Agricultural land use intensity and its determinants: A case study in Taibus Banner, Inner Mongolia, China

Haiguang HAO , Xiubin LI , Minghong TAN , Jiping ZHANG , Huiyuan ZHANG

Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2015, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 308 -318.

PDF (640KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2015, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 308 -318. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-014-0471-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Agricultural land use intensity and its determinants: A case study in Taibus Banner, Inner Mongolia, China

Author information +
History +
PDF (640KB)

Abstract

Based on rural household survey data from Taibus Banner, in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China, this study separately categorizes agricultural land use intensity into labor intensity, capital intensity, the intensity of labor-saving inputs, and the intensity of yield-increasing inputs, and then analyzes their determinants at the household level. The findings reveal that within the study area: (1) labor intensity is higher and capital intensity is lower than in the major grain-producing and economically developed areas of eastern and central China; (2) the most widely planted crops are those with the lowest labor intensity (oats) and capital intensity (benne); (3) there are marked differences in agricultural land use intensity among households; a major factor affecting land use decision-making is the reduced need for labor intensity for those households with high opportunity costs, such as those with income earned from non-farming activities which alleviates financial constraints and allows for increased capital intensity. As a result, these households invest more in labor-saving inputs; (4) households with a larger number of workers will allocate adequate time to manage their land and thus they will not necessarily invest more in labor-saving inputs. Those households with more land to manage tend to adopt an extensive cultivation strategy. Total income has a positive impact on capital intensity and a negative impact on labor intensity. Households that derive a higher proportion of their total income through farming are more reliant upon agriculture, which necessitates significant labor and yield-increasing inputs. Finally, the authors contend that policy makers should clearly recognize the impacts of non-farming employment on agricultural land use intensity. In order to ensure long-term food security and sustainable agricultural development in China, income streams from both farming and non-farming employment should be balanced.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

agricultural land use intensity / labor intensity / capital intensity / opportunity cost of farm workers / Taibus Banner

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Haiguang HAO, Xiubin LI, Minghong TAN, Jiping ZHANG, Huiyuan ZHANG. Agricultural land use intensity and its determinants: A case study in Taibus Banner, Inner Mongolia, China. Front. Earth Sci., 2015, 9(2): 308-318 DOI:10.1007/s11707-014-0471-6

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Alwang J, Siegel B (1999). Labor shortages on small landholdings in Malawi: Implications for policy reforms. World Dev, 27(8): 1461–1475

[2]

An Y J, Men M X, Huo X L, Xu H (2009). The Characteristics of the agricultural land use intensity in Hebei based on the production cost. Progress in Geography, 28(4): 611–616 (in Chinese)

[3]

Barlowe R (1985). Land Resource Economics: The Economics of Real Estate (4th ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 94–97

[4]

Beyene A D (2008). Determinants of off-farm participation decision of farm households in Ethiopia. Agrekon, 47(1): 140–161

[5]

Bicak H A, Jenkins G P, Kuo C Y, Mphahlele M B (2004). An operational guide to the estimation of the economic opportunity cost of labour in South Africa. S Afr J Econ, 72(5): 1057–1068

[6]

Brosig S, Glauben T, Herzfeld T, Wang X B (2009). Persistence of full- and part-time farming in Southern China. China Econ Rev, 20(2): 360–371

[7]

Caraveli H (2000). A comparative analysis on intensification and extensification in Mediterranean agriculture: Dilemmas for LFAs policy. J Rural Stud, 16(2): 231–242

[8]

Chen Y Q (2010). Agricultural land use responses to the rising labor opportunity cost in Sui County, China. Chinese J Pop Resour Environ, 8(4): 10–18

[9]

Chen Y Q, Li X B, Tian Y J, Tan M H (2009). Structural change of agricultural land use intensity and its regional disparity in China. J Geogr Sci, 19(5): 545–556

[10]

Chen Y Q, Li X B, Wang J (2011). Changes and effecting factors of grain production in China. Chin Geogr Sci, 21(6): 676–684

[11]

Fernandez-Cornejo J, Mishra A, Nehring R, Hendricks C, Southern M, Gregory A (2007). Off-farm income, technology adoption, and farm economic performance (No. 7234). United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service

[12]

Gellrich M, Zimmermann N E (2007). Investigating the regional-scale pattern of agricultural land abandonment in the Swiss mountains: A spatial statistical modelling approach. Landsc Urban Plan, 79(1): 65–76

[13]

Gray C L (2009). Rural out-migration and smallholder agriculture in the southern Ecuadorian Andes. Popul Environ, 30(4-5): 193–217

[14]

Groom B, Grosjean P, Kontoleon A, Swanson T, Zhang S (2010). Relaxing rural constraints: a ‘win-win’ policy for poverty and environment in China? Oxf Econ Pap, 62(1): 132–156

[15]

Huang J K, Wu Y H, Rozelle S (2009). Moving off the farm and intensifying agricultural production in Shandong: A case study of rural labor market linkages in China. Agric Econ, 40(2): 203–218

[16]

Huffman W E (1996). Farm labor: key conceptual and measurement issues on the route to better farm cost and return estimates. Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

[17]

Ishemo A, Semple H, Thomas-Hope E (2006). Population mobility and the survival of small farming in the Rio Grande Valley, Jamaica. Geogr J, 172(4): 318–330

[18]

Kilic T, Carletto C, Miluka J, Savastano S (2009). Rural nonfarm income and its impact on agriculture: evidence from Albania. Agric Econ, 40(2): 139–160

[19]

Li M, Zhao L G (2009a). Agricultural labor force aging phenomenon and the effect on agricultural production: Evidence from Liaoning Province. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 10: 12–18 (in Chinese)

[20]

Li M, Zhao L G (2009b). Agricultural labor force feminine phenomenon and the effect on agricultural production: Evidence from Liaoning Province. Chinese Rural Economy, 5: 61–69 (in Chinese)

[21]

Li X, Cai Y, Zhu D, Zhang A (2006). Agricultural land loss in China’s urbanization process. Ecol Econ, 2: 32–41

[22]

Li X, Zhu H, Tan M, Xin L (2008). Measurement of land use intensity. Progress in Geography, 27(6): 12–17 (in Chinese)

[23]

Liu C W, Li X B (2006). Regional disparity in the changes of agricultural land use intensity in China during 1980–2002. J Geogr Sci, 16(3): 286–292

[24]

Liu Y S, Wang J Y, Guo L Y (2009). The spatial-temporal changes of grain production and arable land in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 42(12): 4269–4274 (in Chinese)

[25]

Long H, Zou J (2010). Grain production driven by variations in farmland use in China: An analysis of security patterns. J Resour Ecol, 1(1): 60–67

[26]

Low A (1986). Agricultural Development in Southern Africa: Farm-Household Economics and the Food Crisis. London: James Currey

[27]

Moran-Taylor M J, Taylor M J (2010). Land and leña: linking transnational migration, natural resources, and the environment in Guatemala. Pop Environ, 32(2–3): 198–215

[28]

Morera M C, Gladwin C H (2006). Does off-farm work discourage soil conservation? Incentives and disincentives throughout two Honduran hillside communities. Hum Ecol, 34(3): 355–378

[29]

Newell A, Pandya K, Symons J (1997). Farm size and the intensity of land use in Gujarat. Oxf Econ Pap, 49(2): 307–315

[30]

Oseni G, Winters P (2009). Rural nonfarm activities and agricultural crop production in Nigeria. Agric Econ, 40(2): 189–201

[31]

Paudel K P, Wang Y Q (2002). Part time farming, farm productivity, and farm income: Evidence from the southeast US. In American Agricultural Economics Associations Annual Meeting, California.

[32]

Phimister E, Roberts D (2006). The effect of off-farm work on the intensity of agricultural production. Environ Resour Econ, 34(4): 493–515

[33]

Rudel T K (2006). After the labor migrants leave: The search for sustainable development in a sending region of the Ecuadorian Amazon. World Dev, 34(5): 838–851

[34]

Rudel T K, Coomes O T, Moran E, Achard F, Angelsen A, Xu J C, Lambin E (2005). Forest transitions: Towards a global understanding of land use change. Global Environmental Change, 15(1): 23–31

[35]

Strijker D (2005). Marginal lands in Europe: Causes of decline. Basic Appl Ecol, 6(2): 99–106

[36]

Takahashi K, Otsuka K (2009). The increasing importance of nonfarm income and the changing use of labor and capital in rice farming: The case of Central Luzon, 1979–2003. Agric Econ, 40(2): 231–242

[37]

Taylor J, Rozelle S, deBrauw A (2003). Migration and incomes in source communities: A new economics of migration perspective from China. Econ Dev Cult Change, 52(1): 75–101

[38]

Tian Y, Li X, Ma G, Hao H (2011). Impacts of the rising opportunity cost of farm labor on agricultural land use structure: Theory and empirical evidences. Chinese J Pop Resour Environ, 9(1): 85–90

[39]

Xin L, Li X, Zhu H, Tan M (2009). China’s potential of grain production due to changes in agricultural land utilization in recent years. Chin Geogr Sci, 19(2): 97–103

[40]

Yan H, Liu J, Huang H Q, Tao B, Cao M (2009). Assessing the consequence of land use change on agricultural productivity in China. Global Planet Change, 67(1-2): 13–19

[41]

Yan J Z, Zhuo R G, Xie D L, Zhang Y L (2010). Land use characters of farmers of different livelihood strategies: Cases in Three Gorges Reservoir Area. J Geogr Sci, 65(11): 1401–1410 (in Chinese)

[42]

Yin P H, Fang X Q, Yun Y R (2009). Regional differences of vulnerability of food security in China. J Geogr Sci, 19(5): 532–544

[43]

Zhai R X, Liu Y S (2008). Changes in regional pattern for grain production in China since the 90'S of 20 century. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 32(6): 49–54 (in Chinese)

[44]

Zhang G P, Liu J Y, Zhang Z X (2003). Spatial-temporal changes of cropland in China for the past 10 years based on remote sensing. J Geogr Sci, 58(3): 323–332 (in Chinese)

[45]

Zhang L, Zhang F, An P, Zhang W, Yan L (2008b). Comparative study of cultivated land use intensive degree and its change law at different economic levels. Transactions of the CSAE, 24(1): 108–112 (in Chinese)

[46]

Zhang L, Zhang Y, Yan J, Wu Y (2008a). Livelihood diversification and cropland use pattern in agro-pastoral mountainous region of eastern Tibetan Plateau. J Geogr Sci, 18(4): 499–509

[47]

Zhang L H, Zhao X G, Zhao D W, Yang F, Zhang L (2009). Analysis of grain production changes and food security problem in Inner Mongolia. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 30(6): 673–677 (in Chinese)

[48]

Zhu H Y, Li X B, Xin L J (2007). Intensity change in cultivated land use in China and its policy implications. Journal of Natural Resources, 22(6): 907–915 (in Chinese)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (640KB)

1036

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/