Spatial and temporal correlation between beach and wave processes: implications for bar–berm sediment transition

V. JOEVIVEK , N. CHANDRASEKAR , S. SARAVANAN , H. ANANDAKUMAR , K. THANUSHKODI , N. SUGUNA , J. JAYA

Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2) : 349 -360.

PDF (1743KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2) : 349 -360. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-017-0655-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Spatial and temporal correlation between beach and wave processes: implications for bar–berm sediment transition

Author information +
History +
PDF (1743KB)

Abstract

Investigation of a beach and its wave conditions is highly requisite for understanding the physical processes in a coast. This study composes spatial and temporal correlation between beach and nearshore processes along the extensive sandy beach of Nagapattinam coast, southeast peninsular India. The data collection includes beach profile, wave data, and intertidal sediment samples for 2 years from January 2011 to January 2013. The field data revealed significant variability in beach and wave morphology during the northeast (NE) and southwest (SW) monsoon. However, the beach has been stabilized by the reworking of sediment distribution during the calm period. The changes in grain sorting and longshore sediment transport serve as a clear evidence of the sediment migration that persevered between foreshore and nearshore regions. The Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis and Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) were utilized to investigate the spatial and temporal linkages between beach and nearshore criterions. The outcome of the multivariate analysis unveiled that the seasonal variations in the wave climate tends to influence the bar – berm sediment transition that is discerned in the coast.

Keywords

beach / nearshore / sandbar / grain size / empirical orthogonal function / canonical correlation analysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
V. JOEVIVEK, N. CHANDRASEKAR, S. SARAVANAN, H. ANANDAKUMAR, K. THANUSHKODI, N. SUGUNA, J. JAYA. Spatial and temporal correlation between beach and wave processes: implications for bar–berm sediment transition. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(2): 349-360 DOI:10.1007/s11707-017-0655-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Araya-Vergara J F (1986). Toward a classification of beach profiles. J Coast Res, 2(2): 159–165

[2]

Bascom W N (1951). The relationship between sand size and beach-face slope. Trans Am Geophys Union, 32(6): 866

[3]

Bascom W N (1953). Characteristics of natural beaches. In: Proc 4th Conf Coast Eng, 163–180

[4]

Bascom W N (1964). Waves and Beaches: The Dynamics of the Ocean Surface. Garden City N.Y.: Doubleday and Company

[5]

Blossier B, Bryan K R, Daly C J, Winter C (2016). Nearshore sandbar rotation at single-barred embayed beaches. J Geophys Res: Ocean, 121(4): 2286–2313

[6]

Blott S J, Pye K (2001). GRADISTAT : a grain size distribution and statistics package for the analysis of unconsolidated sediments. Earth Surf Process Landf, 26(11): 1237–1248

[7]

Broekema Y B, Giardino A, van der Werf J J, van Rooijen A A, Vousdoukas M I, van Prooijen B C (2016). Observations and modelling of nearshore sediment sorting processes along a barred beach profile. Coast Eng, 118: 50–62

[8]

Clark D (1975). Understanding canonical correlation analysis. In: Concepts and techniques in modern geography- No.3. Geo Abstracts Ltd, p 36

[9]

Dail H J, Merrifield M A, Bevis M (2000). Steep beach morphology changes due to energetic wave forcing. Mar Geol, 162(2–4): 443–458

[10]

Folk R L, Ward W C (1957). Brazos River bar, a study in the significance of grain size parameters. J Sediment Res, 27(1): 3–26

[11]

Galvin C J Jr (1968). Breaker type classification on three laboratory beaches. J Geophys Res, 73(12): 3651–3659

[12]

Hardoon D R, Szedmak S, Shawe-Taylor J (2004). Canonical correlation analysis: an overview with application to learning methods. Neural Comput, 16(12): 2639–2664

[13]

Harley M D, Turner I L, Short A D (2015). New insights into embayed beach rotation: the importance of wave exposure and cross-shore processes. J Geophys Res: Earth Surf, 120(8): 1470–1484

[14]

Horrillo-Caraballo J M, Reeve D E (2011). Application of a statistical method to investigate patterns of beach evolution in the vicinity of a seawall. J Coast Res, SI64: 95–99

[15]

Hsu T J, Elgar S, Guza R T (2006). Wave-induced sediment transport and onshore sandbar migration. Coast Eng, 53(10): 817–824

[16]

Hunter E R, Edward C, Lawrence P R (1979). Depositional processes, sedimentary structures, and predicted vertical sequences in barred nearshore systems, southern oregon coast. J Sediment Petrol, 49(3): 711–726

[17]

Jayakumar S, Raju N S NGowthaman R (2004). Beach dynamics of an open coast on the west coast of India. In: 3rd Indian national conference on Harbour & Ocean engineering, NIO, Goa. 9–16

[18]

Jesse H B (2008). Variability in Beach Topography and Forcing Along Oak Island, North Carolina. Dissertation for Master Degree. University of North Carolina Wilmington

[19]

Joevivek V, Chandrasekar N (2014). Seasonal impact on beach morphology and the status of heavy mineral deposition – central Tamil Nadu coast, India. J Earth Syst Sci, 123(1): 135–149

[20]

Joevivek V, Chandrasekar N (2016). ONWET: a simple integrated tool for beach morphology and wave dynamics analysis. Mar Georesour Geotechnol, 34(6): 581–593

[21]

Joevivek V, Chandrasekar N (2017). Data on nearshore wave process and surficial beach deposits, central Tamil Nadu coast, India.Data Brief, 13: 306–311

[22]

Larson M, Capobianco M, Jansen H, Rozynshi G, Southgate H N, Stive M, Wijnberg K M, Hulscher S (2003). Analysis of field data of coastal morphological evolution over yearly and decadal time scales. Part 1: background and linear techniques. J Coast Res, 19(4): 760–775

[23]

Liu J T, Zarillo G A (1989). Distribution of grain sizes across a transgressive shoreface. Mar Geol, 87(2): 121–136

[24]

Maanen B V, Ruiter P J, Coco G, Bryan K R, Ruessink B G (2008). Onshore sandbar migration at Tairua Beach (New Zealand): numerical simulations and field measurements. Mar Geol, 253(3–4): 99–106

[25]

Marino-Tapia I J, Russell P E, O’Hare T J, Davidson A, Huntley D A (2007 a). Cross-shore sediment transport on natural beaches and its relation to sandbar migration patterns: 1. Field observations and derivation of a transport parameterization. J Geophys Res: Ocean, 112 (3): C03001

[26]

Marino-Tapia I J, Russell P E, O’Hare T J, Davidson A, Huntley D A (2007 b). Cross-shore sediment transport on natural beaches and its relation to sandbar migration patterns: 2. Application of the field transport parameterization. J Geophys Res: Ocean, 112(3):C03002

[27]

Masselink G, Austin M, Tinker J, O’Hare T, Russel P (2008). Cross-shore sediment transport and morphological response on a macrotidal beach with intertidal bar morphology, Truc Vert, France. Mar Geol, 251(3 – 4): 141–155

[28]

Miller H C (1999). Field measurements of longshore sediment transport during storms. Coast Eng, 36(4): 301–321

[29]

Miselis J L, McNinch J E (2006). Calculating shoreline erosion potential using nearshore stratigraphy and sediment volume: outer banks, North Carolina. J Geophys Res: Earth Surf, 111(2): 1–15

[30]

Nayak G N, Chavadi V C (1988). Studies on sediment size distribution of North Karnataka beaches, West coast of India, using empirical orthogonal function analysis. Indian J Mar Sci, 17: 63–66

[31]

Pape L, Kuriyama Y, Ruessink B G (2010 a). Models and scales for cross-shore sandbar migration. J Geophys Res: Earth Surf, 115(3): 1–13

[32]

Pape L, Plant N G, Ruessink B G (2010 b). On cross-shore migration and equilibrium states of nearshore sandbars. J Geophys Res: Earth Surf, 115(3): 1–16

[33]

Reis A H, Gama C (2010). Sand size versus beachface slope—An explanation based on the Constructal Law. Geomorphology, 114(3): 276–283

[34]

Różyński G (2003). Data-driven modeling of multiple longshore bars and their interactions. Coast Eng, 48(3): 151–170

[35]

Ruessink B G, Pape L, Turner I L (2009). Daily to interannual cross-shore sandbar migration: observations from a multiple sandbar system. Cont Shelf Res, 29(14): 1663–1677

[36]

Sanil Kumar V, Anand N M, Gowthaman R (2002). Variations in nearshore processes along Nagapattinam coast, India. Curr Sci, 82: 1381–1389

[37]

Saravanan S, Chandrasekar N, Joevivek V (2013). Temporal and spatial variation in the sediment volume along the beaches between Ovari and Kanyakumari (SE INDIA). Int J Sediment Res, 28(3): 384–395

[38]

Shenoi S S C, Murty C S, Veerayya M (1987). Monsoon-induced seasonal variability of sheltered versus exposed beaches along the west coast of India. Mar Geol, 76: 117–130

[39]

Xie S L, Liu T F (1987). Long-term variation of longshore sediment transport. Coast Eng, 11(2): 131–140

[40]

Short A D (2012). Coastal Processes and Beaches. Nat Educ Knowl, 3(10): 15

[41]

Splinter K D, Turner I L, Davidson M A, Barnard P, Castelle B, Oltman-Shay J (2014). A generalized equilibrium model for predicting daily to interannual shoreline response. J Geophys Res: Earth Surf, 119(9): 1936–1958

[42]

Svensson C (1999). Empirical orthogonal function analysis of daily rainfall in the upper reaches of the Huai River Basin, China. Theor Appl Climatol, 62(3): 147–161

[43]

Walton T L, Bruno R O (1989). Longshore transport at a detached breakwater, Phase II. J Coast Res, 5(4): 679–691

[44]

Wang P, Kraus N C, Davis R A (1998). Total longshore sediment transport rate in the surf zone: field measurements and empirical predictions. J Coast Res, 14(1): 269–282

[45]

Winant C D, Inman D L, Nordstrom C E (1975). Description of seasonal beach changes using empirical eigenfunctions. J Geophys Res, 80(15): 1979–1986

[46]

Wright L D, Short A D (1984). Morphodynamic variability of surf zones and beaches: a synthesis. Mar Geol, 56(1–4): 93–118

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1743KB)

979

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/