Local structured representation for generic object detection
Junge ZHANG, Kaiqi HUANG, Tieniu TAN, Zhaoxiang ZHANG
Local structured representation for generic object detection
Structure information plays an important role in both object recognition and detection. This paper studies what visual structure is and addresses the problem of structure modeling and representation from two aspects: visual feature and topology model. Firstly, at feature level, we propose Local Structured Descriptor to capture the object’s local structure effectively, and develop the descriptors from shape and texture information, respectively. Secondly, at topology level, we present a local structured model with a boosted feature selection and fusion scheme. All experiments are conducted on the challenging PASCAL Visual Object Classes (VOC) datasets from VOC2007 to VOC2010. Experimental results show that our method achieves very competitive performance.
Local Structured Descriptor / Local Structured Model / Object Representation / Object Structure / Object Detection / PASCAL VOC
[1] |
AlexeB, Deselaers T, FerrariV . Measuring the objectness of image windows. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2012, 34(11): 2189–2202
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
ChengM M, ZhangZ, LinW Y, Torr P. Bing: binarized normed gradients for objectness estimation at 300fps. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2014, 3286–3293
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
ZitnickC, Dollár P. Edge boxes: locating object proposals from edges. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision. 2014, 391–405
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
YaoC, BaiX, LiuW. A unified framework for multioriented text detection and recognition. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2014, 23(11): 4737–4749
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
ZhuY, YaoC, BaiX. Scene text detection and recognition: recent advances and future trends. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2016, 10(1): 19–36
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
DalalN, TriggsB. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2005, 886–893
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
VedaldiA, Gulshan V, VarmaM , ZissermanA. Multiple kernels for object detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2009, 606–613
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
WangX, HanT X, YanS. An HOG-LBP human detector with partial occlusion handling. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2009, 32–39
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
FelzenszwalbP, Girshick R, McAllesterD , RamananD. Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2010, 32(9): 1627–1645
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
FergusR, PeronaP, ZissermanA. Object class recognition by unsupervised scale-invariant learning. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2003, 264–271
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
SchnitzspanP, RothS, SchieleB. Automatic discovery of meaningful object parts with latent CRFs. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2010, 121–128
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
YangY, Ramanan D. Articulated pose estimation with flexible mixtures-of-parts. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2011, 1385–1392
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
ZhuL, ChenY, YuilleA L, Freeman W T. Latent hierarchical structural learning for object detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2010, 1062–1069
|
[14] |
FischlerM, Elschlager R. The representation and matching of pictorial structures. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 1973, 22(1): 67–92
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
OjalaT, Pietikäinen M, HarwoodD . A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions. Pattern Recognition, 1996, 29(1): 51–59
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
LoweD G.Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2004, 60(2): 91–110
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
MarkE, GoolL, WilliamsC K , WinnJ, Zisserman A. The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2010, 88(2): 303–338
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
ZhangJ, HuangK, YuY, TanT. Boosted local structured HOG-LBP for object localization. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2011, 1393–1400
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Papageorgiou, C, Poggio T. A trainable system for object detection.International Journal of Computer Vision, 2000, 38(1): 15–33
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
ViolaP, JonesM J. Robust real-time face detection. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2004, 57(2): 137–154
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
LeeT S. Image representation using 2D gabor wavelets. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1996, 18(10): 959–971
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
ShechtmanE, IraniM. Matching local self-similarities across images and videos. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2007, 1–8
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
FerrariV, Fevrier L, JurieF , SchmidC. Groups of adjacent contour segments for object detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2008, 30(1): 36–51
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
BaiX, BaiS, ZhuZ, Latecki L J. 3D shape matching via two layer coding. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2015, 37(12): 2361–2373
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
LazebnikS, SchmidC, PonceJ. Beyond bags of features: spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2006, 2169–2178
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
SivicJ, Russell B, EfrosA , ZissermanA, Freeman W. Discovering objects and their location in images. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2005, 370–377
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
FelzenszwalbP F, Huttenlocher D P. Distance transforms of sampled functions. Theory of Computing, 2012, 8(1): 415–428
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
EsteparR S J. Local Structure tensor for multidimensional signal processing: applications to medical image analysis. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Valladolid:University of Valladolid, 2005
|
[29] |
MorroneC, BurrD. Feature detection in human vision: a phasedependent energy model. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 1988, 221–245
|
[30] |
VenkateshS, OwensR. On the classification of image features. Pattern Recognition Letters, 1990, 11(5): 339–349
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
GranlundG H, Knutsson H. Signal Processing for Computer Vision. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
OlivaA, Torralba A. Modeling the shape of the scene: a holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2001, 42(3): 145–175
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
OjalaT, Pietikainen M, MaenpaaT . Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2002, 24(7): 971–987
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
VarmaM, BabuB R. More generality in efficient multiple kernel learning. In: Proceedings of International Conference onMachine Learning. 2009, 1065–1072
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
FriedmanJ, HastieT, TibshiraniR . Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting. Annuals of Statistics, 2000, 28(2): 374–376
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
HussainS, TriggsB. Feature sets and dimensionality reduction for visual object detection. In: Proceedings of British Machine Vision Conference. 2010
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
FelzenszwalbP F, Girshick R B, McAllesterD . Discriminatively Trained Deformable Part Models, Release 3
|
[38] |
Felzenszwalb, P F, Girshick R B, McAllesterD . Discriminatively Trained Deformable Part Models, Release 4, 2010
|
[39] |
GehlerP, Nowozin S. On feature combination for multiclass object classification. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2009, 221–228
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
TorralbaA, MurphyK, FreemanW. Sharing features: efficient boosting procedures for multiclass object detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2004, 762–769
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[41] |
EveringhamM, GoolV L, WilliamsC K I , WinnJ, Zisserman A. Empirical analysis of detection cascades of boosted classifiers for rapid object detection. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2003, 2781: 297–304
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[42] |
EveringhamM, GoolV L, WilliamsC K I , WinnJ, Zisserman A. The PASCAL visual object classes challenge 2007 (VOC2007) results. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2010, 88(2): 303–338
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
DesaiC, Ramanan D, FowlkesC . Discriminative models for multiclass object layout. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2009, 229–236
|
[44] |
PedersoliM, Vedaldi A, GonzalezJ . A coarse-to-fine approach for fast deformable object detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2011, 1353–1360
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[45] |
RazaviN, GallJ, GoolV L. Scalable multi-class object detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2011, 1505–1512
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[46] |
DivvalaS K, Zitnick C, KapoorA , BakerS. Detecting objects using unsupervised parts-based attributes. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-11- 10, Robotics Institute. 2010
|
[47] |
SchnitzspanP, FritzM, RothS, Schiele B. Discriminative structure learning of hierarchical representations for object detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2009, 2238–2245
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[48] |
MalisiewiczT, GuptaA, EfrosA A. Ensemble of exemplar-svms for object detection and beyond. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2011, 89–96
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[49] |
DuboutC, Fleuret F. Deformable part models with individual part scaling. In: Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference. 2013
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[50] |
GidarisS, Komodakis N. Object detection via a multi-region and semantic segmentation-aware cnn model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2015, 1134–1142
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[51] |
GirshickR. Fast r-cnn. 2015, arXiv:1504.08083
|
[52] |
GirshickR, Donahue J, DarrellT , MalikJ. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2014, 580–587
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[53] |
HeK, ZhangX, RenS, Sun J. Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision. 2014, 346–361
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[54] |
LiangX, LiuS, WeiY, Liu L, LinL , YanS. Computational baby learning. 2014, arXiv:1411.2861
|
[55] |
RenS, HeK, GirshickR, Sun J. Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. 2015, arXiv:1506.01497
|
[56] |
RenS, HeK, GirshickR, Zhang X, SunJ . Object detection networks on convolutional feature maps. 2015, arXiv:1504.06066
|
[57] |
RenW, HuangK, Tao D, Tan T. Weakly supervised large scale object localization with multiple instance learning and bag splitting. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2016, 32(2): 405–416
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[58] |
WanL, EigenD, FergusR. End-to-end integration of a convolutional network, deformable parts model and non-maximum suppression. 2014, arXiv:1411.5309
|
[59] |
WangC, HuangK, RenW, Zhang J, MaybankS . Large-scale weakly supervised object localization via latent category learning. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2015, 24(4): 1371–1385
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[60] |
ZhangY, SohnK, VillegasR, Pan G, LeeH . Improving object detection with deep convolutional networks via Bayesian optimization and structured prediction. 2015, arXiv:1504.03293
|
[61] |
ZhuY, Urtasun R, SalakhutdinovR , FidlerS. segDeepM: exploiting segmentation and context in deep neural networks for object detection. 2015, arXiv:1502.04275
|
[62] |
SongX, WuT, JiaY, Zhu S C. Discriminatively trained and-or tree models for object detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2013, 23–28
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[63] |
WangX, LinL, HuangL, Yan S. Incorporating structural alternatives and sharing into hierarchy for multiclass object recognition and detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2013, 3334–3341
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[64] |
MarkE, GoolV L, WilliamsC K I , WinnJ, Zisserman A. The PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge 2008 (VOC2008) Results. Technical Report. 2008
|
[65] |
ChenY, ZhuL, YuilleA. Active mask hierarchies for object detection. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision. 2010, 43–56
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[66] |
OttP, Everingham M. Shared parts for deformable part-based models. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2011, 1513–1520
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[67] |
ZhangJ, HuangY, HuangK, Wu Z, TanT . Data decomposition and spatial mixture modeling for part based model. In: Proceedings of Asian Conference on Computer Vision. 2012, 123–137
|
/
〈 | 〉 |