The governance technology for blockchain systems: a survey
Guocheng ZHU , Debiao HE , Haoyang AN , Min LUO , Cong PENG
Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2) : 182813
The governance technology for blockchain systems: a survey
After the Ethereum DAO attack in 2016, which resulted in significant economic losses, blockchain governance has become a prominent research area. However, there is a lack of comprehensive and systematic literature review on blockchain governance. To deeply understand the process of blockchain governance and provide guidance for the future design of the blockchain governance model, we provide an in-depth review of blockchain governance. In this paper, first we introduce the consensus algorithms currently used in blockchain and relate them to governance theory. Second, we present the main content of off-chain governance and investigate two well-known off-chain governance projects. Third, we investigate four common on-chain governance voting techniques, then summarize the seven attributes that the on-chain governance voting process should meet, and finally analyze four well-known on-chain governance blockchain projects based on the previous research. We hope this survey will provide an in-depth insight into the potential development direction of blockchain governance and device future research agenda.
blockchain governance / off-chain governance / on-chain governance / voting
| [1] |
Nakamoto S. Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Decentralized Business Review, 2008, 2120 |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
Lin J H, Primicerio K, Squartini T, Decker C, Tessone C J. Lightning network: a second path towards centralisation of the Bitcoin economy*. New Journal of Physics, 2020, 22(8): 083022 |
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
Posthumus S, Von Solms R. A framework for the governance of information security. Computers & security, 2004, 23(8): 638-646 |
| [15] |
Micheli M, Ponti M, Craglia M, Berti Suman A. Emerging models of data governance in the age of datafication. Big Data & Society, 2020, 7(2): 2053951720948087 |
| [16] |
Reddy S, Allan S, Coghlan S, Cooper P. A governance model for the application of AI in health care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2020, 27(3): 491-497 |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
Duffield E, Diaz D. Dash: a privacy-centric crypto-currency. See exodus.com/assets/docs/dash-whitepaper website, 2015 |
| [24] |
Kim M S, Chung J Y. Sustainable growth and token economy design: the case of steemit. Sustainability, 2018, 11(1): 167 |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
Elrom E. EOS.IO Wallets and Smart Contracts. The Blockchain Developer, 2019, 213–256 |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
Alves D. Proof-of-Concept (POC) of Restaurant’s food requests in the Lisk Blockchain/sidechain. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1828(1): 012110 |
| [30] |
Hanke T, Movahedi, M., Williams D. DFINITY technology overview series consensus system, 2018 |
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
Pasquini R. Quadratic funding under constrained matching funds. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2020, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3702318 |
| [33] |
Abdullah M A, Ibrahim M A R, Shapiee M N A, et al. The classification of skateboarding tricks via transfer learning pipelines, PeerJ Computer Science, 2021, 7: e680 |
| [34] |
Fan X, Chai Q, Zhong Z. MULTAV: a multi-chain token backed voting framework for decentralized blockchain governance. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Blockchain. 2020, 33−47 |
| [35] |
Merrill P, Austin T H, Rietz J, Pearce J. Ping-pong governance: token locking for enabling blockchain self-governance. In: Proceedings of the 1st Mathematical Research for Blockchain Economy. 2020, 13−29 |
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
Berg A, Berg C, Novak M. Crypto Public Choice. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2018, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3236025 |
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
Demers A, Greene D, Hauser C, Irish W, Larson J, Shenker S, Sturgis H, Swinehart D, Terry D. Epidemic algorithms for replicated database maintenance. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing. 1987, 1−12 |
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
Clarkson M R, Chong S, Myers A C. Civitas: toward a secure voting system. In: Proceedings of 2008 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (sp 2008). 2008, 354−368 |
| [47] |
Zhao C, Zhao S, Zhao M et al. Secure multi-party computation: theory, practice and applications. Information Sciences, 2019, 476: 357-372 |
| [48] |
Allombert V, Bourgoin M, Tesson J. Introduction to the Tezos blockchain. In: Proceedings of 2019 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS). 2019, 1-10 |
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
Khan N, Kchouri B, Yatoo N A, Kräussl Z, Patel A, State R. Tokenization of sukuk: Ethereum case study. Global Finance Journal, 2022, 51: 100539 |
The Author(s) 2023. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn
Supplementary files
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |