Three distinct global estimates of historical land-cover change and land-use conversions for over 200 years

Prasanth MEIYAPPAN, Atul K. JAIN

PDF(655 KB)
PDF(655 KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› DOI: 10.1007/s11707-012-0314-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Three distinct global estimates of historical land-cover change and land-use conversions for over 200 years

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Earth’s land cover has been extensively transformed over time due to both human activities and natural causes. Previous global studies have focused on developing spatial and temporal patterns of dominant human land-use activities (e.g., cropland, pastureland, urban land, wood harvest). Process-based modeling studies adopt different strategies to estimate the changes in land cover by using these land-use data sets in combination with a potential vegetation map, and subsequently use this information for impact assessments. However, due to unaccounted changes in land cover (resulting from both indirect anthropogenic and natural causes), heterogeneity in land-use/cover (LUC) conversions among grid cells, even for the same land use activity, and uncertainty associated with potential vegetation mapping and historical estimates of human land use result in land cover estimates that are substantially different compared to results acquired from remote sensing observations. Here, we present a method to implicitly account for the differences arising from these uncertainties in order to provide historical estimates of land cover that are consistent with satellite estimates for recent years. Due to uncertainty in historical agricultural land use, we use three widely accepted global estimates of cropland and pastureland in combination with common wood harvest and urban land data sets to generate three distinct estimates of historical land-cover change and underlying LUC conversions. Hence, these distinct historical reconstructions offer a wide range of plausible regional estimates of uncertainty and the extent to which different ecosystems have undergone changes. The annual land cover maps and LUC conversion maps are reported at 0.5°×0.5° resolution and describe the area of 28 land-cover types and respective underlying land-use transitions. The reconstructed data sets are relevant for studies addressing the impact of land-cover change on biogeophysics, biogeochemistry, water cycle, and global climate.

Keywords

historical land use / land-cover change / land-use conversions / deforestation / HYDE / Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Prasanth MEIYAPPAN, Atul K. JAIN. Three distinct global estimates of historical land-cover change and land-use conversions for over 200 years. Front Earth Sci, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-012-0314-2

References

[1]
AroraV K, BoerG J (2006). Simulating competition and coexistence between plant functional types in a dynamic vegetation model. Earth Interactions, 10(10): 1–30
[2]
BalaG, CaldeiraK, WickettM, PhillipsT J, LobellD B, DelireC, MirinA (2007). Combined climate and carbon-cycle effects of large-scale deforestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 104(16): 6550–6555
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[3]
BonanG B (2008). Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science, 320(5882): 1444–1449
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
BonanG B, PollardD, ThompsonS L (1992). Effects of boreal forest vegetation on global climate. Nature, 359(6397): 716–718
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
BrovkinV, ClaussenM, DriesschaertE, FichefetT, KicklighterD, LoutreM F, MatthewsH D, RamankuttyN, SchaefferM, SokolovA (2006). Biogeophysical effects of historical land cover changes simulated by six Earth system models of intermediate complexity. Clim Dyn, 26(6): 587–600
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
CanadellJ G (2002). Land use effects on terrestrial carbon sources and sinks. Science in China (Series C), 45(Sl): 1–9
Pubmed
[7]
CanadellJ G, Le QuéréC, RaupachM R, FieldC B, BuitenhuisE T, CiaisP, ConwayT J, GillettN P, HoughtonR A, MarlandG (2007). Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 104(47): 18866–18870
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[8]
CollatzG J, BerryJ A, ClarkJ S (1998). Effects of climate and atmospheric CO2 partial pressure on the global distribution of C4 grasses: present, past, and future. Oecologia, 114(4): 441–454
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
EllisE C, Klein GoldewijkK, SiebertS, LightmanD, RamankuttyN (2010). Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 19: 589–606
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
FAO (2001). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000. Main Report, FAO Forestry Paper 140, Rome, Italy. Available at http://www.fao.org/forestry/fra/2000/report/en/
[11]
FAO (2006). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005. Main Report, FAO Forestry Paper 147, Rome, Italy. Available at http://www.fao.org/forestry/fra/fra2005/en/
[12]
FAO (2008). FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. Available at: http://www.fao.org
[13]
FAO (2010). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010, Main Report, FAO Forestry Paper 163, Rome, Italy. Available at http://www.fao.org/forestry/fra/fra2010/en/
[14]
FeddemaJ J, OlesonK W, BonanG B, MearnsL O, BujaL E, MeehlG A, WashingtonW M (2005). The importance of land cover change in simulating future climates. Science, 310(5754): 1674–1678
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[15]
FindellK L, PitmanA J, EnglandM H, PegionP J (2009). Regional and global impacts of land cover change and sea surface temperature anomalies. J Clim, 22(12): 3248–3269
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
FoleyJ A, CostaM H, DelireC, RamankuttyN, SnyderP (2003). Green surprise? How terrestrial ecosystems could affect Earth’s climate. Front Ecol Environ, 1(1): 38–44
[17]
FoleyJ A, DefriesR, AsnerG P, BarfordC, BonanG, CarpenterS R, ChapinF S, CoeM T, DailyG C, GibbsH K, HelkowskiJ H, HollowayT, HowardE A, KucharikC J, MonfredaC, PatzJ A, PrenticeI C, RamankuttyN, SnyderP K (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734): 570–574
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[18]
FoleyJ A, RamankuttyN, BraumanK A, CassidyE S, GerberJ S, JohnstonM, MuellerN D, O’ConnellC, RayD K, WestP C, BalzerC, BennettE M, CarpenterS R, HillJ, MonfredaC, PolaskyS, RockströmJ, SheehanJ, SiebertS, TilmanD, ZaksD P (2011). Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478(7369): 337–342
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[19]
FriedlM A, Sulla-MenasheD, TanB, SchneiderA, RamankuttyN, SibleyA, HuangX (2010). MODIS collection 5 global land cover: algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets. Remote Sens Environ, 114(1): 168–182
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
GiglioL, RandersonJ T, van der WerfG R, KasibhatlaP S, CollatzG J, MortonD C, DeFriesR S (2010). Assessing variability and long-term trends in burned area by merging multiple satellite fire products. Biogeosciences, 7(3): 1171–1186
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
HansenM C, DeFriesR S, TownshendJ G R, SohlbergR (2000). Global land cover classification at 1km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach. Int J Remote Sens, 21(6–7): 1331–1364
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
HoughtonR A (1999). The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850–1990. Tellus B Chem Phys Meterol, 51(2): 298–313
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
HoughtonR A (2005). Aboveground forest biomass and the global carbon balance. Glob Change Biol, 11(6): 945–958
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
HoughtonR A (2008). Carbon flux to the atmosphere from land use changes: 1850–2005. In: A Compendium of Data on Global Change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
[25]
HoughtonR A, HobbieJ E, MelilloJ M, MooreB, PetersonB J, ShaverG R, WoodwellG M (1983). Changes in the carbon content of terrestrial biota and soils between 1860 and 1980: a net release of CO2 to the atmosphere. Ecol Monogr, 53(3): 235–262
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
HoughtonR A, van der WerfG R, DeFriesR S, HansenM C, HouseJ I, Le QuéréC, PongratzJ, RamankuttyN (2012). Chapter G2 carbon emissions from land use and land cover change. Biogeosciences Discuss, 9(1): 835–878
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
HurttG C, ChiniL P, FrolkingS, BettsR A, FeddemaJ, FischerG, HibbardK, HoughtonR, JanetosA, JonesC D, KindermannG, KinoshitaT, Klein GoldewijkK, RiahiK, ShevliakovaE, SmithS, StehfestE, ThomsonA, ThortonP, VuurenD P, WangY (2011). Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500–2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands. Clim Change, 109(1–2): 117–161
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
HurttG C, FrolkingS, FearonM G, MooreB III, ShevliakovaE, MalyshevS, PacalaS W, HoughtonR A (2006). The underpinnings of land use history: three centuries of global gridded land use transitions, wood harvest activity, and resulting secondary lands. Glob Change Biol, 12(7): 1208–1229
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
JainA K, YangX (2005). Modeling the effects of two different land cover change data sets on the carbon stocks of plants and soils in concert with CO2 and climate change. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 19(2): GB2015
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
JainA K, YangX, KheshgiH, McGuireA D, PostW P, KicklighterD (2009). Nitrogen attenuation of terrestrial carbon cycle response to global environmental factors. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 23(4): GB4028
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
JungM, HenkelK, HeroldM, ChurkinaG (2006). Exploiting synergies of global land cover products for carbon cycle modeling. Remote Sens Environ, 101(4): 534–553
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Klein GoldewijkK (2001). Estimating global land use change over the past 300 years: the HYDE database. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 15(2): 417–433
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Klein GoldewijkK, BeusenA, van DrechtG, De VosM (2011). The HYDE 3.1 spatially explicit database of human-induced land-use change over the past 12,000 years. Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 20(1): 73–86
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Klein GoldewijkK, BeusenA, JanssenP (2010). Long term dynamic modeling of global population and built-up area in a spatially explicit way, HYDE 3.1. Holocene, 20(4): 565–573
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Klein GoldewijkK, RamankuttyN (2004). Land cover change over the last three centuries due to human activities: the availability of new global data sets. GeoJournal, 61(4): 335–344
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Klein GoldewijkK, van DrechtG, BouwmanA F (2007). Mapping contemporary global cropland and grassland distributions on a 5 × 5 minute resolution. Journal of Land Use Science, 2(3): 167–190
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
LambinE F, GeistH J (2003). Regional differences in tropical deforestation. Environment, 45(6): 22–36
[38]
LambinE F, GeistH J, LepersE (2003). Dynamics of land use and land cover change in tropical regions. Annu Rev Environ Resour, 28(1): 205–241
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
LawrenceP J, FeddemaJ J, BonanG B, MeehlG A, O’NeillB C, OlesonK W, LevisS, LawrenceD M, KluzekE, LindsayK, ThorntonP E (2012). Simulating the biogeochemical and biogeophysical impacts of transient land cover change and wood harvest in the Community Climate System Model (CCSM4) from 1850 to 2100. J Clim: 120208141321006
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
LeiteC C, CostaM H, de LimaC A, RibeiroC A A S, SediyamaG C (2011). Historical reconstruction of land use in the Brazilian Amazon (1940–1995). Journal of Land Use Science, 6(1): 33–52
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
LiB B, FangX Q, YeY, ZhangX (2010). Accuracy assessment of global historical cropland datasets based on regional reconstructed historical data—a case study in Northeast China. Science in China (D): Earth Sciences, 53(11): 1689–1699
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
LiuM, TianH (2010). China’s land cover and land use change from 1700 to 2005: estimations from high-resolution satellite data and historical archives. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 24(3): GB3003
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
LovelandT R, BelwardA S (1997). The IGBP-DIS global 1 km land cover data set, DISCover first results. Int J Remote Sens, 18(15): 3289–3295
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
McGuireA D, SitchS, CleinJ S, DargavilleR, EsserG, FoleyJ, HeimannM, JoosF, KaplanJ, KicklighterD W, MeierR A, MelilloJ M, MooreB III, PrenticeI C, RamankuttyN, ReichenauT, SchlossA, TianH, WilliamsL J, WittenbergU (2001). Carbon balance of the terrestrial biosphere in the twentieth century: analyses of CO2, climate and land use effects with four process-based ecosystem models. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 15(1): 183–206
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
MeinshausenM, SmithS J, CalvinK V, DanielJ S, KainumaM L T, LamarqueJ F, MatsumotoK, MontzkaS A, RaperS C B, RiahiK, ThomsonA, VeldersG J M, VuurenD P P (2011). The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extension from 1765 to 2300. Clim Change, 109(1–2): 213–241
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
MitchellT D, JonesP D (2005). An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. Int J Climatol, 25(6): 693–712
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
MonfredaC, RamankuttyN, FoleyJ A (2008). Farming the Planet: 2.Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary prodution in the year 2000. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 22: GB1022
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
MossR H, EdmondsJ A, HibbardK A, ManningM R, RoseS K, van VuurenD P, CarterT R, EmoriS, KainumaM, KramT, MeehlG A, MitchellJ F B, NakicenovicN, RiahiK, SmithS J, StoufferR J, ThomsonA M, WeyantJ P, WilbanksT J (2010). The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment.Nature, 463(7282): 747–756
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[49]
OlofssonJ, HicklerT (2008). Effects of human land use on the global carbon cycle during the last 6000 years. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 17(5): 605–615
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
ParryM L, CanzianiO F, PalutikofJ P, van der LindenP J, HansonC E (2007). Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 211–272
[51]
PielkeR A, MarlandG, BettsR A, ChaseT N, EastmanJ L, NilesJ O, NiyogiD D S, RunningS W (2002). The influence of land use change and landscape dynamics on the climate system: relevance to climate-change policy beyond the radiative effect of greenhouse gases. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A, 360(1797): 1705–1719
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
PielkeR A Sr, PitmanA, NiyogiD, MahmoodR, McAlpineC, HossainF, Klein GoldewijkK, NairU, BettsR, FallS, ReichsteinM, KabatP, de NobletN (2011). Land use/land cover changes and climate: modeling analysis and observational evidence. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Clim Change, 2(6): 828–850
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
PitmanA J, AvilaF B, AbramowitzG, WangY P, PhippsS J, de Noblet-DucoudréN (2011). Importance of background climate in determining impact of land cover change on regional climate. Nature Climate Change, 1(9): 472–475
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
PitmanA J, de Noblet-DucoudréN, CruzF T, DavinE, BonanG B, BrovkinV, ClaussenM, DelireC, GaylerV, van den HurkB J J M, LawrenceP J, van der MolenM K, MüllerC, ReickC H, SeneviratneS I, StrengersB J, VoldoireA (2009). Uncertainties in climate responses to past land cover change: first results from the LUCID intercomparison study. Geophysical Research Letters, 36; L14814
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
PongratzJ, ReickC, RaddatzT, ClaussenM (2008). A reconstruction of global agricultural areas and land cover for the Last Millennium. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 22(3): GB3018
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
PongratzJ, ReickC H, RaddatzT, ClaussenM (2009). Effects of anthropogenic land cover change on the carbon cycle of the last millennium. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 23(4): GB4001
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
RamankuttyN, EvanA, MonfredaC, FoleyJ A (2008). Farming the Planet: 1. The geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 22(1): GB1003
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
RamankuttyN, FoleyJ (1999). Estimating historical changes in global land cover: croplands from 1700 to 1992. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 13(4): 997–1028
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
ReickC, RaddatzT, PongratzJ, ClaussenM (2010). Contribution of anthropogenic land cover change emissions to pre-industrial atmospheric CO2. Tellus B Chem Phys Meterol, 62(5): 329–336
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
ShevliakovaE, PacalaS W, MalyshevS, HurttG C, MillyP C D, CaspersenJ P, SentmanL T, FiskJ P, WirthC, CrevoisierC (2009). Carbon cycling under 300 years of land use change: importance of the secondary vegetation sink. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 23(2): GB2022
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
StillC J, BerryJ A, CollatzG J, DeFriesR S (2003). Global distribution of C3 and C4 vegetation: carbon cycle implications. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 17(1): 1006–1020
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
van der WerfG R, RandersonJ T, GiglioL, CollatzG J, MuM, KasibhatlaP S, MortonD C, DeFriesR S, JinY, van LeeuwenT T (2010). Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009). Atmos Chem Phys, 10(23): 11707–11735
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
YangX, RichardsonT K, JainA K (2010). Contributions of secondary forest and nitrogen dynamics to terrestrial carbon uptake. Biogeosciences Discuss, 7(2): 2739–2765
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
YangX, WittigV, JainA K, PostW (2009). Integration of nitrogen cycle dynamics into the Integrated Science Assessment Model for the study of terrestrial ecosystem responses to global change. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 23(4): GB4029
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
YeY, FangX Q (2011). Spatial pattern of land cover changes across Northeast China over the past 300 years. J Hist Geogr, 37(4): 408–417
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Navin Ramankutty for sharing the new historical cropland and pastureland data sets and answering several questions relating to the data sets. We thank Kees Klein Goldewijk for providing access to an older version of HYDE data. We would like to thank Richard Houghton for sharing his latest regional cropland and pastureland data. We thank Chad Monfreda for providing the C3/C4 harvested cropland fraction map. We also owe thanks to Martin Jung and Markus Reichstein for providing FLUXNET-MTE data sets. We would also like to acknowledge ORNL DAAC for their extensive collection of satellite-based land cover data, which were of immense use to us. This work was supported by National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Land Cover and Land Use Change Program (No. NNX08AK75G).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(655 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/