Integrative assessment of hydrological, ecological, and economic systems for water resources management at river basin scale

Abstract

This study presents a basin-scale integrative hydrological, ecological, and economic (HEE) modeling system, aimed at evaluating the impact of resources management, especially agricultural water resources management, on the sustainability of regional water resources. The hydrological model in the modeling system was adapted from SWAT, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool, to simulate the water balance in terms of soil moisture, evapotranspiration, and streamflow. An ecological model was integrated into the hydrological model to compute the ecosystem production of biomass production and yield for different land use types. The economic model estimated the monetary values of crop production and water productivity over irrigated areas. The modeling system was primarily integrated and run on a Windows platform and was able to produce simulation results at daily time steps with a spatial resolution of hydrological response unit (HRU). The modeling system was then calibrated over the period from 1983 to 1991 for the upper and middle parts of the Yellow River basin, China. Calibration results showed that the efficiencies of the modeling system in simulating monthly streamflow over 5 hydrological stations were from 0.54 to 0.68 with an average of 0.64, indicating an acceptable calibration. Preliminary simulation results from 1986 to 1995 revealed that water use in the study region has largely reduced the streamflow in many parts of the area except for that in the riverhead. Spatial distribution of biomass production, and crop yield showed a strong impact of irrigation on agricultural production. Water productivity over irrigated cropland ranged from 1 to 1640 USD/(ha·mm^-1), indicating a wide variation of the production conditions within the study region and a great potential in promoting water use efficiency in low water productivity areas. Generally, simulation results from this study indicated that the modeling system was capable of tracking the temporal and spatial variability of pertinent water balance variables, ecosystem dynamics, and regional economy, and provided a useful simulation tool in evaluating long-term water resources management strategies in a basin scale.

Keywords

ecosystem production / integrative modeling system / upper and middle parts of the Yellow River basin / water resources management

References

[1] Andrea W, Fohrer N, Moller D (2001). Long-term land use changes in a mesoscale watershed due to socio-economic factors -effects on landscape structures and functions. Ecological Modeling, 140: 125-140

[2] Arnold J G, Srinivasan R, Muttiah R S (1994). Large scale hydrologic modeling and assessment. Proc. Annual Summer Symp. American Water Resources Association, 3-15

[3] Arnold J G, Srinivasan R, Muttiah R S, Williams J R (1998). Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part 1: Model development. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 34 (1): 73-89

[4] Berbel J, Gomez-Limon J (2000). The impacts of water-pricing policy in Spain: an analysis of three irrigated areas. Agric Water Manag, 43: 219-238

[5] Booker J E, Young R A (1994). Modeling intrastate and interstate markets for Colorado River water resources. Journal of Environment Economic and Management, 26(1): 66-87

[6] Braat L C, Lierop W F J (1987). Integrated economic-ecological modeling. Braat L C, Lierop W F J, eds. Integrated Economic Ecological Modeling, 49-67

[7] Breuer L, Huisman J A, Steiner N, Weinmann B, Frede H G (2003). Eco-hydrologic and economic trade-off functions in watershed managment. Proceedings of the second international SWAT conference Bari, Italy, 37-40

[9] Cai X, McKinney D C, Lasdon L S (2001). Solving nonlinear water management models using a combined genetic algorithm and linear programming approach. Advances in Water Resources, 24(6): 667-676

[8] Cai X , McKinney D C, Lasdon L S (2003). Integrated hydrologic-agronomic-economic model for river basin management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 129(1): 4-17

[10] Compaq Computer Corporation (2001). Compaq visual fortran programmer's guide. Aug, Houston, Texas Houston, Texas

[11] Cook S, Gichuki F, Turral H (2006). Agricultural Water Productivity: Issues, Concepts and Approaches, CGIAR CPWF Report. Basin Focal Project Working Paper No. 1

[12] Dinar A, Letey J (1996). Modelling Economic Management and Policy Issues of Water in Irrigated Agriculture. Connecticut: Praeger Publishers

[13] Dudley B J, Scott B W (1993). Integrating irrigation water demand, supply, and delivery management in a stochastic environment. Water Resources Research, 29(9): 3093-3101

[14] Fohrer N, Möller D, Steiner N (2002). An interdisciplinary modeling approach to evaluate the effects of land use change. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 27 (9-10): 655-662

[15] Lefkoff L J, Gorelick S M (1990a). Simulating physical processes and economic behavior in saline, irrigated agriculture: model development. Water Resources Research, 26(7): 1359-1369

[16] Li X, Yang X, Luo Y, Dong S, Wang C, Deng X (2003). Farming productivity and resources sustainability in the Yellow River Basin, China. ASAE paper number: 033001. July, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

[17] Nash J E, Sutcliffe J V (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models–Part I: A discussion of principles. J Hydrol, 10: 282-290

[18] Noel J E, Howitt R E (1982). Conjunctive multibasin management: an optimal control approach. Water Resources Research, 18(4): 753-763

[19] Oweis T, Hachum A (2001). Reducing peak supplemental irrigation demand by extending sowing dates. Agric Water Manag, 50: 109-123

[20] Raju K S, Kumar D N (1999). Multicriteria decision making in irrigation planning. Agric Syst, 62 (2): 117-129

[21] Ringler C (2001). Optimal water allocation in the Mekong River basin, ZEF-discussion papers on development policy. Bonn: Center for Development Research, 38(5): 50-58

[22] Rosegrant M W, Cai X, Ringler C, Keller A, Donoso G, McKinney D C (1999). Report for the inter-American development bank on integrated economic-hydrologic water modeling at the basin scale: the Maipo River basin in Chile. Washington D C: IFPRI

[23] Rosegrant M W, Ringler C, McKinney D C, Cai X, Keller A, Donoso G (2000). Integrated economic-hydrologic water modeling at the basin scale: the Maipo River basin. Agricultural Economics, 24: 33-46

[24] Vedula S, Kumar D N (1996). An integrated model for optimal reservoir operation for irrigation of multiple crops. Water Resources Research, 32(4): 1101-1108

[25] Vedula S, Mujumdar P P (1992). Optimal reservoir operation for irrigation of multiple crops. Water Resources Research, 28(1): 1-9

[27] Yellow River Conservancy Commission (2001). Background Material for Yellow River Basin

[28] Zhang G P, Savenije H H G (2005). Interactive comment on “Rainfall-runoff modeling in a catchment with a complex groundwater flow system: application of the Representative Elementary Watershed (REW) approach”. Hydrology and Earth System Science Discussions, (2): 345-359

Acknowledgements

Research support was partially provided by the University of Connecticut Research Foundation, Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences Outstanding Overseas Chinese Scholars Award, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 40671071).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg