The evolution of hollow symmetric-PV tower during the landfall of Typhoon Mujigae (2015)

Baofeng JIAO, Lingkun RAN, Xinyong SHEN

PDF(4629 KB)
PDF(4629 KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4) : 817-828. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-019-0783-7
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The evolution of hollow symmetric-PV tower during the landfall of Typhoon Mujigae (2015)

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The evolution of Typhoon Mujigae (2015) during the landfall period is determined using potential vorticity (PV) based on a high-resolution numerical simulation. Diabatic heating from deep moist convections in the eyewall produces a hollow PV tower extending from the lower troposphere to the middle levels. Since the potential temperature and wind fields could be highly asymmetric during landfall, the fields are divided into symmetric and asymmetric components. Thus, PV is split into three parts: symmetric PV, first-order asymmetric PV, and quadratic-order asymmetric PV. By calculating the azimuth mean, the first-order term disappears. The symmetric PV is at least one order of magnitude larger than the azimuthal mean quadratic-order term, nearly accounting for the mean cyclone. Furthermore, the symmetric PV tendency equation is derived in cylindrical coordinates. The budget terms include the symmetric heating term, flux divergence of symmetric PV advection due to symmetric flow, flux divergence of partial first-order PV advection due to asymmetric flow, and the conversion term between the symmetric PV and quadratic-order asymmetric term. The diagnostic results indicate that the symmetric heating term is responsible for the hollow PV tower generation and maintenance. The symmetric flux divergence largely offsets the symmetric heating contribution, resulting in a horizontal narrow ring and vertical extension structure. The conversion term contribution is comparable to the mean term contributions, while the contribution of the partial first-order PV asymmetric flux divergence is apparently smaller. The conversion term implicitly contains the combined effects of processes that result in asymmetric structures. This term tends to counteract the contribution of symmetric terms before landfall and favor horizontal PV mixing after landfall.

Keywords

landfall typhoon / potential vorticity / hollow PV tower / asymmetric features

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Baofeng JIAO, Lingkun RAN, Xinyong SHEN. The evolution of hollow symmetric-PV tower during the landfall of Typhoon Mujigae (2015). Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(4): 817‒828 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-019-0783-7

References

[1]
Chen Y, Yau M K (2003). Asymmetric structures in a simulated landfalling hurricane. J Atmos Sci, 60(18): 2294–2312
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Corbosiero K L, Molinari J, Black M L (2005). The structure and evolution of Hurricane Elena (1985). Part I: Symmetric intensification. Mon Weather Rev, 133(10): 2905–2921
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Duan Y H, Chen L S, Liang J Y, Wang Y, Wu L G, Cui X P, Ma L M, Li Q Q (2014). Research progress in the unusual variations of typhoons before and after landfalling. Acta Meteorol Sin, 72(5): 969–986 (in Chinese)
[4]
Hendricks E A, Schubert W H, Chen Y H, Kuo H C, Peng M S (2014). Hurricane eyewall evolution in a forced shallow-water model. J Atmos Sci, 71(5): 1623–1643
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Jiao Y Y, Ran L K, Li N, Gao S T, Zhou G B (2017). High resolution numerical simulation of Typhoon Mujigae (2015) and analysis of vortex Rossby waves. Wuli Xuebao, 66(08): 381–400 (in Chinese)
[6]
Kossin J P, Eastin M D (2001). Two distinct regimes in the kinematic and thermodynamic structure of the hurricane eye and eyewall. J Atmos Sci, 58(9): 1079–1090
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Kuo H C, Williams R T, Chen J H (1999). A possible mechanism for the eye rotation of Typhoon Herb. J Atmos Sci, 56(11): 1659–1673
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Kurihara Y, Bender M A, Ross R J (1993). An initialization scheme of hurricane models by vortex specification. Mon Weather Rev, 121(7): 2030–2045
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Kurihara Y, Bender M A, Tuleya R E, Ross R J (1995). Improvements in the GFDL hurricane prediction system. Mon Weather Rev, 123(9): 2791–2801
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Li Y, Qian C H, Chen L S (2009). A study on the eyewall expansion of Typhoon Sepat (2009) during its landfall process. Acta Meteorol Sin, 67(5): 799–810 (in Chinese)
[11]
Liu S S, Liu S D (2011). Atmospheric Dynamics. 2nd ed. Beijing: Peking University Press, 92–93
[12]
Meng Z Y, Xu X D, Chen L S (1998). Mechansism of the impact of the cyclone system induced by the Taiwan Island topography on tropical cyclone unusual motion. Chin J Atmos Sci, 22(2): 156–168 (in Chinese)
[13]
Montgomery M T, Kallenbach R J (1997). A theory for vortex Rossby-waves and its application to spiral bands and intensity changes in hurricanes. Q J R Meteorol Soc, 123(538): 435–465
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Montgomery M T, Nicholls M E, Cram T A, Saunders A B (2006). A vortical hot tower route to tropical cyclogenesis. J Atmos Sci, 63(1): 355–386
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Montgomery M T, Smith R K (2014). Paradigms for tropical cyclone intensification. In: naval postgraduate school monterey ca dept of meteorology
[16]
Nguyen M C, Reeder M J, Davidson N E, Smith R K, Montgomery M T (2011). Inner-core vacillation cycles during the intensification of Hurricane Katrina. Q J R Meteorol Soc, 137(657): 829–844
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Reasor P D, Montgomery M T, Marks F D Jr, Gamache J F (2000). Low-wavenumber structure and evolution of the hurricane inner core observed by airborne dual-Doppler radar. Mon Weather Rev, 128(6): 1653–1680
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Rozoff C M, Kossin J P, Schubert W H, Mulero P J (2009). Internal control of hurricane intensity variability: the dual nature of potential vorticity mixing. J Atmos Sci, 66(1): 133–147
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Schubert W H, Montgomery M T, Taft R K, Guinn T A, Fulton S R, Kossin J P, Edwards J P (1999). Polygonal eyewalls, asymmetric eye contraction, and potential vorticity mixing in hurricanes. J Atmos Sci, 56(9): 1197–1223
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Shapiro L J, Willoughby H E (1982). The response of balanced hurricanes to local sources of heat and momentum. J Atmos Sci, 39(2): 378–394
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Su H, Qian C, Gu H, Wang Q (2016). The impact of tropical cyclones on China in 2015. Trop Cyclone Res Rev, 5(1–2): 1–11
[22]
Wang Y, Holland G J (1996). The beta drift of baroclinic vortices. Part II: Diabatic vortices. J Atmos Sci, 53(24): 3737–3756
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Wang Y (2002). Vortex Rossby waves in a numerically simulated tropical cyclone. Part I: Overall structure, potential vorticity, and kinetic energy budgets. J Atmos Sci, 59(7): 1213–1238
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Wang Y, Wu C C (2004). Current understanding of tropical cyclone structure and intensity changes—a review. Meteorol Atmos Phys, 87(4): 257–278
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Wei C S, Zhao K, Yu H, Wang M J (2011). Mesoscale structure of landfall Typhoon Khanun (0515) by single doppler Radar. Chin J Atmos Sci, 35(1): 68–80 (in Chinese)
[26]
Williams G J Jr (2017). The generation and maintenance of hollow PV towers in a forced primitive equation model. In: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Proceedings. 2017, 1(5): 156
[27]
Wu C C, Cheng H J, Wang Y, Chou K H (2009). A numerical investigation of the eyewall evolution in a landfalling typhoon. Mon Weather Rev, 137(1): 21–40
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Yu J H, Tan Z M (2007). Island-like topographic effects on the propagation of vortex rossby waves. Journal of Nanjing University, 43(06):597–605 (in Chinese)
[29]
Zhang D L, Liu Y, Yau M K (1999). Surface winds at landfall of Hurricane Andrew (1992)—A reply. Mon Weather Rev, 127(7): 1711–1721
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Zhang S F, Yu H, Xiang C Y (2015). Error analysis on official Typhoon intensity forecasts of CMO from 2001 to 2012. Meteorol Monogr, 41(10): 1278–1285 (in Chinese)

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Strategic Leading Science and Technology Project (A) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grants Nos. XDA17010105 and XDA20100304), the National Basic Research Program of China (Grants No. 2015CB452804), and the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41575065, 4177510, and 41530427), and The Key Projects of Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Plan (Grants No. 20180201035SF).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(4629 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/