String similarity join with different similarity thresholds based on novel indexing techniques

Chuitian RONG, Yasin N. SILVA, Chunqing LI

PDF(741 KB)
PDF(741 KB)
Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2) : 307-319. DOI: 10.1007/s11704-016-5231-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE

String similarity join with different similarity thresholds based on novel indexing techniques

Author information +
History +

Abstract

String similarity join is an essential operation of many applications that need to find all similar string pairs from two given collections. A quantitative way to determine whether two strings are similar is to compute their similarity based on a certain similarity function. The string pairs with similarity above a certain threshold are regarded as results. The current approach to solving the similarity join problem is to use a unique threshold value. There are, however, several scenarios that require the support of multiple thresholds, for instance, when the dataset includes strings of various lengths. In this scenario, longer string pairs typically tolerate much more typos than shorter ones. Therefore, we proposed a solution for string similarity joins that supports different similarity thresholds in a single operator. In order to support different thresholds, we devised two novel indexing techniques: partition based indexing and similarity aware indexing. To utilize the new indices and improve the join performance, we proposed new filtering methods and index probing techniques. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that addresses this problem. Experimental results on real-world datasets show that our solution performs efficiently while providing a more flexible threshold specification.

Keywords

similarity join / similarity aware index / similarity thresholds

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chuitian RONG, Yasin N. SILVA, Chunqing LI. String similarity join with different similarity thresholds based on novel indexing techniques. Front. Comput. Sci., 2017, 11(2): 307‒319 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-016-5231-1

References

[1]
Monge A, Elkan C. The field matching problem: algorithms and applications. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 1996, 267–270
[2]
Zhang Z J, Hadjieleftheriou M, Ooi B, Srivastava D. Bed-tree: an allpurpose index structure for string similarity search based on edit distance. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 2010, 915–926
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Lu W, Du X Y, Hadjieleftheriou M, Ooi B C. Efficiently supporting edit distance based string similarity search using b+-trees. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2014, 26(12): 2983–2996
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Wang J N, Feng J H, Li G L. Trie-join: efficient trie-based string similarity joins with edit-distance constraints. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2010, 3(1–2): 1219–1230
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Sarawagi S, Kirpal A. Efficient set joins on similarity predicates. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 2004, 743–754
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Chaudhuri S, Ganti V, Kaushik R. A primitive operator for similarity joins in data cleaning. In: Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering. 2006, 61–72
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Bayardo R, Ma Y, Srikant R. Scaling up all pairs similarity search. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference onWorldWide Web. 2007, 131–140
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Xiao C, Wang W, Lin X M, Yu J. Efficient similarity joins for near duplicate detection. In: Proceedings of ACM International Conference on World Wide Web. 2008, 563–574
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Hernández M, Stolfo S. The merge/purge problem for large databases. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 1995, 127–138
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Winkler W E. The state of record linkage and current research problems. Technical Report, Statistical Research Division, U.S. Census Bureau. 1999
[11]
Sivic J, Zisserman A. Video google: a text retrieval approach to object matching in videos. 2003, 1470–1477
[12]
Dong X, Halevy A, Madhavan J. Reference reconciliation in complex information spaces. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 2005, 85–96
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Sarawagi S, Bhamidipaty A. Interactive deduplication using active learning. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2002, 269–278
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Arasu A, Ré C, Suciu D. Large-scale deduplication with constraints using dedupalog. In: Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering. 2009, 952–963
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Gravano L, Ipeirotis P G, Jagadish H V, Koudas N, Muthukrishnan S, Srivastava D. Approximate string joins in a database (almost) for free. In: Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment. 2001, 491–500
[16]
Elmagarmid A K, Ipeirotis P G, Verykios V S. Duplicate record detection: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2007, 19(1): 1–16
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Naumann F, Herschel M. An Introduction to duplicate detection. Synthesis Lectures on Data Management, 2010, 2(1): 1–87
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Jiang Y, Li G L, Feng J H, Li W S. String similarity joins: an experimental evaluation. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2014, 7(8): 625–636
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Chaudhuri S, Kaushik R. Extending autocompletion to tolerate errors. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 2009, 707–718
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Deng D, Li G L, Feng J H. A pivotal prefix based filtering algorithm for string similarity search. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 2014, 673–684
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Wang J N, Li G L, Feng J H. Can we beat the prefix filtering?: an adaptive framework for similarity join and search. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 2012, 85–96
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Rong C T, Lu W, Wang X L, Du X Y, Chen Y G, Tung A K H. Efficient and scalable processing of string similarity join. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2013, 25(10): 2217–2230
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Lu J H, Lin C B, Wang W, Li C, Wang H Y. String similarity measures and joins with synonyms. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 2013, 373–384
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Li G L, He J, Deng D, Li J. Efficient similarity join and search on multi-attribute data. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 2015, 1137–1151
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Salton G, McGill M J. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1986
[26]
Witten I H, Moffat A, Bell T C. Managing Gigabytes: Compressing and Indexing Documents and Images. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1999

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2016 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(741 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/