Model learning: a survey of foundations, tools and applications

Shahbaz ALI, Hailong SUN, Yongwang ZHAO

PDF(700 KB)
PDF(700 KB)
Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5) : 155210. DOI: 10.1007/s11704-019-9212-z
REVIEW ARTICLE

Model learning: a survey of foundations, tools and applications

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Software systems are present all around us and playing their vital roles in our daily life. The correct functioning of these systems is of prime concern. In addition to classical testing techniques, formal techniques like model checking are used to reinforce the quality and reliability of software systems. However, obtaining of behavior model, which is essential for model-based techniques, of unknown software systems is a challenging task. To mitigate this problem, an emerging black-box analysis technique, called Model Learning, can be applied. It complements existing model-based testing and verification approaches by providing behavior models of blackbox systems fully automatically. This paper surveys the model learning technique, which recently has attracted much attention from researchers, especially from the domains of testing and verification. First, we review the background and foundations of model learning, which form the basis of subsequent sections. Second, we present some well-known model learning tools and provide their merits and shortcomings in the form of a comparison table. Third, we describe the successful applications of model learning in multidisciplinary fields, current challenges along with possible future works, and concluding remarks.

Keywords

model learning / active automata learning / automata learning libraries/tools / inferring behavior models / testing and formal verification

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shahbaz ALI, Hailong SUN, Yongwang ZHAO. Model learning: a survey of foundations, tools and applications. Front. Comput. Sci., 2021, 15(5): 155210 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-019-9212-z

References

[1]
Blair M, Obenski S, Bridickas P. Patriot missile defense: software problem led to system failure at dhahran. Report GAO/IMTEC-92-26, 1992
[2]
Lions J L. Ariane 5 flight 501 failure. Report by the Inquiry Board, 1996
[3]
Stephenson A G, Mulville D R, Bauer F H, Dukeman G A, Norvig P, LaPiana L S, Rutledge P J, Folta D, Sackheim R. Mars Climate Orbiter Mishap Investigation Board Phase I Report. NASA, Washington, DC, 1999
[4]
Leveson N G, Turner C S. An investigation of the therac-25 accidents. Journal of Computer, 1993, 26(7): 18–41
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Coe T. Inside the pentium FDIV bug. DR Dobbs Journal, 1995, 20(4): 129
[6]
Ball T, Rajamani S K. The slam project: debugging system software via static analysis. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages. 2002, 1–3
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Henzinger T A, Jhala R, Majumdar R, Sutre G. Lazy abstraction. Journal of ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 2002, 37(1): 58–70
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Walkinshaw N, Bogdanov K, Ali S, Holcombe M. Automated discovery of state transitions and their functions in source code. Journal of Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, 2008, 18(2): 99–121
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Walkinshaw N, Bogdanov K, Holcombe M, Salahuddin S. Reverse engineering state machines by interactive grammar inference. In: Proceedings of Working Conference on Reverse Engineering. 2007, 209–218
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Biermann AW, Krishnaswamy R. Constructing programs from example computations. Journal of IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1976, 3: 141–153
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Muller-Olm M, Schmidt D A, Steffen B. Model-checking: a tutorial introduction. In: Proceedings of International Static Analysis Symposium. 1999, 330–354
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Clarke E M, Grumberg O, Peled D. Model Checking. MIT Press, 1999
[13]
Baier C, Katoen J P. Principles of Model Checking. MIT Press, 2008
[14]
Broy M, Jonsson B, Katoen J P, Leucker M, Pretschner A. Model-based testing of reactive systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Utting M, Legeard B. Practical Model-based Testing: a Tools Approach. Elsevier, 2010
[16]
Arbab F. Reo: a channel-based coordination model for component composition. Journal ofMathematical Structures in Computer Science, 2004, 14(3): 329–366
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Ball T, Bounimova E, Cook B, Levin V, Lichtenberg J, McGarvey C, Ondrusek B, Rajamani S K, Ustuner A. Thorough static analysis of device drivers. Journal of ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 2006, 40(4): 73–85
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Hungar H, Niese O, Steffen B. Domain-specific optimization in automata learning. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Verification. 2003, 315–327
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Margaria T, Niese O, Raffelt H, Steffen B. Efficient test-based model generation for legacy reactive systems. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International High-Level Design Validation and Test Workshop. 2004, 95–100
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Muccini H, Polini A, Ricci F, Bertolino A. Monitoring architectural properties in dynamic component-based systems. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Component-Based Software Engineering. 2007, 124–139
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Shahbaz M. Reverse engineering enhanced state models of black box software components to support integration testing. Doctoral Dissertation, 2008
[22]
Shu G, Lee D. Testing security properties of protocol implementations-a machine learning based approach. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. 2007
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Aarts F, Vaandrager F. Learning I/O automata. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Concurrency Theory. 2010, 71–85
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Moore E F. Gedanken-experiments on sequential machines. Journal of Automata Studies, 1956, 34: 129–153
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Berg T, Grinchtein O, Jonsson B, Leucker M, Raffelt H, Steffen B. On the correspondence between conformance testing and regular inference. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering. 2005, 175–189
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Hagerer A, Hungar H, Niese O, Steffen B. Model generation by moderated regular extrapolation. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering. 2002, 80–95
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Isberner M. Foundations of active automata learning: an algorithmic perspective. Doctoral Dissertation, 2015
[28]
De Ruiter J, Poll E. Protocol state fuzzing of TLS implementations. In: Proceedings of the 24th USENIX Security Symposium. 2015, 193–206
[29]
Vaandrager F. Model learning. Journal of Communications of ACM, 2017, 60(2): 86–95
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Peled D, Vardi M Y, Yannakakis M. Black box checking. Journal of Automata, Languages and Combinatorics, 2002, 7(2): 225–246
[31]
Ammons G, Bodík R, Larus J R. Mining specifications. Journal of ACM Sigplan Notices, 2002, 37(1): 4–16
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Lo D, Khoo S C. Smartic: towards building an accurate, robust and scalable specification miner. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering. 2006, 265–275
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Lorenzoli D, Mariani L, Pezzè M. Automatic generation of software behavioral models. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering. 2008, 501–510
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Bennaceur A, Meinke K. Machine learning for software analysis: models, methods, and applications. In: Bennaceur A, Hähnle R, Meinke K, eds. Machine Learning for Dynamic Software Analysis: Potentials and Limits. Springer, Cham, 2018
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Starkie B, Zaanen V M, Estival D. The tenjinno machine translation competition. In: Proceedings of International Colloquium on Grammatical Inference. 2006, 214–226
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Starkie B, Coste F, Zaanen V M. The omphalos context-free grammar learning competition. In: Proceedings of International Colloquium on Grammatical Inference. 2004, 16–27
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Walkinshaw N, Lambeau B, Damas C, Bogdanov K, Dupont P. Stamina: a competition to encourage the development and assessment of software model inference techniques. Journal of Empirical Software Engineering, 2013, 18(4): 791–824
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Combe D, De La Higuera C, Janodet J C. Zulu: an interactive learning competition. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Finite-State Methods and Natural Language Processing. 2009, 139–146
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Angluin D. Learning regular sets from queries and counterexamples. Journal of Information and Computation, 1987, 75(2): 87–106
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Gold EM. Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 1967, 10(5): 447–474
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Valiant L G. A theory of the learnable. Journal of Communications of ACM, 1984, 27(11): 1134–114 2
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Angluin D, Smith C H. Inductive inference: theory and methods. Journal of ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 1983, 15(3): 237–269
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
GasarchWI C H, Smith. Learning via queries. Journal of ACM (JACM), 1992, 39(3): 649–674
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Watanabe O. A framework for polynomial-time query learnability. Journal of Mathematical Systems Theory, 1994, 27(3): 211–229
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Blumer A, Ehrenfeucht A, Haussler D, Warmuth M K. Learnability and the vapnik-chervonenkis dimension. Journal of ACM (JACM), 1989, 36(4): 929–965
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Pitt L, Valiant L G. Computational limitations on learning from examples. Journal of ACM (JACM), 1988, 35(4): 965–984
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Pitt L, Warmuth M K. Prediction-preserving reducibility. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 1990, 41(3): 430–467
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Angluin D, Kharitonov M. When won’t membership queries help? Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 1995, 50(2): 336–355
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Steffen B, Howar F, Merten M. Introduction to active automata learning from a practical perspective. In: Proceedings of International School on Formal Methods for the Design of Computer, Communication and Software Systems. 2012, 256–296
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Rivest R L, Schapire R E. Inference of finite automata using homing sequences. Journal of Information and Computation, 1993, 103(2): 299–347
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Groz R, Simao A, Petrenko A, Oriat C. Inferring finite state machines without reset using state identification sequences. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Testing Software and Systems. 2015, 161–177
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Groz S AR, Petrenko A, Oriat C. Inferring fsm models of systems without reset. In: Bennaceur A, Hähnle R,Meinke K, eds. Machine Learning for Dynamic Software. Springer, Cham, 2018
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Hopcroft J E, Motwani R, Ullman J D. Introduction to automata theory, languages, and computation. ACM Sigact News, 2001, 32(1): 60–65
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Niese O. An integrated approach to testing complex systems. Doctoral Disseration, Technical University of Dortmund, Germany, 2003
[55]
Shahbaz M, Groz R. Inferring mealy machines. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Formal Methods. 2009, 207–222
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Shahbaz M, Li K, Groz R. Learning parameterized state machine model for integration testing. In: Proceedings of Computer Software and Applications Conference. 2007, 755–760
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Aarts F, Kuppens H, Tretmans J, Vaandrager F, Verwer S. Improving active mealy machine learning for protocol conformance testing. Journal of Machine Learning, 2014, 96(1–2): 189–224
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Walkinshaw N, Derrick J, Guo Q. Iterative refinement of reverseengineered models by model-based testing. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Formal Methods. 2009, 305–320
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Groz R, Li K, Petrenko A, Shahbaz M. Modular system verification by inference, testing and reachability analysis. In: Suzuki K, Higashino T, Ulrich A, Hasegawa T, eds. Testing of Software and Communicating Systems. Springer,Berlin, Hedelberg, 2008
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Huima A. Implementing conformiq qtronic. In: Petrenko A, Veanes M, Tretmans J, Griekamp W, eds.Testing of Software and Communicating Systems. Springer, Berlin, Hedelberg, 2007
[61]
Jhala R, Majumdar R. Software model checking. Journal of ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 2009, 41(4): 21
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Howar F, Steffen B, Jonsson B, Cassel S. Inferring canonical register automata. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Verification, Model Checking, and Abstract Interpretation. 2012, 251–266
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Howar F, Isberner M, Steffen B, Bauer O, Jonsson B. Inferring semantic interfaces of data structures. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. 2012, 554–571
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Merten M, Howar F, Steffen B, Cassel S, Jonsson B. Demonstrating learning of register automata. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems. 2012, 466–471
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Isberner M, Howar F, Steffen B. Learning register automata: from languages to program structures. Journal of Machine Learning, 2014, 96(1–2): 65–98
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Cassel S, Howar F, Jonsson B, Steffen B. Active learning for extended finite state machines. Journal of Formal Aspects of Computing, 2016, 28(2): 233–263
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Maler O, Mens I E. Learning regular languages over large alphabets. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems. 2014, 485–499
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Argyros G, D’Antoni L. The learnability of symbolic automata. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Verification. 2018, 427–445
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
Drews S, D’Antoni L. Learning symbolic automata. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems. 2017, 173–189
CrossRef Google scholar
[70]
Argyros G, Stais I, Kiayias A, Keromytis A D. Back in black: towards formal, black box analysis of sanitizers and filters. In: Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. 2016, 91–109
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Veanes M, Hooimeijer P, Livshits B, Molnar D, Bjorner N. Symbolic finite state transducers: algorithms and applications. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages. 2012, 137–150
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
Veanes M. Applications of symbolic finite automata. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Implementation and Application of Automata. 2013, 16–23
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
Argyros G, Stais I, Jana S, Keromytis A D, Kiayias A. Sfadiff: automated evasion attacks and fingerprinting using black-box differential automata learning. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 2016, 1690–1701
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
Alur R, Dill D L. A theory of timed automata. Journal of Theoretical Computer Science, 1994, 126(2): 183–235
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Grinchtein O, Jonsson B, Leucker M. Learning of event-recording automata. Journal of Theoretical Computer Science, 2010, 411(47): 4029–4054
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Clark A, Thollard F. Pac-learnability of probabilistic deterministic finite state automata. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2004, 5(May):473–497
[77]
Castro J, Gavaldà R. Towards feasible pac-learning of probabilistic deterministic finite automata. In: Proceedings of International Colloquium on Grammatical Inference. 2008, 163–174
CrossRef Google scholar
[78]
Yokomori T. Learning Non-Deterministic Finite Automata From Queries and Counterexamples. Oxford University Press, 1994
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
Denis F, Lemay A, Terlutte A. Learning regular languages using non deterministic finite automata. In: Proceedings of International Colloquium on Grammatical Inference. 2000, 39–50
CrossRef Google scholar
[80]
Alur R, Courcoubetis C, Henzinger T A, Ho P H. Hybrid automata: an algorithmic approach to the specification and verification of hybrid systems. In: Grossman R L, Herode A, Ravn A P, eds.Hybrid Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heideberg, 1993
CrossRef Google scholar
[81]
Van Der Aalst W, Adriansyah A, De Medeiros A K A, Arcieri F, Baier T, Blickle T, Bose J C, Brand V. d P, Brandtjen R, Buijs J, . Process mining manifesto. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Business Process Management. 2011, 169–194
[82]
de la Higuera C, Janodet J C. Inference of ω-languages from prefixes. Theoretical Computer Science, 2004, 313(2): 295–312
CrossRef Google scholar
[83]
Hopcroft J E, Motwani R, Ullman J D. Introduction to automata theory, languages, and computation. Journal of ACM Sigact News, 2001, 32(1): 60–65
CrossRef Google scholar
[84]
Bollig B, Habermehl P, Kern C, Leucker M. Angluin-style learning of NFA. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2009, 1004–1009
[85]
Merten M, Howar F, Steffen B, Margaria T. Automata learning with onthe-fly direct hypothesis construction. In: Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification, and Validation. Springer, 2012
CrossRef Google scholar
[86]
Maler O, Pnueli A. On the learnability of infinitary regular sets. Journal of Information and Computation, 1995, 118(2): 316–326
CrossRef Google scholar
[87]
Irfan M N, Oriat C, Groz R. Model inference and testing. In: Advances in Computers. Elsevier, 2013
[88]
Kearns M J, Vazirani U V. An Introduction to Computational Learning Theory. MIT Press, 1994
CrossRef Google scholar
[89]
Isberner M, Howar F, Steffen B. The TTT algorithm: a redundancy-free approach to active automata learning. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Runtime Verification. 2014, 307–322
CrossRef Google scholar
[90]
Groce A, Peled D, Yannakakis M. Adaptive model checking. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 2006, 14(5): 729–744
CrossRef Google scholar
[91]
Smeenk W, Moerman J, Vaandrager F, Jansen D N. Applying automata learning to embedded control software. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods. 2015, 67–83
CrossRef Google scholar
[92]
Lee D, Yannakakis M. Principles and methods of testing finite state machines-a survey. Proceedings of IEEE, 1996, 84(8): 1090–1123
CrossRef Google scholar
[93]
Bos V P, Smetsers R, Vaandrager F. Enhancing automata learning by log-based metrics. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Integrated Formal Methods. 2016, 295–310
CrossRef Google scholar
[94]
Chen Y F, Hsieh C, Lengál O, Lii T J, Tsai MH, Wang B Y, Wang F. PAC learning-based verification and model synthesis. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering. 2016, 714–724
CrossRef Google scholar
[95]
Chow T S. Testing software design modeled by finite-state machines. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1978, 3: 178–187
CrossRef Google scholar
[96]
Fujiwara S, Bochmann G V, Khendek F, Amalou M, Ghedamsi A. Tes selection based on finite state models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1991, 17(6): 591–603
CrossRef Google scholar
[97]
Shen Y, Lombardi F, Dahbura A T. Protocol conformance testing using multiple UIO sequences. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 1992, 40(8): 1282–128 7
CrossRef Google scholar
[98]
Vuong S T. The uiov-method for protocol test sequence generation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IFIP International Workshop on Protocol Test Systems. 1989, 161–175
[99]
Aarts F, Jonsson B, Uijen J. Generating models of infinite-state communication protocols using regular inference with abstraction. In: Proceedings of IFIP International Conference on Testing Software and Systems. 2010, 188–204
CrossRef Google scholar
[100]
Aarts F, Jonsson B, Uijen J, Vaandrager F. Generating models of infinitestate communication protocols using regular inference with abstraction. Journal of Formal Methods in System Design, 2015, 46(1): 1–41
CrossRef Google scholar
[101]
Cho C Y, Babíc D, Shin E C R, Song D. Inference and analysis of formal models of botnet command and control protocols. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 2010, 426–439
CrossRef Google scholar
[102]
Chalupar G, Peherstorfer S, Poll E, De Ruiter J. Automated reverse engineering using lego® . In: Proceedings of the 8th {USENIX} Workshop on Offensive Technologies ({WOOT} 14). 2014
[103]
Vaandrager F. Active learning of extended finite state machines. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Testing Software and Systems. 2012, 5–7
CrossRef Google scholar
[104]
Aarts F, Heidarian F, Kuppens H, Olsen P, Vaandrager F. Automata learning through counterexample guided abstraction refinement. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Formal Methods. 2012, 10–27
CrossRef Google scholar
[105]
Aarts F, Heidarian F, Vaandrager F. A theory of history dependent abstractions for learning interface automata. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Concurrency Theory. 2012, 240–255
CrossRef Google scholar
[106]
Gold E M. Complexity of automaton identification from given data. Journal of Information and Control, 1978, 37(3): 302–320
CrossRef Google scholar
[107]
Isberner M, Steffen B, Howar F. Learnlib tutorial. In: Bartocci E, Majumdar R, eds.Runtime Verification. Springer, Cham, 2015, 358–377
CrossRef Google scholar
[108]
Xiao H. Automatic model learning and its applications in malware detection. Doctoral Dissertation, Nanyang Technological University, 2017
[109]
Aarts F D. Tomte: bridging the gap between active learning and realworld systems. Doctoral Dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen, 2014
[110]
Fiterau-Brostean P. Active model learning for the analysis of network protocols. Doctoral Dissertation, Radboud University, 2018
[111]
Irfan M N. Analysis and optimization of software model inference algorithms. Universita de Grenoble, Grenoble, France, 2012
[112]
Czerny M X. Learning-based software testing: evaluation of angluin’s L* algorithm and adaptations in practice. Batchelors Thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 2014
[113]
Henrix M. Performance improvement in automata learning. Master thesis, Radboud University, 2015
[114]
Uijen J. Learning models of communication protocols using abstraction techniques. Master Thesis, Uppscola University, 2009
[115]
Aarts F. Inference and abstraction of communication protocols. Master Thesis, Uppscola University, 2009
[116]
Bohlin T, Jonsson B. Regular inference for communication protocol entities. Technical Report 2008-024, Uppsala University, Computer Systems, 2008
[117]
Berg T. Regular inference for reactive systems. Doctoral Dissertation, Uppsala Universitet, 2006
[118]
Berg T, Jonsson B, Leucker M, Saksena M. Insights to angluin’s learning. Journal of Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 2005, 118: 3–18
CrossRef Google scholar
[119]
Irfan M N. State machine inference in testing context with long counterexamples. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation. 2010, 508–511
CrossRef Google scholar
[120]
Sidhu D P, Leung T K. Formal methods for protocol testing: a detailed study. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1989, 15(4): 413–426
CrossRef Google scholar
[121]
Dorofeeva R, El-Fakih K, Maag S, Cavalli A R, Yevtushenko N. Experimental evaluation of fsm-based testing methods. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods. 2005, 23–32
CrossRef Google scholar
[122]
Aarts F, Howar F, Kuppens H, Vaandrager F. Algorithms for inferring register automata. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. 2014, 202–219
CrossRef Google scholar
[123]
Stevens P, Moller F. The edinburgh concurrency workbench user manual (version 7.1). Laboratory for Foundations of Computer Science, University of Edinburgh, 1999, 7
[124]
Maler O, Pnueli A. On the learnability of infinitary regular sets. Information and Computation, 1991, 118: 316–326
CrossRef Google scholar
[125]
Irfan M N, Oriat C, Groz R. Angluin style finite state machine inference with non-optimal counterexamples. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Model Inference in Testing. 2010, 11–19
CrossRef Google scholar
[126]
Merten M, Howar F, Steffen B, Margaria T. Automata learning with onthe-fly direct hypothesis construction. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. 2011, 248–260
CrossRef Google scholar
[127]
Isberner M, Steffen B. An abstract framework for counterexample analysis in active automata learning. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Grammatical Inference. 2014, 79–93
[128]
Li K, Groz R, Shahbaz M. Integration testing of distributed components based on learning parameterized I/O models. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Formal Techniques for Networked and Distributed Systems. 2006, 436–450
CrossRef Google scholar
[129]
Howar F. Active Learning of Interface Programs. Doctoral Dissertation, TU Dortmund University, 2012
[130]
Cassel S, Howar F, Jonsson B, Steffen B. Learning extended finite state machines. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods. 2014, 250–264
CrossRef Google scholar
[131]
D’Antoni L, Veanes M. The power of symbolic automata and transducers. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Verification. 2017, 47–67
CrossRef Google scholar
[132]
Isberner M, Howar F, Steffen B. The open-source learnlib. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Verification. 2015, 487–495
CrossRef Google scholar
[133]
Isberner M, Howar F, Steffen B. The open-source learnlib. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Verification. 2015, 487–495
CrossRef Google scholar
[134]
Raffelt H, Steffen B. LearnLib a library for automata learning and experimentation. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering. 2006, 377–380
CrossRef Google scholar
[135]
Isberner M, Howar F, Steffen B. Inferring automata with state-local alphabet abstractions. In: Proceedings of NASA Formal Methods Symposium. 2013, 124–138
CrossRef Google scholar
[136]
Hopcroft J E, Karp R M. A linear algorithm for testing equivalence of finite automata. Technical Report, Cornell University, 1971
[137]
Giannakopoulou D, Rakamarič Z, Raman V. Symbolic learning of component interfaces. In: Proceedings of International Static Analysis Symposium. 2012, 248–264
CrossRef Google scholar
[138]
Howar F, Giannakopoulou D, Rakamarič Z. Hybrid learning: interface generation through static, dynamic, and symbolic analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2013 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis. 2013, 268–279
CrossRef Google scholar
[139]
Bainczyk A, Schieweck A, Isberner M, Margaria T, Neubauer J, Steffen B. Alex: mixed-mode learning of web applications at ease. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods. 2016, 655–671
CrossRef Google scholar
[140]
Botinčan M, Babič D. Sigma* symbolic learning of input-output specifications. Journal of ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 2013, 48(1): 443–456
CrossRef Google scholar
[141]
Bollig B, Katoen J P, Kern C, Leucker M, Neider D, Piegdon D R. Libalf: the automata learning framework. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Verification. 2010, 360–364
CrossRef Google scholar
[142]
Merten M, Steffen B, Howar F, Margaria T. Next generation learnlib. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems. 2011, 220–223
CrossRef Google scholar
[143]
Cassel S, Howar F, Jonsson B. RAlib: A learnLib extension for inferring EFSMs. DIFTS, 2015
[144]
Khalili A, Tacchella A. Aide: automata-identification engine. See Archive. codeplex Website, 2014
[145]
Aarts F, Schmaltz J, Vaandrager F. Inference and abstraction of the biometric passport. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. 2010, 673–686
CrossRef Google scholar
[146]
Aarts F, De Ruiter J, Poll E. Formal models of bank cards for free. In: Proceedings of Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops. 2013, 461–468
CrossRef Google scholar
[147]
Smeenk W. Applying automata learning to complex industrial software. Master’s Thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, 2012
[148]
Janssen R, Vaandrager F W, Verwer S. Learning a state diagram of tcp using abstraction. Bachelor Thesis, ICIS, Radboud University Nijmegen, 2013, 12
[149]
Fiterău-Bro¸stean P, Janssen R, Vaandrager F. Learning fragments of the tcp network protocol. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Formal Methods for Industrial Critical Systems. 2014, 78–93
CrossRef Google scholar
[150]
Tijssen M. Automatic modeling of ssh implementations with state machine learning algorithms. Bachelor thesis, Radboud University, Nijmegen, 2014
[151]
Fiter T P, Janssen R, Vaandrager F. Combining model learning and model checking to analyze tcp implementations. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Verification. 2016, 454–471
CrossRef Google scholar
[152]
Fiterău-Bro¸stean P, Lenaerts T, Poll E, Ruiter d J, Vaandrager F, Verleg P. Model learning and model checking of SSH implementations. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSOFT International SPIN Symposium on Model Checking of Software. 2017, 142–151
CrossRef Google scholar
[153]
Schuts M, Hooman J, Vaandrager F. Refactoring of legacy software using model learning and equivalence checking: an industrial experience report. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Integrated Formal Methods. 2016, 311–325
CrossRef Google scholar
[154]
Neubauer J, Steffen B, Bauer O, Windmüller S, Merten M, Margaria T, Howar F. Automated continuous quality assurance. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Formal Methods in Software Engineering: Rigorous and Agile Approaches. 2012, 37–43
CrossRef Google scholar
[155]
Windmüller S, Neubauer J, Steffen B, Howar F, Bauer O. Active continuous quality control. In: Proceedings of the 16th International ACM Sigsoft Symposium on Component-based Software Engineering. 2013, 111–120
CrossRef Google scholar
[156]
Verleg P, Poll E, Vaandrager F. Inferring SSHstate machines using protocol state fuzzing. Masters Thesis, Radboud University, 2016
[157]
Groce A, Peled D, Yannakakis M. Adaptive model checking. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, 2002, 269–301
CrossRef Google scholar
[158]
Li K, Groz R, Shahbaz M. Integration testing of components guided by incremental state machine learning. In: Proceedings of the Testing: Academic and Industrial Conference on Practice and Research Techniques. 2006, 59–70
[159]
Shahbaz M, Groz R. Analysis and testing of black-box component-based systems by inferring partial models. Journal of Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, 2014, 24(4): 253–288
CrossRef Google scholar
[160]
Shahbaz M, Li K, Groz R. Learning and integration of parameterized components through testing. In: Petrenko A, Veanes M, Tretmans J, Grieskamp W, eds. Testing of Software and Communicating Systems. Springer, Berlin, Hedelberg, 2007
CrossRef Google scholar
[161]
Shahbaz M, Parreaux B, Klay F. Model inference approach for detecting feature interactions in integrated systems. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Feature Interactions in Software and Communication Systems. 2007, 161–171
[162]
Walkinshaw N, Bogdanov K, Derrick J, Paris J. Increasing functional coverage by inductive testing: a case study. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Testing Software and Systems. 2010, 126–141
CrossRef Google scholar
[163]
Cobleigh JM, Giannakopoulou D, Pasareanu C S. Learning assumptions for compositional verification. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems. 2003, 331–346
CrossRef Google scholar
[164]
Păsăreanu S C, Giannakopoulou D, Bobaru M G, Cobleigh J M, Barringer H. Learning to divide and conquer: applying the L* algorithm to automate assume-guarantee reasoning. Formal Methods in System Design, 2008, 32(3): 175–205
CrossRef Google scholar
[165]
He F, Mao S, Wang B Y. Learning-based assume-guarantee regression verification. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Verification. 2016, 310–328
CrossRef Google scholar
[166]
Chen Y F, Clarke E M, Farzan A, He F, Tsai M H, Tsay Y K, Wang B Y, Zhu L. Comparing learning algorithms in automated assume-guarantee reasoning. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. 2010, 643–657
CrossRef Google scholar
[167]
Chen Y F, Clarke E M, Farzan A, Tsai M H, Tsay Y K, Wang B Y. Automated assume-guarantee reasoning through implicit learning. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Verification. 2010, 511–526
CrossRef Google scholar
[168]
He F, Wang B Y, Yin L, Zhu L. Symbolic assume-guarantee reasoning through BDD learning. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering. 2014, 1071–1082
[169]
Lin S W, Hsiung P A. Compositional synthesis of concurrent systems through causal model checking and learning. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Formal Methods. 2014, 416–431
CrossRef Google scholar
[170]
Neider D, Topcu U. An automaton learning approach to solving safety games over infinite graphs. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems. 2016, 204–221
CrossRef Google scholar
[171]
Margaria T, Niese O, Steffen B, Erochok A. System level testing of virtual switch (re-) configuration over IP. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE European Test Workshop. 2002, 67–72
[172]
Niese O, Steffen B, Margaria T, Hagerer A, Brune G, Ide H D. Librarybased design and consistency checking of system-level industrial test cases. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, 2001, 233–248
CrossRef Google scholar
[173]
Feng L, Lundmark S, Meinke K, Niu F, Sindhu M A, Wong P Y. Case studies in learning-based testing. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Testing Software and Systems. 2013, 164–179
CrossRef Google scholar
[174]
Oliveira A L, Silva J P. Efficient algorithms for the inference of minimum size dfas. Journal of Machine Learning, 2001, 44(1–2): 93–119
CrossRef Google scholar
[175]
Choi W, Necula G, Sen K. Guided gui testing of android apps with minimal restart and approximate learning. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 2013, 48(10): 623–640
CrossRef Google scholar
[176]
Alur R, Černỳ P, Madhusudan P, Nam W. Synthesis of interface specifications for java classes. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 2005, 40(1): 98–109
CrossRef Google scholar
[177]
Xiao H, Sun J, Liu Y, Lin S W, Sun C. Tzuyu: learning stateful typestates. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Automated Software Engineering. 2013, 432–442
CrossRef Google scholar
[178]
Raffelt H, Steffen B, Margaria T. Dynamic testing via automata learning. In: Proceedings of Haifa Verification Conference. 2007, 136–152
CrossRef Google scholar
[179]
Clarke E, Long D, McMillan K. Compositional model checking. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science. 1989
[180]
Smeenk W, Vaandrager FW. Applying automata learning to complex industrial software. Master’s Thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, 2012
[181]
Tappler M, Aichernig B K, Bloem R. Model-based testing IoT communication via active automata learning. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation. 2017, 276–287
CrossRef Google scholar
[182]
Aarts F, Fiterau-Brostean P, Kuppens H, Vaandrager F. Learning register automata with fresh value generation. In: Proceedings of International Colloquium on Theoretical Aspects of Computing. 2015, 165–183
CrossRef Google scholar
[183]
Meinke K, Sindhu M A. Incremental learning-based testing for reactive systems. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Tests and Proofs. 2011, 134–151
CrossRef Google scholar
[184]
Volpato M, Tretmans J. Active learning of nondeterministic systems from an ioco perspective. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. 2014, 220–235
CrossRef Google scholar
[185]
Groz R, Irfan M N, Oriat C. Algorithmic improvements on regular inference of software models and perspectives for security testing. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. 2012, 444–457
CrossRef Google scholar
[186]
Ernst M D, Perkins J H, Guo P J, McCamant S, Pacheco C, Tschantz M S, Xiao C. The daikon system for dynamic detection of likely invariants. Journal of Science of Computer Programming, 2007, 69(1–3): 35–45
CrossRef Google scholar
[187]
Nachmanson L, Veanes M, Schulte W, Tillmann N, Grieskamp W. Optimal strategies for testing nondeterministic systems. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 2004, 29(4): 55–64
CrossRef Google scholar
[188]
Volpato M, Tretmans J. Approximate active learning of nondeterministic input output transition systems. Electronic Communications of the EASST, 2015, 72
[189]
Khalili A, Tacchella A. Learning nondeterministic mealy machines. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Grammatical Inference. 2014, 109–123
[190]
El-Fakih K, Groz R, Irfan M N, Shahbaz M. Learning finite state models of observable nondeterministic systems in a testing context. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Testing Software and Systems. 2010, 97–102
[191]
Dallmeier V. Mining and checking object behavior. Doctoral Dissertation, 2010
[192]
Van der Aalst WM P, Rubin V, Verbeek H M W, Dongen V B F, Kindler E, Günther C W. Process mining: a two-step approach to balance between underfitting and overfitting. Journal of Software & Systems Modeling, 2010, 9(1): 87
CrossRef Google scholar
[193]
Meinke K. CGE: a sequential learning algorithm for mealy automata. In: Proceedings of International Colloquium on Grammatical Inference. 2010, 148–162
CrossRef Google scholar
[194]
Peled D, Vardi MY, Yannakakis M. Black box checking. In: Wu J, Chanson S T, Gao Q, eds. Formal Methods for Protocol Engineering and Distributed Systems. Springer, Boston, MA, 1999
CrossRef Google scholar
[195]
Cassel S, Howar F, Jonsson B, Merten M, Steffen B. A succinct canonical register automaton model. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis. 2011, 366–380
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(700 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/