Variant quantifiers in L3-valued first-order logic

Wei LI , Yuefei SUI

Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5) : 155403

PDF (292KB)
Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5) : 155403 DOI: 10.1007/s11704-020-7399-7
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Variant quantifiers in L3-valued first-order logic

Author information +
History +
PDF (292KB)

Abstract

Traditional first-order logic has four definitions for quantifiers, which are defined by universal and existential quantifiers. In L3-valued (three-valued) first-order logic, there are eight kinds of definitions for quantifiers; and corresponding Gentzen deduction systems will be given and their soundness and completeness theorems will be proved.

Keywords

L 3-valued (three-valued) first-order logic / sequent / quantifier / soundness theorem / completeness theorem

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wei LI, Yuefei SUI. Variant quantifiers in L3-valued first-order logic. Front. Comput. Sci., 2021, 15(5): 155403 DOI:10.1007/s11704-020-7399-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Li W. Mathematical Logic: Foundations for Information Science. 2nd ed. Birkhäuser, 2010

[2]

Zach R. Proof theory of finite-valued logics, Technical Report TUWE185.2-Z.1-93. Institut Für Computersprachen, Technische Universität Wien, 1993

[3]

Avron A. The method of hypersequents in the proof theory of propositional non-classical logics. In: Hodges W, Hyland M, Steinhorn C, Truss J, eds. Logic: From Foundations to Applications European Logic Colloquium. Clarendon Press, 1994, 1–32

[4]

Zach R, Fermüller C, Baaz M, Salzer G. Labeled calculi and finite-valued logics. Studia Logica, 1998, 61: 7–33

[5]

Li W, Sui Y F. Multisequent gentzen deduction systems for B22-valued first-order logic. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2018, 7(1): 53

[6]

Wansing H. The power of Belnap: sequent systems for SIXTEEN3. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2010, 39(4): 369–393

[7]

Urquhart A. Basic many-valued logic. In: Gabbay D M, Guenthner F, eds. Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol.2. Springer Netherlands, 2001, 249–295

[8]

Avron A. Natural 3-valued logics-characterization and proof theory. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1991, 56(1): 276–294

[9]

Baaz M, Fermüller C G, Ovrutcki A, Zach R. MULTLOG: a system for axiomatizing many-valued logics. In: Voronkov A, ed. Logic Programming and Automated Reasoning. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1993, 345–347

[10]

Bochvar D A, Bergmann M. On a three-valued logical calculus and its application to the analysis of the paradoxes of the classical extended functional calculus. History and Philosophy of Logic, 1981, 2: 87–112

[11]

Fitting MC. Many-valued modal logics. Fundamenta Informaticae, 1999, 15: 235–254

[12]

Gottwald S. A Treatise on Many-Valued Logics(Studies in Logic and Computation). Baldock: Research Studies Press, 2001

[13]

Hähnle R. Advanced many-valued logics. In: Gabbay D, Guenthner F, eds. Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol.2. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2001, 297–395

[14]

Malinowski G. Many-valued logic and its philosophy. In: Gabbay D M, Woods J, eds. Handbook of The History of Logic, vol.8, TheMany Valued and Nonmonotonic Turn in Logic. Elsevier, 2009

[15]

Novák V. A formal theory of intermediate quantifiers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2008, 159: 1229–1246

[16]

Straccia U. Reasoning within fuzzy description logics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2001, 14: 137–166

[17]

Li W, Sui Y F. The B4-valued propositional logic with unary logical connectives ∼1/∼2/⊲. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2007, 11(5): 887–894

[18]

Łukasiewicz J. Selected Works. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1970

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (292KB)

Supplementary files

Article highlights

1056

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/