ScenicPlanner: planning scenic travel routes leveraging heterogeneous user-generated digital footprints

Chao CHEN, Xia CHEN, Zhu WANG, Yasha WANG, Daqing ZHANG

PDF(1065 KB)
PDF(1065 KB)
Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 61-74. DOI: 10.1007/s11704-016-5550-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE

ScenicPlanner: planning scenic travel routes leveraging heterogeneous user-generated digital footprints

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To facilitate the travel preparation process to a city, a lot of work has been done to recommend a POI or a sequence of POIs automatically to satisfy users’ needs. However, most of the existing work ignores the issue of planning the detailed travel routes between POIs, leaving the task to online map services or commercial GPS navigators. Such a service or navigator in terms of suggesting the shortest travel distance or time, which cannot meet the diverse requirements of users. For instance, in the case of traveling by driving for leisure purpose, the scenic view along the travel routes would be of great importance to users, and a good planning service should put the sceneries of the route in higher priority rather than the distance or time taken. To this end, in this paper, we propose a novel framework called ScenicPlanner for route recommendation, leveraging a combination of geotagged image and check-in digital footprints from locationbased social networks (LBSNs). First, we enrich the road network and assign a proper scenic view score to each road segment to model the scenic road network, by extracting relevant information from geo-tagged images and check-ins. Then, we apply heuristic algorithms to iteratively add road segment and determine the travelling order of added road segments with the objective of maximizing the total scenic view score while satisfying the user-specified constraints (i.e., origin, destination and the total travel distance). Finally, to validate the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed framework, we conduct extensive experiments on three real-world data sets from the Bay Area in the city of San Francisco, which contain a road network crawled from OpenStreetMap, more than 31 000 geo-tagged images generated by 1 571 Flickr users in one year, and 110 214 check-ins left by 15 680 Foursquare users in six months.

Keywords

scenic view / travel route planning / heterogeneous / digital footprint

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chao CHEN, Xia CHEN, Zhu WANG, Yasha WANG, Daqing ZHANG. ScenicPlanner: planning scenic travel routes leveraging heterogeneous user-generated digital footprints. Front. Comput. Sci., 2017, 11(1): 61‒74 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-016-5550-2

References

[1]
Chen C, Zhang D Q, Guo B, Ma X J, Pan G, Wu Z H. Tripplanner: personalized trip planning leveraging heterogeneous crowdsourced digital footprints. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2015, 16(3): 1259–1273
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
De Choudhury M, Feldman M, Amer-Yahia S, Golbandi N, Lempel R, Yu C. Automatic construction of travel itineraries using social breadcrumbs. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermediain. 2010, 35–44
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Yu Z W, Xu H, Yang Z, Guo B. Personalized travel package with multipoint- of-interest recommendation based on crowdsourced user footprints. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 2016, 46(1): 151–158
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Vansteenwegen P, Souffriau W, Berghe G V, Van Oudheusden D. The city trip planner: an expert system for tourists. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(6): 6540–6546
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Guo B, Zhang D Q, Yu Z W, Liang Y J, Wang Z, Zhou X S. From the internet of things to embedded intelligence. World Wide Web, 2013, 16(4): 399–420
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Li X L, Pan G, Wu Z H, Qi G D, Li S J, Zhang D Q, Zhang W S, Wang Z H. Prediction of urban human mobility usinglarge-scale taxi traces and its applications. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2012, 6(1): 111–121
[7]
Zhang D Q, Guo B, Yu Z W. The emergence of social and community intelligence. Computer, 2011, 44(7): 21–28
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Cheng Z Y, Caverlee J, Lee K, Sui D Z. Exploring millions of footprints in location sharing services. ICWSM, 2011, 2011: 81–88
[9]
Scellato S, Noulas A, Mascolo C. Exploiting place features in link prediction on location-based social networks. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2011, 1046–1054
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Zheng Y T, Zha Z J, Chua T S. Mining travel patterns from geotagged photos. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 2012, 3(3): 56
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Kurashima T, Iwata T, Irie G, and Fujimura K. Travel route recommendation using geotags in photo sharing sites. In: Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2010, 579–588
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Alivand M, Hochmair H, Srinivasan S. Analyzing how travelers choose scenic routes using route choice models. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2015, 50: 41–52
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Alivand M, Hochmair H. Extracting scenic routes from vgi data sources. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Crowdsourced and Volunteered Geographic Information. 2013, 23–30
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Wolsey L A. Integer Programming. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1998
[15]
Jolliffe I. Principal Component Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2002
[16]
Zheng Y T, Yan S C, Zha Z J, Li Y Q, Zhou X D, Chua T S, Jain R. GPSView: a scenic driving route planner. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), 2013, 9(1): 3
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Lew A, Mauch H. Dynamic Programming: A Computational Tool. Berlin: Springer, 2006
[18]
Simon I, Snavely N, Seitz S M. Scene summarization for online image collections. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2007, 1–8
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Papadopoulos S, Zigkolis C, Kompatsiaris Y, Vakali A. Cluster-based landmark and event detection for tagged photo collections. IEEE MultiMedia, 2011, 18(1): 52–63
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Yang Y Y, Gong Z G. Identifying points of interest by self-tuning clustering. In: Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2011, 883–892
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Jin X, Gallagher A, Cao L L, Luo J B, Han J W. The wisdom of social multimedia: using flickr for prediction and forecast. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 2010, 1235–1244
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Abbasi R, Chernov S, Nejdl W, Paiu R, Staab S. Exploiting flickr tags and groups for finding landmark photos. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Information Retrieval. 2009, 654–661
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Lee I, Cai G C, Lee K. Exploration of geo-tagged photos through data mining approaches. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41(2): 397–405
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Lu X, Wang C H, Yang J M, Pang Y W, Zhang L. Photo2trip: generating travel routes from geo-tagged photos for trip planning. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 2010, 143–152
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Kurashima T, Iwata T, Hoshide T, Takaya N, Fujimura K. Geo topic model: joint modeling of user’s activity area and interests for location recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 2013, 375–384
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Wang H, Terrovitis M, Mamoulis N. Location recommendation in location-based social networks using user check-in data. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 2013, 374–383
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Hsieh H P, Li C T, Lin S D. Exploiting large-scale check-in data to recommend time-sensitive routes. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD International Workshop on Urban Computing, 2012, 55–62
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Dehne F, Omran M T, Sack J R. Shortest paths in time-dependent fifo networks using edge load forecasts. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Computational Transportation Science. 2009, 1–6
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Hochmair H. Towards a classification of route selection criteria for route planning tools. In: Fisher P F, ed. Developments in Spatial Data Handling. Springer, 2005, 481–492
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Fawcett J, Robinson P. Adaptive routing for road traffic. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 2005, 20(3): 46–53
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Sharker M H, Karimi H A, Zgibor J C. Health-optimal routing in pedestrian navigation services. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Use of GIS in Public Health. 2012, 1–10
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Quercia D, Schifanella R, Aiello L M. The shortest path to happiness: Recommending beautiful, quiet, and happy routes in the city. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM conference on Hypertext and Social Media. 2014, 116–125
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Kim J, Cha M, Sandholm T. Socroutes: safe routes based on tweet sentiments. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on World Wide Web. 2014, 179–182
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Galbrun E, Pelechrinis K, Terzi E. Urban navigation beyond shortest route: the case of safe paths. Information Systems, 2016, 57: 160–171
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2016 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1065 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/