Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Regression Tree (CART) applications for the indirect estimation of unsaturated soil shear strength parameters

Abstract

The shear strength parameters of soil (cohesion and angle of internal friction) are quite essential in solving many civil engineering problems. In order to determine these parameters, laboratory tests are used. The main objective of this work is to evaluate the potential of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Regression Tree (CART) techniques for the indirect estimation of these parameters. Four different models, considering different combinations of 6 inputs, such as gravel %, sand %, silt %, clay %, dry density, and plasticity index, were investigated to evaluate the degree of their effects on the prediction of shear parameters. A performance evaluation was carried out using Correlation Coefficient and Root Mean Squared Error measures. It was observed that for the prediction of friction angle, the performance of both the techniques is about the same. However, for the prediction of cohesion, the ANN technique performs better than the CART technique. It was further observed that the model considering all of the 6 input soil parameters is the most appropriate model for the prediction of shear parameters. Also, connection weight and bias analyses of the best neural network (i.e., 6/2/2) were attempted using Connection Weight, Garson, and proposed Weight-bias approaches to characterize the influence of input variables on shear strength parameters. It was observed that the Connection Weight Approach provides the best overall methodology for accurately quantifying variable importance, and should be favored over the other approaches examined in this study.

Keywords

cohesion / friction angle / Artificial Neural Network / Regression Tree / Connection Weight / Weight-bias Approach

References

[1] Agrawal G, Weeraratne S, Khilnani K (1994). Estimating clay liner and cover permeability using computational neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st Congress on Computing in Civil Engineering, Washington

[2] Akbulut S (2005). Artificial neural networks for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of coarse grained soils. Eurasian Soil Sci, 38: 392-398

[3] Alavi A H, Gandomi A H, Gandomi M, Sadat H S S (2009). Prediction of maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of stabilized soil using RBF neural networks. IES Journal Part A: Civil & Structural Engineering, 2(2): 98-106

[4] Arora M K, Das Gupta A S, Gupta R P (2004). An artificial neural network approach for landslide hazard zonation in the Bhagirathi (Ganga) Valley, Himalayas. Int J Remote Sens, 25(3): 559-572

[5] Atkinson P M, Tatnall A R L (1997). Neural networks in remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens, 18(4): 699-709

[6] Attoh-Okine N O (2004). Application of genetic-based neural network to lateritic soil strength modeling. Construct Build Mater, 18(8): 619-623

[7] Baykasoğlu A, Güllüb H, Çanakçıb H, Özbakırc L (2008). Prediction of compressive and tensile strength of limestone via genetic programming. Expert Syst Appl, 35(1-2): 111-123

[8] Breiman L, Friedman J H, Olshen R A, Stone C J (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Newyork: Chapman and Hall Ltd/CRC

[9] Çanakcı H, Baykasoglu A, Gullu H (2009). Prediction of compressive and tensile strength of Gaziantep basalts via neural networks and gene expression programming. Neural Comput Appl, 18(8): 1031-1041

[10] Cho S E (2009). Probabilistic stability analyses of slopes using the ANN-based response surface. Comput Geotech, 36(5): 787-797

[11] Das S K, Basudhar P K (2008). Prediction of residual friction angle of clays using artificial neural network. Eng Geol, 100(3-4): 142-145

[12] Escario V, Juca J E T (1989). Strength and deformation of partly saturated soils. In: Proceedings 12th International Conf. Soil Mech. Foundation Engineering. Rio de Janeiro, 1: 43-46

[13] Ferentinou M D, Sakellariou M G (2007). Computational intelligence tools for the prediction of slope performance. Comput Geotech, 34(5): 362-384

[14] Foody G M, Arora M K (1997). An evaluation of some factors affecting the accuracy of classification by an artificial neural network. Int J Remote Sens, 18(4): 799-810

[15] Freund J E (1992). Mathematical Statistics (5th edition). New Delhi: Printice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., 658p.

[16] Garson G D (1991). Interpreting neural-network connection weights Artif Intell Expert, 6: 47-51

[17] Gevrey M, Dimopoulos I, Lek S (2003). Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models. Ecol Model, 160: 249-264

[18] Goh A T C, Kulhawy F H, Asce F, Chua C G (1994). Seismic liquefaction potential assessed by neural networks. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 120(9): 1467-1480

[19] Goh A T C, Kulhawy F H, Chua C G (2005). Bayesian neural network analysis of undrained side resistance of drilled shafts. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 131(1): 84-93

[20] Goktepe A B, Altun S, Altintas G, Tan O (2008). Shear strength estimation of plastic clays with statistical and neural approaches. Build Environ, 43(5): 849-860

[21] Goktepe A B, Sezer A (2010). Effect of particle shape on density and permeability of sands. Proceedings of institution of civil engineers geotechnical engineering, 163: 307-320

[22] Gómez H, Kavzoglu T (2005). Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela. Eng Geol, 78(1-2): 11-27

[23] Gong P (1996). Integrated analysis of spatial data from multiple sources: using evidential reasoning and artificial neural network techniques for geological mapping. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 62(5): 513-523

[24] Hagan M T, Demuth H B, Beale M H (1996). Neural Network Design. Boston: PWS Publishing, 730p

[25] Hagan M T, Menhaj M B (1994). Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw, 5(6): 989-993

[26] Hanna A M, Ural D, Saygili G (2007). Neural network model for liquefaction potential in soil deposits using Turkey and Taiwan earthquake data. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng, 27(6): 521-540

[27] Haykin S (1998). Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 842p

[28] IS 2720 (Part IV) (1985). Indian Standard for Grain Size Analysis (2nd Revision). New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 73-94

[29] IS 2720 (Part V) (1985). Indian Standard for Determination of liquid and plastic limit (2nd Revision). New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 109-114

[30] IS 2720 (Part XIII) (1986). Indian Standard for Direct shear test (Second Revision). New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 195-198

[31] Jain V, Seung H S, Turaga S C (2010). Machines that learn to segment images: a crucial technology for connectomics. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 20(5): 653-666

[32] Juang C H, Chen C J, Jiang T, Andrus R D (2000). Risk-based liquefaction potential evaluation using standard penetration tests. Can Geotech J, 37(6): 1195-1208

[33] Kanungo D P, Arora M K, Sarkar S, Gupta R P (2006). A comparative study of conventional, ANN black box, fuzzy and combined neural and fuzzy weighting procedure for landslide susceptibility zonation in Darjeeling Himalayas. Eng Geol, 85(3-4): 347-366

[34] Kaya A (2009). Residual and fully softened strength evaluation of soils using artificial neural networks. Geological and Geotechnical Engineering, 27(2): 281-288

[35] Kayadelen C, Günaydın O, Fener M, Demir A, Özvan A (2009). Modeling of the angle of shearing resistance of soils using soft computing systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 36: 11814-11826

[36] Lee S, Ryu J H, Won J S, Park H J (2004). Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network. Eng Geol, 71(3-4): 289-302

[37] Lu P, Rosenbaum M S (2003). Artificial neural networks and grey systems for the prediction of slope stability. Nat Hazards, 30(3): 383-398

[38] Lu Z (1992). The relationship of shear strength to swelling pressure for unsaturated soils. Chinese journal of geotechnical engineering, 14(3): 1-8(in Chinese)

[39] Maji V B, Sitharam T G (2008). Prediction of elastic modulus of jointed rock mass using artificial neural networks. Geotech Geol Eng, 26(4): 443-452

[40] Najjar Y M, Basheer I A (1996). Discussion of stress-strain modeling of sands using artificial neural networks. J Geotech Eng, 122(11): 949-951

[41] Neaupane K M, Achet S H (2004). Use of backpropagation neural network for landslide monitoring: a case study in the higher Himalaya. Eng Geol, 74(3-4): 213-226

[42] Nefeslioglu H A, Duman T Y, Durmaz S (2008). Landslide susceptibility mapping for a part of tectonic Kelkit Valley (Eastern Black Sea region of Turkey). Geomorphology, 94(3-4): 401-418

[43] Olden J D, Jackson D A (2002). Illuminating the “black box”: understanding variable contributions in artificial neural networks. Ecol Model, 154: 135-150

[44] Olden J D, Joy M K, Death R G (2004). An accurate comparison of methods for quantifying variable importance in artificial neural networks using simulated data. Ecol Model, 178 (3-4): 389-397

[45] Rafiai H, Jafari A (2011). Artificial neural networks as a basis for new generation of rock failure criteria. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 48(7): 1153-1159

[46] Ripley B (1996). Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 403p

[47] Schalkoff R J (1997). Artificial Neural Networks. New York: Wiley, 422p

[48] Shen Z, Yu S (1996). The problems in the present studies on mechanics of unsaturated soils. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Geotechnical Aspects of Regional Soils. Beijing: Atomic Energy Press (in Chinese)

[49] Sietsma J, Dow R J F (1991). Creating artificial neural networks that generalize. Neural Netw, 4(1): 67-79

[50] Sonmez H, Gokceoglua C, Nefeslioglub H A, Kayabasi A (2006). Estimation of rock modulus: for intact rocks with an artificial neural network and for rock masses with a new empirical equation. Eng Geol, 43: 224-235

[51] Tiryaki B (2008). Predicting intact rock strength for mechanical excavation using multivariate statistics, artificial neural networks, and regression trees. Eng Geol, 99(1-2): 51-60

[52] Xu Y (1997). Mechanical Properties of Unsaturated Expansive Soils and Its Application to Engineering. Dissertation for Ph.D degree. Nanjing: Hohai University (in Chinese)

[53] Yesilnacar E, Topal T (2005). Landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey). Eng Geol, 79(3-4): 251-266

[54] Youd T L, Gilstrap S D (1999). Liquefaction and deformation of silty and fine-grained soils. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, 3: 1013-1020

[55] Zhou W (1999). Verification of the nonparametric characteristics of back <?Pub Caret?>propagation neural networks for image classification. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and remote sensing, 37: 771-779

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to the Director, CSIR-CBRI for his kind permission to publish this work. We also thank the editors and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments, which helped to improve the quality of the paper.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg