Economic structure and environmental quality and their impact on changing land use efficiency in China

Abstract

Extensive urban land expansion and heavy industrialization have increased energy consumption and caused environmental problems, both of which present serious threats to humans. Consequently, improved land use efficiency and realization of green development are imperative. Based on a detailed analysis of spatial-temporal evolution of urban land use efficiency, this paper analyzes the synergistic effect of industrial structure and city size, as well as the effect of environmental quality, by using panel data from 283 cities at or above prefecture-level in China from 2003 to 2012. It was concluded that 1) environmental quality has an obvious “crowding out effect” on urban land use efficiency and 2) urban land use efficiency shows a significant spatial auto-correlation. The effect of industrial structure is dependent on population size of the city. It has been found that a threshold population size of more than 108.45 (10,000 persons) is needed for an optimized benefit from industrial linkages. The urban population size presents an inverted-U shape against the urban land use efficiency, and the marginal benefit of urban size increases when the industrial structure shifts from secondary industry to tertiary industry. Additionally we found that the actual urban size of 98.2% is less than the cities’ optimal sizes.

Keywords

agglomeration economies / structure-size synergistic effects / environmental quality / land use efficiency / spatial-temporal evolution

References

[1] Abdel-Rahman H M, Anas A (2004). Theories of Systems of Cities. In: Henderson J V, Thisse J F, eds. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Elsevier, 4: 4–52

[2] Au C C, Henderson J V (2006). Are Chinese cities too small? Rev Econ Stud, 73(3): 549–576

[3] Bi G B, Song W, Zhou P, Liang L (2014). Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China’s thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model. Energy Policy, 66(3): 537–546

[4] Bian Y W, Yang F (2010). Resource and environment efficiency analysis of provinces in China: a DEA approach based on Shannon’s entropy. Energy Policy, 38(4): 1909–1917

[5] Bobylev S (1981). Means of improving the utilization of land resources. Probl Econ Transit, 24(1): 78–95

[6] Bun M, Makhloufi A (2007). Dynamic externalities, local industrial structure and economic development: panel data evidence for Morocco. Reg Stud, 41(6): 823–837

[7] Capello R, Camagni R (2000). Beyond optimal city size: an evaluation of alternative urban growth patterns. Urban Stud, 37(9): 1479–1496

[8] Chen G Q, Chen Z M (2010). Carbon emissions and resources use by Chinese economy 2007: a 135-sector inventory and input-output embodiment. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 15(11): 3647–3732

[9] Chen G Q, Han M Y (2015). Virtual land use change in China 2002–2010: internal transition and trade imbalance. Land Use Policy, 47: 55–65

[10] Chen J L, Gao J L, Chen W (2016). Urban land expansion and the transitional mechanisms in Nanjing, China. Habitat Int, 53: 274–283

[11] Chen S Y, Jefferson G H, Zhang J (2011). Structural change, productivity growth and industrial transformation in China. China Econ Rev, 22(1): 133–150

[12] Chen S Y, Zhang S J (2014). Large-scale land use for construction and energy consumption after the new millennium with their impact on total-factor efficiency change in China’s regional economy. Energies, 7(4): 1986–2003

[13] Ciccone A (2002). Agglomeration effects in Europe. Eur Econ Rev, 46(2): 213–227

[14] Ciccone A, Hall R E (1996). All Productivity and the density of economic activity. Am Econ Rev, 86(1): 54–70

[15] Deng X K, Yu Y H, Liu Y (2015). Effect of construction land expansion on energy-related carbon emissions: empirical analysis of china and its provinces from 2001 to 2011. Energies, 8(6): 5516–5537

[16] Deng X Z, Zhao C H, Lin Y Z, Zhang T, Qu Y, Zhang F, Wang Z, Wu F (2014). Downscaling the impacts of large-scale LUCC on surface temperature along with IPCC RCPs: a global perspective. Energies, 7(4): 2720–2739

[17] Deng Y, Srinivasan S (2016). Urban land use change and regional access: a case study in Beijing, China. Habitat Int, 51: 103–113

[18] Dou J M, Wang Z Y (2010). Economic agglomeration, industrial structure and urban land productivity: empirical study based on the panel data of 234 municipalities in China from 1999 to 2006. J Financ Econ, 36(10): 26–36 (in Chinese)

[19] Fischer G, Sun L (2001). Model based analysis of future land-use development in China. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 85(S 1–3): 163–176

[20] Hasselmann F, Csaplovics E, Falconer I, Bürgi M, Hersperger A M (2010). Technological driving forces of LUCC: conceptualization, quantification, and the example of urban power distribution networks. Land Use Policy, 27(2): 628–637

[21] Hu Y, Guo D M, Wang M X, Zhang X, Wang S Y (2015). The relationship between energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from China’s industrial sectors. Energies, 8(9): 9392–9406

[22] Jiang Y, Liu J, Cui Q, AN X H, Wu C X (2011). Land use/land cover change and driving force analysis in Xishuangbanna Region in 1986–2008. Front Earth Sci, 5(3): 288–293

[23] Ke S Z, Zhao Y (2014). Industrial structure, city size, and urban productivity in China. Econ Res J, 4: 76–88 (in Chinese)

[24] Lanoie P, Patry M, Lajeunesse R (2008). Environmental Regulation and Productivity: Testing the Porter Hypothesis. J Prod Anal, 30(2): 121–128

[25] Li M, Wu J J, Deng X Z (2013). Identifying drivers of land use change in China: a spatial multinomial logit model analysis. Land Econ, 89(4): 632–654

[26] Liang B Q, Weng Q B (2011). Assessing urban environmental quality change of Indianapolis, United States, by the remote sensing and GIS Integration. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations & Remote Sensing, 4(1): 43–55

[27] Li J Q, Qu F T (2012). The impact of land market reform on the intensity of construction land use. China Land Sciences, 26(5): 71–75 (in Chinese)

[28] Orubu C O, Omotor D G (2011). Environmental quality and economic growth: searching for environmental Kuznets curves for air and water pollutants in Africa. Energy Policy, 39(7): 4178–4188

[29] Peneder M (2003). Industrial structure and aggregate growth. Innovation Industry Evolution & Employment, 14(4): 427–448

[30] Peng C, Xiao H, Han F (2014). Analysis on the characters of spatial agglomeration evolvement and disparity of the intensive urban land use in China from 2003 to 2012. China Land Science, 28(12): 24–31 (in Chinese)

[31] Porter M E, van der Linde C (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect, 9(4): 97–118

[32] Qasim M, Hubacek K, Termansen M (2013). Underlying and proximate driving causes of land use change in district Swat, Pakistan. Land Use Policy, 34(12): 146–157

[33] Roy J R (2004). Spatial Internation Modeling: A Regional Science Context. New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

[34] Xia X H, Chen Y B, Li J S, Tasawar H, Alsaedi A, Chen G Q (2014). Energy regulation in China: Objective selection, potential assessment and responsibility sharing by partial frontier analysis. Energy Policy, 66(66): 292–302

[35] Xie H L, Kung C C, Zhao Y L (2012). Spatial disparities of regional forest land change based on ESDA and GIS at the county level in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area. Front Earth Sci, 6(4): 445–452

[36] Wang F, Mao Q (2016). Scenario Simulations and Strategy of Coupling Optimization between Industrial Structure and Environmental Quality: A Case Study of the Areas along the Yellow River of Ningxia and Inner Mongolia. Ecological Economy, 32(1):14–21

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg