Impacts of biogas projects on agro-ecosystem in rural areas----A case study of Gongcheng

Jin YANG , Weichao CHEN , Bin CHEN

Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2011, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (3) : 317 -322.

PDF (87KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2011, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (3) : 317 -322. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-011-0183-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Impacts of biogas projects on agro-ecosystem in rural areas----A case study of Gongcheng

Author information +
History +
PDF (87KB)

Abstract

The rapid growth of agro-ecosystem has been the focus of “New Rural Construction” in China due to intensive energy consumption and environmental pollution in rural areas. As a kind of renewable energy, biogas is helpful for new energy development and plays an important role in the sustainable development of agro-ecosystem in China. To evaluate the effects of biogas on agro-ecosystem from a systematic angle, we discussed the status quo of household biogas and identified its main factors that may have impacts on agro-ecosystem. An indicator framework covering environmental, social and economic aspects was established to quantify the impacts exerted by biogas project on agro-ecosystem. A case study of Gongcheng was then conducted to evaluate the combined impact of biogas project using the proposed indicator framework. Results showed that there was a notable positive effect brought by the application of biogas, and the integrated benefit has been significantly improved by 60.36%, implying that biogas as a substitute energy source can promote the sustainable level of rural areas.

Keywords

biogas / agro-ecosystem / sustainable development / Gongcheng

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jin YANG, Weichao CHEN, Bin CHEN. Impacts of biogas projects on agro-ecosystem in rural areas----A case study of Gongcheng. Front. Earth Sci., 2011, 5(3): 317-322 DOI:10.1007/s11707-011-0183-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Berglund M, Börjesson P (2006). Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production. Biomass Bioenergy, 30(3): 254–266

[2]

Brown B B, Yiridoe E K, Gordon R (2007). Impact of single versus multiple policy options on the economic feasibility of biogas energy production: Swine and dairy operations in Nova Scotia. Energy Policy, 35(9): 4597–4610

[3]

Chen Y, Yang G H, Sweeney S, Feng Y Z (2010). Household biogas use in rural China: A study of opportunities and constraints. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 14(1): 545–549

[4]

Hediger W (1999). Reconciling “weak” and “strong” sustainability. International Journal of Social Economics, 26 (7–9): 1120–1143

[5]

Saaty T L (1992). Decision Making for Leaders.Pittsburgh: RWS Publications

[6]

Stoorvogel J J, Antle J M, Crissman C C, Bowen W (2004). The trade-off analysis model: Integrated bio-physical and economic modeling of agricultural production systems. Agric Syst, 80(1): 43–66

[7]

Vaidya O S, Kumar S (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. Eur J Oper Res, 169(1): 1–29

[8]

Wang X H, Di C L, Hu X Y, Wu W M, Jiang X P, Jiang S Y (2007). The influence of using biogas digesters on family energy consumption and its economic benefit in rural areas—Comparative study between Lianshui and Guichi in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 11(5): 1018–1024

[9]

Yiridoe E K, Gordon R, Brown B B (2009). Nonmarket cobenefits and economic feasibility of on-farm biogas energy production. Energy Policy, 37: 1170–1179

[10]

Zhang P D, Jia G M, Wang G (2007). Contribution to emission reduction of CO2 and SO2 by household biogas construction in rural China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 11(8): 1903–1912

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (87KB)

1206

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/