. Brighton, Institute of Development Studies 296

[6] Chen Y, Ge Y (2015). Spatial point pattern analysis on the villages in China’s poverty-stricken areas. Procedia Environ Sci, 27: 98–105

[7] Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill R V, Paruelo J, Raskin R G, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630): 253–260

[8] Costanza R, de Groot R, Braat L, Kubiszewski I, Fioramonti L, Sutton P, Farber S, Grasso M (2017). Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst Serv, 28: 1–16

[9] Cuni-Sanchez A, Ngute A S, Sonké B, Sainge M, Burgess N, Klein J, Marchant R (2019). The importance of livelihood strategy and ethnicity in forest ecosystem services’ perceptions by local communities in north-western Cameroon. Ecosyst Serv, 40: 101000

[10] D’Amato D, Rekola M, Wan M, Cai D, Toppinen A (2017). Effects of industrial plantations on ecosystem services and livelihoods: perspectives of rural communities in China. Land Use Policy, 63: 266–278

[11] Daily G C (1997). Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press

[12] Daw T, Brown K, Rosendo S, Pomeroy R, Brockington D (2011). Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being. Environ Conserv, 38(4): 370–379

[13] Elvidge C D, Sutton P C, Ghosh T, Tuttle B T, Baugh K E, Bhaduri B, Bright E (2009). A global poverty map derived from satellite data. Comput and Geosci, 35: 1652–1660

[14] Fisher J A, Patenaude G, Giri K, Lewis K, Meir P, Pinho P, Rounsevell M D A, Williams M (2014). Understanding the relationships between ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: a conceptual framework. Ecosyst Serv, 7: 34–45

[15] Gong Q, Zhang J (2007). Relations between agricultural natural disasters and rural poverty based on analysis of panel data in Anhui Province, China. Chinese J Population Resour Environ, 17: 92–95

[16] Gregory P J, Johnson S N, Newton A C, Ingram J S I (2009). Integrating pests and pathogens into the climate change/food security debate. J Exp Bot, 60(10): 2827–2838

[17] Heilig G K, Zhang M, Long H, Li X, Wu X (2006). Poverty alleviation in China: a lesson for the developing world? Geogr Rundsch, 2: 4–13

[18] Homewood K, Schreckenberg K (2018). Sharing data from the Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation programme. Sci Data, 5(1): 180137

[19] Hu X, Zhang H, Hao H, Feng D, Liu H, Zhang Q (2020). Understanding the relationships between poverty alleviation and ecosystem conservation: empirical evidence from western China. Front Earth Sci, 14(1): 209–220

[20] Huq N, Pedroso R, Bruns A, Ribbe L, Huq S (2020). Changing dynamics of livelihood dependence on ecosystem services at temporal and spatial scales: an assessment in the southern wetland areas of Bangladesh. Ecol Indic, 110: 105855

[21] Ibáñez J, Martínez J, Schnabel S (2007). Desertification due to overgrazing in a dynamic commercial livestock–grass–soil system. Ecol Modelling, 205: 277–288

[22] Illingworth V (1996). The Penguin dictionary of physics. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press

[23] Jogo W, Hassan R (2010). Determinants of rural household labour allocation for wetland and other livelihood activities: the case of the Limpopo wetland in Southern Africa. Agrekon, 49(2): 195–216

[24] Kalaba F K, Quinn C H, Dougill A J (2013). Contribution of forest provisioning ecosystem services to rural livelihoods in the Miombo woodlands of Zambia. Popul Environ, 35(2): 159–182

[25] Khan S R, Khan S R (2009). Assessing poverty-deforestation links: evidence from Swat, Pakistan. Ecol Econ, 68(10): 2607–2618

[26] Kumar H, Pandey B W, Anand S (2019). Analyzing the impacts of forest ecosystem services on livelihood security and sustainability: a case study of Jim Corbett National Park in Uttarakhand. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 7(2): 45–55

[27] Li C, Li S, Feldman M W, Li J, Zheng H, Daily G C (2018). The impact on rural livelihoods and ecosystem services of a major relocation and settlement program: a case in Shaanxi, China. Ambio, 47(2): 245–259

[28] Li Y, Li Y, Zhou Y, Shi Y, Zhu X (2012). Investigation of a coupling model of coordination between urbanization and the environment. Journal of Environmental Management, 98: 127–133

[29] Li Y, Su B, Liu Y (2016). Realizing targeted poverty alleviation in China: People’s voices, implementation challenges and policy implications. China Agric Econ Rev, 8(3): 443–454

[30] Liu N, Liu C, Xia Y, Da B (2018). Examining the coordination between urbanization and eco-environment using coupling and spatial analyses: a case study in China. Ecol Indic, 93: 1163–1175

[31] Liu Y, Liu J, Zhou Y (2017). Spatio-temporal patterns of rural poverty in china and targeted poverty alleviation strategies. J Rural Stud, 52: 66–75

[32] Ma L, Jin F, Song Z, Liu Y (2013). Spatial coupling analysis of regional economic development and environmental pollution in China. J Geogr Sci, 23(3): 525–537

[33] Meehan M C (1969). General system theory: foundations, development, applications. JAMA, 208(5): 870

[34] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (EMA) (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington DC

[35] Ouyang Z, Zheng H, Xiao Y, Polasky S, Liu J, Xu W, Wang Q, Zhang L, Xiao Y, Rao E, Jiang L, Lu F, Wang X, Yang G, Gong S, Wu B, Zeng Y, Yang W, Daily G C (2016). Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science, 352(6292): 1455–1459

[36] Parton W J, Scurlock J M O, Ojima D S, Schimel D S, Hall D O, Members S G (1995). Impact of climate change on grassland production and soil carbon worldwide. Glob Change Biol, 1(1): 13–22

[37] Quine T A, Walling D E (1993). Assessing recent rates of soil loss from areas of arable cultivation in the UK. Farm Land Erosion: 357–371

[38] Reed J, Van Vianen J, Foli S, Clendenning J, Yang K, MacDonald M, Petrokofsky G, Padoch C, Sunderland T (2017). Trees for life: the ecosystem service contribution of trees to food production and livelihoods in the tropics. For Policy Econ, 84: 62–71

[39] Ren Z, Ge Y, Wang J, Mao J, Zhang Q (2017). Understanding the inconsistent relationships between socioeconomic factors and poverty incidence across contiguous poverty-stricken regions in China: multilevel modelling. Spat Stat, 21: 406–420

[40] Robinson B E, Zheng H, Peng W (2019). Disaggregating livelihood dependence on ecosystem services to inform land management. Ecosyst Serv, 36: 100902

[41] Saaty T L (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: McGraw

[42] Saaty T L (2003). Decision-making with the AHP: why is the principal eigenvector necessary. Eur J Oper Res, 145(1): 85–91

[43] Saha D, Sundriyal R C (2012). Utilization of non-timber forest products in humid tropics: implications for management and livelihood. For Policy Econ, 14(1): 28–40

[44] Sen G (1999). Engendering poverty alleviation: challenges and opportunities. Dev Change, 30(3): 685–692

[45] Shaffer P (2013). Poverty and development in China: alternative approaches to poverty assessment. J Dev Stud, 49(7): 1030–1031

[46] Shemshadi A, Shirazi H, Toreihi M, Tarokh M J (2011). A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Expert Syst Appl, 38(10): 12160–12167

[47] Song C, Chen Z, Zhai W (2015). Analysis of sequential characteristic of coupling coordination degree between urbanization and resources-environment in Hubei Province. Adv Mat Res, 1073–1076: 1380–1386

[48] Sumner A (2012). Where do the poor live? World Dev. 40(5): 865–877

[49] Sun Y, Liu S, Dong Y, An Y, Shi F, Dong S, Liu G (2019). Spatio-temporal evolution scenarios and the coupling analysis of ecosystem services with land use change in China. Sci Total Environ, 681: 211–225

[50] Tao J, Zhang Y, Dong J, Fu Y, Zhu J, Zhang G, Jiang Y, Tian L, Zhang X, Zhang T, Xi Y (2015). Elevation-dependent relationships between climate change and grassland vegetation variation across the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Int J Climatol, 35(7): 1638–1647

[51] The Development for International Development (1999). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. London: DFID

[52] The Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation (ESPA) programme (2018). An environment for wellbeing: pathways out of poverty. In: Policy messages from the ESPA Programme

[53] The State Council Information Office, PRC. (2016). China’s Progress in Poverty Reduction and Human Rights. Human Rights, 15: 625–627

[54] Wang C, Pang W, Hong J (2017). Impact of a regional payment for ecosystem service program on the livelihoods of different rural households. J Clean Prod, 164: 1058–1067

[55] Wang J (2010). Sustainable development, poverty reduction, and infrastructure in western China. Chin Econ, 43(3): 6–30

[56] Wang S, Ma H, Zhao Y (2014). Exploring the relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment—a case study of Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. Ecol Indic, 45: 171–183

[57] Xiong W, Lin E, Ju H, Xu Y (2007). Climate change and critical thresholds in China’s food security. Clim Change, 81(2): 205–221

[58] Yang W, Dietz T, Liu W, Luo J, Liu J (2013). Going beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: an index system of human dependence on ecosystem services. PLoS One, 8(5): e64581

[59] Yu X, Li Y, Xi M, Kong F, Pang M, Yu Z (2019). Ecological vulnerability analysis of Beidagang National Park, China. Front Earth Sci, 13(2): 385–397

[60] Zhang J, Iwaasa A D, Han G, Gu C, Wang H, Jefferson P G, Kusler J (2018). Utilizing a multi-index decision analysis method to overall assess forage yield and quality of C3 grasses in the western Canadian prairies. Field Crops Res, 222: 12–25

[61] Zhang L, Zhang Y, Yan J, Wu Y (2008). Livelihood diversification and cropland use pattern in agro-pastoral mountainous region of eastern Tibetan Plateau. J Geogr Sci, 18(4): 499–509

[62] Zhang Z, Xia F, Yang D, Huo J, Wang G, Chen H (2020). Spatiotemporal characteristics in ecosystem service value and its interaction with human activities in Xinjiang, China. Ecol Indic,

[63] Zhao Y, Wang S, Ge Y, Liu Q, Liu X (2017). The spatial differentiation of the coupling relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment in countries globally: a comprehensive assessment. Ecol Modell, 360: 313–327

[64] Zhao Y, Wang S, Zhou C (2016). Understanding the relation between urbanization and the eco-environment in China’s Yangtze River Delta using an improved EKC model and coupling analysis. Sci Total Environ, 571: 862–875

[65] Zhen J (2015). Analysis on coupling relations between industrialization and ecological environmental in Inner Mongolia. App Mechanics and Mater, 3817: 989–993

[66] Zhou Y, Li N, Wu W, Liu H, Wang L, Liu G, Wu J (2014). Socioeconomic development and the impact of natural disasters: some empirical evidences from China. Nat Hazards, 74(2): 541–554

[67] Zhou D, Xu J, Lin Z (2017). Conflict or coordination? Assessing land use multi-functionalization using production-living-ecology analysis. Sci Total Environ, 577: 136–147

[68] Zhou L, Guan D, Yuan X (2018a). Coupling correlation analysis of ecosystem services and livelihoods in the perspective of targeted poverty alleviation. Acta Ecological Sinica, 38(18): 6391–6401 (in Chinese)

[69] Zhou Y, Guo Y, Liu Y, Wu W, Li Y (2018b). Targeted poverty alleviation and land policy innovation: Some practice and policy implications from China. Land Use Policy, 74: 53–65

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press