
Probabilistic synthesis against GR(1) winning condition
Wei ZHAO, Rui LI, Wanwei LIU, Wei DONG, Zhiming LIU
Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2) : 162203.
Probabilistic synthesis against GR(1) winning condition
Reactive synthesis is a technique for automatic generation of a reactive system from a high level specification. The system is reactive in the sense that it reacts to the inputs from the environment. The specification is in general given as a linear temporal logic (LTL) formula. The behaviour of the system interacting with the environment can be represented as a game in which the system plays against the environment. Thus, a problem of reactive synthesis is commonly treated as solving such a game with the specification as the winning condition. Reactive synthesis has been thoroughly investigated for more two decades. A well-known challenge is to deal with the complex uncertainty of the environment. We understand that a major issue is due to the lack of a sufficient treatment of probabilistic properties in the traditional models. For example, a two-player game defined by a standard Kriple structure does not consider probabilistic transitions in reaction to the uncertain physical environment; and a Markov Decision Process (MDP) in general does not explicitly separate the system from its environment and it does not describe the interaction between system and the environment. In this paper, we propose a new and more general model which combines the two-player game and the MDP. Furthermore, we study probabilistic reactive synthesis for the games of General Reactivity of Rank 1 (i.e., GR(1)) defined in this model. More specifically, we present an algorithm, which for given model
reactive system / probabilistic synthesis / GR(1)
[1] |
Pneuli A, Rosner R. On the synthesis of a reactive module. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Colloquium. ICALP89, 1989, 179–190
|
[2] |
Wallmeier N, Hütten P, Thomas W. Symbolic synthesis of finite-state controllers for request-response specifications. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Implementation and Application of Automata. 2003, 113–22
|
[3] |
Alur R , Torre S L . Deterministic generators and games for LTL fragments. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL), 2004, 5( 1): 1– 25
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Jobstmann B, Griesmayer A, Bloem R. Program repair as a game. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification. 2005, 226–238
|
[5] |
Harding A, Ryan M, Schobbens P Y. A new algorithm for strategy synthesis in LTL games. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems. 2005, 477–492
|
[6] |
Asarin E , Maler O , Pnueli A , Sifakis J . Controller synthesis for timed automata. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 1998, 31( 18): 447– 452
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Bloem R , Jobstmann B , Piterman N , Pnueli A . Synthesis of reactive(1) designs. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 2012, 78( 3): 911– 938
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Wasowski A , Dingel J , Rudie K . Controller synthesis for dynamic hierarchical real-time plants using timed automata. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, 2017, 27( 12): 1– 35
|
[9] |
Shapley
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Chatterjee K, Henzinger T A, Jobstmann B. Environment assumptions for synthesis. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Concurrency Theory. 2008, 147–161
|
[11] |
Kwiatkowska M, Parker D. Automated verification and strategy synthesis for probabilistic systems. In: Proceedings of the 11th international Symposium, Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis. 2013, 53–22
|
[12] |
Neyman A, Sorin S. Stochastic games and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003
|
[13] |
Nilim A , Ghaoui L . Robust control of markov decision processes with uncertain transition matrices. Operations Research, 2005, 53( 5): 780– 798
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Svoreňová M , Kwiatkowska M . Quantitative verification and strategy synthesis for stochastic games. European Journal of Control, 2016, 30
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Chatterjee K, Jurdziński M, Henzinger T A. Simple stochastic parity games. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Computer Science Logic. 2003, 100–113
|
[16] |
Buchi J R, Landweber L H. Solving Sequential Conditions by Finite-State Strategies. New York, Springer, 1990
|
[17] |
Alur R , Moarref S , Topcu U . Counter-strategy guided refinement of GR(1) temporal logic specifications. Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design, 2013,
|
[18] |
Koenighofer R , Hofferek G , Bloem R . Debugging formal specifications: a practical approach using model-based diagnosis and counterstrategies. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 2013, 15( 5–6): 563– 583
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Kuvent A, Maoz S, Ringert J O. A symbolic justice violations transition system for unrealizable GR(1) specifications. In: Proceedings of the 11th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering. 2017, 362–372
|
[20] |
Maoz S, Ringert J O, Shalom R. Symbolic repairs for GR (1) specifications. In: Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). 2019, 1016–1026
|
[21] |
Alfaro L D , Henzinger T A , Kupferman O . Concurrent reachability games. Theoretical Computer Science, 2007, 386( 3): 188– 217
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Emerson E A. Temporal and Modal Logic. Elsevier and MIT Press, 1990, 995–1072
|
[23] |
Baier C, Katoen J P. Principles of model checking. MIT Press, 2008
|
[24] |
Kesten Y, Piterman N, Pnueli A. Bridging the gap between fair simulation and trace inclusion. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference Computer Aided Verification. 2003, 381–393
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |