A statistical learning based image denoising approach
Ke TU, Hongbo LI, Fuchun SUN
A statistical learning based image denoising approach
The image denoising is a very basic but important issue in the field of image procession. Most of the existing methods addressing this issue only show desirable performance when the image complies with their underlying assumptions. Especially, when there is more than one kind of noises, most of the existing methods may fail to dispose the corresponding image. To address this problem, we propose a two-step image denoising method motivated by the statistical learning theory. Under the proposed framework, the type and variance of noise are estimated with support vector machine (SVM) first, and then this information is employed in the proposed denoising algorithm to further improve its denoising performance. Finally, comparative study is constructed to demonstrate the advantages and effectiveness of the proposed method.
SVM / image denosing / multiple noises
[1] |
Li J, Ge H. New progress in geometric computing for image and video processing. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2012, 6(6): 769―775
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Zhao F, Jiao L, Liu H. Fuzzy c-means clustering with non local spatial information for noisy image segmentation. Frontiers of Computer Science in China, 2011, 5(1): 45―56
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Horng S J, Hsu L Y, Li T, Qiao S, Gong X, Chou H H, Khan M K. Using sorted switching median filter to remove high-density impulse noises. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 2013, 24(7): 956―967
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Om H, Biswas M. An improved image denoising method based on wavelet thresholding. Journal of Signal & Information Processing, 2012, 3(1): 17686―8
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Chen G, Qian S E. Denoising of hyperspectral imagery using principal component analysis and wavelet shrinkage. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2011, 49(3): 973―980
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Kazerouni A, Kamilov U, Bostan E, Unser M. Bayesian denoising: from MAP to MMSE using consistent cycle spinning. IEEE Signal Processing. Letter, 2013, 20(3): 249―252
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Kumar V, Kumar A. Simulative analysis for image denoising using wavelet thresholding techniques. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering & Technology (IJARCET), 2013, 2(5): 1873―1878
|
[8] |
Gramfort A, Poupon C, Descoteaux M. Denoising and fast diffusion imaging with physically constrained sparse dictionary learning. Medical Image Analysis, 2014, 18(1): 36―49
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Ataman E, Aatre V K, Wong K M. Some statistical properties of median filters. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 1981, 29(5): 1073―1075
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Daubechies I, Bates B J. Ten lectures on wavelets. Acoustical Society of America Journal, 1993, 93: 1671
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Donoho D L, Johnstone JM. Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika, 1994, 81(3): 425―455
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Donoho D L, Johnstone I M, Kerkyacharian G, Picard D. Wavelet shrinkage: asymptopia? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 1995: 301―369
|
[13] |
Coifman R R, Donoho D L. Translation-invariant de-noising. New York: Springer, 1995
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Chang S G, Yu B, Vetterli M. Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2000, 9(9): 1532―1546
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Fowler J E. The redundant discrete wavelet transform and additive noise. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2005, 12(9): 629―632
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Perona P, Malik J. Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1990, 12(7): 629―639
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Catté F, Lions P L, Morel J M, Coll T. Image selective smoothing and edge detection by nonlinear diffusion. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1992, 29(1): 182―193
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Rudin L I, Osher S, Fatemi E. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 1992, 60(1): 259―268
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Shao Y, Sun F, Li H, Liu Y. Structural similarity-optimal total variation algorithm for image denoising. In: Proceeding of Foundations and Practical Applications of Cognitive Systems and Information Processing. 2014, 833―843
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Kulkarni S, Harman G. An elementary introduction to statistical learning theory. Wiley, 2011
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Smola A J, Scholkopf B. A tutorial on support vector regression. Statistics and Computing, 2004, 14(3): 199―222
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
AbramowitL M, Stegun I A. Handbook of mathematical functions. New York: Dover, 1970
|
[23] |
Chang C C, Lin C J. Training v-support vector regression: theory and algorithms. Neural Computation, 2002, 14(8): 1959―1977
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Vapnik V. The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, 2000
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Sheikh H R, Sabir M F, Bovik A C. A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2006, 15(11): 3440―3451
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Wang Z, Bovik A C, Sheikh H R, Simoncelli E P. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2014, 13(4): 600―612
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Hore A, Ziou D. Image quality metrics: PSNR vs. SSIM. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR). 2010, 2366―2369
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |