Data fusion in data scarce areas using a back-propagation artificial neural network model: a case study of the South China Sea

Zheng WANG, Zhihua MAO, Junshi XIA, Peijun DU, Liangliang SHI, Haiqing HUANG, Tianyu WANG, Fang GONG, Qiankun ZHU

PDF(5804 KB)
PDF(5804 KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2) : 280-298. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-017-0652-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Data fusion in data scarce areas using a back-propagation artificial neural network model: a case study of the South China Sea

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The cloud cover for the South China Sea and its coastal area is relatively large throughout the year, which limits the potential application of optical remote sensing. A HJ-charge-coupled device (HJ-CCD) has the advantages of wide field, high temporal resolution, and short repeat cycle. However, this instrument suffers from its use of only four relatively low-quality bands which can’t adequately resolve the features of long wavelengths. The Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper-plus (ETM+) provides high-quality data, however, the Scan Line Corrector (SLC) stopped working and caused striping of remote sensed images, which dramatically reduced the coverage of the ETM+ data. In order to combine the advantages of the HJ-CCD and Landsat ETM+ data, we adopted a back-propagation artificial neural network (BP-ANN) to fuse these two data types for this study. The results showed that the fused output data not only have the advantage of data intactness for the HJ-CCD, but also have the advantages of the multi-spectral and high radiometric resolution of the ETM+ data. Moreover, the fused data were analyzed qualitatively, quantitatively and from a practical application point of view. Experimental studies indicated that the fused data have a full spatial distribution, multi-spectral bands, high radiometric resolution, a small difference between the observed and fused output data, and a high correlation between the observed and fused data. The excellent performance in its practical application is a further demonstration that the fused data are of high quality.

Keywords

data fusion / South China Sea / BP-ANN model

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zheng WANG, Zhihua MAO, Junshi XIA, Peijun DU, Liangliang SHI, Haiqing HUANG, Tianyu WANG, Fang GONG, Qiankun ZHU. Data fusion in data scarce areas using a back-propagation artificial neural network model: a case study of the South China Sea. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(2): 280‒298 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-017-0652-1

References

[1]
Al-Sbou Y A (2012). Artificial neural networks evaluation as an image denoising tool. World Appl Sci J, 17(2): 218–227
[2]
Amici G,Dell'Acqua F,Gamba P,Pulina G (2004). A comparison of fuzzy and neuro-fuzzy data fusion for flooded area mapping using SAR images. Int J Remote Sens, 25(20): 4425–4430
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Benediktsson J A, Swain P H, Ersoy O K (1989). Neural Network Approaches Versus Statistical Methods in Classification of Multisource Remote Sensing Data. In: 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 489–492
[4]
Bernstein L S, Adler-Golden S M, Sundberg R L, Levine R Y, (2005). A new method for atmospheric correction and aerosol optical property retrieval for VIS-SWIR multi- and hyperspectral imaging sensors: QUAC (QUick atmospheric correction). Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. IGARSS '05. Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International IEEE, 2005:3549–3552
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Bossé É, Roy J, Paradis S (2000). Modeling and simulation in support of the design of a data fusion system. Inf Fusio10.1109/IGARSS. 2005.1526613n, 1(2): 77–87
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Busetto L, Meroni M, Colombo R (2008). Combining medium and coarse spatial resolution satellite data to improve the estimation of sub-pixel NDVI time series. Remote Sens Environ, 112(1): 118–131
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Chen F, Tang L, Wang C, Qiu Q (2011a). Recovering of the thermal band of Landsat 7 SLC-off ETM+ image using CBERS as auxiliary data. Adv Space Res, 48(6): 1086–1093
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Chen J, Zhu X, Vogelmann J E, Gao F, Jin S (2011b). A simple and effective method for filling gaps in Landsat ETM+ SLC-off images. Remote Sens Environ, 115(4): 1053–1064
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Chen Y, Deng L, Li J, Li X, Shi P (2006). A new wavelet‐based image fusion method for remotely sensed data. Int J Remote Sens, 27(7): 1465–1476
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Chen Z Y, Desai M, Zhang X P (1997). Feedforward neural networks with multilevel hidden neurons for remotely sensed image classification. In: International Conference on Image Processing, 2: 653–656
[11]
Daily M I, Farr T, Elachi C, Schaber G (1979). Geologic interpretation from composited radar and Landsat imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing, 45(8): 1109–1116
[12]
Ehlers M (1991). Multi sensor image fusion techniques in remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 46(1): 19–30
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Fan J, Zhao D, Wang J (2014). Oil Spill GF-1 Remote Sensing Image Segmentation Using an Evolutionary Feedforward Neural Network. In IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 446–450
[14]
Faouzi N E, Leung H, Kurian A (2011). Data fusion in intelligent transportation systems: progress and challenges – A survey. Inf Fusion, 12(1): 4–10
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Farifteh J, Van der Meer F, Atzberger C, Carranza E J M (2007). Quantitative analysis of salt-affected soil reflectance spectra: a comparison of two adaptive methods (PLSR and ANN). Remote Sens Environ, 110(1): 59–78
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Fiorella M, Ripple W J (1995). Determining successional stage of temperate coniferous forests with landsat satellite data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing, 59(2): 239–246
[17]
Gao B C (1996). NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sens Environ, 58(3): 257–266
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Gigli G, Bossé É, Lampropoulos G A (2007). An optimized architecture for classification combining data fusion and data-mining. Inf Fusion, 8(4): 366–378
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Hilker T, Wulder M A, Coops N C, Linke J, McDermid G, Masek J G, Gao F, White J C (2009). A new data fusion model for high spatial- and temporal-resolution mapping of forest disturbance based on Landsat and MODIS. Remote Sens Environ, 113(8): 1613–1627
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Hu Q, Wu W, Xia T, Yu Q, Yang P, Li Z, Song Q (2013). Exploring the use of Google Earth imagery and object-based methods in land use/cover mapping. Remote Sens, 5(11): 6026–6042
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Jacobson A, Dhanota J, Godfrey J, Jacobson H, Rossman Z, Stanish A, Walker H, Riggio J (2015). A novel approach to mapping land conversion using Google Earth with an application to East Africa. Environ Model Softw, 72: 1–9
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Karayiannis N B, Purushothaman G (1994). Fuzzy pattern classification using feedforward neural networks with multilevel hidden neurons. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 1994. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence
[23]
Khaleghi B, Khamis A, Karray F O, Razavi S N (2013). Multisensor data fusion: a review of the state-of-the-art. Inf Fusion, 14(1): 28–44
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Kiema J B K (2002). Texture analysis and data fusion in the extraction of topographic objects from satellite imagery. Int J Remote Sens, 23(4): 767–776
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Lee Z, Carder K L (2000). Band-ratio or spectral-curvature algorithms for satellite remote sensing. Appl Opt, 39(24): 4377–4380
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Liu R, Sun J, Wang J, Liao X (2011). Data quality evaluation of Chinese HJ CCD sensor. Advances in Earth Science, 26(9): 971–979
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Liu Y, Chen X, Peng H, Wang Z (2017a). Multi-focus image fusion with a deep convolutional neural network. Inf Fusion, 36: 191–207
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Liu Z, Blasch E, John V (2017b). Statistical comparison of image fusion algorithms: recommendations. Inf Fusion, 36: 251–260
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Maeda E E, Formaggio A R, Shimabukuro Y E, Arcoverde G F B, Hansen M C (2009). Predicting forest fire in the Brazilian Amazon using MODIS imagery and artificial neural networks. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf, 11(4): 265–272
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Mallick K, Bhattacharya B K, Patel N K (2009). Estimating volumetric surface moisture content for cropped soils using a soil wetness index based on surface temperature and NDVI. Agric Meteorol, 149(8): 1327–1342
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Maxwell S K, Schmidt G L, Storey J C (2007). A multi-scale segmentation approach to filling gaps in Landsat ETM+ SLC-off images. Int J Remote Sens, 28(23): 5339–5356
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
McFeeters S K (1996). The use of the normalized difference water index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. Int J Remote Sens, 17(7): 1425–1432
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Mehta A, Parihar A S, Mehta N (2015). Supervised Classification of Dermoscopic Images using Optimized Fuzzy Clustering based Multi-Layer Feed-Forward Neural Network. 2015 International Conference on Computer, Communication and Control (IC4)
[33]
Mohammdy M, Moradi H R, Zeinivand H, Temme A J A M, Pourghasemi H R, Alizadeh H (2014). Validating gap-filling of Landsat ETM+ satellite images in the Golestan Province, Iran. Arab J Geosci, 7(9): 3633–3638
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Mohan S, Mehta R L (1988). Combined Radar and Landsat data analysis for land use/cover studies over parts of the Punjab plains. J Indian Soc Remote Sens, 16(4): 33–36
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Muskat J (1983). Geologic interpretations of Seasat-A radar images and Landsat MSS images of a portion of the southern Appalachian Plateau, Virginia, Kentucky, West Virginia. California State University Northridge
[36]
Nachouki G, Quafafou M (2008). Multi-data source fusion. Inf Fusion, 9(4): 523–537
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Nguyen H, Katzfuss M, Cressie N, Braverman A(2014). Spatio-temporal data fusion for very large remote sensing datasets. Technometrics, 56(2): 174–185
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Novelli A, Tarantino E, Fratino U, Iacobellis V, Romano G, Gentile F (2016). A data fusion algorithm based on the Kalman filter to estimate leaf area index evolution in durum wheat by using field measurements and MODIS surface reflectance data. Remote Sens Lett, 7(5): 476–484
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Sharma S C, Rajendran N, Grover A K, Srivastava G S (1990). Interpretation of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery for geological appraisal: a comparative study in Anantapur district of Andhra Pradesh. J Indian Soc Remote Sens, 18(4): 45–64
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Sims D A, Rahman A F, Cordova V D, Elmasri B, Baldocchi D, Bolstad P, Flanagan L, Goldstein A, Hollinger D, Misson L (2008). A new model of gross primary productivity for North American ecosystems based solely on the enhanced vegetation index and land surface temperature from MODIS. Remote Sens Environ, 112(4): 1633–1646
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Suliman S I (2016). Locally linear manifold model for gap-filling algorithms of hyperspectral imagery: proposed algorithms and a comparative study. Dissertation for Master Degree. Michigan State University, 1–73
[42]
Tedesco M, Pulliainen J, Takala M, Hallikainen M, Pampaloni P (2004). Artificial neural network-based techniques for the retrieval of SWE and snow depth from SSM/I data. Remote Sens Environ, 90(1): 76–85
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Toutin T (1995). Intéegration de données multisources: comparaison de méthodes géométriques et radiométriques. Int J Remote Sens, 16(15): 2795–2811
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Turker M, San B T (2003). SPOT HRV data analysis for detecting earthquake-induced changes in Izmit, Turkey. Int J Remote Sens, 24(12): 2439–2450
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Weckenmann A, Jiang X, Sommer K D, Neuschaefer-Rube U, Seewig J, Shaw L, Estler T (2009). Multisensor data fusion in dimensional metrology. CIRP Annals- Manufacturing Technology, 58(2): 701–721
[46]
Welch R, Ehlers M (1987). Merging multiresolution SPOT HRV and Landsat TM data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing, 53: 301–303
[47]
Wilson E H, Sader S A (2002). Detection of forest harvest type using multiple dates of Landsat TM imagery. Remote Sens Environ, 80(3): 385–396
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Wu M Q, Wang J, Niu Z, Zhao Y Q, Wang C Y (2012). A model for spatial and temporal data fusion. J Infrared Millim W, 31(1): 80–84
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Xu H Q (2005). A study on information extraction of water body with the modified normalized difference water index (MNDWI).J Remot Sens, 9(5): 589‒595
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Zeng C, Shen H, Zhang L (2013). Recovering missing pixels for Landsat ETM+ SLC-off imagery using multi-temporal regression analysis and a regularization method. Remote Sens Environ, 131: 182–194
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Zervas E, Mpimpoudis A, Anagnostopoulos C, Sekkas O, Hadjiefthymiades S (2011). Multisensor data fusion for fire detection. Inf Fusion, 12(3): 150–159
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Zha Y, Gao J, Ni S (2003). Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. Int J Remote Sens, 24(3): 583–594
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Zhang C, Li W, Travis D (2007). Gaps-fill of SLC-off Landsat ETM+ satellite image using a geostatistical approach. Int J Remote Sens, 28(22): 5103–5122
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Zhu X, Liu D, Chen J (2012). A new geostatistical approach for filling gaps in Landsat ETM+ SLC-off images. Remote Sens Environ, 124: 49–60
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the reviewers and the editor for their constructive comments. This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC1400901), the High Resolution Earth Observation Systems of National Science and Technology Major Projects (41-Y20A31-9003-15/17), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41476156 and 41621064), and the Public Science and Technology Research Funds Projects of Ocean (201005030).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2017 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(5804 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/