SLA-driven container consolidation with usage prediction for green cloud computing

Abstract

Since service level agreement (SLA) is essentially used to maintain reliable quality of service between cloud providers and clients in cloud environment, there has been a growing effort in reducing power consumption while complying with the SLA by maximizing physical machine (PM)-level utilization and load balancing techniques in infrastructure as a service. However, with the recent introduction of container as a service by cloud providers, containers are increasingly popular and will become the major deployment model in the cloud environment and specifically in platform as a service. Therefore, reducing power consumption while complying with the SLA at virtual machine (VM)-level becomes essential. In this context, we exploit a container consolidation scheme with usage prediction to achieve the above objectives. To obtain a reliable characterization of overutilized and underutilized PMs, our scheme jointly exploits the current and predicted CPU utilization based on local history of the considered PMs in the process of the container consolidation. We demonstrate our solution through simulations on real workloads. The experimental results show that the container consolidation scheme with usage prediction reduces the power consumption, number of container migrations, and average number of active VMs while complying with the SLA.

Keywords

container consolidation / service level agreement / power consumption / usage prediction

References

[1] Buyya R, Ramamohanarao K, Leckie C, Calheiros R N, Dastjerdi A, Versteeg S. Big data analytics-enhanced cloud computing: challenges architectural elements, and future directions. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems. 2015, 75–84

[2] Zheng K, Wang X, Li L, Wang X. Joint power optimization of data center network and servers with correlation analysis. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Communication. 2014, 2598–2606

[3] Piraghaj S F, Dastjerdi A, Calheiros R N, Buyya R. A framework and algorithm for energy efficient container consolidation in cloud data centers. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Data Intensive Systems. 2015, 368–375

[4] Ma H, Wang L, Tak B, Wang L, Tang C. Auto-tuning performance of MPI parallel programs using resource management in container-based virtual cloud. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing. 2016, 545–552

[5] Li L, Tang T, Chou W. A rest service framework for fine-grained resource management in container-based cloud. In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing. 2015, 645–652

[6] Mouat A. Using Docker: Developing and Deploying Software with Containers. California: O’Reilly Media, Inc., 2015

[7] Hoenisch P, Weber I, Schulte S, Zhu L, Fekete A. Four-fold autoscaling on a contemporary deployment platform using docker containers. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing. 2015, 316–323

[8] Paraiso F, Stephanie C, Yahya A D, Merle P. Model-driven management of docker containers. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing. 2016, 718–725

[9] Affetti L, Bresciani G, Guinea S. aDock: a cloud infrastructure experimentation environment based on open stack and docker. In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing. 2015, 203–210

[10] Piraghaj S F, Dastjerdi A, Calheiros R N, Buyya R. Efficient virtual machine sizing for hosting containers as a service. In: Proceedings of IEEE World Congress on Services. 2015, 31–38

[11] Beloglazov A, Buyya R. Managing overloaded hosts for dynamic consolidation of virtual machines in cloud data centers under quality of service constraints. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2016, 24(7): 1366–1379

[12] Beloglazov A, Buyya R. Optimal online deterministic algorithms and adaptive heuristics for energy and performance efficient dynamic consolidation of virtual machines in cloud data centers. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2012, 24(13): 1397–1420

[13] Farahnakian F, Liljeberg P, Plosila J. LiRCUP: linear regression based CPU usage prediction algorithm for live migration of virtual machines in data centers. In: Proceedings of the 39th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications. 2017, 357–364

[14] Piraghaj S F, Dastjerdi A, Calheiros R N, Buyya R. Container-CloudSim: an environment for modeling and simulation of containers in cloud data centers. Software-Practice and Experience, 2017, 47(4): 505–521

[15] Bobroff N, Kochut A, Beaty K. Dynamic placement of virtual machines for managing SLA violations. In: Proceedings of the 10th IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management. 2007, 119–128

[16] Farahnakian F, Pahikkala T, Liljeberg P, Plosila J, Tenhunen H. Utilization prediction aware VM consolidation approach for green cloud computing. In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing. 2015, 381–388

[17] Chen L, Shen H. Consolidating complementary VMs with spatial/temporal-awareness in cloud datacenters. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Communication. 2014, 1033–1041

[18] Wang S, Zhou A, Hsu C, Xiao X, Yang F. Provision of data-intensive services through energy- and QoS-aware virtual machine placement in national cloud data centers. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 2016, 4(2): 290–300

[19] Liu J, Wang S, Zhou A, Xu X, Kumar S A P, Yang F. Towards band-width guaranteed virtual cluster reallocation in the cloud. The Computer Journal, 2018, 61(9): 1284–1295

[20] Liu Z, Wang S, Sun Q, Zou H, Yang F. Cost-aware cloud service request scheduling for SaaS providers. The Computer Journal, 2014, 57(2): 291–301

[21] Ghribi C. Energy efficient resource allocation in cloud computing environments. Institut National des Télécommunications, 2014

[22] Dong Z, Zhuang W, Rojas-Cessa R. Energy-aware scheduling schemes for cloud data centers on google trace data. In: Proceedings of IEEE Online Conference on Green Communications. 2014, 1–6

[23] Spicuglia S, Chen L, Birke R, Binder W. Optimizing capacity allocation for big data applications in cloud datacenters. In: Proceedings of IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management. 2015, 511–517

[24] Yaqub E, Yahyapour R, Wieder P, Jehangiri A, Lu K, Kotsokalis C. Metaheuristics-based planning and optimization for SLA-aware resource management in PaaS clouds. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing. 2014, 288–297

[25] Zhang H, Ma H, Fu G, Yang X, Jiang Z, Gao Y. Container based video surveillance cloud service with fine-grained resource provisioning. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing. 2016, 759–765

[26] Liu J, Wang S, Zhou A, Kumar S A P, Yang F, Buyya R. Using proactive fault-tolerance approach to enhance cloud service reliability. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 2018, 4: 1191–1202

[27] Ali-Eldin A, Tordsson J, Elmroth E. An adaptive hybrid elasticity controller for cloud infrastructures. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Network Operations and Management Symposium. 2012, 204–212

[28] Di S, Kondo D, Cirne W. Host load prediction in a Google compute cloud with a Bayesian model. In: Proceedings of ACM International Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis. 2012, 1–11

[29] Mao M, Humphrey M. A performance study on the VM startup time in the cloud. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing. 2012, 423–430

[30] Park K, Pai V S. CoMon: a mostly-scalable monitoring system for PlanetLab. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 2006, 40(1): 65–74

[31] Tomás L, Tordsson J. An autonomic approach to risk-aware data center overbooking. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 2014, 2(3): 292–305

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature