Strongly connected components based efficient computation of page rank

Hongguo YANG, Derong SHEN, Yue KOU, Tiezhen NIE, Ge YU

PDF(569 KB)
PDF(569 KB)
Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (6) : 1208-1219. DOI: 10.1007/s11704-016-6168-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Strongly connected components based efficient computation of page rank

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In this paper, an efficient page rank (PR) exact algorithm is proposed, which can improve the computation efficiency without sacrificing results accuracy. The existing exact algorithms are generally based on the original power method (PM). In order to reduce the number of I/Os required to improve efficiency, they partition the big graph into multiple smaller ones that can be totally fitted in memory. The algorithmproposed in this paper can further reduce the required number of I/Os. Instead of partitioning the graph into the general subgraphs, our algorithm partitions graph into a special kind of subgraphs: SCCs (strongly connected components), the nodes in which are reachable to each other. By exploiting the property of SCC, some theories are proposed, based on which the computation iterations can be constrained on these SCC subgraphs. Our algorithm can reduce lots of I/Os and save a large amount of computations, as well as keeping the results accuracy. In a word, our algorithm is more efficient among the existing exact algorithms. The experiments demonstrate that the algorithms proposed in this paper can make an obvious efficiency improvement and can attain high accurate results.

Keywords

page rank / strongly connected component / power method / I/Os

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hongguo YANG, Derong SHEN, Yue KOU, Tiezhen NIE, Ge YU. Strongly connected components based efficient computation of page rank. Front. Comput. Sci., 2018, 12(6): 1208‒1219 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-016-6168-0

References

[1]
Mihalcea R, Tarau P. Textrank: bringing order into texts. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2004
[2]
Page L, Brin S, Motwani R, Winograd T. The pagerank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. Stanford University Technical Report, 1999
[3]
Mitliagkas I, Borokhovich M, Dimakis A G, Caramanis C. Frogwild!: fast pagerank approximations on graph engines. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2015, 8(8): 874–885
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Avrachenkov K, Litvak N, Nemirovsky D, Osipova N. Monte carlo methods in pagerank computation: when one iteration is sufficient. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 2005, 45(2): 890–904
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Zhou Y, Liu L, Lee K, Zhang Q. Graph Twist: fast iterative graph computation with two-tier optimizations. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2015, 8(11): 1262–1273
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Gonzalez J E, Xin R S, Dave A, Crankshaw D, Franklin M J, Stoica I. Graphx: graph processing in a distributed dataflow framework. In: Proceedings of the 11th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation. 2014, 599–613
[7]
Roy A, Mihailovic I, Zwaenepoel W. X-stream: edge-centric graph processing using streaming partitions. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. 2013, 472–488
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Haveliwala T. Efficient computation of pagerank. Stanford University Technical Report, 2002
[9]
Shao B, Wang H X, Li Y T. Trinity: a distributed graph engine on a memory cloud. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 2013, 505–516
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Gonzalez J E, Low Y, Gu H, Bickson D, Guestrin C. Powergraph: distributed graph-parallel computation on natural graphs. In: Proceedings of the 10th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation. 2012, 17–30
[11]
Brinkmeier M. Distributed calculation of pagerank using strongly connected components. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Innovative Internet Community Systems. 2005, 29–40
[12]
Engström C, Silvestrov S. A componentwise pagerank algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 16th Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis International Conference with Demographics 2015 Workshop. 2015, 185–198
[13]
Xie W L, Wang G Z, Bindel D, Demers A, Gehrke J. Fast iterative graph computation with block updates. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2013, 6(14): 2014–2025
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Kyrölä A, Blelloch G, Guestrin C. Large-scale graph computation on just a PC. In: Proceedings of the 10th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation. 2012, 31–46
[15]
Kohlschütter C, Chirita P A, Nejdl W. Efficient parallel computation of pagerank. In: Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Information Retrieval. 2006, 241–252
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Kamvar S D, Haveliwala T H, Manning C D, Golub G H. Extrapolation methods for accelerating pagerank computations. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web. 2003, 261–270
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Kamvar S D, Haveliwala T H, Manning C D, Golub G H. Exploiting the block structure of the web for computing pagerank. Stanford University Technical Report, 2003
[18]
Custódio A L, Rocha H, Vicente L N. Incorporating minimum frobenius norm models in direct search. Computational Optimization and Applications, 2010, 46(2): 265–278
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Nuutila E, Soisalon-Soininen E. On finding the strongly connected components in a directed graph. Information Processing Letters, 1994, 49(1): 9–14
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(569 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/