Network analysis of eight industrial symbiosis systems

Abstract

Industrial symbiosis is the quintessential characteristic of an eco-industrial park. To divide parks into different types, previous studies mostly focused on qualitative judgments, and failed to use metrics to conduct quantitative research on the internal structural or functional characteristics of a park. To analyze a park’s structural attributes, a range of metrics from network analysis have been applied, but few researchers have compared two or more symbioses using multiple metrics. In this study, we used two metrics (density and network degree centralization) to compare the degrees of completeness and dependence of eight diverse but representative industrial symbiosis networks. Through the combination of the two metrics, we divided the networks into three types: weak completeness, and two forms of strong completeness, namely “anchor tenant” mutualism and “equality-oriented” mutualism. The results showed that the networks with a weak degree of completeness were sparse and had few connections among nodes; for “anchor tenant” mutualism, the degree of completeness was relatively high, but the affiliated members were too dependent on core members; and the members in “equality-oriented” mutualism had equal roles, with diverse and flexible symbiotic paths. These results revealed some of the systems’ internal structure and how different structures influenced the exchanges of materials, energy, and knowledge among members of a system, thereby providing insights into threats that may destabilize the network. Based on this analysis, we provide examples of the advantages and effectiveness of recent improvement projects in a typical Chinese eco-industrial park (Shandong Lubei).

Keywords

industrial ecology / network analysis / density / network degree centralization / eco-industrial park

References

[1] Ashton W S (2008). Understanding the organization of industrial ecosystems: a social network approach. J Ind Ecol, 12(1): 34–51

[2] Ashton W S (2009). The structure, function, and evolution of a regional industrial ecosystem. J Ind Ecol, 13(2): 228–246

[3] Ashton W S, Bain A C (2012). Assessing the “short mental distance in eco-industrial networks”. J Ind Ecol, 16(1): 70–82

[4] Borgatti S P (2005). Centrality and network flow. Soc Networks, 27(1): 55–71

[5] Chen D J (2003). Analysis, integration and complexity study of industrial ecosystems. Dissertation for PhD Degree. Beijing: Tsinghua University (in Chinese)

[6] Chertow M R (2000). Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy. Annu Rev Energy Environ, 25(1): 313–337

[7] Chertow M R (2007). “Uncovering” industrial symbiosis. J Ind Ecol, 11(1): 11–30

[8] Chertow M R, Lombardi D R (2005). Quantifying economic and environmental benefits of co-located firms. Environ Sci Technol, 39(17): 6535–6541

[9] Côté R P, Cohen-Rosenthal E (1998). Designing eco-industrial parks: a synthesis of some experiences. J Clean Prod, 6(3-4): 181–188

[10] Dai T J (2010). Two quantitative indices for the planning and evaluation of eco-industrial parks. Resour Conserv Recycling, 54(7): 442–448

[11] Doménech T, Davies M (2009). The social aspects of industrial symbiosis: the application of social network analysis to industrial symbiosis networks. Prog Ind Ecol Internat J, 6(1): 68–99

[12] Doménech T, Davies M (2011). Structure and morphology of industrial symbiosis networks: the case of Kalundborg. Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 10: 79–89

[13] Dunne J A, Williams R J, Martinez N D (2002). Food-web structure and network theory: the role of connectance and size. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99(20): 12917–12922

[14] Ehrenfeld J, Chertow M (2002). Industrial symbiosis: the legacy of Kalundborg. In: Ayres R, Ayres L, eds. Handbook of Industrial Ecology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 334–350

[15] Ehrenfeld J, Gertler N (1997). Industrial ecology in practice: the evolution of interdependence at Kalundborg. J Ind Ecol, 1(1): 67–79

[16] Engberg H (1992). Industrial Symbiosis in Denmark. New York: Leonard N. Stern School of Business

[17] Fang Y P, Côté R P, Qin R (2007). Industrial sustainability in China: practice and prospects for eco-industrial development. J Environ Manage, 83(3): 315–328

[18] Fath B D, Patten B C (1999). Review of the foundations of network environ analysis. Ecosystems (N Y), 2(2): 167–179

[19] Feng J T (2003). Development and practice of eco-industrial linkages in Lubei Group. China Population Resource and Environment, 1: 110–112 (in Chinese)

[20] Fichtner W, Tietze-Stöckinger I, Rentz O (2004). On industrial symbiosis networks and their classification. Prog Ind Ecol Internat J, 1(1/2/3): 130–142

[21] Gertler N, Ehrenfeld J R (1996). A down-to-earth approach to clean production. Technol Rev, 99(2): 48–54

[22] Graedel T, Allenby B R (1995). Industrial Ecology. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall

[23] Granovetter M S (1973). The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol, 78(6): 1360–1380

[24] Hardy C, Graedel T E (2002). Industrial ecosystems as food webs. J Ind Ecol, 6(1): 29–38

[25] Harper E, Graedel T (2004). Industrial ecology: a teenager’s progress. Technol Soc, 26(2-3): 433–445

[26] Heeres R R, Vermeulen W J V, de Walle F B D (2004). Eco-industrial park initiatives in the USA and the Netherlands: first lessons. J Clean Prod, 12(8-10): 985–995

[27] Jacobsen N B (2006). Industrial symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: a quantitative assessment of economic and environmental aspects. J Ind Ecol, 10(1/2): 239–255

[28] Kitakyushu Eco-Town Plan by the City of Kitakyushu (2012).

[29] Kitakyushu Eco-Town Project (2005).

[30] Lambert A J D, Boons F A (2002). Eco-industrial parks: stimulating sustainable development in mixed industrial parks. Technovation, 22(8): 471–484

[31] Lowe E A (1997). Creating by-product resource exchanges: strategies for eco-industrial parks. J Clean Prod, 5(1-2): 57–65

[32] Lowe E A (2001). Eco-Industrial Park Handbook for Asian Developing Countries.

[33] Martin S A, Weitz A, Cushman R, Sharma A, Lindrooth R C, Moran S R (1996). Eco-Industrial Parks: A Case Study and Analysis of Economic, Environmental, Technical, and Regulatory Issues. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute. Project Number 6050 FR

[34] Mihelcic J R, Zimmerman J B (2010). Environmental Engineering: Fundamentals, Sustainability, Design. New York: John Wiley & Sons

[35] Mirata M, Emtairah T (2005). Industrial symbiosis networks and the contribution to environmental innovation: the case of the Landskrona industrial symbiosis programme. J Clean Prod, 13(10-11): 993–1002

[36] Muto Y (2004). Sustainable Management Activities in Kitakyushu Eco-Town. Office for International Environmental Cooperation, Environmental Bureau, City of Kitakyushu

[37] Paine R T (1969). A note on trophic complexity and community stability. Am Nat, 103(929): 91–93

[38] Potts Carr A J (1998). Choctaw eco-industrial park: an ecological approach to industrial land-use planning and design. Landsc Urban Plan, 42(2-4): 239–257

[39] Schwarz E J, Steininger K W (1997). Implementing nature’s lesson: the industrial recycling network enhancing regional development. J Clean Prod, 5(1-2): 47–56

[40] Scott J (2000). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage Publications

[41] Scott J, Tallia A, Crosson J C, Urzano A J, Stroebel C, DiCicco-Bloom B, O’Malley D, Shaw E, Crabtree B (2005). Social network analysis as an analytic tool for interaction patterns in primary care practices. Ann Fam Med, 3(5): 443–448

[42] Shi H, Chertow M, Song Y Y (2010). Developing country experience with eco-industrial parks: a case study of the Tianjin Economic-Technological Development Area in China. J Clean Prod, 18(3): 191–199

[43] TEDA Trade Promotion Centre (2012).

[44] van Beers D, Bossilkov A, Corder G, van Berkel R (2007). Industrial symbiosis in the Australian minerals industries: the cases of Kwinana and Gladstone. J Ind Ecol, 11(1): 55–72

[45] van Berkel R V, Fujita T, Hashimoto S, Fujii M (2009). Quantitative assessment of urban and industrial symbiosis in Kawasaki, Japan. Environ Sci Technol, 43(5): 1271–1281

[46] Wells P E, Darby L (2006). Rewriting the ecological metaphor, Part 2: the example of diversity. Prog Ind Ecol Internat J, 3(1/2): 129–147

[47] Wright R A, Côté R P, Duffy J, Brazner J (2009). Diversity and connectance in an industrial context: the case of Burnside Industrial Park. J Ind Ecol, 13(4): 551–564

[48] Wu Y P, Duan N, Qiao Q, Liu J Y (2004). Study on industrial symbiosis chain and net structure of the all new type ecosystem industrial parks. China Population. Resources and Environment, 14: 125–130 (in Chinese)

[49] Yang L, Hu S Y, Liang R Z, Chen D J, Fang X, Li Y R, Shen J Z, Feng J T, Kong L Q (2004). The Lubei eco-industrial model of China. Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 4: 467–474 (in Chinese)

[50] Zhang Y, Yang Z F, Fath B D, Li S S (2010). Ecological network analysis of an urban energy metabolic system: model development, and a case study of four Chinese cities. Ecol Modell, 221(16): 1865–1879

[51] Zhang Y, Zheng H M, Chen B, Yang N J (2013). Social network analysis and network connectedness analysis for industrial symbiotic systems: model development and case study. Front Earth Sci, 7(2): 169–181

[52] Zhong G, Cao J, Cao L J, Wang S P (2010). Quantitative analysis of industrial symbiotic network’s structure. In: Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences, ed. Proceedings 2010 China Environmental Science Society Annual Meeting, 5-7 May, Shanghai. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press (in Chinese), 1192–1200

[53] Zhu Q E, Lowe E A, Wei Y, Barnes D (2007). Industrial symbiosis in China: a case study of the Guitang Group. J Ind Ecol, 11(1): 31–42

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg