The most typical shape of oceanic mesoscale eddies from global satellite sea level observations

Zifei WANG, Qiuyang LI, Liang SUN, Song LI, Yuanjian YANG, Shanshan Liu

PDF(787 KB)
PDF(787 KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2015, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 202-208. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-014-0478-z
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The most typical shape of oceanic mesoscale eddies from global satellite sea level observations

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In this research, we normalized the characteristics of ocean eddies by using satellite observation of the Sea Level Anomaly (SLA) data to determine the most typical shape of ocean eddies. This normalization is based on modified analytic functions with nonlinear optimal fitting. The most typical eddy is the Taylor vortex (~50%), which exhibits a Gaussian-shaped exp(-r2) SLA and a vorticity distribution of (1-r2)exp(-r2) as a function of the normalized radii r. The larger the amplitude of the eddy, the more likely the eddy is to be Gaussian-shaped. Furthermore, approximately 40% of ocean eddies are combinations of two Gaussian eddies with different parameters, but the composition of these types of eddies is more like a quadratic eddy than a Gaussian one. Only a small portion of oceanic eddies are pure quadratic eddies (<10%) with the same vorticity distribution as a Rankine vortex. We concluded that the Taylor vortex is a good approximation of the typical shape of ocean eddies.

Keywords

sea level anomaly / ocean eddies / Taylor vortex / typical shape

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zifei WANG, Qiuyang LI, Liang SUN, Song LI, Yuanjian YANG, Shanshan Liu. The most typical shape of oceanic mesoscale eddies from global satellite sea level observations. Front. Earth Sci., 2015, 9(2): 202‒208 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-014-0478-z

References

[1]
Chaigneau A, Gizolme A, Grados C (2008). Mesoscale eddies off Peru in altimeter records: identification algorithms and eddy spatio-temporal patterns. Prog Oceanogr, 79(2-4): 106-119
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Chaigneau A, Le Texier M, Eldin G, Grados C, Pizarro O (2011). Vertical structure of mesoscale eddies in the eastern South Pacific Ocean: A composite analysis from altimetry and Argo profiling floats. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 116(C11): C11025
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Chelton D B, Gaube P, Schlax M G, Early J J, Samelson R M (2011b). The influence of nonlinear mesoscale eddies on near surface oceanic Chlorophyll. Science, 334(6054): 328-332
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Chelton D B, Schlax M G, Samelson R M (2011a). Global observations of nonlinear mesoscale eddies. Prog Oceanogr, 91(2): 167-216
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Chelton D B, Schlax M G, Samelson R M, de Szoeke R A (2007). Global observations of large oceanic eddies. Geophys Res Lett, 34(15): L15606
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Dong C, Lin X, Liu Y, Nencioli F, Chao Y, Guan Y, Chen D, Dickey T, McWilliams J C (2012). Three-dimensional oceanic eddy analysis in the Southern California Bight from a numerical product. J Geophys Res, 117: C00H14
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Dong C, McWilliams J C, Liu Y, Chen D (2014). Global heat and salt transports by eddy movement. Nature Communications, 5: 3294
[8]
Ducet N, Le Traon P Y, Reverdin G (2000), Global high resolution mapping of ocean circulation from TOPEX/Poseidon and ERS-1 and -2, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 19,477-19,478
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Early J J, Samelson R M, Chelton D B (2011). The evolution and propagation of quasigeostrophic ocean eddies. J Phys Oceanogr, 41(8): 1535-1555
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Hu J, Gan J, Sun Z, Zhu J, Dai M (2011). Observed three-dimensional structure of a cold eddy in the southwestern South China Sea. J Phys Oceanogr, 116: C05016
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Isern-Fontanet J, Garcia-Ladona E, Font J (2003). Identification of marine eddies from altimetric maps. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 20(5): 772-778
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Li Q Y, Sun L, Liu S S, Xian T, Yan Y F (2014). A new mononuclear eddy identification method with simple splitting strategies. Remote Sensing Letters, 5 (1): 65-72
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Ponte R M, Wunsch C, Stammer D (2007). Spatial Mapping of Time-Variable Errors in Jason-1 and TOPEX/Poseidon Sea Surface Height Measurements. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 24(6): 1078-1085
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Roemmich D, Gilson J (2001). Eddy transport of heat and thermocline waters in the North Pacific: a key to interannual/decadal climate variability? J Phys Oceanogr, 31(3): 675-687
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Sun L (2011). A typhoon-like vortex solution of incompressible 3D inviscid flow. Theor Appl Mech Lett, 1(4): 042003
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Wu J Z, Ma H Y, Zhou M D (2006). Vorticity and Vortex Dynamics. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. XIV, 776 p., 291 illus
[17]
Yang G, Wang F, Li Y, Lin P (2013). Mesoscale eddies in the northwestern subtropical Pacific Ocean: Statistical characteristics and three‐dimensional structures. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 118(4): 1906-1923
[18]
Zhang Z G, Zhang Y, Wang W, Huang R X (2013). Universal structure of mesoscale eddies in the ocean. Geophys Res Lett, 40(14): 3677-3681
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

We thank the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions. This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Nos. 2012CB417402 and 2013CB430303) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41376017 and 41205126) and the Open Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Composition and Optical Radiation of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. JJ1102). We thank AVISO for providing the SLA data and the open fund of State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics (No. SOED1501).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(787 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/