A framework based on sparse representation model for time series prediction in smart city
Zhiyong YU, Xiangping ZHENG, Fangwan HUANG, Wenzhong GUO, Lin SUN, Zhiwen YU
A framework based on sparse representation model for time series prediction in smart city
Smart city driven by Big Data and Internet of Things (IoT) has become a most promising trend of the future. As one important function of smart city, event alert based on time series prediction is faced with the challenge of how to extract and represent discriminative features of sensing knowledge from the massive sequential data generated by IoT devices. In this paper, a framework based on sparse representation model (SRM) for time series prediction is proposed as an efficient approach to tackle this challenge. After dividing the over-complete dictionary into upper and lower parts, the main idea of SRMis to obtain the sparse representation of time series based on the upper part firstly, and then realize the prediction of future values based on the lower part. The choice of different dictionaries has a significant impact on the performance of SRM. This paper focuses on the study of dictionary construction strategy and summarizes eight variants of SRM. Experimental results demonstrate that SRM can deal with different types of time series prediction flexibly and effectively.
sparse representation / smart city / time series prediction / dictionary construction
[1] |
Zheng Y. Urban computing: enabling urban intelligence with big data. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2017, 11(1): 1–3
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Su K, Li J, Fu H. Smart city and the applications. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Control. 2011, 1028–1031
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Yi F, Yu Z, Chen H, Du H, Guo B. Cyber-physical-social collaborative sensing: from single space to cross-space. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2018, 12(4): 609–622
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Yu Z, Yi F, Lv Q, Guo B. Identifying on-site users for social events: mobility, content, and social relationship. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2018, 17(9): 2055–2068
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Yu Z, Wang H, Guo B, Gu T, Mei T. Supporting serendipitous social interaction using human mobility prediction. IEEE Transactions on Human- Machine Systems, 2015, 45(6): 811–818
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Yu Z, Yu Z, Chen Y. Multi-hop mobility prediction. Mobile Networks and Applications, 2016, 21(2): 367–374
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Yu Z, Xu H, Yang Z, Guo B. Personalized travel package with multipoint- of-interest recommendation based on crowdsourced user footprints. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 2015, 46(1): 151–158
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Wang L, Yu Z, Guo B, Ku T, Yi F. Moving destination prediction using sparse dataset: a mobility gradient descent approach. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 2017, 11(3): 1–33
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Yu C N, Mirowski P, Ho T K. A sparse coding approach to household electricity demand forecasting in smart grids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2016, 8(2): 738–748
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Fu T C. A review on time series data mining. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2011, 24(1): 164–181
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Zhang Z, Xu Y, Yang J, Li X, Zhang D. A survey of sparse representation: algorithms and applications. IEEE Access, 2015, 3: 490–530
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Fakhr MW. Online nonstationary time series prediction using sparse coding with dictionary update. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Research. 2015, 112–115
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Rosas-Romero R, Díaz-Torres A, Etcheverry G. Forecasting of stock return prices with sparse representation of financial time series over redundant dictionaries. Expert Systems with Applications, 2016, 57: 37–48
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Helmi A, Fakhr MW, Atiya A F. Multi-step ahead time series forecasting via sparse coding and dictionary based techniques. Applied Soft Computing, 2018, 69: 464–474
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
De Gooijer J G, Hyndman R J. 25 years of time series forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 2006, 22(3): 443–473
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Dijk D, Teräsvirta T, Franses P H. Smooth transition autoregressive models—a survey of recent developments. Econometric Reviews, 2002, 21(1): 1–47
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Anand N C, Scoglio C, Natarajan B. GARCH—non-linear time series model for traffic modeling and prediction. In: Proceedings of IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium. 2008, 694–697
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Bontempi G, Taieb S, Borgne Y L. Business Intelligence. Berlin, Springer, 2013
|
[19] |
Ahmed N K, Atiya A F, Gayar N E, Shishiny H E. An empirical comparison of machine learning models for time series forecasting. Econometric Reviews, 2010, 29(5–6): 594–621
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Kumar M, Thenmozhi M. Forecasting stock index movement: a comparison of support vector machines and random forest. In: Proceedings of the 9th Capital Markets Conference on Indian Institute of Capital Markets. 2006, 1–16
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Längkvist M, Karlsson L, Loutfi A. A review of unsupervised feature learning and deep learning for time-series modeling. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2014, 42: 11–24
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Zheng J, Xu C, Zhang Z, Li X. Electric load forecasting in smart grids using long-short-term-memory based recurrent neural network. In: Proceedings of the 51st IEEE Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems. 2017, 1–6
|
[23] |
Fu R, Zhang Z, Li L. Using LSTM and GRU neural network methods for traffic flow prediction. In: Proceedings of the 31st IEEE Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation. 2016, 324–328
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Zhou G B, Wu J, Zhang C L, Zhou Z H. Minimal gated unit for recurrent neural networks. International Journal of Automation and Computing, 2016, 13(3): 226–234
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Guo W, Li J, Chen G, Niu Y, Chen C. A PSO-optimized real-time fault-tolerant task allocation algorithm in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2014, 26(12): 3236–3249
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Ye D, Chen Z. A new approach to minimum attribute reduction based on discrete artificial bee colony. Soft Computing, 2015, 19(7): 1893–1903
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Qiu X, Zhang L, Ren Y, Suganthan P N, Amaratunga G. Ensemble deep learning for regression and time series forecasting. In: Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Ensemble Learning. 2014, 1–6
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Zhang G P. Time series forecasting using a hybrid ARIMA and neural network model. Neurocomputing, 2003, 50: 159–175
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Duan Z, Yang Y, Zhang K, Ni Y, Bajgain S. Improved deep hybrid networks for urban traffic flow prediction using trajectory data. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 31820–31827
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Donoho D L. Compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006, 52(4): 1289–1306
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Lewicki M S, Sejnowski T J. Learning overcomplete representations. Neural Computation, 2000, 12(2): 337–365
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Wang S, Guo W. Sparse multigraph embedding for multimodal feature representation. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2017, 19(7): 1454–1466
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Rubinstein R, Bruckstein A M, Elad M. Dictionaries for sparse representation modeling. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2010, 98(6): 1045–1057
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Batal I, Hauskrecht M. A supervised time series feature extraction technique using DCT and DWT. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications. 2009, 735–739
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Stanković R S, Falkowski B J. The Haar wavelet transform: its status and achievements. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 2003, 29(1): 25–44
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
Qayyum A, Malik A S, Naufal M, Saad M, Mazher M, Abdullah F, Abdullah T A R B T. Designing of overcomplete dictionaries based on DCT and DWT. In: Proceedings of IEEE Student Symposium in Biomedical Engineering & Sciences. 2015, 134–139
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Aharon M, Elad M, Bruckstein A. K-SVD: an algorithm for designing overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2006, 54(11): 4311–4322
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Ertugrul Ö F. Forecasting electricity load by a novel recurrent extreme learning machines approach. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2016, 78: 429–435
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[39] |
Natarajan B K. Sparse approximate solutions to linear systems. SIAM Journal on Computing, 1995, 24(2): 227–234
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Mallat S G, Zhang Z. Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1993, 41(12): 3397–3415
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[41] |
Pati Y C, Rezaiifar R, Krishnaprasad P S. Orthogonal matching pursuit: recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition. In: Proceedings of the 27th IEEE Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers. 1993, 40–44
|
[42] |
Needell D, Tropp J A. CoSaMP: iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 2009, 26(3): 301–321
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Donoho D L, Tsaig Y, Drori I, Starck J L. Sparse solution of underdetermined linear equations by stagewise orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2012, 58(2): 1094–1121
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[44] |
Dai W, Milenkovic O. Subspace pursuit for compressive sensing signal reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2009, 55(5): 2230–2249
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[45] |
Karahanoglu N B, Erdogan H. Compressed sensing signal recovery via forward–backward pursuit. Digital Signal Processing, 2013, 23(5): 1539–1548
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[46] |
Donoho D L. For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal l1-norm solution is also the sparsest solution. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2006, 59(6): 797–829
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[47] |
Chen S S, Donoho D L, Saunders M A. Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM Review, 2001, 43(1): 129–159
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[48] |
Efron B, Hastie T, Johnstone I, Tibshirani R. Least angle regression. The Annals of Statistics, 2004, 32(2): 407–499
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[49] |
Figueiredo MA T, Nowak R D, Wright S J. Gradient projection for sparse reconstruction: application to compressed sensing and other inverse problems. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2007, 1(4): 586–597
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[50] |
Beck A, Teboulle M. A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 2009, 2(1): 183–202
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[51] |
Qiu K, Dogandzic A. Variance-component based sparse signal reconstruction and model selection. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2010, 58(6): 2935–2952
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[52] |
Guo S, Wang Z, Ruan Q. Enhancing sparsity via lp (0<p<1) minimization for robust face recognition. Neurocomputing, 2013, 99: 592–602
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[53] |
Chartrand R. Exact reconstruction of sparse signals via nonconvex minimization. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2007, 14(10): 707–710
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[54] |
Zeng J, Xu Z, Zhang B, Hong W, Wu Y. Accelerated L1/2 regularization based SAR imaging via BCR and reduced Newton skills. Signal Processing, 2013, 93(7): 1831–1844
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[55] |
Foucart S, Lai M J. Sparsest solutions of underdetermined linear systems via lq-minimization for 0<q≤1. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 2009, 26(3): 395–407
|
[56] |
Daubechies I, DeVore R, Fornasier M, Güntürk C S. Iteratively reweighted least squares minimization for sparse recovery. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2010, 63(1): 1–38
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[57] |
Xu Z, Chang X, Xu F, Zhang H. L1/2 regularization: a thresholding representation theory and a fast solver. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2012, 23(7): 1013–1027
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[58] |
Chen B J, Chang M, Lin C J. Load forecasting using support vector machines: a study on EUNITE competition 2001. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2004, 19(4): 1821–1830
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[59] |
Makridakis S, Hibon M. The M3-Competition: results, conclusions and implications. International Journal of Forecasting, 2000, 16(4): 451–476
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[60] |
Makridakis S, Spiliotis E, Assimakopoulos V. The accuracy of machine learning (ML) forecasting methods versus statistical ones: extending the results of the M3-Competition. Working Paper, University of Nicosia, Institute for the Future, Greece, 2017
|
[61] |
Makridakis S, Spiliotis E, Assimakopoulos V. Statistical and machine learning forecasting methods: concerns and ways forward. PloS One, 2018, 13(3): e0194889
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[62] |
Taieb S B, Atiya A F. A bias and variance analysis for multistep-ahead time series forecasting. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2015, 27(1): 62–76
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |