Adaptive and scalable load balancing for metadata server cluster in cloud-scale file systems

Quanqing XU , Rajesh Vellore ARUMUGAM , Khai Leong YONG , Yonggang WEN , Yew-Soon ONG , Weiya XI

Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2015, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (6) : 904 -918.

PDF (923KB)
Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2015, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (6) : 904 -918. DOI: 10.1007/s11704-015-4560-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Adaptive and scalable load balancing for metadata server cluster in cloud-scale file systems

Author information +
History +
PDF (923KB)

Abstract

Big data is an emerging term in the storage industry, and it is data analytics on big storage, i.e., Cloud-scale storage. In Cloud-scale (or EB-scale) file systems, load balancing in request workloads across a metadata server cluster is critical for avoiding performance bottlenecks and improving quality of services.Many good approaches have been proposed for load balancing in distributed file systems. Some of them pay attention to global namespace balancing, making metadata distribution across metadata servers as uniform as possible. However, they do not work well in skew request distributions, which impair load balancing but simultaneously increase the effectiveness of caching and replication. In this paper, we propose Cloud Cache (C2), an adaptive and scalable load balancing scheme for metadata server cluster in EB-scale file systems. It combines adaptive cache diffusion and replication scheme to cope with the request load balancing problem, and it can be integrated into existing distributed metadata management approaches to efficiently improve their load balancing performance. C2 runs as follows: 1) to run adaptive cache diffusion first, if a node is overloaded, loadshedding will be used; otherwise, load-stealing will be used; and 2) to run adaptive replication scheme second, if there is a very popular metadata item (or at least two items) causing a node be overloaded, adaptive replication scheme will be used, in which the very popular item is not split into several nodes using adaptive cache diffusion because of its knapsack property. By conducting performance evaluation in trace-driven simulations, experimental results demonstrate the efficiency and scalability of C2.

Keywords

metadata management / load balancing / adaptive cache diffusion / adaptive replication / cloud-scale file systems

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Quanqing XU, Rajesh Vellore ARUMUGAM, Khai Leong YONG, Yonggang WEN, Yew-Soon ONG, Weiya XI. Adaptive and scalable load balancing for metadata server cluster in cloud-scale file systems. Front. Comput. Sci., 2015, 9(6): 904-918 DOI:10.1007/s11704-015-4560-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Raicu I, Foster I, Beckman P. Making a case for distributed file systems at exascale. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Large-scale System and Application Performance. 2011, 11−18

[2]

Amer A, Long D, and Schwarz T. Reliability challenges for storing exabytes. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications. 2014, 907−913

[3]

Ousterhout J K, Costa H D, Harrison D, Kunze J A, Kupfer M D, Thompson J G. A trace-driven analysis of the UNIX 4.2 BSD file system. In: Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. 1985, 15−24

[4]

Zhu Y, Jiang H, Wang J, Xian F. HBA: Distributed metadata management for large cluster-based storage systems. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2008, 19(6): 750−763

[5]

Hua Y, Zhu Y, Jiang H, Feng D, Tian L. Supporting scalable and adaptive metadata management in ultralarge-scale file systems. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2011, 22(4): 580−593

[6]

Welch B, Unangst M, Abbasi Z, Gibson G A, Mueller B, Small J, Zelenka J, Zhou B. Scalable performance of the panasas parallel file system. In: Proceedings of the 6th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies. 2008, 17−33

[7]

Xu Q, Arumugam R V, Yang K L, Mahadevan S. DROP: Facilitating distributed metadata management in EB-scale storage systems. In: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies. 2013, 1−10

[8]

Chen Z, Xiong J, Meng D. Replication-based highly available metadata management for cluster file systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing. 2010, 292−301

[9]

Wendell P, Freedman M J. Going viral: flash crowds in an open CDN. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement. 2011, 549−558

[10]

Fan B, Lim H, Andersen D G, Kaminsky M. Small cache, big effect: provable load balancing for randomly partitioned cluster services. In: Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing. 2011, 26−28

[11]

Xu Q, Arumugam R V, Yong K L, Wen Y, Ong Y S. C2: Adaptive load balancing for metadata server cluster in cloud-scale storage systems. In: Proceedings of the 18th Asia Pacific Symposium on Intelligent and Evolutionary Systems. 2015, 195−209

[12]

Kavalanekar S, Worthington B L, Zhang Q, Sharda V. Characterization of storage workload traces from production windows servers. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization. 2008, 119−128

[13]

Ellard D, Ledlie J, Malkani P, Seltzer MI. Passive NFS tracing of email and research workloads. In: Proceedings of USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies. 2003, 203−216

[14]

Stoica I, Morris R, Karger D R, Kaashoek MF, Balakrishnan H. Chord: a scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2001, 31(4): 149−160

[15]

Ledlie J, Seltzer M I. Distributed, secure load balancing with skew, heterogeneity and churn. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications. 2005, 1419−1430

[16]

Andersen D G, Franklin J, Kaminsky M, Phanishayee A, Tan L, Vasudevan V. FAWN: a fast array of wimpy nodes. In: Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. 2009, 1−14

[17]

O’Neil P E, Cheng E, Gawlick D, O’Neil E J. The log-structured merge-tree (LSM-tree). Acta Informatica, 1996, 33(4): 351−385

[18]

Chang F, Dean J, Ghemawat S, Hsieh W C, Wallach D A, Burrows M, Chandra T, Fikes A, Gruber R. Bigtable: A distributed storage system for structured data. In: Proceedings of USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation. 2006, 205−218

[19]

Shetty P, Spillane R P, Malpani R, Andrews B, Seyster J, Zadok E. Building workload-independent storage with VT-trees. In: Proceedings of USENIX conference on File and Storage Technologies. 2013, 17−30

[20]

Wang P, Sun G, Jiang S, Ouyang J, Lin S, Zhang C, Cong J. An efficient design and implementation of LSM-tree based key-value store on open-channel SSD. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Systems. 2014, 13−16

[21]

Sivasubramanian S, Pierre G, Steen M, Alonso G. Analysis of caching and replication strategies for web applications. IEEE Internet Computing, 2007, 11(1): 60−66

[22]

Gummadi P K, Dunn R J, Saroiu S, Gribble S D, Levy H M, Zahorjan J. Measurement, modeling, and analysis of a peer-to-peer file-sharing workload. In: Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. 2003, 314−329

[23]

Khuller S, Kim Y A, Wan Y J. Algorithms for data migration with cloning. In: Proceedings of ACM on Principles of Database Systems. 2003, 27−36

[24]

Fan L, Cao P, Almeida J M, Broder A Z. Summary cache: a scalable wide-area web cache sharing protocol. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2000, 8(3): 281−293

[25]

Bykov S, Geller A, Kliot G, Larus J R, Pandya R, Thelin J. Orleans: cloud computing for everyone. In: Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing. 2011, 1−14

[26]

Xu Q, Arumugam R, Yong K L, Mahadevan S. Efficient and scalable metadata management in EB-scale file systems. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2014, 25(11): 2840−2850

[27]

Ratnasamy S, Handley M, Karp R M, Shenker S. Topologically-aware overlay construction and server selection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications. 2002, 1190−1199

[28]

Renesse R, Schneider F B. Chain replication for supporting high throughput and availability. In: Proceedings of USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation. 2004, 91−104

[29]

Moritz R H, Williams R C. A coin-tossing problem and some related combinatorics. Mathematics Magazine, 1988, 61(1): 24−29

[30]

Berenbrink P, Brinkmann A, Friedetzky T, Meister D, Nagel L. Distributing storage in cloud environments. In: Proceedings of the 27th IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing, Workshops and PhD Forum. 2013, 963−973

[31]

Berenbrink P, Brinkmann A, Friedetzky T, Nagel L. Balls into nonuniform bins. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 2014, 74(2): 2065−2076

[32]

Aho A V, Lam M S, Sethi R, Ullman J. Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 2006

[33]

Hua Y, Jiang H, Zhu Y, Feng D, Tian L. Smartstore: a new metadata organization paradigm with semantic-awareness for next-generation file systems. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Conference on High Performance Computing Networking, Storage and Analysis. 2009, 1−12

[34]

Godfrey B, Lakshminarayanan K, Surana S, Karp R M, Stoica I. Load balancing in dynamic structured P2P systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications. 2004, 2253−2262

[35]

Karger D R, Ruhl M. Simple efficient load balancing algorithms for peer-to-peer systems. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures. 2004, 36−43

[36]

Naor M, Wieder U. Novel architectures for P2P applications: the continuous-discrete approach. ACM Transactions on Algorithms, 2007, 3(3): 1−37

[37]

You G, Hwang S, Jain N. Scalable load balancing in cluster storage systems. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Middleware Conference on International Federation for Information Processing. 2011, 101−122

[38]

Annapureddy S, Freedman MJ, Mazières D. Shark: scaling file servers via cooperative caching. In: Proceedings of the 2nd USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation. 2005, 129−142

[39]

Batsakis A, Burns R C. NFS-CD: write-enabled cooperative caching in NFS. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2008, 19(3): 323−333

[40]

Yadgar G, Factor M, Schuster A. Cooperative caching with return on investment. In: Proceedings of the 29th IEEE Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies. 2013, 1−13

[41]

Ramaswamy L, Liu L, Iyengar A. Cache clouds: cooperative caching of dynamic documents in edge networks. In: Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. 2005, 229−238

[42]

Xu Q, Shen H T, Chen Z, Cui B, Zhou X, Dai Y. Hybrid information retrieval policies based on cooperative cache in mobile P2P networks. Frontiers of Computer Science in China, 2009, 3(3): 381−395

[43]

Dabek F, Kaashoek M F, Karger D R, Morris R, Stoica I. Wide-area cooperative storage with CFS. In: Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. 2001, 202−215

[44]

Ramasubramanian V, Sirer E G. Beehive: O(1) lookup performance for power-law query distributions in peer-to-peer overlays. In: Proceedings of USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation. 2004, 99−112

[45]

Gopalakrishnan V, Silaghi B D, Bhattacharjee B, Keleher P J. Adaptive replication in peer-to-peer systems. In: Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. 2004, 360−369

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (923KB)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Material-Highlights in 3-page ppt

1239

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/