An optimal hydropower contract load determination method considering both human and riverine ecosystem needs

Abstract

In this research, a new method is developed to determine the optimal contract load for a hydropower reservoir, which is achieved by incorporating environmental flows into the determination process to increase hydropower revenues, while mitigating the negative impacts of hydropower generation on riverine ecosystems. In this method, the degree of natural flow regime alteration is adopted as a constraint of hydropower generation to protect riverine ecosystems, and the maximization of mean annual revenue is set as the optimization objective. The contract load in each month and the associated reservoir operating parameters were simultaneously optimized by a genetic algorithm. The proposed method was applied to China’s Wangkuai Reservoir to test its effectiveness. The new method offers two advantages over traditional studies. First, it takes into account both the economic benefits and the ecological needs of riverine systems, rather than only the economic benefits, as in previous methods. Second, although many measures have been established to mitigate the negative ecological impacts of hydropower generation, few have been applied to the hydropower planning stage. Thus, since the contract load is an important planning parameter for hydropower generation, influencing both economic benefits and riverine ecosystem protection, this new method could provide guidelines for the establishment of river protection measures at the hydropower planning stage.

Keywords

hydropower / electricity supply load / reservoir operation / river protection

References

[1] Arthington A H, Bunn S E, Poff N L, Naiman R J (2006). The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecol Appl, 16(4): 1311–1318

[2] Bunn S E, Arthington A H (2002). Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Manage, 30(4): 492–507

[3] Cai Y P, Huang G H, Tan Q, Yang Z F (2011). An integrated approach for climate-change impact analysis and adaptation planning under multi-level uncertainties. Part I: Methodology. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 15(6): 2779–2790

[4] Cai Y P, Huang G H, Yang Z F, Lin Q G, Tan Q (2009). Community-scale renewable energy systems planning under uncertainty—An interval chance-constrained programming approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 13(4): 721–735

[5] Carrion M, Philpott A B, Conejo A J, Arroyo J M (2007). A stochastic programming approach to electric energy procurement for large consumers. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 22(2): 744–754

[6] Chang F J, Chen L, Chang L C (2005). Optimizing the reservoir operating rule curves by genetic algorithms. Hydrol Processes, 19(11): 2277–2289

[7] Chang L C, Chang F J, Wang K W, Dai S Y (2010). Constrained genetic algorithms for optimizing multi-use reservoir operation. J Hydrol (Amst), 390(1–2): 66–74

[8] Chen L (2003). Real coded genetic algorithm optimization of long term reservoir operation. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 39(5): 1157–1165

[9] Chen L, McPhee J, Yeh W W G (2007). A diversified multiobjective GA for optimizing reservoir rule curves. Adv Water Resour, 30(5): 1082–1093

[10] Cheng C T, Wang W C, Xu D M, Chau K (2008). Optimizing hydropower reservoir operation using hybrid genetic algorithm and chaos. Water Resour Manage, 22(7): 895–909

[11] Feng D H, Gan D Q, Zhong J, Ni Y X (2007). Supplier asset allocation in a pool-based electricity market. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 22(3): 1129–1138

[12] Ferreira A, Teegavarapu R (2012). Optimal and adaptive operation of a hydropower system with unit commitment and water quality constraints. Water Resour Manage, 26(3): 707–732

[13] Gehrke P C, Brown P, Schiller C B, Moffatt D B, Bruce A M (1995). River regulation and fish communities in the Murray-Darling river system, Australia. Regul Rivers Res Manage, 11(3–4): 363–375

[14] Gippel C J, Stewardson M J (1998). Use of wetted perimeter in defining minimum environmental flows. Regul Rivers Res Manage, 14(1): 53–67

[15] Haihe Water Commission (2008). Comprehensive water resources planning for Hai River basin. Report of Ministry of Water Resources of China, Tianjin (in Chinese)

[16] Hänggi P, Weingartner R (2012). Variations in discharge volumes for hydropower generation in switzerland. Water Resour Manage, 26(5): 1231–1252

[17] HPMPB (Hebei Province Municipal Price Bureau) (2009). Announce for the adjustment of electricity price in Hebei Province. Shijiazhuang: HPMPB (in Chinese)

[18] IEA (International Energy Agency) (2003). Energy policies of IEA countries: 2003, Review. Paris: OECD/IEA

[19] Jager H I, Smith B T (2008). Sustainable reservoir operation: can we generate hydropower and preserve ecosystem values? River Res Appl, 24(3): 340–352

[20] King J, Brown C, Sabet H (2003). A scenario-based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for rivers. River Res Appl, 19(5–6): 619–639

[21] Kingsford R T (2000). Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on floodplain wetlands in Australia. Austral Ecol, 25(2): 109–127

[22] Ladson A R, White L J (1999). An index of stream condition: reference manual. Melbourne: Department of Natural Resources and Environment

[23] Li J Q, Mariño M, Ji C M, Zhang Y S (2009). Mathematical models of inter-plant economical operation of a cascade hydropower system in electricity market. Water Resour Manage, 23(10): 2003–2013

[24] Liu P, Guo S L, Xu X W, Chen J H (2011). Derivation of aggregation-based joint operating rule curves for cascade hydropower reservoirs. Water Resour Manage, 25(13): 3177–3200

[25] Poff N L, Allan J D, Bain M B, Karr J R, Prestegaard K L, Richter B D, Sparks R E, Stromberg J C (1997). The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience, 47(11): 769–784

[26] Poff N L, Richter B D, Arthington A H, Bunn S E, Naiman R J, Kendy E, Acreman M, Apse C, Bledsoe B P, Freeman M C, Henriksen J, Jacobson R B, Kennen J G, Merritt D M, O’Keeffe J H, Olden J D, Rogers K, Tharme R E, Warner A (2010). The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshw Biol, 55: 147–170

[27] Poff N L, Zimmerman J K L (2009). Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshw Biol, 55(1): 194–205

[28] Rehfuess E, Mehta S, Prüss-Üstün A (2006). Assessing household solid fuel use: multiple implications for the millennium development goals. Environ Health Perspect, 114(3): 373–378

[29] Renöfält B M, Jansson R, Nilsson C (2010). Effects of hydropower generation and opportunities for environmental flow management in Swedish riverine ecosystems. Freshw Biol, 55: 49–67

[30] Richter B D, Baumgartner J V, Powell J, Braun B P (1996). A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conserv Biol, 10(4): 1163–1174

[31] Richter B D, Baumgartner J V, Braun B P, Powell J (1998). A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network. Regul Rivers Res Manage, 14(4): 329–340

[32] Richter B D, Baumgartner J V, Wigington R, Braun B P (1997). How much water does a river need? Freshw Biol, 37(1): 231–249

[33] Richter B D, Thomas G A (2007). Restoring environmental flows by modifying dam operations. Ecol Soc, 12: 12

[34] Rotting T A, Gjelsvik A (1992). Stochastic dual dynamic programming for seasonal scheduling in the Norwegian power system. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 7(1): 273–279

[35] SBQTS (State Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision) (1998). Specification of reservoir operation for large and medium-scale hydropower stations. Beijing: SBQTS

[36] Spence R, Hickley P (2000). The use of PHABSIM in the management of water resources and fisheries in England and Wales. Ecol Eng, 16(1): 153–158

[37] Srinivas M, Patnaik L M (1994). Adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation in genetic algorithms. IEEE T Syst Man Cyb, 24(4): 656–667

[38] State Environment Protection Administration of China (2006). Technical guidelines for environmental impact assessment for ecological water usage, low temperature water and fish habitat facilities in hydraulics projects, report, Beijing (in Chinese).

[39] Suen J P, Eheart J W (2006). Reservoir management to balance ecosystem and human needs: incorporating the paradigm of the ecological flow regime. Water Resour Res, 42(3): W03417

[40] Tennant D L (1976). Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources. Fisheries (Bethesda, Md), 1(4): 6–10

[41] Tu M Y, Hsu N S, Tsai F T C, Yeh W W G (2008). Optimization of hedging rules for reservoir operations. J Water Resour Plan Manage, 134(1): 3–13

[42] Walker K F, Thoms M C (1993). Environmental effects of flow regulation on the lower river Murray, Australia. Regul Rivers Res Manage, 8(1–2): 103–119

[43] Yin X A, Yang Z F (2011). Development of a coupled reservoir operation and water diversion model: balancing human and environmental flow requirements. Ecol Modell, 222(2): 224–231

[44] Yin X A, Yang Z F, Petts G E (2011). Reservoir operating rules to sustain environmental flows in regulated rivers. Water Resour Res, 47(8): W08509

[45] Yin X A, Yang Z F, Petts G E (2012). Optimizing environmental flows below dams. River Res Appl, 28(6): 703–716

[46] Yin X A, Yang Z F, Yang W, Zhao Y W, Chen H (2010). Optimized reservoir operation to balance human and riverine ecosystem needs: model development, and a case study for the Tanghe reservoir, Tang river basin, China. Hydrol Processes, 24: 461–471

[47] Yüksel I (2007). Development of hydropower: a case study in developing countries. Energ Source Part B, 2(2): 113–121

Acknowledgments

We thank the International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China (No. 2011DFA72420), the National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2013CB430402), Huoyingdong Education Fund (No. 142023), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51309012) and the Fundamental Research Funds for their financial support.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2015 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg