Learning from context: a mutual reinforcement model for Chinese microblog opinion retrieval

Abstract

This study addresses the problem of Chinese microblog opinion retrieval, which aims to retrieve opinionated Chinese microblog posts relevant to a target specified by a user query. Existing studies have shown that lexicon-based approaches employed online public sentiment resources to rank sentimentwords relying on the document features. However, this approach could not be effectively applied to microblogs that have typical user-generated content with valuable contextual information: “user–user” interpersonal interactions and “user–post/comment” intrapersonal interactions. This contextual information is very helpful in estimating the strength of sentiment words more accurately. In this study, we integrate the social contextual relationships among users, posts/comments, and sentiment words into a mutual reinforcement model and propose a unified three-layer heterogeneous graph, on which a random walk sentiment word weighting algorithm is presented to measure the strength of opinion of the sentiment words. Furthermore, the weights of sentiment words are incorporated into a lexicon-based model for Chinese microblog opinion retrieval. Comparative experiments are conducted on a Chinese microblog corpus, and the results show that our proposed mutual reinforcement model achieves significant improvement over previous methods.

Keywords

opinion retrieval / sentiment words / lexicon weighting / mutual reinforcement model

References

[1] Pang B, Lee L. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Journal of Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2008, 2(1–2): 1–135

[2] Macdonald C, Ounis I, Soboroff I. Overview of the TREC-2007 blog track. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Text Retrieval Conference. 2007, 31–43

[3] Seki Y, Evans D K, Ku L W, Sun L, Chen H H, Kando N, Lin C Y. Overview of multilingual opinion analysis task at NTCIR-7. In: Proceedings of the 7th National Center for Science Information Systems Test Collections for IR Meeting on Evaluation of Information Access Technologies. 2008

[4] Tan S B, Liu K, Wang S G, Yan X, Liao X W. Overview of Chinese opinion analysis evaluation 2013. In: Proceedings of the 5th Chinese Opinion Analysis Evaluation. 2013, 5–33

[5] Li B Y, Zhou L J, Feng S, Wong K F. A unified graph model for sentence-based opinion retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2010, 1367–1375

[6] Zhang W, Yu C, Meng W Y. Opinion retrieval from blogs. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2007, 831–840

[7] Santos R L T, He B, Macdonald C, Ounis I. Integrating proximity to subjective sentences for blog opinion retrieval. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Retrieval. 2009, 325–336

[8] Jiang L, Yu M, Zhou M, Liu X H, Zhao T J. Target-dependent twitter sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2011, 151–160

[9] Wang X L, Wei F R, Liu X H, Zhou M, Zhang M. Topic sentiment analysis in twitter: a graph-based hashtag sentiment classification approach. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2011, 1031–1040

[10] Hu X, Tang J L, Gao H J, Liu H. Unsupervised sentiment analysis with emotional signals. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web. 2013, 607–618

[11] Eguchi K, Lavrenko V. Sentiment retrieval using generative models. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2006, 345–354

[12] Zhang M, Ye X Y. A generation model to unify topic relevance and lexicon-based sentiment for opinion retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2008, 411–418

[13] Huang X J, Croft W B. A unified relevance model for opinion retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2009, 947–956

[14] Luo Z C, Osborne M, Wang T. Opinion retrieval in twitter. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference onWeblogs and Social Media Conference. 2012, 507–510

[15] Mei Q Z, Ling X, Wondra M, Su H, Zhai C X. Topic sentiment mixture: modeling facets and opinions in weblogs. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web. 2007, 171–180

[16] He B, Macdonald C, He J, Ounis , I. An effective statistical approach to blog post opinion retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2008, 1063–1072

[17] Weerkamp W, Balog K, de Rijke M. A generative blog post retrieval model that uses query expansion based on external collections. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing. 2009, 1057–1065

[18] Jiang M, Cui P, Liu R, Yang Q, Wang F, Zhu W W, Yang S Q. Social contextual recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2012, 45–54

[19] Feng S, Song K S, Wang D L, Yu G. A word-emoticon mutual reinforcement ranking model for building sentiment lexicon from massive collection of microblogs. World Wide Web Journal, 2015, 18(4): 949–967

[20] Hu X, Tang L, Tang J L, Liu H. Exploiting social relations for sentiment analysis in microblogging. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 2013, 537–546

[21] Li F T, Liu N N, Jin H W, Zhao K, Yang Q, Zhu X. Incorporating reviewer and product information for review rating prediction. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2011, 1820–1825

[22] Wei F R, Li W J, Lu Q, He Y X. Applying two-level reinforcement ranking in query-oriented multidocument summarization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(10): 2119–2131

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature