Probabilistic forecasting based on ensemble forecasts and EMOS method for TGR inflow

Yixuan ZHONG, Shenglian GUO, Feng XIONG, Dedi LIU, Huanhuan BA, Xushu WU

Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (1) : 188-200.

PDF(966 KB)
PDF(966 KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (1) : 188-200. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-019-0773-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Probabilistic forecasting based on ensemble forecasts and EMOS method for TGR inflow

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Probabilistic inflow forecasts can quantify the uncertainty involved in the forecasting process and provide useful risk information for reservoir management. This study proposed a probabilistic inflow forecasting scheme for the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) at 1–3 d lead times. The post-processing method Ensemble Model Output Statistics (EMOS) is used to derive probabilistic inflow forecasts from ensemble inflow forecasts. Considering the inherent skew feature of the inflow series, lognormal and gamma distributions are used as EMOS predictive distributions in addition to conventional normal distribution. Results show that TGR’s ensemble inflow forecasts at 1–3 d lead times perform well with high model efficiency and small mean absolute error. Underestimation of forecasting uncertainty is observed for the raw ensemble inflow forecasts with biased probability integral transform (PIT) histograms. The three EMOS probabilistic forecasts outperform the raw ensemble forecasts in terms of both deterministic and probabilistic performance at 1–3 d lead times. The EMOS results are more reliable with much flatter PIT histograms, coverage rates approximate to the nominal coverage 89.47% and satisfactory sharpness. Results also show that EMOS with gamma distribution is superior to normal and lognormal distributions. This research can provide reliable probabilistic inflow forecasts without much variation of TGR’s operational inflow forecasting procedure.

Keywords

ensemble forecast / probabilistic forecast / numeric weather prediction / EMOS / Three Gorges Reservoir

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yixuan ZHONG, Shenglian GUO, Feng XIONG, Dedi LIU, Huanhuan BA, Xushu WU. Probabilistic forecasting based on ensemble forecasts and EMOS method for TGR inflow. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(1): 188‒200 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-019-0773-9

References

[1]
Arnal L, Ramos M H, de Perez E C, Cloke H L, Stephens E, Wetterhall F, van Andel S J, Pappenberger F (2016). Willingness-to-pay for a probabilistic flood forecast: a risk-based decision-making game. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 20(8): 3109–3128
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Baran S, Lerch S (2015). Lognormal distribution based EMOS models for probabilistic wind speed forecasting. Q J R Meteorol Soc, 141(691) 2289–2299
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Baran S, Nemoda D (2016). Censored and shifted gamma distribution based EMOS model for probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting. Environmetrics, 27(5): 280–292
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Bourdin D R, Nipen T N, Stull R B (2014). Reliable probabilistic forecasts from an ensemble reservoir inflow forecasting system. Water Resour Res, 50(4): 3108–3130
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Bröcker J, Smith L A (2007). Increasing the reliability of reliability diagrams. Weather Forecast, 22(3): 651–661
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Chen L, Singh V P, Guo S, Zhou J, Zhang J (2015). Copula-based method for multisite monthly and daily streamflow simulation. J Hydrol (Amst), 528: 369–384
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Cloke H L, Pappenberger F (2009). Ensemble flood forecasting: a review. J Hydrol (Amst), 375(3–4): 613–626
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Cunge J A (1969). On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Muskingum method). J Hydraul Res, 7(2): 205–230
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Duan Q, Ajami N K, Gao X, Sorooshian S (2007). Multi-model ensemble hydrologic prediction using Bayesian model averaging. Adv Water Resour, 30(5): 1371–1386
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Dunne T (1978). Field studies of hillslope flow processes. Hillslope hydrology, 227: 227–293
[11]
Emam A R, Kappas M, Fassnacht S, Linh N H K (2018). Uncertainty analysis of hydrological modeling in a tropical area using different algorithms. Front Earth Sci, 12(4): 661–671
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Fernandez B, Salas J D (1986). Periodic gamma autoregressive processes for operational hydrology. Water Resour Res, 22(10): 1385–1396
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Gneiting T, Balabdaoui F, Raftery A E (2007). Probabilistic forecasts, calibration and sharpness. J R Stat Soc, 69(2): 243–268
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Gneiting T, Raftery A E (2005). Weather forecasting with ensemble methods. Science, 310(5746): 248–249
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[15]
Gneiting T, Katzfuss M (2014). Probabilistic forecasting. J R Stat Soc, 1(1): 125–151
[16]
Goldberg D E (1989). Genetic algorithm in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison Wesley: 2104–2116
[17]
Hamill T M (2001). Interpretation of rank histograms for verifying ensemble forecasts. Mon Weather Rev, 129(3): 550–560
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Hardy J, Gourley J J, Kirstetter P E, Hong Y, Kong F, Flamig Z L (2016). A method for probabilistic flash flood forecasting. J Hydrol (Amst), 541: 480–494
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Hemri S, Lisniak D, Klein B (2015). Multivariate postprocessing techniques for probabilistic hydrological forecasting. Water Resour Res, 51(9): 7436–7451
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Huang K D, Ye L, Chen L, Wang Q, Dai L, Zhou J, Singh V P, Huang M, Zhang J (2018). Risk analysis of flood control reservoir operation considering multiple uncertainties. J Hydrol (Amst), 565: 672–684
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Hu C H, Guo S L, Xiong L H, Peng D (2005). A modified Xinanjiang model and its application in Northern China. Hydrol Res, 36(2): 175–192
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Jiang S, Ren L, Hong Y, Yang X, Ma M, Zhang Y, Yuan F (2014). Improvement of multi-satellite real-time precipitation products for ensemble streamflow simulation in a middle latitude basin in south China. Water Resour Manage, 28(8): 2259–2278
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Jie M X, Chen H, Xu C Y, Zeng Q, Chen J, Kim J S, Guo S, Guo F Q (2018). Transferability of conceptual hydrological models across temporal resolutions: approach and application. Water Resour Manage, 32(4): 1367–1381
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Kang L, Zhou L, Zhang S (2017). Parameter estimation of two improved nonlinear Muskingum models considering the lateral flow using a hybrid Algorithm. Water Resour Manage, 31(14): 4449–4467
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Khan M M, Shamseldin A Y, Melville B W, Shoaib M (2015). Stratification of NWP forecasts for medium-range ensemble streamflow forecasting. J Hydrol Eng, 20(7): 04014076
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Laiolo P, Gabellani S, Rebora N, Rudari R, Ferraris L, Ratto S, Stevenin H, Cauduro M (2014). Validation of the flood-proofs probabilistic forecasting system. Hydrol Processes, 28(9): 3466–3481
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Lerch S, Thorarinsdottir T L (2013). Comparison of non-homogeneous regression models for probabilistic wind speed forecasting. Tellus, 65(10): 98–110
[28]
Lewis D, Singer M J, Dahlgren R A, Tate K W (2000). Hydrology in a California oak woodland watershed: a 17-year study. J Hydrol (Amst), 240(1–2): 106–117
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Lan T, Lin K, Liu Z, He Y H, Xu C Y, Zhang H B, Chen X H (2018). A clustering preprocessing framework for the subannual calibration of a hydrological model considering climate-land surface variations. Water Resour Res, 54
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Lin K, Lv F, Chen L, Singh V P, Zhang Q, Chen X (2014). Xinanjiang model combined with Curve Number to simulate the effect of land use change on environmental flow. J Hydrol (Amst), 519: 3142–3152
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Liu J, Xie Z (2014). BMA probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting over the Huaihe Basin using TIGGE multi-model ensemble forecasts. Mon Weather Rev, 142(4): 1542–1555
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Liu Z, Guo S, Zhang H, Liu D, Yang G (2016). Comparative study of three updating procedures for real-time flood forecasting. Water Resour Manage, 30(7): 2111–2126
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Liu Z, Guo S, Xiong L, Xu C Y (2018). Hydrologic uncertainty processor based on copula function. Hydrol Sci J, 63(1): 74–86
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Mascaro G, Vivoni E R, Deidda R (2011). Impact of basin scale and initial condition on ensemble streamflow forecast uncertainty. In: The 25th Conference on Hydrology, American Meteorological Society
[35]
Najafi M R, Moradkhani H (2016). Towards ensemble combination of seasonal streamflow forecasts. J Hydrol Eng, 21(1): 04015043
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Nash J E, Sutcliffe J V (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models: part 1: a discussion of principles. J Hydrol (Amst), 10(3): 282–290
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Oudin L, Andréassian V, Mathevet T, Perrin C, Michel C (2006). Dynamic averaging of rainfall-runoff model simulations from complementary model parameterizations. Water Resour Res, 42(7): 887–896
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Parasuraman K, Elshorbagy A (2007). Cluster-based hydrologic prediction using Genetic Algorithm-trained Neural Networks. J Hydrol Eng, 12(1): 52–62
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Perrin C, Michel C, Andréassian V (2001). Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments. J Hydrol (Amst), 242(3–4): 275–301
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Perrin C, Michel C, Andréassian V (2003). Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation. J Hydrol (Amst), 279(1–4): 275–289
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Raftery A E, Gneiting T, Balabdaoui F, Polakowski M (2005). Using Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles. Mon Weather Rev, 133(5): 1155–1174
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Steinschneider S, Brown C (2011). Influences of North Atlantic climate variability on low-flows in the Connecticut River Basin. J Hydrol (Amst), 409(1–2): 212–224
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Sloughter J M, Raftery A E, Gneiting T, Fraley C (2007). Probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting using Bayesian model averaging. Mon Weather Rev, 135(9): 3209–3220
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Thorarinsdottir T L, Gneiting T (2010). Probabilistic forecasts of wind speed: ensemble model output statistics by using heteroscedastic censored regression. J R Stat Soc (Ser A), 173(2): 371–388
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Tian Y, Xu Y P, Zhang X J (2013). Assessment of climate change impacts on river high flows through comparative use of GR4J, HBV and Xinanjiang models. Water Resour Manage, 27(8): 2871–2888
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Todini E (2017). Flood forecasting and decision making in the new millennium: where are we? Water Resour Manage, 31(8): 1–19
[47]
Wilks D S, Hamill T M (2007). Comparison of ensemble-MOS methods using GFS reforecasts. Mon Weather Rev, 135(6): 2379–2390
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
WMO (2005) First Workshop on the THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble (TIGGE), Final Report
[49]
WMO (2010) Workshop on the Strategy and Action Plan of the WMO Flood Forecasting Initiative, Final Report
[50]
Wu C L, Chau K W (2006). A flood forecasting neural network model with genetic algorithm. Int J Environ Pollut, 28(3–4): 261–273
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Wu Z, Wu J, Lu G (2016). A one-way coupled atmospheric-hydrological modeling system with combination of high-resolution and ensemble precipitation forecasting. Front Earth Sci, 10(3): 432–443
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Xiong F, Guo S, Chen L, Yin J, Liu P (2018). Flood frequency analysis using Halphen distribution and maximum entropy. J Hydrol Eng, 23(5): 04018012
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Yue S, Ouarda T B M J, Bobée B (2001). A review of bivariate gamma distributions for hydrological application. J Hydrol (Amst), 246(1–4): 1–18
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Zhao L, Qi Dan, Tian F, Wu H, D, J, Wang Z, Li A (2012). Probabilistic flood prediction in the upper Huaihe catchment using TIGGE data. J Meteorol Res, 26(1): 62–71
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Zhao R (1992). The Xinanjiang model applied in China. J Hydrol (Amst), 135(1–4): 371–381
[56]
Zhong Y, Guo S, Ba H, Xiong F, Chang F J, Lin K (2018a). Evaluation of the BMA probabilistic inflow forecasts using TIGGE numeric precipitation predictions based on artificial neural network. Hydrol Res, 49(5): 1417–1433
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Zhong Y, Guo S, Liu Z, Wang Y, Yin J (2018b). Quantifying differences between reservoir inflows and dam site floods using frequency and risk analysis methods. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess, (6):1–15

Acknowledgment

This study is supported by the National Key Research and Development Plan of China (No. 2016YFC0402206) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51879192, 91647106). Thanks are also given to CWRC for providing necessary data and the three anonymous reviewers’ valuable suggestions to improve our manuscript.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(966 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/