The mass, fake news, and cognition security

Bin GUO, Yasan DING, Yueheng SUN, Shuai MA, Ke LI, Zhiwen YU

PDF(338 KB)
PDF(338 KB)
Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3) : 153806. DOI: 10.1007/s11704-020-9256-0
REVIEW ARTICLE

The mass, fake news, and cognition security

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The widespread fake news in social networks is posing threats to social stability, economic development, and political democracy, etc. Numerous studies have explored the effective detection approaches of online fake news, while few works study the intrinsic propagation and cognition mechanisms of fake news. Since the development of cognitive science paves a promising way for the prevention of fake news, we present a new research area called Cognition Security (CogSec), which studies the potential impacts of fake news on human cognition, ranging from misperception, untrusted knowledge acquisition, targeted opinion/attitude formation, to biased decision making, and investigates the effective ways for fake news debunking. CogSec is a multidisciplinary research field that leverages the knowledge from social science, psychology, cognition science, neuroscience, AI and computer science. We first propose related definitions to characterize CogSec and review the literature history. We further investigate the key research challenges and techniques of CogSec, including humancontent cognition mechanism, social influence and opinion diffusion, fake news detection, and malicious bot detection. Finally, we summarize the open issues and future research directions, such as the cognition mechanism of fake news, influence maximization of fact-checking information, early detection of fake news, fast refutation of fake news, and so on.

Keywords

cyberspace / cognition security / fake news / crowd computing / human-content interaction

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Bin GUO, Yasan DING, Yueheng SUN, Shuai MA, Ke LI, Zhiwen YU. The mass, fake news, and cognition security. Front. Comput. Sci., 2021, 15(3): 153806 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-020-9256-0

References

[1]
Iyengar S, Massey D S. Scientific communication in a post-truth society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019, 116(16): 7656–7661
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Fernandez M, Alani H. Online misinformation: challenges and future directions. In: Proceedings of the Web Conference. 2018, 595–602
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Guess A, Nyhan B, Reifler J. Selective exposure to misinformation: evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 US presidential campaign. European Research Council, 2018, 9(3): 4–52
[4]
Zhou X, Zafarani R, Shu K, Liu H. Fake news: fundamental theories, detection strategies and challenges. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 2019, 836–837
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S. The spread of true and false news online. Science, 2018, 359(6380): 1146–1151
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Lazer D M J, Baum M A, Benkler Y, Berinsky A J, Greenhill K M, Menczer F, Metzger M J, Nyhan B, Pennycook G, Rothschild D. The science of fake news. Science, 2018, 359(6380): 1094–1096
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Ruths D. The misinformation machine. Science, 2019, 363(6425): 348
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Qiu X, Oliveira D F M, Shirazi A S, Flammini A, Menczer F. Limited individual attention and online virality of low-quality information. Nature Human Behaviour, 2017, 1(7): 0132
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Bakdash J, Sample C, Rankin M, Kantarcioglu M, Holmes J, Kase S, Zaroukian E, Szymanski B. The future of deception: machine-generated and manipulated images, video, and audio?. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Social Sensing. 2018
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Floridi L. Artificial intelligence, deepfakes and a future of ectypes. Philosophy & Technology, 2018, 31(3): 317–321
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Yang X, Li Y, Lyu S. Exposing deep fakes using inconsistent head poses. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. 2019, 8261–8265
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Agarwal S, Farid H, Gu Y, He M, Nagano K, Li H. Protecting world leaders against deep fakes. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. 2019, 38–45
[13]
Acerbi A. Cognitive attraction and online misinformation. Palgrave Communications, 2019, 5(1): 15–21
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Zubiaga A, Aker A, Bontcheva K, Liakata M, Procter R. Detection and resolution of rumours in social media: a survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 2018, 51(2): 32–67
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Kumar S, West R, Leskovec J. Disinformation on the web: impact, characteristics, and detection of wikipedia hoaxes. In: Proceedings of International Conference on World Wide Web. 2016, 591–602
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Volkova S, Shaffer K, Jang J Y, Hodas N. Separating facts from fiction: linguistic models to classify suspicious and trusted news posts on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2017, 647–653
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Wu L, Morstatter F, Hu X, Liu H. Big Data in Complex and Social Networks. 1st ed. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2016
[18]
Shu K, Sliva A, Wang S, Tang J, Liu H. Fake news detection on social media: a data mining perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 2017, 19(1): 22–36
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Zhou X, Zafarani R. Fake news: a survey of research, detection methods, and opportunities. 2018, arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.00315
[20]
Jr S B, Campos G F, Tavares G M, Igawa R A, Jr M L P, Guido R C. Detection of human, legitimate bot, and malicious bot in online social networks based on wavelets. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 2018, 14(1s): 26–42
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Macskassy S A. On the study of social interactions in twitter. In: Proceedings of the 6th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. 2012, 226–233
[22]
Forouzan B A. Cryptography & Network Security. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007
[23]
Greenstadt R, Beal J. Cognitive security for personal devices. In: Proceedings of ACM Workshop on AISec. 2008, 27–30
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Kinsner W. Towards cognitive security systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing. 2012, 539
[25]
DiFranzo D, Gloria M J K. Filter bubbles and fake news. ACM Crossroads, 2017, 23(3): 32–35
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Vaccari C. From echo chamber to persuasive device? rethinking the role of the Internet in campaigns. New Media & Society, 2013, 15(1): 109–127
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Flaxman S, Goel S, Rao J M. Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 2016, 80(S1): 298–320
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Flintham M, Karner C, Bachour K, Creswick H, Gupta N, Moran S. Falling for fake news: investigating the consumption of news via social media. In: Proceedings of CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2018, 376–385
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Barberá P, Jost J T, Nagler J, Tucker J A, Bonneau R. Tweeting from left to right: is online political communication more than an echo chamber?. Psychological Science, 2015, 26(10): 1531–1542
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Bessi A. Personality traits and echo chambers on facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016, 65: 319–324
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Zajonc R B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 9(2p2): 1–27
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Del Vicario M, Bessi A, Zollo F, Petroni F, Scala A, Caldarelli G, Stanley H E, Quattrociocchi W. The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2016, 113(3): 554–559
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Singer J B. Online journalists: foundations for research into their changing roles. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1998, 4(1): JCMC412
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Nielsen R K. News Media, Search Engines and Social Networking Sites as Varieties of Online Gatekeepers. Rethinking Journalism Again. London: Routledge, 2016
[35]
Bui C L. How online gatekeepers guard our view-news portals’ inclusion and ranking of media and events. Global Media Journal, 2010, 9(16): N_A
[36]
Xu W, Feng M. Talking to the broadcasters on twitter: networked gatekeeping in twitter conversations with journalists. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2014, 58(3): 420–437
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Garimella K, De Francisci Morales G, Gionis A, Mathioudakis M. Political discourse on social media: echo chambers, gatekeepers, and the price of bipartisanship. In: Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference. 2018, 913–922
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
DiFonzo N. Ferreting facts or fashioning fallacies? factors in rumor accuracy. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2010, 4(11): 1124–1137
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Entman R M. Framing bias: media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 2007, 57(1): 163–173
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Chiang C F, Knight B. Media bias and influence: evidence from newspaper endorsements. The Review of Economic Studies, 2011, 78(3): 795–820
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Iyengar S, Kinder D R. News That Matters: Television and American opinion. Palo Alto: University of Chicago Press, 2010
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Jamieson K H, Campbell K K. Interplay of Influence: News, Advertising, Politics and the Internet Age (with InfoTrac). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing, 2005
[43]
Puglisi R. Being the new york times: the political behaviour of a newspaper. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 2011, 11(1): 1–48
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Gerber A S, Karlan D, Bergan D. Does the media matter? a field experiment measuring the effect of newspapers on voting behavior and political opinions. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2009, 1(2): 35–52
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Ribeiro F N, Henrique L, Benevenuto F, Chakraborty A, Kulshrestha J, Babaei M, Gummadi K P. Media bias monitor: quantifying biases of social media news outlets at large-scale. In: Proceedings of the 12th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 2018, 290–299
[46]
Budak C, Goel S, Rao J M. Fair and balanced? quantifying media bias through crowdsourced content analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 2016, 80(S1): 250–271
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Bovet A, Makse H A. Influence of fake news in twitter during the 2016 US presidential election. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(1): 7–20
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Kucharski A. Post-truth: study epidemiology of fake news. Nature, 2016, 540(7634): 525
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
DiFonzo N, Beckstead JW, Stupak N, Walders K. Validity judgments of rumors heard multiple times: the shape of the truth effect. Social Influence, 2016, 11(1): 22–39
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Ngai E W T, Tao S S C, Moon K K L. Social media research: theories, constructs, and conceptual frameworks. International Journal of Information Management, 2015, 35(1): 33–44
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Allcott H, Gentzkow M. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2017, 31(2): 211–236
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
DiFonzo N, Bourgeois M J, Suls J, Homan C, et al. Rumor clustering, consensus, and polarization: dynamic social impact and selforganization of hearsay. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2013, 49(3): 378–399
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Guess A, Nagler J, Tucker J. Less than you think: prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on facebook. Science Advances, 2019, 5(1): eaau4586
[54]
Budak C. What happened? the spread of fake news publisher content during the 2016 US presidential election. In: Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference. 2019, 139–150
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Poldrack R A, Farah M J. Progress and challenges in probing the human brain. Nature, 2015, 526(7573): 371–382
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Csibra G, Gergely G. Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2011, 366(1567): 1149–1157
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Cappella J N, Kim H S, Albarracín D. Selection and transmission processes for information in the emerging media environment: psychological motives and message characteristics. Media Psychology, 2015, 18(3): 396–424
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Scholz C, Baek E C, O’Donnell M B, Kim H S, Cappella J N, Falk E B. A neural model of valuation and information virality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2017, 114(11): 2881–2886
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Hodas N O, Butner R. How a user’s personality influences content engagement in social media. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Social Informatics. 2016, 481–493
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Falk E B, Morelli S A, Welborn B L, Dambacher K, Lieberman M D. Creating buzz: the neural correlates of effective message propagation. Psychological Science, 2013, 24(7): 1234–1242
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Hu W, Singh K K, Xiao F, Han J, Chuah C N, Lee Y J. Who will share my image?: predicting the content diffusion path in online social networks. In: Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 2018, 252–260
[62]
Zhang Q, Gong Y, Wu J, Huang H, Huang X. Retweet prediction with attention-based deep neural network. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2016, 75–84
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Lewandowsky S, Ecker U K, Seifert C M, Schwarz N, Cook J. Misinformation and its correction: continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2012, 13(3): 106–131
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Davidson R J, Pizzagalli D, Nitschke J B, Putnam K. Depression: perspectives from affective neuroscience. Annual Review of Psychology, 2002, 53(1): 545–574
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
LaBar K S, Cabeza R. Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2006, 7(1): 54–64
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Howard-Jones P A. Neuroscience and education: myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2014, 15(12): 817–824
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Hassabis D, Kumaran D, Summerfield C, Botvinick M. Neuroscienceinspired artificial intelligence. Neuron, 2017, 95(2): 245–258
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Camerer C, Loewenstein G, Prelec D. Neuroeconomics: how neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 2005, 43(1): 9–64
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
Poldrack R A, Farah M J. Progress and challenges in probing the human brain. Nature, 2015, 526(7573): 371–382
CrossRef Google scholar
[70]
Dmochowski J P, Bezdek MA, Abelson B P, Johnson J S, Schumacher E H, Parra L C. Audience preferences are predicted by temporal reliability of neural processing. Nature Communications, 2014, 5(1): 1–9
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Falk E B, Berkman E T, Lieberman M D. From neural responses to population behavior: neural focus group predicts population-level media effects. Psychological Science, 2012, 23(5): 439–445
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
Hasson U, Nir Y, Levy I, Fuhrmann G, Malach R. Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science, 2004, 303(5664): 1634–1640
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
Adlolphs R. Cognitive neuroscience of human social behavior. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2003, 4: 165–178
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
DeGroot M H. Reaching a consensus. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1974, 69(345): 118–121
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Cialdini R B, Petty R E, Cacioppo J T. Attitude and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 1981, 32(1): 357–404
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Kempe D, Kleinberg J, Tardos É. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2003, 137–146
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
Rozin P, Royzman E B. Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2001, 5(4): 296–320
CrossRef Google scholar
[78]
Hatfield E, Cacioppo J T, Rapson R L. Emotional contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1993, 2(3): 96–100
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
Argo J J, Dahl D W, Morales A C. Positive consumer contagion: responses to attractive others in a retail context. Journal of Marketing Research, 2008, 45(6): 690–701
CrossRef Google scholar
[80]
Allen F, Gale D. Financial contagion. Journal of Political Economy, 2000, 108(1): 1–33
CrossRef Google scholar
[81]
Morone F, Makse H A. Influence maximization in complex networks through optimal percolation. Nature, 2015, 524(7563): 65–147
CrossRef Google scholar
[82]
Moore C, Newman M E J. Epidemics and percolation in small-world networks. Physical Review E, 2000, 61(5): 5678–5683
CrossRef Google scholar
[83]
Amati G, Angelini S, Gambosi G, Rossi G, Vocca P. Influential users in Twitter: detection and evolution analysis. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2019, 78(3): 3395–3407
CrossRef Google scholar
[84]
Amati G, Angelini S, Capri F, Gambosi G, Rossi G, Vocca P. Twitter temporal evolution analysis: comparing event and topic driven retweet graphs. IADIS International Journal on Computer Science & Information Systems, 2016, 11(2): 155–162
[85]
Qiu J, Tang J, Ma H, Dong Y, Wang K, Tang J. Deepinf: social influence prediction with deep learning. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2018, 2110–2119
CrossRef Google scholar
[86]
Ugander J, Backstrom L, Marlow C, Kleinberg J. Structural diversity in social contagion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012, 109(16): 5962–5966
CrossRef Google scholar
[87]
Kramer A D I, Guillory J E, Hancock J T. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014, 111(24): 8788–8790
CrossRef Google scholar
[88]
Abebe R, Kleinberg J, Parkes D, Tsourakakis C E. Opinion dynamics with varying susceptibility to persuasion. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2018, 1089–1098
CrossRef Google scholar
[89]
Ratkiewicz J, Conover M, Meiss M, Goncalves B, Patil S, Flammini A, Menczer F. Truthy: mapping the spread of astroturf in microblog streams. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web. 2011, 249–252
CrossRef Google scholar
[90]
Friggeri A, Adamic L, Eckles D, Cheng J. Rumor cascades. In: Proceedings of International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. 2014, 101–110
[91]
Peng X, Li Y, Wang P, Mo L, Chen Q. The ugly truth: negative gossip about celebrities and positive gossip about self entertain people in different ways. Social Neuroscience, 2015, 10(3): 320–336
CrossRef Google scholar
[92]
Granovetter M. Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 1978, 83(6): 1420–1443
CrossRef Google scholar
[93]
Kempe D, Kleinberg J, Tardos É. Influential nodes in a diffusion model for social networks. In: Proceedings of International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming. 2005, 1127–1138
CrossRef Google scholar
[94]
Chatterjee S, Seneta E. Towards consensus: some convergence theorems on repeated averaging. Journal of Applied Probability, 1977, 14(1): 89–97
CrossRef Google scholar
[95]
Wang Y, Theodorou E, Verma A, Song L. Steering opinion dynamics in information diffusion networks. 2016, arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.09021
[96]
Martins A C R. Continuous opinions and discrete actions in opinion dynamics problems. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 2008, 19(4): 617–624
CrossRef Google scholar
[97]
Yang Y, Tang J, Leung C W K, Sun Y, Chen Q, Li J, Yang Q. RAIN: social role-aware information diffusion. In: Proceedings of the 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2015, 367–373
[98]
Castillo C, Mendoza M, Poblete B. Information credibility on twitter. In: Proceedings of International Conference on World Wide Web. 2011, 675–684
CrossRef Google scholar
[99]
Potthast M, Kiesel J, Reinartz K, Bevendorff J, Stein B. A stylometric inquiry into hyperpartisan and fake news. 2017, arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.05638
CrossRef Google scholar
[100]
Hu X, Tang J, Gao H, Liu H. Social spammer detection with sentiment information. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. 2014, 180–189
[101]
Qazvinian V, Rosengren E, Radev D R, Mei Q. Rumor has it: identifying misinformation in microblog. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2011, 1589–1599
[102]
Kwon S, Cha M, Jung K, Chen W, Wang Y. Prominent features of rumor propagation in online social media. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. 2013, 1103–1108
CrossRef Google scholar
[103]
Horne B D, Adali S. This just in: fake news packs a lot in title, uses simpler, repetitive content in text body, more similar to satire than real news. In: Proceedings of the 11th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 2017, 759–766
[104]
Tacchini E, Ballarin G, Della Vedova M L, Moret S, de Alfaro L. Some like it hoax: automated fake news detection in social networks. 2017, arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.07506
[105]
Ma J, Gao W,Wei Z, Lu Y, Wong K F. Detect rumors using time series of social context information on microblogging websites. In: Proceedings of ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2015, 1751–1754
[106]
Jin Z, Cao J, Zhang Y, Luo J. News verification by exploiting conflicting social viewpoints in microblogs. In: Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2016, 2972–2978
[107]
Yang S, Shu K, Wang S, Gu R, Wu F, Liu H. Unsupervised fake news detection on social media: a generative approach. In: Proceedings of the 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2019, 5644–5651
CrossRef Google scholar
[108]
Gupta M, Zhao P, Han J. Evaluating event credibility on twitter. In: Proceedings of the SIAMInternational Conference on DataMining, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. 2012, 153–164
CrossRef Google scholar
[109]
Jin Z, Cao J, Jiang Y G, Zhang Y. News credibility evaluation on microblog with a hierarchical propagation model. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. 2014, 230–239
CrossRef Google scholar
[110]
Shu K, Wang S, Liu H. Understanding user profiles on social media for fake news detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval. 2018, 430–435
CrossRef Google scholar
[111]
Wu K, Yang S, Zhu K Q. False rumors detection on sinaweibo by propagation structures. In: Proceedings of the 31st IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering. 2015, 651–662
[112]
Jin F, Dougherty E, Saraf P, Cao Y, Ramakrishnan N. Epidemiological modeling of news and rumors on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Social Network Mining and Analysis. 2013, 1–9
CrossRef Google scholar
[113]
Liu Y, Xu S. Detecting rumors through modeling information propagation networks in a social media environment. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2016, 3(2): 46–62
CrossRef Google scholar
[114]
Kim J, Kim D, Oh A. Homogeneity-based transmissive process to model true and false news in social networks. In: Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 2019, 348–356
CrossRef Google scholar
[115]
Ma J, Gao W, Wong K F. Detect rumors in microblog posts using propagation structure via kernel learning. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2017, 708–717
[116]
Yu F, Liu Q, Wu S, Wang L, Tan T. A convolutional approach for misinformation identification. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2017, 3901–3907
[117]
Ma J, Gao W, Mitra P, Kwon S, Jansen B J, Wong K F, Cha M. Detecting rumors from microblogs with recurrent neural networks. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2016, 3818–3824
[118]
Li L, Cai G, Chen N. A rumor events detection method based on deep bidirectional GRU neural network. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing. 2018, 755–759
[119]
Liu Y, Wu Y F B. Early detection of fake news on social media through propagation path classification with recurrent and convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2018, 354–361
[120]
Ruchansky N, Seo S, Liu Y. CSI: a hybrid deep model for fake news detection. In: Proceedings of ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2017, 797–806
[121]
Jin Z, Cao J, Guo H, Zhang Y, Luo J. Multimodal fusion with recurrent neural networks for rumor detection on microblogs. In: Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 2017, 795–816
CrossRef Google scholar
[122]
Liu Q, Yu F, Wu S,Wang L. Mining significant microblogs for misinformation identification: an attention-based approach. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2018, 9(5): 50–67
CrossRef Google scholar
[123]
Guo H, Cao J, Zhang Y, Guo J, Li J. Rumor detection with hierarchical social attention network. In: Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2018, 943–951
[124]
Popat K, Mukherjee S, Yates A, Weikum G. DeClarE: debunking fake news and false claims using evidence-aware deep learning. 2018, arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.06416
CrossRef Google scholar
[125]
Ferrara E, Varol O, Davis C, Menczer F, Flammini A. The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM, 2016, 59(7): 96–104
CrossRef Google scholar
[126]
de Lima Salge C A, Berente N. Is that social bot behaving unethically?. Communications of the ACM, 2017, 60(9): 29–31
CrossRef Google scholar
[127]
Chu Z, Gianvecchio S, Wang H, Jajodia S. Detecting automation of twitter accounts: are you a human, bot, or cyborg?. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2012, 9(6): 811–824
CrossRef Google scholar
[128]
Boshmaf Y, Muslukhov I, Beznosov K, Ripeanu M. Design and analysis of a social botnet. Computer Networks, 2013, 57(2): 556–578
CrossRef Google scholar
[129]
Yu S, Gu G, Barnawi A, Guo S, Stojmenovic I. Malware propagation in large-scale networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2014, 27(1): 170–179
CrossRef Google scholar
[130]
Boshmaf Y, Muslukhov I, Beznosov K, Ripeanu M. The socialbot network: when bots socialize for fame and money. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference. 2011, 93–102
CrossRef Google scholar
[131]
Haustein S, Bowman T D, Holmberg K, Tsou A, Sugimoto C R, Larivière V. Tweets as impact indicators: examining the implications of automated “bot” accounts on twitter. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(1): 232–238
CrossRef Google scholar
[132]
Gilani Z, Farahbakhsh R, Tyson G, Wang L, Crowcroft J. An in-depth characterisation of bots and humans on Twitter. 2017, arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.01508
CrossRef Google scholar
[133]
Yu S, Guo S, Stojmenovic I. Fool me if you can: mimicking attacks and anti-attacks in cyberspace. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 2013, 64(1): 139–151
CrossRef Google scholar
[134]
Varol O, Ferrara E, Davis C A, Menczer F, Flammini A. Online humanbot interactions: detection, estimation, and characterization. In: Proceedings of the 11th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 2017, 280–289
[135]
Thomas K, Grier C, Ma J, Paxson V, Song D. Design and evaluation of a real-time url spam filtering service. In: Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. 2011, 447–462
CrossRef Google scholar
[136]
Egele M, Stringhini G, Kruegel C, Vigna G. Towards detecting compromised accounts on social networks. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2015, 14(4): 447–460
CrossRef Google scholar
[137]
Kudugunta S, Ferrara E. Deep neural networks for bot detection. Information Sciences, 2018, 467: 312–322
[138]
Gao H, Yang Y, Bu K, Chen Y, Downey D, Lee K, Choudhary A. Spam ain’t as diverse as it seems: throttling OSN spam with templates underneath. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference. 2014, 76–85
CrossRef Google scholar
[139]
Messias J, Schmidt L, Oliveira R A R D, Souza F B D. You followed my bot! transforming robots into influential users in twitter. Peer-Reviewed Journal on the Internet, 2013, 18(7–1): 1–14
CrossRef Google scholar
[140]
Abokhodair N, Yoo D, McDonald D M. Dissecting a social botnet: growth, content and influence in twitter. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work& Social Computing. 2015, 839–851
CrossRef Google scholar
[141]
Freitas C, Benevenuto F, Ghosh S, Veloso A. Reverse engineering socialbot infiltration strategies in twitter. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining. 2015, 25–32
CrossRef Google scholar
[142]
Guixeres J, Bigné E, AusñíAzofra J M, Alcañiz Raya M, Colomer Granero A, Fuentes Hurtado F, Naranjo Ornedo V. Consumer neuroscience-based metrics predict recall, liking and viewing rates in online advertising. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, 8: 1808–1821
CrossRef Google scholar
[143]
Yılmaz B, Korkmaz S, Arslan D B, Güngör E, Asyalı M H. Like/dislike analysis using EEG: determination of most discriminative channels and frequencies. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2014, 113(2): 705–713
[144]
Lewandowsky S, Ecker U K H, Cook J. Beyond misinformation: understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2017, 6(4): 353–369
CrossRef Google scholar
[145]
Arapakis I, Barreda-Angeles M, Pereda-Baños A. Interest as a proxy of engagement in news reading: spectral and entropy analyses of EEG activity patterns. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2017, 10(1): 100–114
CrossRef Google scholar
[146]
Chen T, Li X, Yin H, Zhang J. Call attention to rumors: deep attention based recurrent neural networks for early rumor detection. In: Proceedings of Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2018, 40–52
CrossRef Google scholar
[147]
Shu K, Cui L, Wang S, Lee D, Liu H. dEFEND: explainable fake news detection. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2019, 395–405
[148]
Gad-Elrab M H, Stepanova D, Urbani J, Weikum G. ExFaKT: a framework for explaining facts over knowledge graphs and text. In: Proceedings of ACM International Conference onWeb Search and Data Mining. 2019, 87–95
CrossRef Google scholar
[149]
Nguyen A T, Kharosekar A, Lease M, Wallace B. An interpretable joint graphical model for fact-checking from crowds. In: Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2018, 1511–1518
[150]
Du M, Liu N, Hu X. Techniques for interpretable machine learning. Communications of the ACM, 2019, 63(1): 68–77
CrossRef Google scholar
[151]
Murdoch W J, Singh C, Kumbier K, Abbasi-Asl R, Yu B. Definitions, methods, and applications in interpretable machine learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019, 116(44): 22071–22080
CrossRef Google scholar
[152]
Vo N, Lee K. The rise of guardians: fact-checking url recommendation to combat fake news. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval. 2018, 275–284
[153]
Kim J, Tabibian B, Oh A, Schölkopf B, Gomez-Rodriguez M. Leveraging the crowd to detect and reduce the spread of fake news and misinformation. In: Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 2018, 324–332
CrossRef Google scholar
[154]
Bhattacharjee S D, Talukder A, Balantrapu B V. Active learning based news veracity detection with feature weighting and deep-shallow fusion. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Big Data. 2017, 556–565
CrossRef Google scholar
[155]
Cao J, Guo J, Li X, Jin Z, Guo H, Li J. Automatic rumor detection on microblogs: a survey. 2018, arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03505
[156]
Zhao Z, Resnick P, Me i Q. Enquiring minds: early detection of rumors in social media from enquiry posts. In: Proceedings of International Conference on World Wide Web. 2015, 1395–1405
CrossRef Google scholar
[157]
Sampson J, Morstatter F, Wu L, Liu H. Leveraging the implicit structure within social media for emergent rumor detection. In: Proceedings of ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2016, 2377–2382
[158]
Liu X, Nourbakhsh A, Li Q, Fang R, Shah S. Real-time rumor debunking on twitter. In: Proceedings of ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2015, 1867–1870
CrossRef Google scholar
[159]
Qian F, Gong C, Sharma K, Liu Y. Neural user response generator: fake news detection with collective user intelligence. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2018, 3834–3840
CrossRef Google scholar
[160]
Tschiatschek S, Singla A, Gomez Rodriguez M, Merchant A, Krause A. Fake news detection in social networks via crowd signals. In: Proceedings of the Web Conference. 2018, 517–524
CrossRef Google scholar
[161]
Tan C, Sun F, Kong T, Zhang W, Yang C, Liu C. A survey on deep transfer learning. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks. 2018, 270–279
CrossRef Google scholar
[162]
Li Z, Wei Y, Zhang Y, Yang Q. Hierarchical attention transfer network for cross-domain sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2018, 5852–5859
[163]
Wang W, Zheng V W, Yu H, Miao C. A survey of zero-shot learning: settings, methods, and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2019, 10(2): 1–37
CrossRef Google scholar
[164]
Socher R, Ganjoo M, Manning C D, Ng A. Zero-shot learning through cross-modal transfer. In: Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2013, 935–943
[165]
Yao H, Liu Y, Wei Y, Tang X, Li Z. Learning from multiple cities: a meta-learning approach for spatial-temporal prediction. In: Proceedings of The World Wide Web Conference. 2019, 2181–2191
CrossRef Google scholar
[166]
Finn C, Abbeel P, Levine S. Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70. 2017, 1126–1135
[167]
Santoro A, Bartunov S, Botvinick M, Wierstra D, Lillicrap T. Metalearning with memory-augmented neural networks. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning. 2016, 1842–1850
[168]
Ginsca A L, Popescu A, Lupu M. Credibility in information retrieval. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2015, 9(5): 355–475
CrossRef Google scholar
[169]
Shi B, Weninger T. Fact checking in heterogeneous information networks. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web. 2016, 101–102
CrossRef Google scholar
[170]
Nyhan B, Reifler J. When corrections fail: the persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 2010, 32(2): 303–330
CrossRef Google scholar
[171]
Bordia P, DiFonzo N, Haines R, Chaseling E. Rumors denials as persuasive messages: effects of personal relevance, source, and message characteristics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2005, 35(6): 1301–1331
CrossRef Google scholar
[172]
Tanaka Y, Sakamoto Y, Honda H. The impact of posting urls in disasterrelated tweets on rumor spreading behavior. In: Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2014, 520–529
CrossRef Google scholar
[173]
Ozturk P, Li H, Sakamoto Y. Combating rumor spread on social media: the effectiveness of refutation and warning. In: Proceedings of the 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2015, 2406–2414
CrossRef Google scholar
[174]
Alemanno A. How to counter fake news? a taxonomy of anti-fake news approaches. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2018, 9(1): 1–5
CrossRef Google scholar
[175]
Barrat A, Barthelemy M, Vespignani A. Dynamical Processes on Complex Networks. Paris: Cambridge University Press, 2008
CrossRef Google scholar
[176]
Chang Y T, Yu H, Lu H P. Persuasive messages, popularity cohesion, and message diffusion in social media marketing. Journal of Business Research, 2015, 68(4): 777–782
CrossRef Google scholar
[177]
Huang WM, Zhang L J, Xu X J, Fu X. Contagion on complex networks with persuasion. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 23766–23773
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(338 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/