Instance selection method for improving graph-based semi-supervised learning
Hai WANG, Shao-Bo WANG, Yu-Feng LI
Instance selection method for improving graph-based semi-supervised learning
Graph-based semi-supervised learning is an important semi-supervised learning paradigm. Although graphbased semi-supervised learning methods have been shown to be helpful in various situations, they may adversely affect performance when using unlabeled data. In this paper, we propose a new graph-based semi-supervised learning method based on instance selection in order to reduce the chances of performance degeneration. Our basic idea is that given a set of unlabeled instances, it is not the best approach to exploit all the unlabeled instances; instead, we should exploit the unlabeled instances that are highly likely to help improve the performance, while not taking into account the ones with high risk. We develop both transductive and inductive variants of our method. Experiments on a broad range of data sets show that the chances of performance degeneration of our proposed method are much smaller than those of many state-of-the-art graph-based semi-supervised learning methods.
graph-based semi-supervised learning / performance degeneration / instance selection
[1] |
Zhou D, Bousquet O, Lal T N, Weston J, Schölkopf B. Learning with local and global consistency. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2004, 321–328
|
[2] |
Zhu X. Semi-supervised learning literature survey. Technical Report, 2007
|
[3] |
Zhu X, Goldberg A B. Introduction to semi-supervised learning. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 2009, 3(1): 1–130
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Chapelle O, Schölkopf B, Zien A. Semi-Supervised Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Blum A, Mitchell T. Combining labeled and unlabeled data with cotraining. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory. 1998, 92–100
|
[6] |
Joachims T. Transductive inference for text classification using support vector machines. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Machine Learning. 1999, 200–209
|
[7] |
Zhu X, Ghahramani Z, Lafferty J. Semi-supervised learning using Gaussian fields and harmonic functions. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Machine learning. 2003, 912–919
|
[8] |
Zhu X, Lafferty J, Rosenfeld R. Semi-supervised learning with graphs. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Pittsburgh: CarnegieMellon University, 2005
|
[9] |
Cai X F, Wen G H, Wei J, Yu Z W. Relative manifold based semisupervised dimensionality reduction. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2014, 8(6): 923–932
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Liu W, Wang J, Chang S F. Robust and scalable graph-based semisupervised learning. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2012, 100(9): 2624–2638
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Joachims T. Transductive learning via spectral graph partitioning. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Machine Learning. 2003, 290–297
|
[12] |
Zha Z J, Mei T, Wang J, Wang Z, Hua X S. Graph-based semisupervised learning with multiple labels. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 2009, 20(2): 97–103
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Camps-Valls G, Marsheva T V B, Zhou D. Semi-supervised graphbased hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2007, 45(10): 3044–3054
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Belkin M, Niyogi P. Semi-supervised learning on riemannian manifolds. Machine Learning, 2004, 56(1–3): 209–239
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Karlen M, Weston J, Erkan A, Collobert R. Large scale manifold transduction. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning. 2008, 775–782
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Wang F, Zhang C. Label propagation through linear neighborhoods. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2008, 20(1): 55–67
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Li Y F, Wang S B, Zhou Z H. Graph quality judgement: a large margin expedition. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Confernece on Artificial Intelligence. 2016, 1725–1731
|
[18] |
Li Y F, Zhou Z H. Towards making unlabeled data never hurt. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2015, 37(1): 175–188
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Li Y F, Kwok J T, Zhou Z H. Towards safe semi-supervised learning for multivariate performance measures. In: Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2016, 1816–1822
|
[20] |
Balsubramani A, Freund Y. Optimally combining classifiers using unlabeled data. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Learning Theory. 2015, 211–225
|
[21] |
Bennett K P, Demiriz A. Semi-supervised support vector machines. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems II. 1999, 368–374
|
[22] |
Li Y F, Kwok J T, Zhou Z H. Semi-supervised learning using label mean. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Machine Learning. 2009, 633–640
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Blum A, Chawla S. Learning from labeled and unlabeled data using graph mincuts. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning. 2001, 19–26
|
[24] |
Chapelle O, Weston J, Schölkopf B. Cluster kernels for semisupervised learning. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2003, 601–608
|
[25] |
Szummer M, Jaakkola T. Partially labeled classification with Markov random walks. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2002, 945–952
|
[26] |
Kemp C, Griffiths T L, Stromsten S, Tenenbaum J B. Semi-supervised learning with trees. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2004, 257–264
|
[27] |
Wang H, Wang S B, Li Y F. Instance selection method for improving graph-based semi-supervised learning. In: Proceedings of the 14th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2016, 565–573
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Jebara T, Wang J, Chang S F. Graph construction and b-matching for semi-supervised learning. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Machine Learning. 2009, 441–448
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Belkin M, Niyogi P. Laplacian eigenmaps and spectral techniques for embedding and clustering. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2002, 585–591
|
[30] |
Kuncheva L I, Whitaker C J, Shipp C A, Duin R P. Limits on the majority vote accuracy in classifier fusion. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 2003, 6(1): 22–31
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Delalleau O, Bengio Y, Roux N L. Efficient non-parametric function induction in semi-supervised learning. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 2005, 96–103
|
[32] |
Li Y F, Zhou Z H. Improving semi-supervised support vector machines through unlabeled instances selection. In: Proceedings of the 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2011, 386–391
|
[33] |
Yang Y, Nie F P, Xu D, Luo J B. Zhuang Y T, Pan Y H. A multimedia retrieval framework based on semi-supervised ranking and relevance feedback. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2012, 34(4): 723–742
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Yang Y, Ma Z G, Nie F P, Chang X J, Hauptmann A G. Multi-class active learning by uncertainty sampling with diversity maximization. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2015, 113(2): 113–127
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |