Experience report: investigating bug fixes in machine learning frameworks/libraries

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) techniques and algorithms have been successfully and widely used in various areas including software engineering tasks. Like other software projects, bugs are also common in ML projects and libraries. In order to more deeply understand the features related to bug fixing in ML projects, we conduct an empirical study with 939 bugs from five ML projects by manually examining the bug categories, fixing patterns, fixing scale, fixing duration, and types of maintenance. The results show that (1) there are commonly seven types of bugs in ML programs; (2) twelve fixing patterns are typically used to fix the bugs in ML programs; (3) 68.80% of the patches belong to micro-scale-fix and small-scale-fix; (4) 66.77% of the bugs in ML programs can be fixed within one month; (5) 45.90% of the bug fixes belong to corrective activity from the perspective of software maintenance. Moreover, we perform a questionnaire survey and send them to developers or users of ML projects to validate the results in our empirical study. The results of our empirical study are basically consistent with the feedback from developers. The findings from the empirical study provide useful guidance and insights for developers and users to effectively detect and fix bugs in MLprojects.

Keywords

bug fixing / machine learning project / empirical study / questionnaire survey

References

[1] Cui Z L, Wang J. Distributed intelligent control system of the injection molding machine based on arm controller. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Automation Engineering. 2011, 339–342

[2] Menasalvas E, Gonzalo-Martin C. Challenges of Medical Text and Image Processing: Machine Learning Approaches. Switzerland: Springer, Cham, 2016

[3] Subrahmanya N, Xu P, El-Bakry A, Reynolds C. Advanced Machine Learning Methods for Production Data Pattern Recognition. Texas: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2014

[4] Raedt L D, Guns T, Nijssen S. Constraint programming for data mining and machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 24th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2010, 11–15

[5] Wang L, Sun X B, Wang J W, Duan Y C, Li B. Construct bug knowledge graph for bug resolution: poster. In: Proceedings of the 39th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering. 2017, 189–191

[6] Sun X B, Li B X, Leung H, Li B, Li Y. Msr4sm: using topic models to effectively mining software repositories for software maintenance tasks, Information and Software Technology, 2015, 66: 1–12

[7] Sun X B, Liu X Y, Li B, Duan Y C, Yang H, Hu J J. Exploring topic models in software engineering data analysis: a survey. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering. 2016, 357–362

[8] Yang H, Sun X B, Li B, Duan Y C. DR_PSF: enhancing developer recommendation by leveraging personalized source-code files. In: Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Annual Conference on Computer, Software and Applications. 2016, 239–244

[9] Xia X, Lo D, Ding Y, Al-Kofahi J M, Nguyen T N, Wang X Y. Improving automated bug triaging with specialized topic model. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2017, 43(3): 272–297

[10] Sun X B, Yang H, Xia X, Li B. Enhancing developer recommendation with supplementary information via mining historical commits. Journal of Systems and Software, 2017, 134: 355–368

[11] Huang Q, Xia X, Lo D. Supervised vs unsupervised models: a holistic look at effort-aware just-in-time defect prediction. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution. 2017, 159–170

[12] Yang Y B, Zhou Y M, Liu J P, Zhao Y Y, Lu H M, Xu L, Xu B W, Leung H. Effort-aware just-in-time defect prediction: simple unsupervised models could be better than supervised models. In: Proceedings of ACM Sigsoft International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering. 2016, 157–168

[13] Zhou T C, Sun X B, Xia X, Li B, Chen X. Improving defect prediction with deep forest. Information and Software Technology, 2019, 114: 204–216

[14] Jing X Y, Wu F, Dong X W, Qi F M, Xu B W. Heterogeneous crosscompany defect prediction by unified metric representation and cca-based transfer learning. In: Proceedings of the 10th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering. 2015, 496–507

[15] Zhang F, Zheng Q, Zou Y, Hassan A E. Cross-project defect prediction using a connectivity-based unsupervised classifier. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering. 2016, 309–320

[16] Sun X B, Peng X, Li B, Li B X, Wen W Z. IPSETFUL: an iterative process of selecting test cases for effective fault localization by exploring concept lattice of program spectra. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2016, 10(5): 812–831

[17] Xu Z G, Ma S Q, Zhang X Y, Zhu S F, Xu B W. Debugging with intelligence via probabilistic inference. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering. 2018, 1171–1181

[18] Chappelly T, Cifuentes C, Krishnan P, Gevay S. Machine learning for finding bugs: an initial report. In: Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning Techniques for Software Quality Evaluation. 2017, 21–26

[19] Helming J, Arndt H, Hodaie Z, Koegel M, Narayan N. Automatic assignment of work items. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering. 2010, 236–250

[20] Liu C, Yang J Q, Tan L, Hafiz M. R2fix: automatically generating bug fixes from bug reports. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation. 2013, 282–291

[21] Thung F, Lo D, Jiang L X. Automatic recovery of root causes from bugfixing changes. In: Proceedings of Working Conference on Reverse Engineering. 2013, 92–101

[22] Anvik J, Murphy G C. Reducing the effort of bug report triage: recommenders for development-oriented decisions. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 2011, 20(3): 1–35

[23] Hellendoorn V J, Devanbu P T. Are deep neural networks the best choice for modeling source code? In: Proceedings of the 11th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering. 2017, 763–773

[24] Yang G, Zhang T, Lee B. Utilizing a multi-developer network-based developer recommendation algorithm to fix bugs effectively. In: Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. 2014, 1134–1139

[25] Gu X D, Zhang H Y, Kim S H. Deep code search. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering. 2018, 933–944

[26] Reungsinkonkarn A, Apirukvorapinit P. Bug detection using particle swarm optimization with search space reduction. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Systems,Modelling and Simulation. 2015, 53–57

[27] Liu H, Xu Z F, Zou Y Z. Deep learning based feature envy detection. In: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering. 2018, 385–396

[28] Hu X, Li G, Xia X, Lo D, Jin Z. Deep code comment generation. In: Proceedings of the 26th Conference on Program Comprehension. 2018, 200–210

[29] Ni Z, Li B, Sun X B, Chen T H, Tang B, Shi X C. Analyzing bug fix for automatic bug cause classification. Journal of Systems and Software, 2020, 163: 110538

[30] Guo J, Cheng J H, Cleland-Huang J. Semantically enhanced software traceability using deep learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Software Engineering. 2017, 3–14

[31] Liu Z X, Xia X, Hassan A E, Lo D, Xing Z C, Wang X Y. Neural-machinetranslation-based commit message generation: how far are we? In: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering. 2018, 373–384

[32] Hu J J, Sun X B, Lo D, Li B. Modeling the evolution of development topics using dynamic topic models. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering. 2015, 3–12

[33] Sun Y C, Wu M, Ruan W J, Huang X W, Kwiatkowska M, Kroening D. Concolic testing for deep neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering. 2018, 109–119

[34] Ma L, Liu Y, Zhao J J,Wang Y D, Xu F J, Zhang F Y, Sun J Y, Xue M H, Li B, Chen C Y, Su T, Li L. Deepgauge: multi-granularity testing criteria for deep learning systems. In: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering. 2018, 120–131

[35] Thung F, Wang S W, Lo D, Jiang L X. An empirical study of bugs in machine learning systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering. 2012, 271–280

[36] Zhang Y H, Chen Y F, Cheung S C, Xiong Y F, Zhang L. An empirical study on tensorflow program bugs. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis. 2018, 129–140

[37] Sun X B, Zhou T C, Li G J, Hu J J, Yang H, Li B. An empirical study on real bugs for machine learning programs. In: Proceedings of Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference. 2017, 348–357

[38] Wang L L, Li B X, Leung H. A new method to encode calling contexts with recursions. Science China Information Sciences, 2016, 59(5): 60–74

[39] Li B X, Wang L L, Leung H, Liu F. Profiling all paths: a new profiling technique for both cyclic and acyclic paths. Journal of Systems and Software, 2012, 85(7): 1558–1576

[40] Danicic S, Laurence M R. Static backward slicing of non-deterministic programs and systems. ACM Transactions on Programming Language and Systems, 2018, 40(3): 11

[41] Ufuktepe E, Tuglular T. A program slicing-based bayesian network model for change impact analysis. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security. 2018, 490–499

[42] Roy S, Pandey A, Dolan-Gavitt B, Hu Y. Bug synthesis: challenging bugfinding tools with deep faults. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering. 2018, 224–234

[43] Cheng D W, Cao C, Xu C, Ma X X. Manifesting bugs in machine learning code: an explorative study with mutation testing. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security. 2018, 313–324

[44] Bian P, Liang B, Shi W C, Huang J J, Cai Y. Nar-miner: discovering negative association rules from code for bug detection. In: Proceedings of ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering. 2018, 411–422

[45] Wong C P, Meinicke J, Kästner C. Beyond testing configurable systems: applying variational execution to automatic program repair and higher order mutation testing. In: Proceedings of ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering. 2018, 749–753

[46] Zhong H, Su Z D. An empirical study on real bug fixes. In: Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering. 2015, 913–923

[47] Roychoudhury A, Xiong Y F. Automated program repair: a step towards software automation. Science China Information Science, 2019, 62(10): 47–49

[48] Goues C L, Pradel M, Roychoudhury A. Automated program repair. Communications of the ACM, 2019, 62(12): 56–65

[49] Yuan Y, Banzhaf W. Toward better evolutionary program repair: an integrated approach. ACM Transactions Software Engineering and Methodology, 2020, 29(1): 5

[50] Jiang J J, Xiong Y F, Xia X. A manual inspection of defects4J bugs and its implications for automatic program repair. SCIENCE China Informaiton Sciences, 2019, 62(10): 200102

[51] Chapin N, Hale J E, Khan M D, Ramil J F, Tan W G. Types of software evolution and software maintenance. Journal of Software Maintenance, 2001, 13(1): 3–30

[52] Tan L, Liu C, Li ZM,Wang X H, Zhou Y Y, Zhai C X. Bug characteristics in open source software. Empirical Software Engineering, 2014, 19(6): 1665–1705

[53] Kong X L, Zhang L M, Wong E, Li B X. The impacts of techniques, programs and tests on automated program repair: an empirical study. Journal of Systems and Software, 2018, 137: 480–496

[54] Monperrus M. Automatic software repair: a bibliography. ACM Computer Survey, 2018, 51(1): 17

[55] Witschey J, Zielinska O A, Welk A K, Murphy-Hill E R, Mayhorn C B, Zimmermann T. Quantifying developers’ adoption of security tools. In: Proceedings of the 10th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering. 2015, 260–271

[56] Lucia L, Thung F, Lo D, Jiang L X. Are faults localizable? In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories. 2012, 74–77

[57] Tufano M, Watson C, Bavota G, Di Penta M, White M, Poshyvanyk D. An empirical investigation into learning bug-fixing patches in the wild via neural machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering. 2018, 832–837

[58] Lehman M M. On understanding laws, evolution, and conservation in the large-program life cycle. Journal of Systems and Software, 1980, 1: 213–221

[59] Lehman M M, Ramil J F. Software evolution and software evolution processes. Automated Software Engineering, 2002, 14(1–4): 275–309

[60] Zhang J M, Harman M, Ma L, Liu Y. Machine learning testing: survey, landscapes and horizons. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2020

[61] Pei K X, Cao Y Z, Yang J F, Jana S. Deepxplore: automated whitebox testing of deep learning systems. In: Proceedings of the 26th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. 2017, 1–18

[62] Papernot N, McDaniel P D, Goodfellow I J, Jha S, Celik Z B, Swami A. Practical black-box attacks against deep learning systems using adversarial examples. 2016, arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.02697

[63] Dwarakanath A, Ahuja M, Sikand S, Rao R M, Bose R P J C, Dubash N, Podder S. Identifying implementation bugs in machine learning based image classifiers using metamorphic testing. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis. 2018, 118–128

[64] Zhang T Y, Gao C Y, Ma L, Lyu MR, Kim M. An empirical study of common challenges in developing deep learning applications. In: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering. 2019, 104–115

[65] Guo Q Y, Chen S, Xie X F, Ma L, Hu Q, Liu H T, Liu Y, Zhao J J, Li X H. An empirical study towards characterizing deep learning development and deployment across different frameworks and platforms. In: Proceedings of the 34th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering. 2019, 810–822

[66] Xie X F, Ma L, Wang H J, Li Y K, Liu Y, Li X H. Diffchaser: detecting disagreements for deep neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2019, 5772–5778

[67] Motwani M, Sankaranarayanan S, Just R, Brun Y. Do automated program repair techniques repair hard and important bugs? Empirical Software Engineering, 2018, 23(5): 2901–2947

[68] Khatiwada S, Tushev M, Mahmoud A. Just enough semantics: an information theoretic approach for ir-based software bug localization. Information & Software Technology, 2018, 93: 45–57

[69] Youm K C, Ahn J, Lee E. Improved bug localization based on code change histories and bug reports. Information and Software Technology, 2017, 82: 177–192

[70] Wen M, Chen J J, Wu R X, Hao D, Cheung S C. Context-aware patch generation for better automated program repair. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering. 2018, 1–11

[71] Wen M, Wu R X, Cheung S C. Locus: locating bugs from software changes. In: Proceedings of the 31st IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering. 2016, 262–273

[72] Wang S W, Lo D. Amalgam+: composing rich information sources for accurate bug localization. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 2016, 28(10): 921–942

[73] Zhou C, Li B, Sun X B. Improving software bug-specific named entity recognition with deep neural network. Journal of Systems and Software, 2020, 165: 110572

[74] Zhou C, Li B, Sun X B, Guo H J. Recognizing software bug-specific named entity in software bug repository. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Program Comprehension. 2018, 108–119

[75] Garcia J, Feng Y, Shen J J, Almanee S, Xia Y, Chen Q A. A comprehensive study of autonomous vehicle bugs. In: Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering. 2020, 385–396

[76] Zhao Y Y, Leung H, Yang Y B, Zhou Y M, Xu B W. Towards an understanding of change types in bug fixing code. Information and Software Technology, 2017, 86: 37–53

[77] Zhong H, Meng N. Towards reusing hints from past fixes — an exploratory study on thousands of real samples. Empirical Software Engineering, 2018, 23(5): 2521–2549

[78] Campos E C, Maia M A. Common bug-fix patterns: a large-scale observational study. In: Proceedings of ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. 2017, 404–413

[79] Yue R R, Meng N, Wang Q X. A characterization study of repeated bug fixes. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution. 2017, 422–432

[80] Soto M, Thung F, Wong C P, Goues C L, Lo D. A deeper look into bug fixes: patterns, replacements, deletions, and additions. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories. 2016, 512–515

[81] Wan Z Y, Lo D, Xia X, Cai L. Bug characteristics in blockchain systems: a large-scale empirical study. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories. 2017, 413–424

[82] Sun X B, Peng X, Zhang K, Liu Y, Cai Y F. How security bugs are fixed and what can be improved: an empirical study with mozilla. Science China Information Sciences, 2019, 62(1): 19102

[83] Braiek H B, Khomh F. On testing machine learning programs. Journal of Systems and Software, 2020, 164: 110542

[84] Xie X F, Ma L, Xu F J, Xue M H, Chen H X, Liu Y, Zhao J J, Li B, Yin J X, See S. Deephunter: a coverage-guided fuzz testing framework for deep neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis. 2019, 146–157

[85] Chillarege R, Bhandari I S, Chaar J K, Halliday M J. Orthogonal defect classification-a concept for in-process measurements. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1992, 18(11): 943–956

[86] Li Z M, Tan L, Wang X H, Lu S, Zhou Y Y, Zhai C X. Have things changed now?: an empirical study of bug characteristics in modern open source software. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Architectural and System Support for Improving Software Dependability. 2006, 25–33

[87] Xia X, Zhou X Z, Lo D, Zhao X Q. An empirical study of bugs in software build systems. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Quality Software. 2013, 200–203

[88] Nayrolles M, Hamou-Lhadj A. Towards a classification of bugs to facilitate software maintainability tasks. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Software Qualities and Their Dependencies. 2018, 25–32

[89] Hernández-González J, Rodríguez D, Inza I, Harrison R, Lozano J A. Learning to classify software defects from crowds: a novel approach. Applied Software Computing, 2018, 62: 579–591

[90] Hamill M, Goseva-Popstojanova K. Exploring fault types, detection activities, and failure severity in an evolving safety-critical software system. Software Quality Journal, 2015, 23(2): 229–265

[91] Silva N, Vieira M. Experience report: orthogonal classification of safety critical issues. In: Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering. 2014, 156–166

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press