Numerical and experimental study of the aerodynamic characteristics around two-dimensional terrain with different slope angles

Abstract

Complicated terrain was considered and simplified as two-dimensional (2D) terrain in a dynamical downscaling model and a parametric wind field model for typhoons developed by the Shanghai Typhoon Institute. The 2D terrain was further modeled as uphill and downhill segments with various slope angles relative to the incoming flow. The wind speed ratios and pressure characteristics around the 2D terrain were numerically and experimentally investigated in this study. Aerodynamic characteristics of the 2D terrain with a limited-length upper surface were first investigated in the wind tunnel with sheared incoming flow. The corresponding numerical investigation was also conducted by using the commercial computational fluid dynamics code FLUENT with the realizable k-ε turbulence model. Special efforts were made to maintain the inflow boundary conditions throughout the computational domain. Aerodynamic characteristics were then investigated for the ideal 2D terrain with an unlimited-length upper surface by using a numerical method with uniform incoming flow. Comparisons of the different terrain models and incoming flows from the above studies show that the wind pressure coefficients and the wind speed ratios are both affected by the slope angle. A negative peak value of the wind pressure coefficients exists at the escarpment point, where flow separation occurs, for the uphill and downhill terrain models with slope angles of 40° and 30°, respectively. Correspondingly, the streamwise wind speed ratios at the points above the escarpment point for the uphill terrain model increase with increasing slope angle, reach their peak values at the slope angle of α = 40° and decrease when the slope angle increases further. For the downhill terrain model, similar trends exist at the points above the escarpment point with the exception that the critical slope angle is α = 30°.

Keywords

numerical simulation / wind tunnel test / aerodynamic characteristics / critical slope angle

References

[1] Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, Carmeliet J (2007). CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems. Atmos Environ, 41(2): 238–252

[2] Bowen A J, Lindley D (1977). A wind-tunnel investigation of the wind speed and turbulence characteristics close to the ground over various escarpment shapes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol, 12(3): 259–271

[3] Cao S, Tamura T (2006). Experimental study on roughness effects on turbulent boundary layer flow over a two-dimensional steep hill. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 94(1): 1–19

[4] Cao S, Tamura T (2007). Effects of roughness blocks on atmospheric boundary layer flow over a two-dimensional low hill with/without sudden roughness change. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 95(8): 679–695

[5] Cao S, Wang T, Ge Y, Tamura Y (2012). Numerical study on turbulent boundary layers over two-dimensional hills-effects of surface roughness and slope. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 104–106: 342–349

[6] Cindori M, Juretic F, Kozmar H, Dzijan I (2018). Steady RANS model of the homogeneous atmospheric boundary layer. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 173: 289–301

[7] COST Action 732 (2005–2009). Quality assurance and improvement of micro-scale meteorological models.

[8] Dickinson R E, Errico R M, Giorgi F, Bates G T (1989). A regional climate model for the western United States. Clim Change, 15(3): 383–422

[9] Fan L J (2006). Statistical downscaling of local and regional climate scenarios over china. Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Beijing: Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Atmospheric Physics) (in Chinese)

[10] Fang P Z, Gu M, Tan J G, Han Z H (2015). A method to solve the wall function problem in simulating the atmospheric boundary layer. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 34(2): 85–90 (in Chinese)

[11] Hu W C, Yang Q S, Zhang J (2018). Comparative study on wind topographic factor of hilly terrain by different codes and standards. Engineering Mechanics, 35(10): 206–214 (in Chinese)

[12] Ishihara T, Hibi K, Oikawa S (1999). A wind tunnel study of turbulent flow over a three-dimensional steep hill. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 83(1–3): 95–107

[13] Ishihara T, Fujino Y, Hibi K (2001). A wind tunnel study of separated flow over a two-dimensional ridge and a circular hill. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 89: 573–576

[14] Ishihara T, Hibi K (2002). Numerical study of turbulent wake flow behind a three-dimensional steep hill. Wind Struct, 5(2–4): 317–328

[15] Jackson P S, Hunt J C R (1975). Turbulent wind flow over a low hill. Q J R Meteorol Soc, 101(430): 929–955

[16] Juretic F, Kozmar H (2014). Computational modeling of the atmospheric boundary layer using various two-equation turbulence models. Wind Struct, 19(6): 687–708

[17] Kamada Y, Li Q, Maeda T, Yamada K (2019). Wind tunnel experimental investigation of flow field around two-dimensional single hill models. Renew Energ, 136: 1107–1118

[18] Kondo K, Tsuchiya M, Sanada S (2002). Evaluation of effect of micro-topography on design wind velocity. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 90(12–15): 1707–1718

[19] Launder B E, Spalding D B (1974). The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 3(2): 269–289

[20] Liu Z, Ishihara T, Tanaka T, He X (2016). LES study of turbulent flow fields over a smooth 3-D hill and a smooth 2-D ridge. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 153: 1–12

[21] Lun Y F, Mochida A, Yoshino H, Murakami S (2007). Applicability of linear type revised k–ε models to flow over topographic features. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 95(5): 371–384

[22] Makridis A, Chick J (2013). Validation of a CFD model of wind turbine wakes with terrain effects. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 123(4): 12–29

[23] Mortensen N G, Landberg L (1993). Wind Altas Analysis and Application Program (WASP) User’s Guide. Roskilde, Denmark: Riso National Laboratory

[24] Shih T H, Liou W W, Shabbir A, Yang Z, Zhu J (1995). A new eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows model development and validation. Comput Fluids, 24(3): 227–238

[25] Tominaga Y, Mochida A, Yoshie R, Kataoka H, Nozu T, Yoshikawa M, Shirasawa T (2008). AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 96(10–11): 1749–1761

[26] Van Doormaal J P, Raithby G D (1984). Enhancements of the SIMPLE method for predicting incompressible fluid flows. Numer Heat Tra-Appl, 7(2): 147–163

[27] Walton D B, Sun F P, Hall A, Capps S (2015). A hybrid dynamical-statistical downscaling technique. Part I: development and validation of the technique. J Clim, 28(12): 4597–4617

[28] Wang W, Shaw W J, Seiple T E, Rishel J P, Xie Y (2008). An evaluation of a diagnostic wind model (CALMET). J Appl Meteorol Climatol, 47(6): 1739–1756

[29] Wilby R L, Wigley T M L (1997). Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations. Prog Phys Geogr, 21(4): 530–548

[30] Wyngaard J C (2004). Toward numerical modeling in the “terra incognita”. J Atmos Sci, 61(14): 1816–1826

[31] Yan B W, Li Q S, He Y C, Chan P W (2016). RANS simulation of neutral atmospheric boundary layer flows over complex terrain by proper imposition of boundary conditions and modification on the k–ε model. Environ Fluid Mech, 16(1): 1–23

[32] Yang W, Andréasson J, Phil Graham L, Olsson J, Rosberg J, Wetterhall F (2010). Distribution-based scaling to improve usability of regional climate model projections for hydrological climate change impacts studies. Hydrol Res, 41(3–4): 211–229

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature