Shadow tomography of quantum states with prediction
Jiyu JIANG, Zongqi WAN, Tongyang LI, Meiyue SHAO, Jialin ZHANG
Shadow tomography of quantum states with prediction
The shadow tomography problem introduced by [
shadow tomography / online learning / quantum state learning / FTRL / quantum machine learning
Jiyu Jiang is a master’s student in the School of Data Science, Fudan University, China under the supervision of Prof. Meiyue Shao. He is interested in quantum computing and machine learning
Zongqi Wan is a PhD student at the Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China under the supervision of Prof. Jialin Zhang. He is interested in several directions of theoretical computer science and machine learning, including bandit theory, submodular maximization, and auction theory
Tongyang Li is an assistant professor at Center on Frontiers of Computing Studies, School of Computer Science, Peking University, China. His research focuses on quantum algorithms, including topics such as quantum algorithms for machine learning and optimization, quantum query complexity, quantum simulation, and quantum walks
Meiyue Shao is an associate professor in the School of Data Science at Fudan University, China. He received his PhD in mathematics from EPF Lausanne in 2014. Before joining Fudan University, China in 2019, he worked in the Computational Research Division at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory as a postdoctoral fellow and then as a project scientist. His research interests include numerical linear, high performance computing, and computational quantum mechanics
Jialin Zhang is currently a professor in Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Science, China. Prior to ICT, she was a postdoctoral researcher in University of Southern California, USA. She received her PhD in applied mathematics from Tsinghua University under the supervision of Andrew Chi-Chih Yao. Her research interest includes quantum computing, submodular maximization, approximation algorithm, and algorithmic game theory
[1] |
Aaronson S. Shadow tomography of quantum states. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing. 2018, 325−338
|
[2] |
Bădescu C, O’Donnell R. Improved quantum data analysis. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing. 2021, 1398−1411
|
[3] |
Huang X W, Luo J Q, Li L. Quantum speedup and limitations on matroid property problems. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2024, 18( 4): 184905
|
[4] |
Paris M, Řeháček J. Quantum State Estimation. Berlin: Springer, 2004
|
[5] |
Innan N, Siddiqui O I, Arora S, Ghosh T, Koçak Y P, Paragas D, Galib A A O, Khan M A Z, Bennai M. Quantum state tomography using quantum machine learning. Quantum Machine Intelligence, 2024, 6( 1): 28
|
[6] |
Cramer M, Plenio M B, Flammia S T, Somma R, Gross D, Bartlett S D, Landon-Cardinal O, Poulin D, Liu Y K. Efficient quantum state tomography. Nature Communications, 2010, 1: 149
|
[7] |
O’Donnell R, Wright J. Efficient quantum tomography. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. 2016, 899−912
|
[8] |
Wright J. How to learn a quantum state. Carnegie Mellon University, Dissertation, 2016
|
[9] |
Haah J, Harrow A W, Ji Z, Wu X, Yu N. Sample-optimal tomography of quantum states. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. 2016, 913−925
|
[10] |
Chen S, Huang B, Li J, Liu A, Sellke M. When does adaptivity help for quantum state learning? In: Proceedings of the 64th IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). 2023, 391−404
|
[11] |
Lanyon B P, Maier C, Holzäpfel M, Baumgratz T, Hempel C, Jurcevic P, Dhand I, Buyskikh A S, Daley A J, Cramer M, Plenio M B, Blatt R, Roos C F. Efficient tomography of a quantum many-body system. Nature Physics, 2017, 13( 12): 1158–1162
|
[12] |
Carrasquilla J, Torlai G, Melko R G, Aolita L. Reconstructing quantum states with generative models. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2019, 1( 3): 155–161
|
[13] |
Torlai G, Mazzola G, Carrasquilla J, Troyer M, Melko R, Carleo G. Neural-network quantum state tomography. Nature Physics, 2018, 14( 5): 447–450
|
[14] |
Aaronson S, Chen X, Hazan E, Kale S. Online learning of quantum states. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2018, 8976−8986
|
[15] |
Hazan E. Introduction to online convex optimization. Foundations and Trends® in Optimization, 2016, 2(3−4): 157−325
|
[16] |
Sack S H, Medina R A, Michailidis A A, Kueng R, Serbyn M. Avoiding barren plateaus using classical shadows. PRX Quantum, 2022, 3( 2): 020365
|
[17] |
McClean J R, Boixo S, Smelyanskiy V N, Babbush R, Neven H. Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes. Nature Communications, 2018, 9( 1): 4812
|
[18] |
Cerezo M, Arrasmith A, Babbush R, Benjamin S C, Endo S, Fujii K, McClean J R, Mitarai K, Yuan X, Cincio L, Coles P J. Variational quantum algorithms. Nature Reviews Physics, 2021, 3( 9): 625–644
|
[19] |
Huang H Y, Kueng R, Preskill J. Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements. Nature Physics, 2020, 16( 10): 1050–1057
|
[20] |
Huang H Y, Kueng R, Torlai G, Albert V V, Preskill J. Provably efficient machine learning for quantum many-body problems. Science, 2022, 377( 6613): eabk3333
|
[21] |
Chen Y, Wang X. More practical and adaptive algorithms for online quantum state learning. 2020, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2006.01013
|
[22] |
Yang F, Jiang J, Zhang J, Sun X. Revisiting online quantum state learning. In: Proceedings of the 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2020, 6607−6614
|
[23] |
Chen X, Hazan E, Li T, Lu Z, Wang X, Yang R. Adaptive online learning of quantum states. 2022, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2206.00220
|
[24] |
Gong W, Aaronson S. Learning distributions over quantum measurement outcomes. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning. 2023, 11598−11613
|
[25] |
Yin X F, Du Y, Fei Y Y, Zhang R, Liu L Z, Mao Y, Liu T, Hsieh M H, Li L, Liu N L, Tao D, Chen Y A, Pan J W. Efficient bipartite entanglement detection scheme with a quantum adversarial solver. Physical Review Letters, 2022, 128( 11): 110501
|
[26] |
Aaronson S, Rothblum G N. Gentle measurement of quantum states and differential privacy. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing. 2019, 322−333
|
[27] |
Chen S, Cotler J, Huang H Y, Li J. Exponential separations between learning with and without quantum memory. In: Proceedings of the 62nd IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). 2022, 574−585
|
[28] |
Nielsen M A, Chuang I L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010
|
[29] |
Osamu H. Application of quantum Pinsker inequality to quantum communications. 2020, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2005.04553
|
[30] |
Greenberger D M, Horne M A, Zeilinger A. Going beyond Bell’s theorem. In: Kafatos M, ed. Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe. Dordrecht: Springer, 1989, 69−72
|
[31] |
Rocchetto A, Aaronson S, Severini S, Carvacho G, Poderini D, Agresti I, Bentivegna M, Sciarrino F. Experimental learning of quantum states. Science Advances, 2019, 5( 3): eaau1946
|
[32] |
Möttönen M, Vartiainen J J, Bergholm V, Salomaa M M. Transformation of quantum states using uniformly controlled rotations. Quantum Information & Computation, 2005, 5( 6): 467–473
|
[33] |
Plesch M, Brukner Č. Quantum-state preparation with universal gate decompositions. Physical Review A, 2011, 83( 3): 032302
|
[34] |
Chen S, Yu W, Zeng P, Flammia S T. Robust shadow estimation. PRX Quantum, 2021, 2( 3): 030348
|
[35] |
Metropolis N, Ulam S. The Monte Carlo method. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1949, 44( 247): 335–341
|
[36] |
Wilde M M. Quantum Information Theory. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017
|
[37] |
Preskill J. Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2018, 2: 79
|
[38] |
Chen S, Cotler J, Huang H Y, Li J. The complexity of NISQ. Nature Communications, 2023, 14( 1): 6001
|
/
〈 | 〉 |