A three-way incremental-learning algorithm for radar emitter identification

Abstract

Radar emitter identification has been recognized as an indispensable task for electronic intelligence system. With the increasingly accumulated radar emitter intelligence and information, one key issue is to rebuild the radar emitter classifier efficiently with the newly-arrived information. Although existing incremental learning algorithms are superior in saving significant computational cost by incremental learning on continuously increasing training samples, they are not adaptable enough yet when emitter types, features and samples are increasing dramatically. For instance, the intra-pulse characters of emitter signals could be further extracted and thus expand the feature dimension. The same goes for the radar emitter type dimension when samples from new radar emitter types are gathered. In addition, existing incremental classifiers are still problematic in terms of computational cost, sensitivity to data input order, and difficulty in multiemitter type identification. To address the above problems, we bring forward a three-way incremental learning algorithm (TILA) for radar emitter identification which is adaptable for the increase in emitter features, types and samples.

Keywords

radar emitter identification / incremental learning / classification / data mining

References

[1] Zhou Z H, Chen Z Q. Hybrid decision tree. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2002, 15(8): 515–528

[2] Domingos P, Hulten G. A general framework for mining massive data streams. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 2003, 12(14): 945–949

[3] Masud M M, Chen Q, Khan L, Aggarwal C C, Gao J, Han J, Srivastava A, Oza N C. Classification and adaptive novel class detection of feature-evolving data streams. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2013, 25(7): 1484–1497

[4] Bordes A, Bottou L. The huller: a simple and efficient online SVM. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, 3720: 505–512

[5] Barak O, Rigotti M. A simple derivation of a bound on the rerceptron margin using singular value decomposition. Neural Computation, 2011, 23(8): 1935–1943

[6] Zhang T. Solving large scale linear prediction problems using stochastic gradient descent algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conferenc on Machine Learning. 2004, 919–926

[7] Shalev-Shwartz S, Singer Y, Srebro N, Cotter A. Pegasos: primal estimated sub-gradient solver for SVM. Mathematical Programming, 2011, 127(1): 3–30

[8] Li Y, Long P M. The relaxed online maximum margin algorithm. Machine Learning, 2002, 46: 1–3

[9] Hulten G, Spencer L, Domingos P. Mining time-changing data streams. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2001, 97–106

[10] Carpenter G A, Grossberg S, Markuzon N, Reynolds J H, Rosen D B. Fuzzy ARTMAP: a neural network architecture for incremental supervised learning of analog multidimensional maps. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1991, 3(5): 698–713

[11] Polikar R, Udpa L, Udpa S S, Honavar V. Learn++: an incremental learning algorithm for supervised neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2001, 31(4): 497–508

[12] Sheng W, Banta L E. Parameter incremental learning algorithm for neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2006, 17(6): 1424–1438

[13] Katakis I, Tsoumakas G, Vlahavas I. Dynamic feature space and incremental feature selection for the classification of textual data streams. Knowledge Discovery from Data Streams, 2006: 107–116

[14] Wenerstrom B, Giraud-Carrier C. Temporal data mining in dynamic feature spaces. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. 2006, 1141–1145

[15] Masud M M, Gao J, Khan L, Han J, Thuraisingham B. Integrating novel class detection with classification for concept-drifting data streams. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2009, 5782: 79–94

[16] Masud M M, Chen Q, Jing G, Latifur K, Jiawei H, Bhavani T. Classification and novel class detection of data streams in a dynamic feature space. Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, 2010, 6322: 337–352

[17] Spinosa E J, de Leon F, de Carvalho A P, Gama J. Cluster-based novel concept detection in data streams applied to intrusion detection in computer networks. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. 2008: 976–980

[18] Sminu N R, Jemimah S. Feature based data stream classification (FBDC) and novel class detection. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA), 2014, 25(7): 28–32

[19] Zhu B, Jin d W. Radar emitter signal recognition based on EMD and neural network. Journal of Computers, 2012, 7(6): 1413–1420

[20] Yang Z, Wu Z, Yin Z, Quan T, Sun H. Hybrid radar emitter recognition based on rough k-means classifier and relevance vector machine. Sensors, 2013, 13(1): 848–864

[21] Liu H J, Liu Z, Jiang W L, Zhou Y Y. Incremental learning approach based on vector neural network for emitter identification. IET Signal Processing, 2010, 4(1): 45–54

[22] Kauppia J P, Martikainenb K, Ruotsalainena U. Hierarchical classifica tion of dynamically varying radar pulse repetition interval modulation patterns. Neural Networks, 2010, 23(10): 1226–1237

[23] Xu X, Wang W. An incremental gray relational analysis algorithm for multiclass classification and outlier detection. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2012, 26(6): 1250011

[24] Montazer G A, Khoshniat H, Fathi V. Improvement of RBF neural networks using Fuzzy-OSD algorithm in an online radar pulse classification system. Applied Soft Computing, 2013, 13(9): 3831–3838

[25] Tang K, Lin M, Minku F L, Yao X. Selective negative correlation learning approach to incremental learning. Neurocomputing, 2009, 72(13–15): 2796–2805

[26] Sudo A, Sato A, Hasegawa O. Associative memory for online learning in noisy environments using self-organizing incremental neural network. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2009, 20(6): 964–972

[27] Chao S, Wong F. An incremental decision tree learning methodology regarding attributes in medical data mining. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics. 2009, 3: 1694–1699

[28] Bottou L. Large-scale machine learning with stochastic gradient descent. In: Procceedings of OMPSTAT. 2010, 177–186

[29] Bottou L, Bousquet O. The tradeoffs of large scale learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2008, 20: 161–168

[30] Sculley D. Combined regression and ranking. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD Conference. 2010, 979–988

[31] Wu X, Yu K, Ding W, Wang H, Zhu X. Online feature selection with streaming features. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 2013, 35(5): 1178–1192

[32] Ditzler G, Rosen G, Polikar R. Incremental learning of new classes from unbalanced data. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). 2013, 33–42

[33] Filzmoser P. A multivariate outlier detection method. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Data Analysis and Modeling. 2004, 18–22

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2015 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg