Agricultural land use intensity and its determinants: A case study in Taibus Banner, Inner Mongolia, China

Haiguang HAO, Xiubin LI, Minghong TAN, Jiping ZHANG, Huiyuan ZHANG

PDF(640 KB)
PDF(640 KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2015, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 308-318. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-014-0471-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Agricultural land use intensity and its determinants: A case study in Taibus Banner, Inner Mongolia, China

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Based on rural household survey data from Taibus Banner, in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China, this study separately categorizes agricultural land use intensity into labor intensity, capital intensity, the intensity of labor-saving inputs, and the intensity of yield-increasing inputs, and then analyzes their determinants at the household level. The findings reveal that within the study area: (1) labor intensity is higher and capital intensity is lower than in the major grain-producing and economically developed areas of eastern and central China; (2) the most widely planted crops are those with the lowest labor intensity (oats) and capital intensity (benne); (3) there are marked differences in agricultural land use intensity among households; a major factor affecting land use decision-making is the reduced need for labor intensity for those households with high opportunity costs, such as those with income earned from non-farming activities which alleviates financial constraints and allows for increased capital intensity. As a result, these households invest more in labor-saving inputs; (4) households with a larger number of workers will allocate adequate time to manage their land and thus they will not necessarily invest more in labor-saving inputs. Those households with more land to manage tend to adopt an extensive cultivation strategy. Total income has a positive impact on capital intensity and a negative impact on labor intensity. Households that derive a higher proportion of their total income through farming are more reliant upon agriculture, which necessitates significant labor and yield-increasing inputs. Finally, the authors contend that policy makers should clearly recognize the impacts of non-farming employment on agricultural land use intensity. In order to ensure long-term food security and sustainable agricultural development in China, income streams from both farming and non-farming employment should be balanced.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

agricultural land use intensity / labor intensity / capital intensity / opportunity cost of farm workers / Taibus Banner

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Haiguang HAO, Xiubin LI, Minghong TAN, Jiping ZHANG, Huiyuan ZHANG. Agricultural land use intensity and its determinants: A case study in Taibus Banner, Inner Mongolia, China. Front. Earth Sci., 2015, 9(2): 308‒318 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-014-0471-6
AUTHOR BIOGRAPHIES

Dr. Haiguang Hao obtained his Ph.D. in Physical Geography Sciences from the Institute of Geographic Science and Natural Resources Research (IGSNRR), Chinese Academy of Sciences. He is currently a post-doctoral in the IGSNRR. His main fields of scientific interest include land use change and its effects on the environment. E-mail: haohg@craes.org.cn

Dr. Xiubin Li obtained his Ph.D. in the Department of Geography from the University of Hong Kong, M.S. degree from the Institute of Geographic Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Bachelor’s degree in Geography from Beijing Normal University. He is currently a professor at the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences. His research fields include land use and land cover change. E-mail: lixb@igsnrr.ac.cn

References

[1]
Alwang J, Siegel B (1999). Labor shortages on small landholdings in Malawi: Implications for policy reforms. World Dev, 27(8): 1461–1475
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
An Y J, Men M X, Huo X L, Xu H (2009). The Characteristics of the agricultural land use intensity in Hebei based on the production cost. Progress in Geography, 28(4): 611–616 (in Chinese)
[3]
Barlowe R (1985). Land Resource Economics: The Economics of Real Estate (4th ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 94–97
[4]
Beyene A D (2008). Determinants of off-farm participation decision of farm households in Ethiopia. Agrekon, 47(1): 140–161
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Bicak H A, Jenkins G P, Kuo C Y, Mphahlele M B (2004). An operational guide to the estimation of the economic opportunity cost of labour in South Africa. S Afr J Econ, 72(5): 1057–1068
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Brosig S, Glauben T, Herzfeld T, Wang X B (2009). Persistence of full- and part-time farming in Southern China. China Econ Rev, 20(2): 360–371
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Caraveli H (2000). A comparative analysis on intensification and extensification in Mediterranean agriculture: Dilemmas for LFAs policy. J Rural Stud, 16(2): 231–242
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Chen Y Q (2010). Agricultural land use responses to the rising labor opportunity cost in Sui County, China. Chinese J Pop Resour Environ, 8(4): 10–18
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Chen Y Q, Li X B, Tian Y J, Tan M H (2009). Structural change of agricultural land use intensity and its regional disparity in China. J Geogr Sci, 19(5): 545–556
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Chen Y Q, Li X B, Wang J (2011). Changes and effecting factors of grain production in China. Chin Geogr Sci, 21(6): 676–684
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Fernandez-Cornejo J, Mishra A, Nehring R, Hendricks C, Southern M, Gregory A (2007). Off-farm income, technology adoption, and farm economic performance (No. 7234). United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service
[12]
Gellrich M, Zimmermann N E (2007). Investigating the regional-scale pattern of agricultural land abandonment in the Swiss mountains: A spatial statistical modelling approach. Landsc Urban Plan, 79(1): 65–76
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Gray C L (2009). Rural out-migration and smallholder agriculture in the southern Ecuadorian Andes. Popul Environ, 30(4-5): 193–217
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Groom B, Grosjean P, Kontoleon A, Swanson T, Zhang S (2010). Relaxing rural constraints: a ‘win-win’ policy for poverty and environment in China? Oxf Econ Pap, 62(1): 132–156
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Huang J K, Wu Y H, Rozelle S (2009). Moving off the farm and intensifying agricultural production in Shandong: A case study of rural labor market linkages in China. Agric Econ, 40(2): 203–218
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Huffman W E (1996). Farm labor: key conceptual and measurement issues on the route to better farm cost and return estimates. Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
[17]
Ishemo A, Semple H, Thomas-Hope E (2006). Population mobility and the survival of small farming in the Rio Grande Valley, Jamaica. Geogr J, 172(4): 318–330
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Kilic T, Carletto C, Miluka J, Savastano S (2009). Rural nonfarm income and its impact on agriculture: evidence from Albania. Agric Econ, 40(2): 139–160
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Li M, Zhao L G (2009a). Agricultural labor force aging phenomenon and the effect on agricultural production: Evidence from Liaoning Province. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 10: 12–18 (in Chinese)
[20]
Li M, Zhao L G (2009b). Agricultural labor force feminine phenomenon and the effect on agricultural production: Evidence from Liaoning Province. Chinese Rural Economy, 5: 61–69 (in Chinese)
[21]
Li X, Cai Y, Zhu D, Zhang A (2006). Agricultural land loss in China’s urbanization process. Ecol Econ, 2: 32–41
[22]
Li X, Zhu H, Tan M, Xin L (2008). Measurement of land use intensity. Progress in Geography, 27(6): 12–17 (in Chinese)
[23]
Liu C W, Li X B (2006). Regional disparity in the changes of agricultural land use intensity in China during 1980–2002. J Geogr Sci, 16(3): 286–292
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Liu Y S, Wang J Y, Guo L Y (2009). The spatial-temporal changes of grain production and arable land in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 42(12): 4269–4274 (in Chinese)
[25]
Long H, Zou J (2010). Grain production driven by variations in farmland use in China: An analysis of security patterns. J Resour Ecol, 1(1): 60–67
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Low A (1986). Agricultural Development in Southern Africa: Farm-Household Economics and the Food Crisis. London: James Currey
[27]
Moran-Taylor M J, Taylor M J (2010). Land and leña: linking transnational migration, natural resources, and the environment in Guatemala. Pop Environ, 32(2–3): 198–215
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Morera M C, Gladwin C H (2006). Does off-farm work discourage soil conservation? Incentives and disincentives throughout two Honduran hillside communities. Hum Ecol, 34(3): 355–378
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Newell A, Pandya K, Symons J (1997). Farm size and the intensity of land use in Gujarat. Oxf Econ Pap, 49(2): 307–315
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Oseni G, Winters P (2009). Rural nonfarm activities and agricultural crop production in Nigeria. Agric Econ, 40(2): 189–201
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Paudel K P, Wang Y Q (2002). Part time farming, farm productivity, and farm income: Evidence from the southeast US. In American Agricultural Economics Associations Annual Meeting, California.
[32]
Phimister E, Roberts D (2006). The effect of off-farm work on the intensity of agricultural production. Environ Resour Econ, 34(4): 493–515
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Rudel T K (2006). After the labor migrants leave: The search for sustainable development in a sending region of the Ecuadorian Amazon. World Dev, 34(5): 838–851
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Rudel T K, Coomes O T, Moran E, Achard F, Angelsen A, Xu J C, Lambin E (2005). Forest transitions: Towards a global understanding of land use change. Global Environmental Change, 15(1): 23–31
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Strijker D (2005). Marginal lands in Europe: Causes of decline. Basic Appl Ecol, 6(2): 99–106
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Takahashi K, Otsuka K (2009). The increasing importance of nonfarm income and the changing use of labor and capital in rice farming: The case of Central Luzon, 1979–2003. Agric Econ, 40(2): 231–242
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Taylor J, Rozelle S, deBrauw A (2003). Migration and incomes in source communities: A new economics of migration perspective from China. Econ Dev Cult Change, 52(1): 75–101
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Tian Y, Li X, Ma G, Hao H (2011). Impacts of the rising opportunity cost of farm labor on agricultural land use structure: Theory and empirical evidences. Chinese J Pop Resour Environ, 9(1): 85–90
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Xin L, Li X, Zhu H, Tan M (2009). China’s potential of grain production due to changes in agricultural land utilization in recent years. Chin Geogr Sci, 19(2): 97–103
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Yan H, Liu J, Huang H Q, Tao B, Cao M (2009). Assessing the consequence of land use change on agricultural productivity in China. Global Planet Change, 67(1-2): 13–19
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Yan J Z, Zhuo R G, Xie D L, Zhang Y L (2010). Land use characters of farmers of different livelihood strategies: Cases in Three Gorges Reservoir Area. J Geogr Sci, 65(11): 1401–1410 (in Chinese)
[42]
Yin P H, Fang X Q, Yun Y R (2009). Regional differences of vulnerability of food security in China. J Geogr Sci, 19(5): 532–544
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Zhai R X, Liu Y S (2008). Changes in regional pattern for grain production in China since the 90'S of 20 century. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 32(6): 49–54 (in Chinese)
[44]
Zhang G P, Liu J Y, Zhang Z X (2003). Spatial-temporal changes of cropland in China for the past 10 years based on remote sensing. J Geogr Sci, 58(3): 323–332 (in Chinese)
[45]
Zhang L, Zhang F, An P, Zhang W, Yan L (2008b). Comparative study of cultivated land use intensive degree and its change law at different economic levels. Transactions of the CSAE, 24(1): 108–112 (in Chinese)
[46]
Zhang L, Zhang Y, Yan J, Wu Y (2008a). Livelihood diversification and cropland use pattern in agro-pastoral mountainous region of eastern Tibetan Plateau. J Geogr Sci, 18(4): 499–509
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Zhang L H, Zhao X G, Zhao D W, Yang F, Zhang L (2009). Analysis of grain production changes and food security problem in Inner Mongolia. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 30(6): 673–677 (in Chinese)
[48]
Zhu H Y, Li X B, Xin L J (2007). Intensity change in cultivated land use in China and its policy implications. Journal of Natural Resources, 22(6): 907–915 (in Chinese)

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant NO. 41161140352).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(640 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/