Green stormwater infrastructure eco-planning and development on the regional scale: a case study of Shanghai Lingang New City, East China

Haishun XU, Liang CHEN, Bing ZHAO, Qiuzhuo ZHANG, Yongli CAI

PDF(1414 KB)
PDF(1414 KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2016, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (2) : 366-377. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-015-0516-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Green stormwater infrastructure eco-planning and development on the regional scale: a case study of Shanghai Lingang New City, East China

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Urban underlying surface has been greatly changed with rapid urbanization, considered to be one of the major causes for the destruction of urban natural hydrological processes. This has imposed a huge challenge for stormwater management in cities. There has been a shift from gray water management to green stormwater management thinking. The green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) is regarded as an effective and cost-efficient stormwater management eco-landscape approach. China’s GSI practice and the development of its theoretical framework are still in the initial stage. This paper presents an innovative framework for stormwater management, integrating green stormwater infrastructure and landscape security patterns on a regional scale based on an urban master plan. The core concept of green stormwater infrastructure eco-planning is to form an interconnected GSI network (i.e., stormwater management landscape security pattern) which consists of the location, portion, size, layout, and structure of GSI so as to efficiently safeguard natural hydrological processes. Shanghai Lingang New City, a satellite new town of Shanghai, China was selected as a case study for GSI studies. Simulation analyses of hydrological processes were carried out to identify the critical significant landscape nodes in the high-priority watersheds for stormwater management. GSI should be planned and implemented in these identified landscape nodes. The comprehensive stormwater management landscape security pattern of Shanghai Lingang New City is designed with consideration of flood control, stormwater control, runoff reduction, water quality protection, and rainwater utilization objectives which could provide guidelines for smart growth and sustainable development of this city.

Keywords

stormwater management / green stormwater infrastructure / urban master plan / landscape security pattern / Shanghai Lingang New City

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Haishun XU, Liang CHEN, Bing ZHAO, Qiuzhuo ZHANG, Yongli CAI. Green stormwater infrastructure eco-planning and development on the regional scale: a case study of Shanghai Lingang New City, East China. Front. Earth Sci., 2016, 10(2): 366‒377 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-015-0516-5

References

[1]
Ballo S, Liu M, Hou L, Chang J (2009). Pollutants in stormwater runoff in Shanghai (China): implications for management of urban runoff pollution. Prog Nat Sci, 19(7): 873–880
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Bao L J (2009). Vulnerability Assessment of the Rainstorm Floods in Pudong of Shanghai Based on the Scenario. Dissertation for Master degree. Shanghai Normal University, 39–50 (in Chinese)
[3]
Carleton J N, Grizzard T J, Godrej A N, Post H E (2001). Factors affecting the performance of stromwater treatment wetlands. Water Resour, 35(6): 1552–1562
[4]
Castelle A J, Johnson A W, Conolly C (1994). Wetland and stream buffer size requirements: a review. Journal of Environmental Quality, 23(5): 878–882
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Forman R T T, Godron M (1986). Landscape Ecology. New York: John Wiley Press, 1–120
[6]
Gong J Z, Xia B C, Chen J F, Lin M Z (2008). Dynamic analysis of the Guangzhou landscape eco-security pattern based on 3S technology. Acta Ecol Sin, 28(9): 4323–4333(in Chinese)
[7]
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007). Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. IPCC Secretariat, Switzerland: 2–21
[8]
Jennings D B, Taylor Jarnagin S (2002). Changes in anthropogenic impervious surfaces, precipitation and daily streamflow discharge: a historical perspective in a mid-Atlantic subwatershed. Landscape Ecol, 17(5): 471–489
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Jiang W Y (2005). Estimation of Non-point Pollutants Load in Coastal Plain Island and the Relevant Effects on Water Environment. Dissertation for Master degree. East China Normal University, 45–51 (in Chinese)
[10]
Leopold L B (1968). Hydrology for urban land planning: a guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use. Geol Surv Circ, 554: 7–17
[11]
Li H, Tang C (2006). Establishment of disaster prevention and relief system in the town with mud-rock flow frequently occurring base on landscape ecological security pattern. Urban Stud, 13(1): 18–22, 29
[12]
Li Y F, Sun X, Zhu X D, Cao H (2010). An early warning method of landscape ecological security in rapid urbanizing coastal areas and its application in Xiamen, China. Ecol Modell, 221(19): 2251–2260
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Line D E, White N M (2007). Effects of development on runoff and pollutant export. Water Environ Res, 79(2): 185–190
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Ma K M, Fu B J, Niu S K (2004). The regional pattern for ecological security (RPES): designing principles and method. Acta Ecol Sin, 24(4): 761–768
[15]
Makepeace D K, Smith D W, Stanley S J (1995). Urban stormwater quality: summary of contaminant data. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol, 25(2): 93–139
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Malmqvist P A (2006). Strategic Planning of Sustainable Urban Water Management. London: IWA Publishing, 1–10
[17]
Mark B, McMahon E (2006). Green Infrastructure: Linking Landscape and Communities. USA: Island Press, 2–21
[18]
Marsalek J, Jimenez-Cisneros B, Karamouz M, Malmquist P A, Goldenfum J, Chocat B (2008). Urban Water Cycle Processes and Interactions. Leiden: Taylor & Francis, 2–5
[19]
Melbourne Water (2005). WSUD Engineering Procedures: Stormwater. Melbourne: CSIRO publishing, 1–6
[20]
Mishra S K, Singh V P (2002). SCS-CN methodpart-1: derivation of SCS-CN based models. Acta Geophysica Polonica, 50(3): 457–477
[21]
Mitsch W J, Gosselink J G (2000). The value of wetlands: importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecol Econ, 35(1): 25–33
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Mo L, Yu K J (2012). Structure the urban green sponge: study on planning an ecological stormwater regulation system. Urban Stud, 19(5): 4–8
[23]
Noss R H, Harris L D (1986). Nodes, networks, and MUMS: preserving diversity at all scales. Environ Manage, 10(3): 299–309
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Novotny V, Brown P (2007). Cities of the future: Towards Integrated Sustainable Water and Landscape Management. London: IWA Publishing, 267–283
[25]
Pan G Q, Che W, Li J Q (2008a). Study on the volume optimization for rainwater collection by storage tank. Water &Wastewater Engineering, 34(12): 42–47 (in Chinese)
[26]
Pan G Q, Che W, Li J Q, Li H Y (2008b). Urban runoff pollution control quantity and its design rainfall in China. China Water & Wastewater , 24(22): 25–29 (in Chinese)
[27]
Sanders R A (1986). Urban vegetation impacts on the hydrology of Dayton, Ohio. Urban Ecol, 9(3–4): 361–376
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Singh P K, Bhunya P K, Mishra S K, Chaube U C (2008). A sediment graph model based on SCS-CN method. J Hydrol (Amst), 349(1–2): 244–255
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Soil Conservation Service (1972). National Engineering Handbook, Section 4: Hydrology. USDA, Springfield, VA: 101–103
[30]
Stormwater Steering Committee (SSC) (2007). Minnesota Stormwater Manual. Minnesota, USA: 43–57
[31]
Tackett T (2008). Seattle’s policy and pilots to support green stormwater infrastructure. 2008 International Low Impact Development Conference. Washington: Environmental and Water Resources institute of ASCE, 1–4
[32]
Tilley D R, Brown M T (1998). Wetland networks for stormwater management in subtropical urban watersheds. Ecol Eng, 10(2): 131–158
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1993). Guidance Manual for Developing Best Management Practices. Washington, D.C., Document No. EPA-833-B-93-004: 7–11
[34]
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2004). The Use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) in Urban Watersheds. Washington: United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-04/18: 21–71
[35]
Van Room M, Van Room H T, Trueman S (2009). Low impact urban design and development: the big picture: an introduction to the LIUDD principles and methods framework. Lincoln, New Zealand: Manaaki Whenua Press: 2–8
[36]
Wang H Y (2005). Pollution Processes and Management Researches on Urban Rainfall Runoff in Shanghai. Dissertation for Master degree. East China Normal University, China: 26–77 (in Chinese)
[37]
Wise S (2008). Green infrastructure rising. Planning, 74(8): 14–19
[38]
Wood-Ballard B, Kellagher R, Martin P, Jefferies C, Bray R, Shaffer P (2007). The SUDS Manual. CIRIA, Classic House, 174-180 0ld Street, London ECIV 9BP, UK: 48–55
[39]
WRI, IUCN and UNEP (1992). Global biodiversity strategy: guidelines for action to save, study and use Earth’s biotic wealth sustainably and equitably. WRI/IUCN/UNEP: 1–244
[40]
Yang R, Cui B (2012). Framework of integrated stormwater management of Jinan City, China. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 13: 2346–2352
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Yu K J (1995). Security Patterns in Landscape Planning with a Case Study in South China. Graduate School of Design, Harvard University, MA, USA: 2–14
[42]
Yu K J (1996). Security patterns and surface model in landscape ecological planning. Landsc Urban Plan, 36(1): 1–17
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Yu K J, Qiao Q, Li D H, Yuan H, Wang S S (2009a). Ecological land use in three towns of eastern Beijing: a case study based on landscape security pattern analysis. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 20(8): 1932–1939 (in Chinese)
[44]
Yu K J, Wang S S, Li D H, Li C B (2009b). The function of ecological security patterns as an urban growth framework in Beijing. Acta Ecol Sin, 29(3): 1189–1204

Acknowledgments

This research is financially supported by grants from Ministry of Education of People’s Republic of China (No. 20120076120019), Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (No. 12ZR1409100 and 12231205300) and Shanghai Key Lab for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration. The authors would like to thank MEPRC, STCSMSTC and SHUES for funding this work. The authors are thankful to Dr. Varenyam Achal for improving the language of manuscript.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2015 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1414 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/