Understanding the relationships between poverty alleviation and ecosystem conservation: empirical evidence from western China

Abstract

Despite growing interest in the use of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) for both social and ecological benefits, few studies have investigated the feedback and interaction between poverty alleviation and ecosystem protection outcomes. In this study, the poverty reduction effects of PES policies and their subsequent influence on environmental protection outcomes are investigated. To address these questions, 222 local rural households who were involved in PES programs from the Habahu National Nature Reserve in western China were interviewed. The results showed that the social and ecological outcomes of PES policies are neither two separate entities nor a trade-off. While rural households are the key participants in PES programs, the social and ecological outcomes of PES policies are closely related to each other. In addition, poverty reduction results could greatly influence ecosystem conservation effects. Livelihood assets, as well as the attitudes of rural households, play important roles in both of the outcomes. This research provides a new perspective that considers the social and ecological benefits of PES policies, and it also calls for an integrated consideration of social and ecological components in the design of PES policies to achieve enhanced results both for poverty alleviation and ecosystem conservation.

Keywords

payments for ecosystem services (PES) / ecosystem protection / poverty alleviation / livelihood assets

References

[1] Adhikari B, Agrawal A (2013). Understanding the social and ecological outcomes of PES projects: a review and an analysis. Conserv Soc, 11(4): 359–374

[2] Alix-Garcia J M, Sims K R, Yañez-Pagans P (2015). Only one tree from each seed? Environmental effectiveness and poverty alleviation in Mexico’s Payments for Ecosystem Services Program. Am Econ J Econ Policy, 7(4): 1–40

[3] Angelsen A, Wertz-Kanounnikoff S (2008). What are the Key Design Issues for REDD and the Criteria for Assessing Option. Bogor: CIFOR

[4] Arriagada R A, Sills E O, Ferraro P J, Pattanayak S K (2015). Do payments pay off? Evidence from participation in Costa Rica’s PES program. PLoS One, 10(7): e0131544

[5] Ash N, Blanco H, Garcia K, Brown C (2010). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: a Manual for Assessment Practitioners. Washington D.C: Island Press

[6] Baylis K, Fullerton D, Shah P (2013). What drives forest leakage? Working Paper. Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

[7] Bétrisey F, Bastiaensen J, Mager C (2018). Payments for ecosystem services and social justice: using recognition theories to assess the Bolivian Acuerdos Recíprocos por el Agua. Geoforum, 92: 134–143

[8] Börner J, Baylis K, Corbera E, Ezzine-de-Blas D, Honey-Rosés J, Persson U M, Wunder S (2017). The effectiveness of payments for environmental services. World Dev, 96: 359–374

[9] Cao S, Xu X, Wu W (2017). A comparative analysis of household livelihoods in Zhejiang mountainous areas under the background of farmer households differentiation. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 34(01): 161–169 (in Chinese)

[10] Chan K M A, Guerry A D, Balvanera P, Klain S, Satterfield T, Basurto X, Bostrom A, Chuenpagdee R, Gould R, Halpern B S, Hannahs N, Levine J, Norton B, Ruckelshaus M, Russell R, Tam J, Woodside U (2012). Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience, 62(8): 744–756

[11] Costanza R, de Groot R, Braat L, Kubiszewski I, Fioramonti L, Sutton P, Farber S, Grasso M (2017). Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst Serv, 28: 1–16

[12] DFID (1999). Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets. London: DFID

[13] Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S (2008). Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol Econ, 65(4): 663–674

[14] Ezzine-de-Blas D, Wunder S, Ruiz-Pérez M, Moreno-Sanchez R P (2016). Global patterns in the implementation of payments for environmental services. PLoS One, 11(3): e0149847

[15] Fan S, Zhou L, Ma Y (2005). The effects of environmental protection policy on households: a case study in Yanchi County. China Population, Resources and Environment, 15 (3): 124–128 (in Chinese)

[16] Ferraro P J, Kiss A (2002). Ecology. Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science, 298(5599): 1718–1719

[17] Grieg-Gran M, Porras I, Wunder S (2005). How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World Dev, 33(9): 1511–1527

[18] Habahu National Nature Reserve Management Bureau (HNNRMB) (2018). General situation of protected areas. Available at Habahu Government website (in Chinese)

[19] Hegde R, Bull G Q (2011). Performance of an agro-forestry based Payments-for-Environmental-Services project in Mozambique: a household level analysis. Ecol Econ, 71: 122–130

[20] Howe C, Suich H, Vira B, Mace G M (2014). Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: a meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world. Glob Environ Change, 28: 263–275

[21] Ingram J C, Wilkie D, Clements T, McNab R B, Nelson F, Baur E H, Sachedina H T, Peterson D D, Foley C A H (2014). Evidence of payments for ecosystem services as a mechanism for supporting biodiversity conservation and rural livelihoods. Ecosyst Serv, 7: 10–21

[22] Krantz L (2001). The sustainable livelihood approach to poverty reduction. SIDA. Division for Policy and Socio-Economic Analysis, 44

[23] Landell-Mills N, Porras I T (2002). Silver Bullet or Fools’ Gold? A Global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services and Their Impact on the Poor. Nottingham: Russell Press

[24] Leimona B, Lee E (2008). Pro-poor Payment for Environmental Services: Some Considerations. Borgor: RUPES-ICRAF SEA

[25] Li C, Li S, Feldman M W, Li J, Zheng H, Daily G C (2018). The impact on rural livelihoods and ecosystem services of a major relocation and settlement program: a case in Shaanxi, China. Ambio, 47(2): 245–259

[26] Li H, Ma H, Yang R (2017). Influence of cotton farmer’s livelihood capitals on livelihood strategy—based on the survey data of Manas and Awat counties, Xinjiang. J Arid Land Resour Environ, 31(05): 57–63 (in Chinese)

[27] Liebenow D K, Cohen M J, Gumbricht T, Shepherd K D, Shepherd G (2012). Do ecosystem services influence household wealth in rural Mali? Ecol Econ, 82: 33–44

[28] Liu C, Lu J, Yin R (2010). An estimation of the effects of China’s Priority Forestry Programs on farmers’ income. Environ Manage, 45(3): 526–540

[29] Liu J, Daily G C, Ehrlich P R, Luck G W (2003). Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature, 421(6922): 530–533

[30] Miller B W, Caplow S C, Leslie P W (2012). Feedbacks between conservation and social-ecological systems. Conserv Biol, 26(2): 218–227

[31] Milner-Gulland E J (2012). Interactions between human behaviour and ecological systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 367(1586): 270–278

[32] Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China (MEP) (2015). National Ecological Functional Zoning (in Chinese)

[33] Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China (MOF) (2016). 2017 central budget for local tax return and transfer payments (in Chinese)

[34] Ministry of finance (MOF) and State forestry administration (SFA) (2004). Management measures of the central forest ecological compensation fund (in Chinese)

[35] National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China (NBS) (2018). People’s Republic of China 2017 national economic and social development statistical bulletin (in Chinese)

[36] Ouyang Z Y, Zheng H, Yue P (2013). Establishment of ecological compensation mechanisms in China: perspectives and strategies. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33 (3): 0686–0692

[37] Pagiola S, Agostini P, Gobbi J, de Haan C, Ibrahim M, Murgueitio E, Ramírez E, Rosales M, Ruíz J P (2005a). Paying for biodiversity conservation services: experience in Colombia, Costa Rica, and Nicaragua. Mt Res Dev, 25(3): 206–212

[38] Pagiola S, Arcenas A, Platais G (2005b). Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Dev, 33(2): 237–253

[39] Pattanayak S K, Wunder S, Ferraro P J (2010). Show me the money: Do payments supply environmental services in developing countries? Rev Environ Econ Policy, 4(2): 254–274

[40] Persson U M, Alpízar F (2013). Conditional cash transfers and payments for environmental services—a conceptual framework for explaining and judging differences in outcomes. World Dev, 43: 124–137

[41] Petheram L, Campbell B M (2010). Listening to locals on payments for environmental services. J Environ Manage, 91(5): 1139–1149

[42] Samii C, Lisiecki M, Kulkarni P, Paler L, Chavis L (2014). Effects of payment for environmental services (PES) on deforestation and poverty in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Campbell Syst Rev, 10(1):1–95

[43] Shang W, Gong Y, Wang Z, Stewardson M J (2018). Eco-compensation in China: theory, practices and suggestions for the future. J Environ Manage, 210: 162–170

[44] Soini E (2005). Land use change patterns and livelihood dynamics on the slopes of Mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Agric Syst, 85(3): 306–323

[45] State forestry administration information office (SFAIO) (2006). The state forestry administration Grain for Green Project management office (in Chinese)

[46] Statistical Bureau of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (SBNHAR) (2017). Ningxia statistical yearbook 2017 (in Chinese)

[47] Suich H, Howe C, Mace G (2015). Ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: a review of the empirical links. Ecosyst Serv, 12: 137–147

[48] The CPC Central Committee the State Council (CPCCC and SC) (2011, Dec 1). The Outline for Development-oriented Poverty Reduction for China’s Rural Areas (2011–2020) (in Chinese)

[49] The State Council (SC) (2010). National Main Function Area Planning (in Chinese)

[50] The State Council (SC) (2016). Opinions on Perfecting the Compensation Mechanisms of Ecological Protection (in Chinese)

[51] Van Hecken G, Bastiaensen J (2010). Payments for ecosystem services: justified or not? A political view. Environ Sci Policy, 13(8): 785–792

[52] Wang H, Dong Z, Xu Y, Ge C (2016). Eco-compensation for watershed services in China. Water Int, 41(2): 271–289

[53] Wendland K J, Honzák M, Portela R, Vitale B, Rubinoff S, Randrianarisoa J (2010). Targeting and implementing payments for ecosystem services: opportunities for bundling biodiversity conservation with carbon and water services in Madagascar. Ecol Econ, 69(11): 2093–2107

[54] Wu L, Jin L (2018). Influence of eco-compensation on peasant households’ livelihood in poverty-stricken regions in Guizhou Province. J Arid Land Resour Environ, 32(08): 1–7 (in Chinese)

[55] Wu Z, Penning M J, Zeng W, Li S, Chappell N L (2016). Relocation and social support among older adults in rural China. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 71(6): 1108–1119

[56] Wunder S (2005). Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. Occasional Paper No. 42. Bogor: CIFOR

[57] Wunder S (2007). The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conserv Biol, 21(1): 48–58

[58] Wunder S, Engel S, Pagiola S (2008). Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecol Econ, 65(4): 834–852

[59] Xie H, He X, You W, Yu D, Liu H, Wang J, Gu S, Nie Q, Liang Y, Zhang J (2016). Effects of ecological stoichiometry on biomass and species diversity of the Artemisia ordosica commuty in Habahu National Nature Reserve. Acta Ecol Sin, 36(12): 3621–3627 (in Chinese)

[60] Xu S (2013). State Council Report on the Construction of Ecological Compensation Mechanism (in Chinese)

[61] Yanchi County People’s Government (YCPG) (2017). Yanchi County Overview (in Chinese)

[62] Zhao W, Yang S, Wang X (2016). The relationship between livelihood capital and livelihood strategy based on logistic regression model in Xinping County of Yuanjiag dry-hot valley. Resour Sci, 38(01): 136–143 (in Chinese)

[63] Zhao X, Zhang L, Jiang J, Hou C (2013). The impact of ecological compensation on the farmers’ livelihood: a case study of Huanghe River Water Supply Areas of Gannan. Geogr Res, 32(03): 531–542 (in Chinese)

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41471092, 41501095 and 4170011561). The view expressed in this document does not reflect the official opinions of donors. Experiments performed in this research comply with the current laws of China.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature