A survey of current trends in computational predictions of protein-protein interactions
Yanbin WANG, Zhuhong YOU, Liping LI, Zhanheng CHEN
A survey of current trends in computational predictions of protein-protein interactions
Proteomics become an important research area of interests in life science after the completion of the human genome project. This scientific is to study the characteristics of proteins at the large-scale data level, and then gain a holistic and comprehensive understanding of the process of disease occurrence and cell metabolism at the protein level. A key issue in proteomics is how to efficiently analyze the massive amounts of protein data produced by high-throughput technologies. Computational technologies with low-cost and short-cycle are becoming the preferred methods for solving some important problems in post-genome era, such as protein-protein interactions (PPIs). In this review, we focus on computational methods for PPIs detection and show recent advancements in this critical area from multiple aspects. First, we analyze in detail the several challenges for computational methods for predicting PPIs and summarize the available PPIs data sources. Second, we describe the stateof-the-art computational methods recently proposed on this topic. Finally, we discuss some important technologies that can promote the prediction of PPI and the development of computational proteomics.
proteomics / protein-protein interactions / protein eature extraction / computational proteomics
[1] |
Colinge J, Bennett K L. Introduction to computational proteomics. PLoS Computational Biology, 2007, 3(7): e114
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Matthiesen R. Methods, algorithms and tools in computational proteomics: a practical point of view. Proteomics, 2010, 7(16): 2815–2832
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Jones S, Thornton J M. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1996, 93(1): 13–20
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Phizicky E M, Fields S. Protein-protein interactions: methods for detection and analysis. Microbiological Reviews, 1995, 59(1): 94–123
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Jansen R, Yu H, Greenbaum D, Kluger Y, Krogan N J, Chung S, Emili A, Snyder M, Greenblatt J F, Gerstein M. A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein-protein interactions from genomic data. Science, 2003, 302(5644): 449–453
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Rhodes D R, Tomlins S A, Varambally S, Mahavisno V, Barrette T, Kalyanasundaram S, Ghosh D, Pandey A, Chinnaiyan A M. Probabilistic model of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature Biotechnology, 2005, 23(8): 951–959
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Oti M, Snel B, Huynen M A, Brunner H G. Predicting disease genes using protein-protein interactions. Journal of Medical Genetics, 2006, 43(8): 691–698
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Sprinzak E, Sattath S, Margalit H. How reliable are experimental protein-protein interaction data? Journal of Molecular Biology, 2003, 327(5): 919–923
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Letovsky S, Kasif S. Predicting protein function from protein-protein interaction data: a probabilistic approach. Intelligent Systems in Molecular Biology, 2003, 19: 197–204
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Xenarios I, Salwinski L, Duan X J, Higney P, Kim S, Eisenberg D. DIP, the database of interacting proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Research, 2002, 30(1): 303–305
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Chatr-Aryamontri A, Breitkreutz B J, Heinicke S, Boucher L, Winter A, Stark C, Nixon J, Ramage L, Kolas N, Odonnell L. The BioGRID interaction database. Nucleic Acids Research, 2013, 41: D816–D823
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Bader G D, Betel D, Hogue CWV. BIND: the biomolecular interaction network database. Nucleic Acids Research, 2001, 31(1): 248–250
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Cherry J M, Adler C, Ball C A, Chervitz S A, Dwight S S, Hester E T, Jia Y, Juvik G, Roe T, Schroeder M. SGD: saccharomyces genome database. Nucleic Acids Research, 1998, 26(1): 73–79
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Peri S, Navarro J D, Amanchy R, Kristiansen T Z, Jonnalagadda C K, Surendranath V, Niranjan V, Muthusamy B, Gandhi T K, Gronborg M. Development of human protein reference database as an initial platform for approaching systems biology in humans. Genome Research, 2003, 13(10): 2363–2371
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Pagel P, Kovac S, Oesterheld M, Brauner B, Dungerkaltenbach I, Frishman G, Montrone C, Mark P, Stumpflen V, Mewes H. The MIPS mammalian protein–protein interaction database. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21(6): 832–834
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Samuel K, Bruno A, Lionel B, Alan B, Fiona B C, Carol C, Margaret D, Marine D,Marc F, Ursula H. The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2012. Nucleic Acids Research, 2012, 40(Database issue): 841–846
|
[17] |
Wei L, Xing P, Zeng J, Chen J, Su R, Guo F. Improved prediction of protein–protein interactions using novel negative samples, features, and an ensemble classifier. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 2017, 83: 67–74
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Ding Y, Tang J, Guo F. Predicting protein-protein interactions via multivariate mutual information of protein sequences. BMC Bioinformatics, 2016, 17(1): 398
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Wang T, Li L, Huang Y, Zhang H, Ma Y, Zhou X. Prediction of proteinprotein interactions from amino acid sequences based on continuous and discrete wavelet transform features. Molecules, 2018, 23(4): 823
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Wang Y, You Z, Li L, Huang Y, Yi H. Detection of interactions between proteins by using legendre moments descriptor to extract discriminatory information embedded in PSSM. Molecules, 2017, 22(8): 1366
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Shen J, Zhang J, Luo X, Zhu W, Yu K, Chen K, Li Y, Jiang H. Predicting protein–protein interactions based only on sequences information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007, 104(11): 4337–4341
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Guo Y, Yu L, Wen Z, Li M. Using support vector machine combined with auto covariance to predict protein-protein interactions from protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Research, 2008, 36(9): 3025–3030
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Cosic I, Hearn M T. Studies on protein-DNA interactions using the resonant recognition model: application to repressors and transforming proteins. FEBS Journal, 2010, 205(2): 613–619
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Yang L, Xia J F, Gui J. Prediction of protein-protein interactions from protein sequence using local descriptors. Protein & Peptide Letters, 2010, 17(9): 1085–1090
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Hu L, Chan K C C. Extracting coevolutionary features from protein sequences for predicting protein-protein interactions. IEEE/ACM Transactions Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 2017, 14(1): 155–166
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Wei Z S, Yang J Y, Yu D J. Predicting protein-protein interactions with weighted PSSM histogram and random forests. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Science and Big Data Engineering. 2015, 326–335
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Zahiri J, Yaghoubi O, Mohammad-Noori M, Ebrahimpour R, Masoudi-Nejad A. PPIevo: protein-protein interaction prediction from PSSM based evolutionary information. Genomics, 2013, 102(4): 237–242
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Lin C Y, Chen Y C, Lo Y S, Yang J M. Inferring homologous proteinprotein interactions through pair position specific scoring matrix. BMC Bioinformatics, 2013, 14(S2): S11
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Wang Y, You Z, Li X, Chen X, Jiang T, Zhang J. PCVMZM: using the probabilistic classification vector machines model combined with a zernike moments descriptor to predict protein-protein interactions from protein sequences. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2017, 18(5): 1029
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Li L P, Wang Y B, You Z H, Li Y, An J Y. PCLPred: a bioinformatics ethod for predicting protein-protein interactions by combining relevance vector machine model with low-rank matrix approximation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2018, 19(4): 1029
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Song X Y, Chen Z H, Sun X Y, You Z H, Li L P, Zhao Y. An ensemble classifier with random projection for predicting protein–protein interactions using sequence and evolutionary information. Applied Sciences, 2018, 8(1): 89
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
An J Y, Meng F R, You Z H, Fang Y H, Zhao Y J, Zhang M. Using the relevance vector machine model combined with local phase quantization to predict protein-protein interactions from protein sequences. BioMed Research International, 2016, 2016: 1–9
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Cheung W, Hamarneh G. n-SIFT: n-dimensional scale invariant feature transform. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2009, 18(9): 2012
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T, Van Gool L. Speeded-up robust features. Computer Vision & Image Understanding, 2008, 110(3): 404–417
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Žunić J, Hirota K, Rosin P L. A Hu moment invariant as a shape circularity measure. Pattern Recognition, 2010, 43(1): 47–57
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
Khotanzad A, Hong Y H. Invariant image recognition by Zernike moments. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis &Machine Intelligence, 1990, 12(5): 489–497
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Zhang F, Liu S Q,Wang D B, Guan W. Aircraft recognition in infrared image using wavelet moment invariants. Image & Vision Computing, 2009, 27(4): 313–318
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Dalal N, Triggs B. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2005, 886–893
|
[39] |
Whitehill J, Omlin C W. Haar features for FACS AU recognition. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition. 2006, 97–101
|
[40] |
Ojala T, Pietikainen M, Harwood D. Performance evaluation of texture measures with classification based on Kullback discrimination of distributions. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. 1994, 582–585
|
[41] |
He D C, Wang L. Texture features based on texture spectrum. Pattern Recognition, 1991, 24(5): 391–399
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[42] |
Qian S, Chen D. Discrete gabor transform. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1993, 41(7): 2429–2438
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Zeng J, Li D, Wu Y, Zou Q, Liu X. An empirical study of features fusion techniques for protein-protein interaction prediction. Current Bioinformatics, 2016, 11(1): 4–12
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[44] |
Tipping M E. Sparse Bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2001, 1(3): 211–244
|
[45] |
Tipping M E. The relevance vector machine. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2000, 652–658
|
[46] |
Wei L, Yang Y, Nishikawa R M, Wernick M N, Edwards A. Relevance vector machine for automatic detection of clustered microcalci fications. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2005, 24(10): 1278
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[47] |
Zhou Z. Learnware: on the future of machine learning. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2016, 10(4): 589–590
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[48] |
Rong W, Peng B, Ouyang Y, Li C, Xiong Z. Structural information aware deep semi-supervised recurrent neural network for sentiment analysis. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2015, 9(2): 171–184
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[49] |
Mikolov T, Karafiat M, Burget L, Cernocký J, Khudanpur S. Recurrent neural network based language model. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. 2010, 1045–1048
|
[50] |
Gregor K, Danihelka I, Graves A, Rezende D J, Wierstra D. DRAW: a recurrent neural network for image generation. In: Proceedings of International Conference of Machine Learning. 2015, 1462–1471
|
[51] |
Sainath T N, Vinyals O, Senior A, Sak H. Convolutional, long shortterm memory, fully connected deep neural networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. 2015, 4580–4584
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[52] |
Dyer C, Ballesteros M, Ling W, Matthews A, Smith N A. Transitionbased dependency parsing with stack long short-term memory. Computer Science, 2015, 37(2): 321–332
|
[53] |
Sak H, Senior A, Beaufays F. Long short-term memory based recurrent neural network architectures for large vocabulary speech recognition. In: Proceedings of the 15 Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. 2014
|
[54] |
Li Z, Wang Y, Zhi T, Chen T. A survey of neural network accelerators. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2017, 11(5): 746–761
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[55] |
Lazib L, Qin B, Zhao Y, Zhang W, Liu T. A syntactic path-based hybrid neural network for negation scope detection. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2020, 14(1): 84–94
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[56] |
Sprinzak E, Margalit H. Correlated sequence-signatures as markers of protein-protein interaction. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2001, 11(4): 681–692
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[57] |
Bock J R, Gough D A. Predicting protein–protein interactions from primary structure. Bioinformatics, 2001, 17(5): 455–460
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[58] |
Martin S, Roe D, Faulon J L. Predicting protein–protein interactions using signature products. Bioinformatics, 2004, 21(2): 218–226
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[59] |
Benhur A, Noble W S. Kernel methods for predicting protein–protein interactions. Intelligent Systems in Molecular Biology, 2005, 21(1): 38–46
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[60] |
Chou K, Cai Y. Predicting protein-protein interactions from sequences in a hybridization space. Journal of Proteome Research, 2006, 5(2): 316–322
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[61] |
Wang Y, You Z, Li L, Cheng L, Zhou X, Zhang L, Li X, Jiang T. Predicting protein interactions using a deep learning method-stacked sparse autoencoder combined with a probabilistic classification vector machine. Complexity, 2018, 2018: 1–12
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[62] |
Sun T, Zhou B, Lai L, Pei J. Sequence-based prediction of protein protein interaction using a deep-learning algorithm. BMC Bioinformatics, 2017, 18(1): 277
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[63] |
Almagro Armenteros J J, Sønderby C K, Sønderby S K, Nielsen H, Winther O. DeepLoc: prediction of protein subcellular localization using deep learning. Bioinformatics, 2017, 33(21): 3387–3395
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[64] |
Yi H C, You Z H, Huang D S, Li X, Jiang T H, Li L P. A deep learning framework for robust and accurate prediction of ncRNA-protein interactions using evolutionary information. Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids, 2018, 11: 337–344
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[65] |
Wang Y B, You Z H, Li X, Jiang T H, Chen X, Zhou X, Wang L. Predicting protein-protein interactions from protein sequences by a stacked sparse autoencoder deep neural network. Molecular Biosystems, 2017, 13(7): 1336–1344
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[66] |
Sennrich R, Haddow B, Birch A. Neural machine translation of rare words with subword units. In: Proceedings of the 54th AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2016, 1715–1725
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[67] |
Kudo T. Subword regularization: improving neural network translation models with multiple subword candidates. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2018, 66–75
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[68] |
Kudo T, Richardson J. SentencePiece: a simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processing. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations. 2018, 66–71
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[69] |
Rebentrost P, Mohseni M, Lloyd S. Quantum support vector machine for big data classification. Physical Review Letters, 2013, 113(13): 130503
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[70] |
Crawford D, Levit A, Ghadermarzy N, Oberoi J S, Ronagh P. Reinforcement learning using quantum boltzmann machines. 2016, arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.05695
|
[71] |
Qiu D, Li L. An overview of quantum computation models: quantum automata. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2008, 2(2): 193–207
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |