Strength Pareto fitness assignment for pseudo-relevance feedback: application to MEDLINE

Ilyes KHENNAK, Habiba DRIAS

PDF(354 KB)
PDF(354 KB)
Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) : 163-176. DOI: 10.1007/s11704-016-5560-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Strength Pareto fitness assignment for pseudo-relevance feedback: application to MEDLINE

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Because of users’ growing utilization of unclear and imprecise keywords when characterizing their information need, it has become necessary to expand their original search queries with additional words that best capture their actual intent. The selection of the terms that are suitable for use as additional words is in general dependent on the degree of relatedness between each candidate expansion term and the query keywords. In this paper, we propose two criteria for evaluating the degree of relatedness between a candidate expansion word and the query keywords: (1) co-occurrence frequency, where more importance is attributed to terms occurring in the largest possible number of documents where the query keywords appear; (2) proximity, where more importance is assigned to terms having a short distance from the query terms within documents. We also employ the strength Pareto fitness assignment in order to satisfy both criteria simultaneously. The results of our numerical experiments on MEDLINE, the online medical information database, show that the proposed approach significantly enhances the retrieval performance as compared to the baseline.

Keywords

information retrieval / query expansion / pseudorelevance feedback / proximity / multi-objective optimization / Pareto dominance / MEDLINE

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ilyes KHENNAK, Habiba DRIAS. Strength Pareto fitness assignment for pseudo-relevance feedback: application to MEDLINE. Front. Comput. Sci., 2018, 12(1): 163‒176 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-016-5560-0

References

[1]
Ranganathan P. From microprocessors to nanostores: rethinking datacentric systems. IEEE Computer, 2011, 44(1): 39–48
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Zhu Y Y, Zhong N, Xiong Y. Data explosion, data nature and dataology. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Brain Informatics. 2009, 147–158
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Ntoulas A, Cho J, Olston C. What’s new on the Web?: the evolution of the Web from a search engine perspective. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web. 2004, 1–12
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Bharat K, Broder A. A technique for measuring the relative size and overlap of public web search engines. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 1998, 30(1): 379–388
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Williams H E, Zobel J. Searchable words on the Web. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 2005, 5(2): 99–105
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Eisenstein J, O’Connor B, Smith N A, Xing E P. Mapping the geographical diffusion of new words. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Social Network and Social Media Analysis: Methods, Models and Applications. 2012
[7]
Sun H M. A study of the features of internet english from the linguistic perspective. Studies in Literature and Language, 2010, 1(7): 98–103
[8]
Chen Q, Li M, Zhou M. Improving query spelling correction usingWeb search results. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning. 2007, 181–189
[9]
Subramaniam L V, Roy S, Faruquie T A, Negi S. A survey of types of text noise and techniques to handle noisy text. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Analytics for Noisy Unstructured Text Data. 2009, 115–122
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Ahmad F, Kondrak G. Learning a spelling error model from search query logs. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2005, 955–962
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Carpineto C, Romano G. A survey of automatic query expansion in information retrieval. ACM Computing Surveys, 2012, 44(1): 1–50
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Véronis J. Hyperlex: lexical cartography for information retrieval. Computer Speech & Language, 2004, 18(3): 223–252
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Bernardini A, Carpineto C, Amico M D. Full-subtopic retrieval with keyphrase-based search results clustering. In: Proceedings of IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technologies. 2009, 206–213
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Wong S K M, Ziarko W, Raghavan V V, Wong P. On modeling of information retrieval concepts in vector spaces. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1987, 12(2): 299–321
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Crestani F. Application of spreading activation techniques in information retrieval. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1997, 11(6): 453–482
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Carpineto C, Romano G. Concept Data Analysis: Theory and Applications. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2004
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Sahlgren M. An introduction to random indexing. In: Proceedings of Methods and Applications of Semantic Indexing Workshop at the 7th International Conference on Terminology and Knowledge Engineering. 2005
[18]
Melucci M. A basis for information retrieval in context. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2008, 26(3): 1–41
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Sun R, Ong C H, Chua T S. Mining dependency relations for query expansion in passage retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2006, 382–389
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Schlaefer N, Ko J, Betteridge J, Pathak M A, Nyberg E, Sautter G. Semantic extensions of the Ephyra QA system for TREC 2007. In: Proceedings of the 16th Text REtrieval Conference. 2007
[21]
Kraaij W, Nie J Y, Simard M. Embedding Web-based statistical translation models in cross-language information retrieval. Computational Linguistics, 2003, 29(3): 381–419
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Kherfi M L, Ziou D, Bernardi A. Image retrieval from the World Wide Web: issues, techniques, and systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 2004, 36(1): 35–67
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Natsev A P, Haubold A, Tešić J, Xie L X, Yan R. Semantic conceptbased query expansion and re-ranking for multimedia retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 2007, 991–1000
[24]
Arguello J, Elsas J L, Callan J, Carbonell J G. Document representation and query expansion models for blog recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. 2008, 10–18
[25]
Hidalgo J M G, de Buenaga Rodríguez M, Pérez J C C. The role of word sense disambiguation in automated text categorization. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems. 2005, 298–309
[26]
Graupmann J, Cai J, Schenkel R. Automatic query refinement using mined semantic relations. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Challenges in Web Information Retrieval and Integration. 2005, 205–213
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Kamvar M, Baluja S. The role of context in query input: using contextual signals to complete queries on mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 2007, 405–412
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Huang C C, Lin K M, Chien L F. Automatic training corpora acquisition through Web mining. In: Proceedings of IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technologies. 2005, 193–199
[29]
Perugini S, Ramakrishnan N. Interacting withWeb hierarchies. IT Professional, 2006, 8(4): 19–28
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Church K, Smyth B. Mobile content enrichment. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 2007, 112–121
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Macdonald C, Ounis I. Expertise drift and query expansion in expert search. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2007, 341–350
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Billerbeck B, Zobel J. Document expansion versus query expansion for ad-hoc retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 10th Australasian Document Computing Symposium. 2005, 34–41
[33]
Shokouhi M, Azzopardi L, Thomas P. Effective query expansion for federated search. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2009, 427–434
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Wang H, Liang Y, Fu L, Xue G R, Yu Y. Efficient query expansion for advertisement search. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2009, 51–58
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Voorhees E M. Query expansion using lexical-semantic relations. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1994, 61–69
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Collins-Thompson K, Callan J. Query expansion using random walk models. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2005, 704–711
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Liu S, Liu F, Yu C, Meng W Y. An effective approach to document retrieval via utilizing wordnet and recognizing phrases. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2004, 266–272
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Song M, Song I Y, Hu X H, Allen R B. Integration of association rules and ontologies for semantic query expansion. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 2007, 63(1): 63–75
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Gauch S, Wang J Y, Rachakonda S M. A corpus analysis approach for automatic query expansion and its extension to multiple databases. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 1999, 17(3): 250–269
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Hu J N, Deng W H, Guo J. Improving retrieval performance by global analysis. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. 2006, 703–706
[41]
Park L A, Ramamohanarao K. Query expansion using a collection dependent probabilistic latent semantic thesaurus. In: Proceedings of the 11th Pacific-Asia Conference on Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2007, 224–235
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Milne D N, Witten I H, Nichols D M. A knowledge-based search engine powered by wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2007, 445–454
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Rocchio J J. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. The SMART Retrieval System-Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, 1971, 313–323
[44]
Robertson S E, Jones K S. Relevance weighting of search terms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1976, 27(3): 129–146
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Wong W, Luk R W P, Leong H V, Ho K, Lee D L. Re-examining the effects of adding relevance information in a relevance feedback environment. Information Processing & Management, 2008, 44(3): 1086–1116
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Zhai C X, Lafferty J. Model-based feedback in the language modeling approach to information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2001, 403–410
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Lavrenko V, Croft W B. Relevance based language models. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2001, 120–127
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Khennak I, Drias H. Strength pareto fitness assignment for generating expansion features. In: Proceedings of the 3rd World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies. 2015, 133–142
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Robertson S, Zaragoza H. The Probabilistic Relevance Framework: BM25 and Beyond. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, 2009, 3(4): 333–389
[50]
Robertson S E. On term selection for query expansion. Journal of Documentation, 1990, 46(4): 359–364
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Carpineto C, De Mori R, Romano G, Bigi B. An information-theoretic approach to automatic query expansion. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2001, 19(1): 1–27
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Jurafsky D, Martin J H. Speech and Language Processing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2014

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(354 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/