Interactive effects of carbon dioxide, low temperature, and ultraviolet-B radiation on cotton seedling root and shoot morphology and growth

David BRAND, Chathurika WIJEWARDANA, Wei GAO, K. Raja REDDY

PDF(1188 KB)
PDF(1188 KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2016, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4) : 607-620. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-016-0605-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Interactive effects of carbon dioxide, low temperature, and ultraviolet-B radiation on cotton seedling root and shoot morphology and growth

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Interactive effects of multiple environmental stresses are predicted to have a negative effect on cotton growth and development and these effects will be exacerbated in the future climate. The objectives of this study were to test the hypothesis that cotton cultivars differ in their responses to multiple environmental factors of (CO2) [400 and 750 µmol·mol−1 (+(CO2)], temperature [28/20 and 20/12°C (−T)], and UV−B radiation [0 and 10 kJ·m−2·d−1 (+UV−B)]. A genetic and molecular standard (TM-1) and three modern cotton cultivars (DP1522B2XF, PHY496W3R, and ST4747GLB2) were grown in eight sunlit, controlled environment chambers with control treatment 400 µmol·mol−1 [CO2], 28/21°C temperature, and 0 kJ UV−B. The results showed significant differences among the cultivars for most of the shoot and root parameters. Plants grown under low temperature alone or as a combination with+UV−B treatment caused more detrimental effects on root and shoot vigor. Although the elevated CO2 treatments weakened the damaging effects of higher UV−B levels on cotton growth on all cultivars, increased CO2 could not mask the negative effects of low temperature. When comparing all cultivars, genetic standard TM-1 produced the smallest values for the majority of traits under CO2, UV−B, and low temperature either alone or in combination with other treatments. Based on principal component analysis, the four cultivars were classified as tolerant (DP1522B2XF), intermediate (PHY496W3R and ST4747GLB2) and sensitive (TM-1) to multiple environmental stresses.Low temperature was identified as the most damaging treatment to cotton early seedling vigor while elevated CO2 caused the least. Existing variability of cotton cultivars in response to multiple environmental stresses could allow for selection of cultivars with the best coping ability and higher lint yield for future climate change environments.

Keywords

Cotton / Climate change / winRHIZO / Principal component analysis. / Stress tolerance. / Abbreviations: DAP, Days after planting / SPAR- Soil-Plant-Atmosphere-Research / PCA, Principal component analysis / SGR, Seed germination rate / PH, Plant height / NOD, Node number / NAR, Node addition rate / LA, Leaf area / LW, Leaf weight / SW, Shoot weight / RW, Root weight / TD, Total dry weight / RS, Root/shoot ratio / RL, Root length / RSA, Root surface area / RD, Root diameter / RLV, Root length per soil volume / RV, Root volume / RT, Number of tips / RF, Number of forks / RC, Number of crossings / SPAD, Total chlorophyll / PHOL, phenolic content

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
David BRAND, Chathurika WIJEWARDANA, Wei GAO, K. Raja REDDY. Interactive effects of carbon dioxide, low temperature, and ultraviolet-B radiation on cotton seedling root and shoot morphology and growth. Front. Earth Sci., 2016, 10(4): 607‒620 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-016-0605-0

References

[1]
Arndt C H (1945). Temperature-growth relations of the roots and hypocotyls of cotton seedlings. Plant Physiol, 20(2): 200–220
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Bange M P, Constable G A, Gordon S G, Naylor G R S, Van der Sluijs M H J (2009). Importance of fiber quality. In M.P Bange et al. (ed.) FIBREpak A guide to improving Australian cotton fiber quality. CSIRO and the Cotton Catchment Communities Coop. Research Centre, Narrabri, NSW, Australia, 30–42
[3]
Bange M P, Milroy S P (2004a). Impact of short term exposure to cold temperatures on early development of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Aus. J. Ag. Res., 55(6): 655–664
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Bowes G (1996). Photosynthetic responses to changing atmospheric carbon dioxide. In: N.R. Baker (ed.). Photosynthesis and the Environment. Advances in Photosynthesis Vol. 5, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 387–407
[5]
Christiansen M N, Thomas R O (1969). Season-long effects of chilling treatments applied to germinating cottonseed. Crop Sci, 9(5): 672–673
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Gao Z, Gao W, Chang N (2010). Comparative analyses of the ultraviolet-B flux over the continental United State based on the NASA total ozone mapping spectrometer data and USDA groundbased measurements. J Appl Remote Sens, 4(1): 1–18
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Hewitt E J (1952). Sand and water culture: methods used in the study of plant nutrition. Technical Communication No. 22, Commonwealth bureau of horticulture and plantation, East Malling, Maidstone. Kent Publishers, Commonwealth agricultural bureaux farmham royal, Bucks, England, 187–190
[8]
Kakani V G, Reddy K R, Zhao D, Gao W (2004). Senescence and hyperspectral reflectance of cotton leaves exposed to ultraviolet-B radiation and carbon dioxide. Physiol Plant, 121(2): 250–257
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Kakani V G, Reddy K R, Zhao D, Mohammed A R (2003). Effects of ultraviolet-B radiation on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) morphology and anatomy. Ann Bot (Lond), 91(7): 817–826
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Kaspar T E, Bland W L (1992). Soil temperature and root growth. Soil Sci, 154(4): 290–299
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Kimball B A, Mauney J R (1993). Response of cotton to varying CO2, irrigation, and nitrogen: yield and growth. Agron J, 85(3): 706–712
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Koti S, Reddy K R, Kakani V G, Zhao D, Gao W (2007). Effects of carbon dioxide, temperature and ultraviolet-B radiation and their interactions on soybean (Glycine max L.) growth and development. Environ Exp Bot, 60(1): 1–10
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Koti S, Reddy K R, Kakani V G, Zhao D, Reddy V R (2005). Interactive effects of carbon dioxide, temperature and ultraviolet-B radiation on flower and pollen morphology, quantity and quality of pollen in soybean (Glycine max L.) genotypes. J Exp Bot, 56: 725–736
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Lokhande S, Reddy K R (2014). Reproductive and fiber quality responses of Upland cotton to moisture deficiency. Agron J, 106(3): 1060–1069
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Mark U, Tevini M (1996). Combination effects of UV-B radiation and temperature on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. J Plant Physiol, 148: 49–56
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
McMichael B L, Burke J J (1994). Metabolic activity of cotton roots in response to temperature. Environ Exp Bot, 34(2): 201–206
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Mujahid H, Pendarvis K, Reddy J S, Nallamilli B R R, Reddy K R, Nanduri B, Peng Z (2016). Comparative proteomic analysis of cotton fiber development and protein extraction method comparison in late stage fibers. Proteomes, 4(1): 7
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Nedunchezhian N, Kulandaivelu G (1996). Effects of ultraviolet-B enhanced radiation and temperature on growth and photochemical activities in Vigna ungiculata. Biol Plant, 38(2): 205–214
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
NOAA (2014). National climatic assessment. U.S. global research program. Accessed on <Date>1/7/2016</Date>. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/climate-information/climate-change-and-variability
[20]
Prior S A, Rogers H H, Runion G B, Hendrey G R (1994a). Free-air CO2 enrichment of cotton: Vertical and lateral root distribution patterns. Plant Soil, 165(1): 33–44
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Prior S A, Rogers H H, Runion G B, Kimball B A, Mauney J R, Lewin K F, Nagy J, Hendrey G R (1995). Free-air CO2 enrichment of cotton: root morphological characteristics. J Environ Qual, 24(4): 678–683
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Prior S A, Rogers H H, Runion G B, Mauney J R (1994). Effects of free-air enrichment on cotton root growth. Agric Meteorol, 70(1-4): 69–86
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Pritchard S G, Prior S A, Rogers H H, Davis M A, Runion G B, Popham T W (2006). Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on root dynamics and productivity of sorghum grown under conventional and conservation agricultural management practices. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 113(1-4): 175–183
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Reddy A R, Reddy K R, Hodges H F (1998). Interactive effects of elevated carbon dioxide and growth temperature on photosynthesis in cotton leaves. Plant Growth Regul, 26(1): 33–40
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Reddy K R, Hodges H F, McCarty W H, McKinion J M (1996). Weather and cotton growth: Present and future. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station. Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Bulletin no: 1061, pp. 23
[26]
Reddy K R, Hodges H F, McKinion J M, Wall G W (1992a). Temperature effects of Pima cotton growth and development. Agron J, 84(2): 237–243
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Reddy K R, Hodges H F, Read J J, McKinion J M, Baker J T, Tarpley L, Reddy V R (2001). Soil–plant–atmosphere–research (SPAR) facility: a tool for plant research and modeling. Biotronics, 30: 27–50
[28]
Reddy K R, Hodges H F, Reddy V R (1992b). Temperature effects on cotton fruit retention. Agron J, 84(1): 26–30
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Reddy K R, Kakani V G, Zhao D, Koti S, Gao W (2004). Interactive effects of ultraviolet-B Radiation and temperature on cotton physiology, growth, development and hyperspectral reflectance. Photochem Photobiol, 79(5): 416–427
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Reddy K R, Kakani V G, Zhao D, Mohammed A R, Gao W (2003). Cotton responses to ultraviolet-B radiation: Experimentation and algorithm development. Agric Meteorol, 120(1-4): 249–266
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Reddy K R, Prasad P V V, Kakani V G (2005). Crop responses to elevated carbon dioxide and interactions with temperature. Cotton. J Crop Improv, 13(1-2): 157–191
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Reddy V R (1997). Root growth of cotton as influenced by CO2 and temperature. Biology of root formation and development. Ed Aktman A. and Waisel Y. Plenum press, New York, 237–241
[33]
Reddy V R, Reddy K R, Acock M C, Trent A (1994). Carbon dioxide enrichment and temperature effects on root growth in cotton. Biotronics, 23: 47–57
[34]
Reddy V R, Reddy K R, Baker D N (1991). Temperature effects on growth and development of cotton during the fruiting period. Agron J, 83(1): 211–217
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Reddy V R, Reddy K R, Hodges H F (1995). Carbon dioxide enrichment and temperature effects on cotton canopy photosynthesis, transpiration, and water use efficiency. Field Crops Res, 41(1): 13–23
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Rogers H H, Peterson C M, McCrimmon J N, Cure J D (1992b). Response of plant roots to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Environ, 15(6): 749–752
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Sanders P L, Markhart A H III (2001). Root system functions during chilling temperatures: Injury and acclimation. In: A.S. Basra (ed.). Crop responses and adaptations to temperature stress. The Haworth Press, Inc., Binghamton, New York, USA, 77–90
[38a]
Singh R P, Prasad P V, Sunita K, Giri S N, Reddy K R (2007). Influence of high temperature and Breeding for heat tolerance in Cotton: A review. advances in agronomy, 93: 313–385
[38]
Singh S K, Kakani V G, Brand D, Baldwin B, Reddy K R (2008). Assessment of cold and heat tolerance of winter-grown canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars by pollen-based parameters. J Agron Crop Sci, 194(3): 225–236
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Stelly D M, Saha S, Raska D A, Jenkins J N, McCarty J C Jr, Gutierrez O A (2005). Registration of 17 Upland (Gossypium hirsutum) cotton germplasm lines distomic for different G. barbadense chromosome or arm substitutions. Crop Sci, 45(6): 2663–2666
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Tevini M, Mark U, Saile-Mark M (1991). Effects of enhanced solar UV-B radiation on growth and function of crop plant seedlings. Curr. Top. Plant Biochem. Physiol., 10: 13–31
[41]
Wijewardana C, Henry W B, Gao W, Reddy K R (2016a). Interactive effects on CO2, drought, and ultraviolet-B radiation on maize growth and development. Photochem Photobiol, 160: 198–209
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Wijewardana C, Henry W B, Hock M, Reddy K R (2016b). Growth and physiological trait variation among corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids for cold tolerance. Can J Plant Sci, 96: 639–656
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Wijewardana C, Hock M, Henry W B, Reddy K R (2015). Screening corn hybrids for cold tolerance using morphological traits for early season seeding. Crop Sci, 19: 75–78
[44]
World Meteorological Organization Geneva, Switzerland. (2011). Executive summary: Scientific assessment of Ozone depletion. pp. 46. Reprinted from scientific assessment of Ozone depletion: 2010, Global Ozone research and monitoring project–Report No. 52, pp. 516, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
[45]
Zhao D, Reddy K R, Kakani V G, Read J J, Sullivan J H (2003). Growth and physiological responses of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to elevated carbon dioxide and ultraviolet-B radiation under controlled environmental conditions. Plant Cell Environ, 26(5): 771–782
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgement

This work is partially supported by the USDA NIFA projects (2014-34263-22038, G-89701-1 and 2015-34263-24070, G-14901-1) and the Cotton Incorporated, Inc., USA. We would like to thank fellow graduate students for their help in taking measurements and processing samples in the lab. This study is a contribution of the Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, and the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2016 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1188 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/