Tenant-based access control model for multi-tenancy and sub-tenancy architecture in Software-as-a-Service

Abstract

Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) introduces multitenancy architecture (MTA). Sub-tenancy architecture (STA), is an extension of MTA, allows tenants to offer services for subtenant developers to customize their applications in the SaaS infrastructure. In a STA system, tenants can create subtenants, and grant their resources (including private services and data) to their subtenants. The isolation and sharing relations between parent-child tenants, sibling tenants or two non-related tenants are more complicated than those between tenants in MTA. It is important to keep service components or data private, and at the same time, allow them to be shared, and support application customizations for tenants. To address this problem, this paper provides a formal definition of a new tenant-based access control model based on administrative role-based access control (ARBAC) forMTA and STA in service-oriented SaaS (called TMS-ARBAC). Autonomous areas (AA) and AA-tree are proposed to describe the autonomy of tenants, including their isolation and sharing relationships. Authorization operations on AA and different resource sharing strategies are defined to create and deploy the access control scheme in STA models. TMS-ARBAC model is applied to design a geographic e-Science platform.

Keywords

Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) / multi-tenancy architecture (MTA) / sub-tenancy architecture (STA) / rolebased access control (RBAC) model / tenant-based access control model

References

[1] TsaiW T, ZhongP.Multi-tenancy and sub-tenancy architecture in Software-as-a-Service (SaaS). In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Symposium on Service Oriented System Engineering. 2014, 128–139

[2] SandhuR S, CoyneE J, FeinsteinH, Youman C. Role-based access control models. IEEE Computer, 1996, 29(2): 38–47

[3] SandhuR, Bhamidipati V, MunawerQ . The ARBAC97 model for rolebased administration of roles. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 1999, 2(1): 105–135

[4] YaishH, GoyalM. Multi-tenant database access control. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering. 2013, 870–877

[5] ZhongH, WangW, YanG, Lei Y. A role-based hierarchical administrative model. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering. 2009, 1–4

[6] BienN H, ThuT D. Hierarchical multi-tenant pattern. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computing, Management and Telecommunications. 2014, 157–164

[7] LiD, LiuC, WeiQ, Liu Z, LiuB . RBAC-based access control for SaaS systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Engineering and Computer Science. 2010, 1–4

[8] LiD, LiuC, LiuB. H-RBAC: a hierarchical access control model for SaaS systems. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 2011, 3(5): 47–53

[9] CaoJ, LiP, ZhuQ, Qian P. A tenant-based access control model TArbac. Computer Science and Application, 2013, 3: 173–179

[10] XiaL, JingJ. An administrative model for role-based access control using hierarchical namespace. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2007, 44(12): 2020–2027

[11] TangB, SandhuR, LiQ. Multi-tenancy authorization models for collaborative cloud services. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems. 2013, 132–138

[12] TangB, LiQ, SandhuR. A multi-tenant RBAC model for collaborative cloud services. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust. 2013, 229–238

[13] WangB, HuangH, LiuX, Xu J. Open identity management framework for SaaS ecosystem. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering. 2009, 512–517

[14] TsaiW T, HuangY, ShaoQ H. EasySaaS: a SaaS development framework. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Service- Oriented Computing and Applications. 2011, 1–4

[15] MasoodR, ShibliM A, GhaziY, Kanwal A, AliA . Cloud authorization: exploring techniques and approach towards effective access control framework. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2015, 9(2): 297–321

[16] KrebsR, MommC, KounevS. Architectural concerns in multi-tenant SaaS applications. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Cloud Computing and Service Science. 2012, 426–431

[17] MaenhautP J, MoensH, DecatM, Bogaerts J, LagaisseB , JoosenW, Ongenae V, De TruckF . Characterizing the performance of tenant data management in multi-tenant cloud authorization systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium. 2014, 1–8

[18] WeissmanC D, Bobrowski S. The design of the Force.com multitenant Internet application development platform. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 2009, 889–896

[19] WeiS, YenI L, ThuraisinghamB , BertinodE. Security-aware service composition with fine-grained information flow control. IEEE Transactions on Service Computing, 2013, 6(3): 330–343

[20] GongL, QianX L. The complexity and composability of security interoperation. In: Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy. 1994, 190–200

[21] GongL, QianX L. Cumputational issues in secure interoperation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1996, 22(1): 43–52

[22] ShafiqB, JoshiJ B D, BertinoE, Ghafoor A. Secure interoperation in a multi-domain environment employing RBAC policies. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2005, 17(11): 1557–1577

[23] LampsonB W. Protection. ACM Operating Systems Review, 1974, 8(1): 18–24

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2016 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg